This way giving Sutil little choice but to stay ahead.
Edited by Ragnar668, 10 June 2013 - 18:03.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:03
Edited by Ragnar668, 10 June 2013 - 18:03.
Advertisement
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:24
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:28
i thought about that during the race and was wondering if Hamilton deliberately sat behind Sutil until after the far side hairpin, so that he would be entitled to use the DRS himself and kept himself ahead of the following Alonso.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:41
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:44
If in fact the above three comments are the case, than Hamilton was a little disingenuous in that he was already yelling by turn 3 or 4 - "Blue flag" (according to Croft).
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:44
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:52
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:55
i thought about that during the race and was wondering if Hamilton deliberately sat behind Sutil until after the far side hairpin, so that he would be entitled to use the DRS himself and kept himself ahead of the following Alonso.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:59
Posted 10 June 2013 - 18:59
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:04
Sorry to disagree, I was yelling at the goggle-box for him to get out of the way - The idea that Hamilton was luring him into a drive-through is ludicrous; Sutil was slow to get out of the way.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:04
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:08
Thus cunningly getting past Sutil at a place where Alonso could also pass, but with a great deal more ease, and a benefit from extra DRS?i thought about that during the race and was wondering if Hamilton deliberately sat behind Sutil until after the far side hairpin, so that he would be entitled to use the DRS himself and kept himself ahead of the following Alonso.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:10
Thus cunningly getting past Sutil at a place where Alonso could also pass, but with a great deal more ease, and a benefit from extra DRS?
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:11
Sorry to disagree, I was yelling at the goggle-box for him to get out of the way - The idea that Hamilton was luring him into a drive-through is ludicrous; Sutil was slow to get out of the way.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:36
Posted 10 June 2013 - 19:42
Well, it was pretty obvious and he got a penalty for it.I sat there feeling Sutil was (again) very reluctant to give Hamilton an easy time, and I'm thinking it's related to the trial around the Lux-episode.
Hamilton wanted to get past Sutil as quickly as possible, ideally in a place where Alonso couldn't follow him through, thereby getting some of the air back between himself and the Ferrari.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 20:41
Posted 10 June 2013 - 20:46
If in fact the above three comments are the case, than Hamilton was a little disingenuous in that he was already yelling by turn 3 or 4 - "Blue flag" (according to Croft).
I don't think that Sutil's penalty was deserved - he didn't jump out of the way, but it was pretty clear he wasn't holding anyone up. One needn't go to far back to see the shoe on the other foot - Hamilton at Hockenheim - a backmarker, but going fast enough not to have to let those behind go by...
Advertisement
Posted 10 June 2013 - 20:48
No, no. I am not suggesting at all that that was what Lewis was doing. I am opining that he knew he can get DRS by waiting a few corners.
Edited by P123, 10 June 2013 - 20:54.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:11
That makes little sense as slowing behind Sutil would also enable Alonso to have the DRS. Sutil passed too many blue flags before he finally let them through, it's as simple as that. Of course Hamilton is involved so the usual get creative, and this theory gets an A for creativity.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:20
Alonso had DRS from Lewis anyway :S
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:37
No, no. I am not suggesting at all that that was what Lewis was doing. I am opining that he knew he can get DRS by waiting a few corners.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:39
no one is suggesting Hamilton was luring Sutil into a drive-through. People are suggesting Hamilton deliberately delayed overtaking Sutil until AFTER the DRS detection point so that Hamilton would have DRS available to defend against Alonso.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:40
Am I the only one feeling that during yesterdays race Hamilton kept a lot of distance between him and Sutil when he was about to lap him (and for a long time) ?
This way giving Sutil little choice but to stay ahead.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:42
Yes that makes sense - let someone who was 4 seconds behind you close up on you to a second so you can use DRS against them. Wow! I love how smart people are on this forum
Posted 10 June 2013 - 21:46
no Alonso was eleventy seconds behind Hamilton, not 4.
Jeez with newbie geniuses that don't even bother to watch races.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 22:07
That makes little sense as slowing behind Sutil would also enable Alonso to have the DRS. Sutil passed too many blue flags before he finally let them through, it's as simple as that. Of course Hamilton is involved so the usual get creative, and this theory gets an A for creativity.
Posted 10 June 2013 - 22:38
Posted 10 June 2013 - 23:11
Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:38
I just watched back, they ran a whole lap behind sutil!
Hamilton was about a sec behind sutil at the last chicane in lap 59, and passed him at the end of next lap.
Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:45
Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:47
Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:15
Posted 11 June 2013 - 10:09
Alonso was not 4s behind, see below.Yes that makes sense - let someone who was 4 seconds behind you close up on you to a second so you can use DRS against them. Wow! I love how smart people are on this forum
While i do agree that Sutil should've yielded earlier and the penalty was justified, i don't think he cost Hamilton that much time. His lap times, Alonso's and the gap between them:Lewis had to follow him almost a full lap. No way he was waiting for anything. Sutil costed him a lot. Backmarkers -and not backmarkers- being lapped were not helpful overall this time.
Posted 11 June 2013 - 10:25
Edited by Burtros, 11 June 2013 - 10:27.
Posted 11 June 2013 - 12:41
Hamilton wasnt being clever if he waited until after the DRS line to pass Sutil. Its common sense for any driver these days and really pretty obvious I would have thought.
The penalty was justified though, but at no point was Hamilton 'clever'.
Hamilton rarely shows examples of being a 'clever' driver in my opinion. Even in Canada a few laps later theres a possible example of this weakness - when he failed to copy Alonso's method for passing him in the 2nd DRS zone to retake 2nd place. Seemed odd he chose to try it before the chicane and ended up missing a bit of front wing, like in the excitement of possibly being able to get his place back, he forgot how he'd lost it only a minute before hand.
Thats before you consider Monaco, where in all the excitement of the saftey car and pitstops, he forgot that a GP Driver ALWAYS has to drive as quick as they possibly can and lost out to the Red Bulls.
Posted 11 June 2013 - 12:41
Hamilton wasnt being clever if he waited until after the DRS line to pass Sutil. Its common sense for any driver these days and really pretty obvious I would have thought.
The penalty was justified though, but at no point was Hamilton 'clever'.
Hamilton rarely shows examples of being a 'clever' driver in my opinion. Even in Canada a few laps later theres a possible example of this weakness - when he failed to copy Alonso's method for passing him in the 2nd DRS zone to retake 2nd place. Seemed odd he chose to try it before the chicane and ended up missing a bit of front wing, like in the excitement of possibly being able to get his place back, he forgot how he'd lost it only a minute before hand.
Thats before you consider Monaco, where in all the excitement of the saftey car and pitstops, he forgot that a GP Driver ALWAYS has to drive as quick as they possibly can and lost out to the Red Bulls.
Posted 11 June 2013 - 13:56
Well according to him he was quite clever in his second ever race when he duped massa
More seriously china 2011 was a nice bit of thinking, I'm not sure you're being entirely fair if you mean Lewis cannot think strategically about overtaking.
I agree alonso got the better of him in Canada but I'm not sure Lewis's failed repass attempt was down to his failure to appreciate the idea of passing in the second zone. Firstly that doesn't always work, secondly it is possible to pass in the first zone, thirdly he may have been trying to stick close to alonso in order to pass in the second zone but misjudged it, fourthly you might put it down to good driving by alonso.
Also not sure how driving under SC conditions and being told to leave a gap of 6 seconds to your teammate is a good example of how race drivers should always drive as fast as they can, although it is a good example of a Lewis misjudgement.
Edited by Juggles, 11 June 2013 - 13:57.
Advertisement
Posted 11 June 2013 - 18:24
Yeah. We're a bit OT but it looked to me like when Lewis caught Nando, Nando braked early to pin Lewis to the outside and spoil the faster entry that Lewis would otherwise have had. That's why there was contact. Plus Lewis had needed his kers as you say and also Lewis said he was running out of revs.I reckon it was this one. He didn't go for a dive down the inside, he stayed on the outside as Alonso did a few laps before. The difference is that Hamilton had already used all his KERS whereas Alonso saved a big chunk for the pit straight so by the time Hamilton activated DRS he was too far behind. Alonso gained on Hamilton much faster out of the last corner when he made his pass so I'm guessing he still had some KERS left then too.
Hamilton is a perfectly intelligent driver. The most recent example I can think of is in Monaco when he tried to overtake Webber into the Rascasse; I was watching to see what he did the next lap because I was worried he would go for another dive and Webber would close the door, but he predicted Webber's defence into the corner and chose to go as wide as possible instead (i.e. the opposite approach). He got great drive out of Rascasse and was the closest he got all race going out of Noghes. Annoyingly Vettel was close enough to give Webber DRS, but it was still good tactical driving from Hamilton.