I didn't see it, but if Webber was German bashing he's both crass and disrespectful given his new employer.
He wasn't. This thread is a mess.
Mods, maybe time to put it out of its (and our) misery?
Posted 08 August 2013 - 18:26
I didn't see it, but if Webber was German bashing he's both crass and disrespectful given his new employer.
Advertisement
Posted 08 August 2013 - 18:30
Hardly surprising. He's been crushed year in year out and now RB are close to bringing in KR, which totally broadsides his ongoing weepy defence that RB systematically protect & favour Vettel. I used to quite like the guy, but he's taken the whole victim role too far lately.From the interview I got that the guy is clearly out of love with f1 now
Posted 08 August 2013 - 19:11
Hardly surprising. He's been crushed year in year out and now RB are close to bringing in KR, which totally broadsides his ongoing weepy defence that RB systematically protect & favour Vettel. I used to quite like the guy, but he's taken the whole victim role too far lately.
Posted 08 August 2013 - 19:24
At least Mrs Brown's Boys doesn't tell and unfunny joke and then spend the next 20 minutes explaining...veeeeeery...slowwwwwwly...whyyyyyy...it...is...funny...More of a mrs Brown's boys fan?
Posted 08 August 2013 - 19:30
Oh please, don't be obtuse. Kimi won't play second fiddle, no way, and he would want that in writing. Further, if you only want your second driver to be a lacky for Vettel - who you had to protect from Webber - why on earth bring in one of the fastest, most expensive and least line-toeing men on the grid?how does bringing in KR refute his assertions?
Who knows; what I do know is that if Webber was really being properly screwed that far back and was not allowed to show his brilliance at RB then he was pretty dim to stay there.silverstone 2010 MW front wing is given to SV. at the time MW was ahead in the championship. how does this square with you?
Posted 08 August 2013 - 19:36
No. Vettel 115 vs Webber 103 prior to the weekendhow does bringing in KR refute his assertions?
silverstone 2010 MW front wing is given to SV. at the time MW was ahead in the championship. how does this square with you?
Posted 08 August 2013 - 20:05
'On Vettel's car' is probably how that quote ends.No. Vettel 115 vs Webber 103 prior to the weekend
'Webber did not want new wing, says engineer'
http://en.espnf1.com...tory/23634.html
http://news.bbc.co.u...one/8807666.stm
Posted 08 August 2013 - 20:43
with all those one year contracts where was he gonna go?and who knows is your best response to silverstone 2010?Oh please, don't be obtuse. Kimi won't play second fiddle, no way, and he would want that in writing. Further, if you only want your second driver to be a lacky for Vettel - who you had to protect from Webber - why on earth bring in one of the fastest, most expensive and least line-toeing men on the grid?
still didn't answer the question. guess your ad hominem attack replaced your response. never said kimi would play second fiddle so why the strawman.
Who knows; what I do know is that if Webber was really being properly screwed that far back and was not allowed to show his brilliance at RB then he was pretty dim to stay there.
Posted 08 August 2013 - 20:50
I suggest you see post #206. I couldn't be arsed to look back, but unfortunately for you someone else did. If you plan to rock up here being all in-yer-face and smart arsed from post #1 you really need to be sure your pivitol facts are correct.and who knows is your best response to silverstone 2010?
Posted 08 August 2013 - 20:50