Pedantic and pointless though this is, does anyone else find the continuous use of the term "mega" as a superlative in F1 commentary, coverage and even among the drivers and engineers, deeply annoying? Everyone else stopped using that term 20 years ago.

Use of the term "mega" in F1 circles
#1
Posted 18 September 2015 - 14:36
#3
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:01
It's a habit they've got into, and changing it is a big ask.
#4
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:22
#5
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:24
#6
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:38
Pedantic and pointless though this is, does anyone else find the continuous use of the term "mega" as a superlative in F1 commentary, coverage and even among the drivers and engineers, deeply annoying?
For sure. (Pauses to break my own fingers after typing my most hated F1 phrase)
#7
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:40
For sure.
Mega.
#8
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:41
Look (in an Aussie accent) At this moment in time (Football), Yknow (Everything) , The LADS (football) taking it race by race (managers).
#9
Posted 18 September 2015 - 15:59
Look, for sure it'd be mega if moving forward we can all come together to address these issues, right?
Such dumb habits always flourish in small circles, which is what the English-language press is. I'm sure the Polish and Brazilian press has similar equally puzzling habits.
#10
Posted 18 September 2015 - 16:17
For sure.
Execute (I've noticed this sh*t creeping in).
All should be rewarded with a swift kick to the balls and a two race ban, no appeals.
#11
Posted 18 September 2015 - 16:18
Well, i thought "mega" belongs to this guy...
#12
Posted 18 September 2015 - 16:20
I hate the word inaugural they use it every other sentence at new races you wait till Mexico! !
Mexico isn't a new race, but I'm sure that won't stop 'em.
#13
Posted 18 September 2015 - 16:45
"Yeh, no..."
#14
Posted 18 September 2015 - 16:51
As Christian Horner would say:
"Yeh, no..."
....absolutely"
#15
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:10
It's mega annoying.
#16
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:15
#17
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:17
This used to drive me a bit nuts, but every sport seems to have its own peculiar over and out-dated use of words.
"Stud" for example is one I hear a lot in NFL, and never fails to make me think WTF, given it's usually one player talking about another.
#18
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:25
At the end of the day, it could be worse.
#19
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:47
As Christian Horner would say:
"Yeh, no..."
"Yeh, no, but..... sure". Grrrrrrr.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 18 September 2015 - 17:57
Was "fantastic" for about 15 years. I got banned from this forum for pointing that out. So be careful.
#21
Posted 18 September 2015 - 18:22
For sure it would be like, mega for LewLew to sing the Russian National Anthem before the Russian GP.
The real problem is getting people who have English as a 2nd or 3rd etc language to expand their vocabulary beyond a choice few words. Still waiting for "amazeballs" to appear in F1 though.
#22
Posted 18 September 2015 - 18:28
#23
Posted 18 September 2015 - 18:51
#24
Posted 18 September 2015 - 18:55
F1 Racing magazine went through a phase, coincidentally when i stopped buying it, of when everyone else was saying "mega" of using "giga".
Frankly that was peta-stupid.
#25
Posted 18 September 2015 - 19:03
F1 Racing magazine went through a phase, coincidentally when i stopped buying it, of when everyone else was saying "mega" of using "giga".
Frankly that was peta-stupid.
but in hindsight, they were about 1000 times better than the others.
#26
Posted 18 September 2015 - 19:11
Edited by milestone 11, 18 September 2015 - 19:12.
#27
Posted 18 September 2015 - 19:23
#28
Posted 18 September 2015 - 19:27
Mega.
For sure.
Execute (I've noticed this sh*t creeping in).
Obviously...
#29
Posted 18 September 2015 - 19:29
Well, i thought "mega" belongs to this guy...
'Mega' ugly
#30
Posted 18 September 2015 - 22:36
'Mega' ugly
fairly unique, I think you'll find....
#31
Posted 19 September 2015 - 06:57
#32
Posted 19 September 2015 - 07:16
#33
Posted 19 September 2015 - 07:18
For sure.
...
[pause]
...
[pause]
...
yes.
(The Hakkinen approach)
#34
Posted 19 September 2015 - 07:34
Yep. Pretty annoying.
#35
Posted 19 September 2015 - 07:47
"Issue" to mean "problem". Its use is far wider than F1 of course. A very big issue.
I feel your pain.
#36
Posted 19 September 2015 - 07:48
I think this was brought up in the last race, but there's no need to say "box" three times. Unless they're racing next to a family of foxes, or there are lots of rocks about. once is enough.
Saying it once won't necessarily be heard if your radio's not working properly. About which Jenson was complaining only yesterday.
Socks on Knox
and Knox in box.
#37
Posted 19 September 2015 - 08:09
#38
Posted 19 September 2015 - 08:15
Coulthard sayin rotate instead of turn! FfS
To be fair, if you look at the friction circle, the transfer of weight will be a rotation. And from a driver's view he is rotating the car around a virtual centre.
Having said that his job is to portray the skill of the driver to people who are only there to watch crashes, so my sentence above is just noise.
#39
Posted 19 September 2015 - 08:29
F1 Racing magazine went through a phase, coincidentally when i stopped buying it, of when everyone else was saying "mega" of using "giga".
Frankly that was peta-stupid.
Oh God. Yes.
As a teenager I subscribed to that. I probably didn't even like it then tbf.
Peter Windsor's columns and buzz phrases ("friction circle", oh **** off).
Matt Bishop starting every editorial with a vivid description of his exact situation at that moment in time ("...as I write I look out over the Corsican bay from my pucka apartment, glass of Shiraz in hand, the sun flickering it's last of a glorious day, I push my oysters around my plate with my fork (mega!) and I consider...", oh **** off).
Matt Bishop's interviews where he would annotate every response with his own vapid ideas in italics ("...as Ron says this his mouth flickers at the sides. His eyes seem to say that there is more to this. I think about pressing him on the issue further but decide not to bother. I move on to my next question: was Ayrton any good?" Oh **** off.)
Etc... etc...
How is it these days? Amazed it is still in print.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 19 September 2015 - 08:52
Oh God. Yes.
As a teenager I subscribed to that. I probably didn't even like it then tbf.
Peter Windsor's columns and buzz phrases ("friction circle", oh **** off).
Matt Bishop starting every editorial with a vivid description of his exact situation at that moment in time ("...as I write I look out over the Corsican bay from my pucka apartment, glass of Shiraz in hand, the sun flickering it's last of a glorious day, I push my oysters around my plate with my fork (mega!) and I consider...", oh **** off).
Matt Bishop's interviews where he would annotate every response with his own vapid ideas in italics ("...as Ron says this his mouth flickers at the sides. His eyes seem to say that there is more to this. I think about pressing him on the issue further but decide not to bother. I move on to my next question: was Ayrton any good?" Oh **** off.)
Etc... etc...
How is it these days? Amazed it is still in print.
Totally agree (although the friction circle is a valid model).
It's actually a really good example of the closed nature of F1 journalism (especially as Bishop is now communications director at McLaren i think).
#41
Posted 19 September 2015 - 08:56
but in hindsight, they were about 1000 times better than the others.
There was a short lived Bernie venture - i think it was just called F1 - can't remember. I think Tom Rubython was editor? Nigel Mansell was a guest editor once. That was quite good, it seemed to be prepared to kick the tyres a bit more than any of the other publications before or since.
#42
Posted 19 September 2015 - 09:01
I agree the friction circle is a valid model, it shouldn't be spunked all over F1 race reports though. It just makes you seem like a pompous arse.
#43
Posted 19 September 2015 - 09:50
Looks like the disease has broken out of F1 and is now infecting the WEC...
“Clearly I was mega-frustrated,” Jani told Motorsport.com. “When I got the red flag on my first attempt, I was on such a good lap. Apart from Turn 1, I’d nailed it, then I get to Turn 11 – red flag. Bah, it was mega! I was way below 1m46s, I’m sure about that really. Ah, OK, go again.
( Jani: I never thought pole was possible after hybrid failure http://www.motorspor...hybrid-failure/ )
#44
Posted 19 September 2015 - 09:56
It's all mega because it is probably a million times more expensive to get the same thrill in F1 than in every other form of motorsport, so everything is a subliminal hint at the cost.
That lap was mega! = that lap cost the team a million pounds.
The sponsorship deal is extra mega = a hell of a lot of millions being thrown around
Pastor Maldonado's lap was mega= He saved the team a million by completing a clean lap.
Astana in F1 mega deal with Ecclestone= Some other rich country is paying Ecclestone a few more million.
#45
Posted 19 September 2015 - 10:02
I think this was brought up in the last race, but there's no need to say "box" three times. Unless they're racing next to a family of foxes, or there are lots of rocks about. once is enough.
Just the use of "box" instead of "pit" annoys me no end.
#46
Posted 19 September 2015 - 14:09
#47
Posted 19 September 2015 - 17:53
Pedantic and pointless though this is, does anyone else find the continuous use of Ted Kravitz in F1 commentary, coverage and even among the drivers and engineers, deeply annoying?
Fixed it to cover something worse. I believe F1's downturn is connected to this. For sure, F1 without Ted could be Mega.
#48
Posted 19 September 2015 - 18:00
Dude ....... relax
#49
Posted 19 September 2015 - 18:10
I'm pretty sure Chandok used Mega more than just about anyone, I didn't really take notice of the term being used more in F1 until he started doing some commenting on practice days and whatnot.
#50
Posted 19 September 2015 - 19:07
For sure.
This topic and thread will be mega but before that happens it will be locked.