Many thanks for all your posts, they much appreciated.
Given that manufacturers' power outputs were usually exaggerated in period, I remain suspicious of their claims, I agree with AAGR, circa 200 bhp might be somewhere near the truth in race tune although 175 bhp seems more realistic. Having driven early TR5s and TR6s before they were detuned I can state with certainty that the TR5s were quicker than the TR6.
I drove most of the high peformance cars of the late 60s/early 70s and manufacturers' claimed power outputs were in some cases, pure fiction, Aston Martin and Jaguar being typical, Ron Beatty told me many years ago that the most powerful production 3.8 litre XK engines were those in the early MK2 saloons, because they were properly gas flowed and polished, he reckoned 210/215 bhp.
The production line 3 carburettor E types were usually 205/210 bhp apparently and Aston Martin were equally disingenuous, some were quite pedestrian, others more responsive. I would also mention that the early 4.2 litre E types were fast (later cars would barely pull the skin off a rice pudding) but we were told not to drive them over 4,500 rpm in top for more than 5 minutes on motorways as the head gaskets were prone to failure. This due to the bodged up block and everything out of alignment to get the extra capacity.
Please forgive my lack of mechanical knowledge, it was and still is magic to me.