As pointed out elsewhere, does not Autosport see the irony in placing it's article about the UK's future coverage of F1 behind a paywall itself?
I have followed motorsport for over 50 years, and almost religiously bought Autosport for most of that time having been introduced to it by Gregor Grant, on a visit to his son at their home. In all that time, my main interest was in F1 and so it was to follow what was happening in F1 that I purchased the magazine each week. Unfortunately, my passion for the sport has waned somewhat over the last few years, and so I stopped buying the magazine; I also stopped watching it as well.
Now FOM is going to allow the UK's coverage to go behind the paywall to the detriment, in my opinion, of the sport, whilst Autosport is also doing the same. In F1, the teams will surely suffer from reduced sponsorship as fewer viewers will see their names on the cars, whilst at the same time, advertisers on Autosport are having the number of viewers reduced by your use of a paywall.
I also cannot understand why it is that you keep changing the number of views allowed. I think that initially it was unlimited, then restricted to 25 views, then 60 views, and now reduced back 25. It can't be good for the advertisers, especially as there seems to be another website that is publishing most of your good stuff, but with totally unlimited views.