Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 16 votes

Ferrari SF70H


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
4042 replies to this topic

#1 Timstr11

Timstr11
  • Member

  • 10,550 posts
  • Joined: May 02

Posted 14 January 2017 - 08:40

Leaked (?) info about the 2017 nose:

http://www.f1analisi...me-sara-il.html



Advertisement

#2 Jovanotti

Jovanotti
  • Member

  • 6,892 posts
  • Joined: October 11

Posted 14 January 2017 - 13:10

Leaked (?) info about the 2017 nose:
http://www.f1analisi...me-sara-il.html

So same basic nose as in 2016 according to that source. I'd hoped the penis noses would disappear...

#3 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 6,924 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 14 January 2017 - 14:04

So same basic nose as in 2016 according to that source. I'd hoped the penis noses would disappear...

 

 

Why is that a 'basic' nose?



#4 Jovanotti

Jovanotti
  • Member

  • 6,892 posts
  • Joined: October 11

Posted 14 January 2017 - 17:27

Why is that a 'basic' nose?

Basic in the sense of same base layout, was probably not worded very clearly :)

#5 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 6,924 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 14 January 2017 - 19:32

Basic in the sense of same base layout, was probably not worded very clearly :)

 

Aw, I just asked becase RB has a similar concept. If it's ok for them, I wouldn't worry about it. It is not what will define the 2017 car IMHO. I am not sure it is even a pic of the 2017 car, but who knows.



#6 Afterburner

Afterburner
  • RC Forum Host

  • 6,897 posts
  • Joined: January 11

Posted 14 January 2017 - 21:48

Why is that a 'basic' nose?

Because it's an electron-pair donor? :p

#7 Marklar

Marklar
  • Member

  • 33,498 posts
  • Joined: May 15

Posted 17 January 2017 - 10:16

Autosprint (via @Gianludale27) about the 2017 car
- Split compressor/turbine
- New nose (W07 style)
- Shark fin engine cover
- HPC suspension system
- Ferrari is poised to adopt split turbine/compressor with its 2017 PU. To reduce the temperatures, the turbo will be more distant from the compressor. This solution will improve cooling, allowing to reduce the dimensions of the intercoolers

C2T0Ta8WgAE8NS0.jpg

#8 muramasa

muramasa
  • Member

  • 8,202 posts
  • Joined: November 08

Posted 17 January 2017 - 10:56

autosprint and those italian motor media are hilarious every year about their funny speculation attempts  :drunk:  :lol:

quick searching:

 

 

2012

Ferrari-F2012-preview.jpg

 

 

2015

45507_la-ferrari-2015-con-il-muso-a-bulb

 

RybjHBP.png

r7vYHP2.jpg



#9 PilotPlant91

PilotPlant91
  • Member

  • 2,286 posts
  • Joined: September 16

Posted 17 January 2017 - 11:10

What is hpc suspension?

#10 MastaKink

MastaKink
  • Member

  • 4,177 posts
  • Joined: April 14

Posted 17 January 2017 - 13:30

What is hpc suspension?

 

Hydraulic Pitch Control



#11 andrea303

andrea303
  • Member

  • 402 posts
  • Joined: February 13

Posted 17 January 2017 - 14:40

What is hpc suspension?

 

That would be similar to that of RBR's suspension in 2016 as far as I reckon.



#12 Forghieri

Forghieri
  • Member

  • 380 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 18 January 2017 - 16:30

According to F1AT Ferrari will keep push rod from 2016 and introduce some kind of "hydraulic suspension" to improve the car balance:

 

http://www.f1analisi...ospensione.html



#13 beqa16v

beqa16v
  • Member

  • 593 posts
  • Joined: July 12

Posted 18 January 2017 - 17:13

I do not have any faith in Ferrari developing a good downforce aero. Mercedes and Red Bull will eat them. The only hope I have for Ferrari is that due to increase in wing size maximum downforce will not be required for most tracks and they will be competitive with ok drag and good mechanical part which they can do. They were competitive in Japan and Belgium, tracks which required medium downforce.



#14 PilotPlant91

PilotPlant91
  • Member

  • 2,286 posts
  • Joined: September 16

Posted 19 January 2017 - 02:56

According to F1AT Ferrari will keep push rod from 2016 and introduce some kind of "hydraulic suspension" to improve the car balance:

 

http://www.f1analisi...ospensione.html

 

about damn time........



#15 noikeee

noikeee
  • Member

  • 15,940 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 19 January 2017 - 09:15

Hello,

 

I have split the above posts from the Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H Part III thread, as this is some info from the new car already.

 

When we have a model name for the car we will edit the thread title.



#16 Forghieri

Forghieri
  • Member

  • 380 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 19 January 2017 - 09:46

Piero Ferrari "would like at least 3 wins in 2017":

 

http://blog.quotidia...-piero-ferrari/



#17 superden

superden
  • Member

  • 4,185 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 19 January 2017 - 11:45

Piero Ferrari "would like at least 3 wins in 2017":

http://blog.quotidia...-piero-ferrari/


Aiming high then.

:lol:

#18 ConsiderAndGo

ConsiderAndGo
  • Member

  • 5,622 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 19 January 2017 - 11:59

What's the point in stating this kinda thing to the public....

It just sets them up to fail, as they did last year.

#19 ANF

ANF
  • Member

  • 10,212 posts
  • Joined: April 12

Posted 19 January 2017 - 12:12

Hydraulic Pitch Control

Isn't that what Ferrari letter prompts row over 2017 Formula 1 suspension designs is about?

Advertisement

#20 Lotus53B

Lotus53B
  • Member

  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 19 January 2017 - 12:17

Aye, but this is Ferrari, and therefore it's okay...

 

More seriously, I think that using hydraulics in real time to control pitch is fine, but if you use it to store pressure or similar, that's a no-no.



#21 Forghieri

Forghieri
  • Member

  • 380 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 22 January 2017 - 17:37

Third article from F1AT on the 2017 Ferrari (not very informative, mainly about the new rules and their presumed effects):

 

http://www.f1analisi...so-lungo-e.html



#22 MastaKink

MastaKink
  • Member

  • 4,177 posts
  • Joined: April 14

Posted 23 January 2017 - 00:19

 

Yeah, I think they were clarifying if you can store the energy like Lotus says above before wasting any time going down that route.(Added bonus of forcing anyone else incorporating it to abandon that particular route)

 

They can still do what Merc are doing though and it looks like they will.



#23 Gintonious

Gintonious
  • Member

  • 1,576 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 24 January 2017 - 20:56

104237117-RTSX4NB.600x400.jpg?v=14852696

 

Make Ferrari Fast Again...



#24 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 6,924 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 25 January 2017 - 06:46

104237117-RTSX4NB.600x400.jpg?v=14852696

 

Make Ferrari Fast Again...

 

"But Mercedes is faster"

 

"that's an alternative fact"



#25 muramasa

muramasa
  • Member

  • 8,202 posts
  • Joined: November 08

Posted 25 January 2017 - 09:28

 

Marchionne wearing sweater even when meeting Trump, seems sweater is his formal suit haha



#26 Zava

Zava
  • Member

  • 7,085 posts
  • Joined: September 10

Posted 26 January 2017 - 16:58

allegedly there was a Santander tweet (obviously deleted since) which revealed the car's name: SF17-JB, in honour of Bianchi.



#27 ConsiderAndGo

ConsiderAndGo
  • Member

  • 5,622 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:10

allegedly there was a Santander tweet (obviously deleted since) which revealed the car's name: SF17-JB, in honour of Bianchi.

Yeah, I saw that. Would be a lovely gesture if true.


Edited by ConsiderAndGo, 26 January 2017 - 17:10.


#28 Archer

Archer
  • Member

  • 520 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:19

104237117-RTSX4NB.600x400.jpg?v=14852696

 

Make Ferrari Fast Again...

I will make Ferrari faster and I will make Mercedes to pay for the expenses.



#29 jimjimjeroo

jimjimjeroo
  • Member

  • 2,103 posts
  • Joined: December 08

Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:33

http://wtf1.co.uk/sa...me-new-ferrari/

#30 shonguiz

shonguiz
  • Member

  • 3,709 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 26 January 2017 - 17:51

Classy gesture if true.

#31 TazioRaikkonen

TazioRaikkonen
  • Member

  • 606 posts
  • Joined: December 16

Posted 26 January 2017 - 18:39

This car better not have a pull-rod suspension.



#32 Okyo

Okyo
  • Member

  • 1,358 posts
  • Joined: March 14

Posted 26 January 2017 - 18:56

Piero Ferrari "would like at least 3 wins in 2017":

 

http://blog.quotidia...-piero-ferrari/

The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year. 

Great.



#33 Archer

Archer
  • Member

  • 520 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 26 January 2017 - 19:27

The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year. 

Great.

 

#include <ferrari.h>

 

uint32_t currentYear    = 2007;     //Starting date

uint32_t thisIsOurYear = 0;           //Next Ferrari world title date

 

while(true){                                   //Infinite loop

   thisIsOurYear = currentYear + 1;

}

 

If for only 3 minutes they would be able to stop firing people and let the engineers do their job without fear to loose their jobs if they fail to perform then they would be dominating F1 again. For them the solution is always to restructure the team, fire people and hire some star engineer to fire him next season blaming him of everything. Marchione is a top businessman, but a F1 team don't work exactly in the same way as a corporation, and he still haven't understood that. The Italian press don't help either selling smoke every winter to then publicly hung them at the very first grand prix of the season.



#34 Marklar

Marklar
  • Member

  • 33,498 posts
  • Joined: May 15

Posted 26 January 2017 - 19:45

We were going way too fast! The name of the 2017 Ferrari car isn’t official yet. We're sorry, but we all have to wait for it. 1f644.png



#35 RECKLESS

RECKLESS
  • Member

  • 2,819 posts
  • Joined: April 16

Posted 26 January 2017 - 20:01

SF17-JB

Like.

#36 Scotracer

Scotracer
  • RC Forum Host

  • 3,877 posts
  • Joined: June 08

Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:00

SF17-JB

 

Santander F1 2017 - Jenson Button?

 

He is part of their marketing campaign afterall....



#37 johnmhinds

johnmhinds
  • Member

  • 7,292 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:28

SF17-John Belushi

#38 kimister

kimister
  • Member

  • 2,979 posts
  • Joined: May 12

Posted 27 January 2017 - 09:51

Ferrari denied this claim.

 

https://twitter.com/...732623092211719



#39 Forghieri

Forghieri
  • Member

  • 380 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:39

Ferrari passes crash test with "more extreme" nose than Haas:

http://it.motorsport...sh-test-869096/



Advertisement

#40 RECKLESS

RECKLESS
  • Member

  • 2,819 posts
  • Joined: April 16

Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:55

Thought it was Scuderia Ferrari 2017 John Bonham.

To put some swagger on it.

#41 Pete_f1

Pete_f1
  • Member

  • 1,452 posts
  • Joined: July 08

Posted 28 January 2017 - 11:55

Why is trump talking to the owner of a foreign car company?

#42 PilotPlant91

PilotPlant91
  • Member

  • 2,286 posts
  • Joined: September 16

Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:41

The PU is considered to be on par with the Merc one by the end of 2016 (on race mode at least). So what's the problem here? Ferrari ain't no longer daring to think about a car worth a WDC and aiming for something what we could possibly hear from a team like Williams or McLaren, especially considering that it's a reshuffle year.

Great.


Not even close. Our pu cant avoid blowing itself up if it runs close to max output.

#43 Marklar

Marklar
  • Member

  • 33,498 posts
  • Joined: May 15

Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:48

Not even close. Our pu cant avoid blowing itself up if it runs close to max output.

Well, the Merc PU did blowed up multiple times perhaps without running close to max output...

The Ferrari PU is no more than 10-15 hp away, though it's not all what counts. Renault is approx 35 hp away

#44 Timstr11

Timstr11
  • Member

  • 10,550 posts
  • Joined: May 02

Posted 28 January 2017 - 12:52

Why is trump talking to the owner of a foreign car company?

 

You mean Chrysler?



#45 superden

superden
  • Member

  • 4,185 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 28 January 2017 - 13:14

SF-17 Just Behind (Mercedes)

#46 chr1s

chr1s
  • Member

  • 310 posts
  • Joined: December 12

Posted 28 January 2017 - 22:27

SF-17 Jim Bowen (Lets take a look at what you could have won!)



#47 Maustinsj

Maustinsj
  • Member

  • 4,355 posts
  • Joined: February 12

Posted 29 January 2017 - 07:39

The SF-17 Justin Bieber, surely?

#48 FullThrottleF1

FullThrottleF1
  • Member

  • 2,696 posts
  • Joined: October 13

Posted 29 January 2017 - 19:05

SF-17 Jim Bowen (Lets take a look at what you could have won!)

"You've won a speedboat!"

 

"I live in Milton Keynes"



#49 Maustinsj

Maustinsj
  • Member

  • 4,355 posts
  • Joined: February 12

Posted 29 January 2017 - 22:24

I thought it was always a caravan.

#50 MastaKink

MastaKink
  • Member

  • 4,177 posts
  • Joined: April 14

Posted 29 January 2017 - 23:58

I thought it was always a caravan.

 

The prizes on Bullseye or Ferrari's F1 car?

 

:p