Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Holden Time Attack Concept.


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#51 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 5,550 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 25 October 2018 - 21:19

Depends on whether it is 2wd or awd.



Advertisement

#52 gruntguru

gruntguru
  • Member

  • 6,603 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 25 October 2018 - 21:53

. . .  max cornering is enabled when all four tyres have their force vector pointing in the same direction (relative to steer angle). . . . .

 

. . . . ultimate cornering grip occurs when each tyre provides lateral grip in proportion to its vertical load AND longitudinal grip in proportion to its vertical load. . . . . 

 

A third and final consequence (within reasonable limits) - each tyre will be operating at the same slip angle (lateral grip) and the same slip % (longitudinal grip).



#53 Lee Nicolle

Lee Nicolle
  • Member

  • 9,504 posts
  • Joined: July 08

Posted 27 October 2018 - 03:50

The diffs are the beiggest contributor.When you set the meshing (in production) there's a horrible compromise. Ideally for fuel consumption you'd like perfect mesh at a fairly low torque. but that implies a poor mesh at high load. That means lots of heat. Diff oil has a very hard life as it is, and you'd end up burning the oil if you were towing up a hill if the mesh was set for the 'ideal' for fuel consumption

So many forget the drive axle. They can burn oil big time and destroy them selves. And drag a lot of power as well. Ford 9" a glaring example. A bloody great innefficient lump that is way too heavy! And for all that drool over them has not been made since about 1978!

As for drive actuation? Whatever anyone says a spool is simple and reliable and generally better than all the fancy electronic crap. Though some these days when working properly is possibly better.

Electric Motors on the wheels is simply unsprung weight.  Independent suspension ofcourse and engine can mate straight to trans. Any form of motivation will always be as we know now. Engine location can be more efficient but they still need cooling so hidden under the car for a practical road vehicle is not the way. For a Time Attack car rear mounted motors would be the best, but not for longevity. This ofcourse is for all types of engine. What is practical for time attack is not practical for anything else.

4WD ?  Should be considered even with the weight penalty, depends on the track. Tight and twisty yes, Open and flowing No. Remember we are talking one or two lap screamers. where the tyres should live.



#54 pierrre

pierrre
  • Member

  • 61 posts
  • Joined: June 17

Posted 05 November 2018 - 18:37

Really?

if there is a lot of power and torque four wheel drive will prevail. say if there is an added 200 horspower and a certain amount of torque at the front wheels to a four wheel drive...thats how much a loss it is for a rear wheel drive only vehicle in traction...then there is driving styles, todays driving style which revolves heavily around acceleration utilizing slow in fast out..that would be advantageous if a four wheel drive system was used



#55 MatsNorway

MatsNorway
  • Member

  • 2,720 posts
  • Joined: December 09

Posted 06 November 2018 - 21:05

Yet Audi managed to win in Touring cars with a 2L NA engine running 4WD, they had only 300hp give or take in a 1070kg car. The ultimate time attack vehicle discussed here could be about half the weight with three times the power. Just like in Top Fuel, losses becomes irrelevant as long as it goes faster.


Edited by MatsNorway, 06 November 2018 - 21:25.