It's a disgrace this is even being asked.
Lewis Hamilton has 5 world championships. Max? Zero
Lewis Hamilton has 86 pole positions. Max? Zero.
Lewis Hamilton has 79 wins. Max? Six.
Max Verstappen has raced in 90 Grand Prix and has not once experienced anything like the pressure that goes with mounting a championship challenge.
Just because he is currently driving very well does not in any way mean he is better than Lewis. Again, it's such an unbelievable statement. Hamilton was winning races, championships, securing poles between 2007-13 and was never afforded such luxurious media praise - in fact it was often the opposite!
Verstappen is driving the third fastest car, in a bubble well outside of Mercedes and Ferrari, but well ahead of the midfield. His car is almost always better during the race than in qualifying, which will always shine a light on his Sunday performances. He has absolutely 100% team support with a lapdog teammate. Nobody else in the top 3 teams holds such a luxury. Remind you of another paddock darling? (Alonso, circa 2011-14). Many F1 fans are pre-disposed to adore the drivers who break the established order, and then praise them again and again to an attempt to heighten their own ego because they don't support a driver fighting for the championship. You do know that Bellof was catching Senna in Monaco 1984? ... Best driver ever? Tazio Nuvolari, obviously! , etc. etc. etc. How noble of you to stray from the established opinion. Add in the long-standing contempt from the majority of F1 folk for absolutely anything Hamilton does ... same old, same old.
Max is a very good driver and a solid prospect. That is all. But we musn't forget his tendency to push the limits of clean racing far beyond the rulebook. Hamilton is the absolute epitome of clean racer and has been for 10 years.
Edited by TomNokoe, 09 July 2019 - 11:16.