
McLaren M.7.C
#1
Posted 15 February 2020 - 22:22
Initially he asked me where the car is now. Thanks to Allen Brown's superb website, 'OldRacingCars.com' we learned very quickly that the car is back where it started, at McLaren's. (Yes, I know, it wasn't built in Woking.....)
So the next question was, does it still have those side tanks that Peter designed and if not, where might they be? He wants them..... lol
Advertisement
#2
Posted 16 February 2020 - 10:17
Photos of the car in its current spec can be found on the internet. There is even a video at:
https://www.mclaren....c-thursday-car/
It is in high wing spec, presumably Monaco GP 1969, so no side tanks.
#3
Posted 16 February 2020 - 10:23
#4
Posted 16 February 2020 - 10:46
This photo, Watkins Glen 1971, suggest that the side tanks were removed during M7C's first line career:
https://library.revs.../0/default.jpg?
#5
Posted 16 February 2020 - 11:27

#8
Posted 17 February 2020 - 09:34
#11
Posted 17 February 2020 - 10:36
So, Peter's best bet appears to be a tour of Scandinavian art museums...
#13
Posted 17 February 2020 - 11:03
Could you ask Peter Connew how much he remembers about the logic behind the design chosen for the side tanks, please. They are too large to account solely for a fuel capacity increase. Meanwhile I'll look at the F1 reg changes to see if I'm asking a silly question...
#14
Posted 18 February 2020 - 11:22
Between its 1971 appearances in South Africa and Germany, the M7C was rebuilt with new monocoque by John Thompson’s TC Prototypes. From picture posted above, it seems that the fuel tanks were removed during that process. As well as the fuel tanks, Surtees had modified the car’s suspension, including fitting TS5 uprights. I don’t know whether those parts remained on the car.
I always thought that the purpose of the Surtees tanks was to get the fuel as low and as close to the centre of the car as possible, following the trend started by the Matra MS80 and various experiment by Bruce McLaren in 68 and 69. The original M7 had a fuel tank over the driver’s knees which is not ideal. It may be that Jo Bonnier did not go fast enough to need the extra capacity.
#15
Posted 18 February 2020 - 11:34
”Jo Bonnier caused much speculation when he turned up in his ex-Surtees McLaren M7C minus its pannier tanks which John had put on the car because the fuel consumption of Cosworth’s V8 increased dramatically when the rev limit went up to 10,000 rpm at the beginning of last year Hopes that Bonnier would establish a couple of minutes’ lead before coming in for a lightning fuel stop were rudely shattered when he failed to qualify for the race”.
#16
Posted 18 February 2020 - 13:18
Ouch!
Then again, you may be right about good ole Jo speculating that, since he always seemed to be lapped umpteen times during a GP, he didn't need all that extra capacity...
#17
Posted 18 February 2020 - 13:22
You don't think the winner of the 1959 Dutch Grand Prix could have been slow, do you?
#18
Posted 18 February 2020 - 13:29
No, it was his job as the GPDA president to strengthen the back of the membership...