Some technical assistance required - suspenion geo
Posted 01 May 2020 - 13:31
Posted 01 May 2020 - 15:24
Can share the summary file, not easy to put up here.
Posted 01 May 2020 - 19:31
Start with goals. Right now you've basically thrown poo on a wall to see what sticks. When evaluating FSAE projects, I ask them to explain how they arrived at the basics. Tires, engine, wheelbase, tracks, CG position & aero (if any) pretty much define the car. Once defined, you can work towards the middle.
Posted 02 May 2020 - 01:22
It is very hard to design a suspension if you don't know much about the tires. And you haven't even described the usage - is this an off road buggy? A hill climber? circuit racer? superkart ? (well probably not)
Posted 02 May 2020 - 03:08
Sorry it was a bit late when I posted this, tried to upload pictures to give you a better idea. After much failure I gave up and hence left a lot of info out...
So basically, it is a 2 seater exo skelecton vehicle. Vast majority of use will be on the road with very limited track, maybe 5% if that (but who knows after I build it).
Tyre wise, 195/50 R15, something like a Toyo – Proxes R1R. A bit of fun really.
I want to car to be fun to drive, good agility. Due to it not having any electric devices I need to maintain some stability and predictability.
What other information would you like to see? Been doing it for so long kinda forget how to explain it.
Here is a link to summary PDF,
I understand this question is very difficult and opens so many issues, even more questions etc.
Main thing is I would like someone to have a look and let me know if I am somewhat going in the right direction. Once again, that can be so subjective.
Please note, the damper positions haven't been resolved yet.
CG height I am working on, will definitely be low (a good engineering term.......) Doing that in CAD now.
Edited by TimW, 02 May 2020 - 03:23.
Posted 02 May 2020 - 11:07
65% is a lot of rear weight and I suspect it may turn out to be less than that with driver. Less still with passenger. It will be easier to tune at 60% or less. Have you looked at Malcolm Oastler's video in the other thread? You should find it reassuring.
Neil Roshier is building/has built something similar to yours although single seat and track focused. He is sure to have some tips.
I assume you have sorted the steering column/angles/etc?
Posted 02 May 2020 - 13:13
Posted 02 May 2020 - 13:45
Ah, let me state that I plead almost total ignorance of suspension design. As a layperson and not an engineer, I have opinions on certain things, but very little practical/technical knowledge - I simply ask questions of people more clever than me. Tim is also familiar with the Social Climber. Also a pure track focus allows for certain liberties that I suspect you do not want to ignore in a road car.
Edited by NRoshier, 02 May 2020 - 13:46.
Posted 03 May 2020 - 02:31
Designing from a clean sheet of paper is good fun, but for a road car it is often a good idea to start with some sort of image car and then ask what you'd like to fix. The much derided Montego had the best target setting process I've ever come across - build an Audi A4 (I think it was) but for X% less.
This meant all of our targets were defined. Similarly for the Territory, after much hemming and hawing, they decided they liked the X5, so we had to beat it objectively and sort out a couple of its strange handling traits. Then they added a new process for steering targets at the last minute. Ha. And of course we couldn't use the BMW tires so the tire was being developed in parallel to the steering cal.
35/65 weight distribution is going to make getting your linear range understeer budget, essential for a road car, rather difficult, unless you have big rear tires.
Here's some understeer budgets, note that they all rely on some weight distribution understeer. Try any of these links they might work
Edited by Greg Locock, 03 May 2020 - 02:39.
Posted 06 May 2020 - 12:00
The bundorf files were interesting to look at, but I have to admit that yet again I did not know all of the terminology used.
Posted 07 May 2020 - 00:06
Weight/tires - tire load sensitivity of the tires
Posted 07 May 2020 - 00:31
Thank you, that helps a lot ... now I know I'm probably not going to make sense of much of that and know what is important without a lot of work! Note I'm reflecting on my own lack of knowledge.
Edited by NRoshier, 07 May 2020 - 00:32.
Posted 07 May 2020 - 00:50
I don't think this matters as much for circuit cars, to be honest. And until you know your tires the whole thing is unreliable. Obviously we have to design cars that someone might put any old tire on, so can't rely too much on fine tuning around them. BMW used to, they've now done a 180 on that. I have worked on programs that were designed around the tire.
The problem is that measuring steer/fy is not impossible, but it isn't something you can do on a Saturday morning in your garage either. Hot tip if you do is to try with Fy at different locations on the contact patch, that way you can work out the SAT steer effect just using force, typically we use 0 and 30mm, as that's the range of pneumatic trail we typically see in handling events.
Posted 08 May 2020 - 05:24
How much would it vary between different tyres within the same tyre size: not putting 20" wheels on a Territory, but say changing from the design tyre to the top cost variant from the same manufacturer?
Posted 08 May 2020 - 22:57
It has always baffled me that bigname brand is happy to still use bigname on the side of the tire, when it is now produced on repurposed ancient machinery in a third world country using a somewhat unknown compound. Inevitably some of these cheap old tires find their way back into first world markets and must cause significant loss of customer satisfaction.
The easy way for me to quantify is to compare a 75%ile tire against a 25%ile tire. Quite a sporty 75%ile tire with a 40 AR profile cornering stiffness @ rated load 2627 N/deg @rated load-1 kN 2381
25%ile, cornering stiffness @ rated load 2354 N/deg @rated load-1 kN 2132
So in this case the cornering stiffness is about 11% less for the bad tire, but the tire load sensitivity isn't much different. That's a statistical model, not an actual example from a manufacturers range. Because the TLS doesn't change much then there wouldn't be that much difference in understeer, in this case.
Posted 27 May 2020 - 23:41