Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Mechanical failures at the Austrian GP


  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#51 Dutchrudder

Dutchrudder
  • Member

  • 891 posts
  • Joined: February 16

Posted 05 July 2020 - 19:29

This track is always attritional, I’m guessing Australia is a little easier on the cars so they get to sort out the bits that show signs of excessive wear before running over these serious kerbs.

The thing that astounds me is that they still push track limits even though they know they are shaking the cars to pieces.

Advertisement

#52 ray b

ray b
  • Member

  • 2,951 posts
  • Joined: January 01

Posted 05 July 2020 - 19:39

what does a gearbox sensor read on the M-B temp, lube level, or something else ?



#53 Myrvold

Myrvold
  • Member

  • 16,009 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 05 July 2020 - 19:58

This track is always attritional

 

Eh, last year all cars finished.



#54 rolf123

rolf123
  • Member

  • 2,417 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 05 July 2020 - 20:01

What's so punishing about the kerbs? Not particularly high. Is it the shape of them that makes things oscillate over them dub-dub-dub-dub noise?



#55 cpbell

cpbell
  • Member

  • 6,964 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 05 July 2020 - 20:12

First race of the season on a punishing circuit. I'd put it down to that.

Felt like the old days. :rotfl:



#56 SonGoku

SonGoku
  • Member

  • 5,553 posts
  • Joined: July 17

Posted 05 July 2020 - 20:24

Apparently it's circuit related according to Wolff, so be ready next weekend. The cars take such a beating that after a certain amount of laps the engine or gearbox has had enough.

#57 Jordan44

Jordan44
  • Member

  • 10,709 posts
  • Joined: May 15

Posted 05 July 2020 - 20:48

I have really missed unreliability we should encourage it more.

Easy solution, cap allowed Dyno running time or "mileage"
Reliability got insane with these V6's because they literally have an engine running 24/7 now without any restrictions. They could use it as much as they like, but only a certain theoretical distance, that way they can develop power but not verify reliability.

Edited by Jordan44, 05 July 2020 - 20:51.


#58 NotAPineapple

NotAPineapple
  • Member

  • 724 posts
  • Joined: July 13

Posted 06 July 2020 - 07:21

what does a gearbox sensor read on the M-B temp, lube level, or something else ?

At a guess the most critical sensors are probably shift barrel or fork position. If there is a problem there then the gearbox controller won't know when the shift is over and the second clutch can be closed.

#59 Ickx

Ickx
  • Member

  • 907 posts
  • Joined: February 03

Posted 06 July 2020 - 07:38

Easy solution, cap allowed Dyno running time or "mileage"
Reliability got insane with these V6's because they literally have an engine running 24/7 now without any restrictions. They could use it as much as they like, but only a certain theoretical distance, that way they can develop power but not verify reliability.


Reliability improved massively overall beginning in the early 00. Larger attention on reliability is part of it but I bet engineering methods and computing power to improve calculations have been as important. Of course, the rules also require parts to be reused now.

Advertisement

#60 sopa

sopa
  • Member

  • 12,230 posts
  • Joined: April 07

Posted 06 July 2020 - 07:52

If such a thing happens out of nowhere, you have to look at factors that have changed. It's not about the circuit, because they have raced in Austria in past seasons too. It's not necessarily about being the 1st race of the season either, because opening races of the season haven't had high attrition rates in the past decade apart from 2015 (also 11 finishers).

 

So what it is about? Lockdown of factories and possibly reduced personnel at the race weekend, which has caught teams unprepared. Does this mean F1 is now again a wee bit less professional with all the restrictions it has had plus in a situation in which F1 has hit economic crisis too with several teams looking for investors? Either way, whatever it is, looks great for racing. Reminds the old days in which you aren't sure, who is going to retire.

 

Or perhaps this race was a one-off and teams will be more 'safeguarded' for the next race weekend, taking more precautions with their limitations and lack of preparation.



#61 Ivanhoe

Ivanhoe
  • RC Forum Host

  • 17,682 posts
  • Joined: November 15

Posted 06 July 2020 - 07:55

I propose a grid penalty if your engine doesn't fail at least once every 7 races.



#62 Rediscoveryx

Rediscoveryx
  • Member

  • 3,427 posts
  • Joined: August 01

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:05

The "part X must last Y races" rules really need to go. With a cost cap (of sorts) in place, there really is no need for a rule that by design makes the races less enjoyable to watch. Let those who value longevity spend their budget on improving reliability while other who value outright performance can spend it on building fragile warp ships.



#63 statman

statman
  • Member

  • 7,312 posts
  • Joined: December 15

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:05

It still lacked the exploding engines of old. That was always spectacular.

 

Formula 2 had a nice flame-throwing engine failure yesterday morning



#64 balmybaldwin

balmybaldwin
  • Member

  • 2,086 posts
  • Joined: January 14

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:15

Apparently it's circuit related according to Wolff, so be ready next weekend. ...

but we are at the same track?



#65 balmybaldwin

balmybaldwin
  • Member

  • 2,086 posts
  • Joined: January 14

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:18

If such a thing happens out of nowhere, you have to look at factors that have changed. It's not about the circuit, because they have raced in Austria in past seasons too. It's not necessarily about being the 1st race of the season either, because opening races of the season haven't had high attrition rates in the past decade apart from 2015 (also 11 finishers).

 

So what it is about? Lockdown of factories and possibly reduced personnel at the race weekend, which has caught teams unprepared. Does this mean F1 is now again a wee bit less professional with all the restrictions it has had plus in a situation in which F1 has hit economic crisis too with several teams looking for investors? Either way, whatever it is, looks great for racing. Reminds the old days in which you aren't sure, who is going to retire.

 

Or perhaps this race was a one-off and teams will be more 'safeguarded' for the next race weekend, taking more precautions with their limitations and lack of preparation.

I'd be amazed if it wasn't merely that they are going to a punishing track 1st without the benefit of lots of running on less punishing tracks to find the issues with mounts, wiring looms etc



#66 SB

SB
  • Member

  • 2,437 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:52

What was all that about? 9 DNFs,

 

Sound like those good old days to me. I love these unpredictably in the races !



#67 grunf77

grunf77
  • Member

  • 509 posts
  • Joined: October 16

Posted 06 July 2020 - 08:57

Imola used to be car breaker. 



#68 Spillage

Spillage
  • Member

  • 10,306 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 06 July 2020 - 09:51

I've no idea why it happened but long may it continue. It made what would otherwise have been a routine Mercedes 1-2 into a genuine thriller.

#69 Dutchrudder

Dutchrudder
  • Member

  • 891 posts
  • Joined: February 16

Posted 07 July 2020 - 19:53

Eh, last year all cars finished.

I stand corrected, said the man in the orthopaedic shoes.

#70 tbones

tbones
  • Member

  • 252 posts
  • Joined: February 05

Posted 07 July 2020 - 21:33

Imola used to be car breaker. 

or the good old days of the engines going ka-bloey headed down the straights at the old hockenhiem :clap:



#71 ARTGP

ARTGP
  • Member

  • 29,801 posts
  • Joined: March 19

Posted 07 July 2020 - 22:15

I don't mind mechanical DNFs, but I prefer the theatrics. Like massive smoke plumes and tire explosions.

 

Cars just "losing drive" because of some electrical connection looks like amateur hour.


Edited by ARTGP, 07 July 2020 - 22:16.


#72 pdac

pdac
  • Member

  • 17,275 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 07 July 2020 - 22:46

or the good old days of the engines going ka-bloey headed down the straights at the old hockenhiem :clap:

 

Yeah, I hate those sensors they now have that cause the race engineer to come on the radio and say "park the car and switch off the engine now".



#73 ARTGP

ARTGP
  • Member

  • 29,801 posts
  • Joined: March 19

Posted 07 July 2020 - 22:51

Yeah, I hate those sensors they now have that cause the race engineer to come on the radio and say "park the car and switch off the engine now".

 

To be fair. These power units now go for 20-30million a pop. A far cry from a naturally aspirated V8,V10,V12 of yesterday.

 

You can hardly blame them for being kind of anxious about it as these engines are not disposable by any means.


Edited by ARTGP, 07 July 2020 - 22:51.


#74 w1Y

w1Y
  • Member

  • 10,624 posts
  • Joined: March 16

Posted 07 July 2020 - 23:04

People will love mechanical issues until their driver suffers from it or the person they dont want to win benefits from it.

I prefer races to be won on track, not through mechanical issues

#75 pdac

pdac
  • Member

  • 17,275 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 07 July 2020 - 23:13

To be fair. These power units now go for 20-30million a pop. A far cry from a naturally aspirated V8,V10,V12 of yesterday.

 

You can hardly blame them for being kind of anxious about it as these engines are not disposable by any means.

 

All you're saying is fireworks cost more than they used to.



#76 ARTGP

ARTGP
  • Member

  • 29,801 posts
  • Joined: March 19

Posted 07 July 2020 - 23:40

All you're saying is fireworks cost more than they used to.

 

:D


Edited by ARTGP, 07 July 2020 - 23:40.