
Vic Rauter,TSN
#1
Posted 13 May 2001 - 20:20
After watching a FANTASTIC GP,I was infuriated by Rauters total negative rant.[not a SINGLE positive expressed about the race.]
His complaints were typical;team orders,Villeneuve's performance and his standard harangue,Traction control[something he knows nothing about.]
He is a shameless CART booster and seems to have had a life-long hatred of F1.
What is most galling,though,is that after slagging the race he feeds us the promo to watch Monaco,in 2 weeks time.Why should I?You have just finished telling us what a bunch of rubbish F1 is.
Sorry to rant here,but that knob,Rauter,took much of the enjoyment of the race away.
Please e-mail TSN.Even non-canucks are welcome[www.tsn.ca]
Advertisement
#2
Posted 13 May 2001 - 20:26

count me in! even though I'm not watching TSN anymore I had to put up with him for 4 freaking years.
#3
Posted 13 May 2001 - 21:16
On Villeneuve, Vic simply agreed with a statement of Gerry Donaldson, who is close to Villeneuve, and has no axe to grind with JV. GD was the one to bring up JV, simply saying that JV had a terrible race and Vic agreed with that ("he did indeed"), before going to commercial. After the commercial asked GD about how frustrated JV must be getting. GD said JV has to pull up his socks, and has to improve. Vic then noted a back problem with JV, and then asked, aside from that, whether JV has lost his nerve at all. GD said no, but JV has lost some of his polish, and is frustrated and overdriving, and needs to get that polish back. Watson then said that JV is suffering from no discipline and leadership ("needs a spanking", as he put it), has the talent, but has just lost focus, and said that he does not think JV wants to languish in a midfield team.
Vic simply asked the questions, and his F1 correspondents, both fair and knowlegeable men making fair and reasonable comments, called it as they saw it. I don't see any problem with the way Vic Rauter handled any of this.
Vic Rauter is not as knowledgeable about the sport as many of us here, but can speak intelligently enough about it to lead his correspondents in an appropriate discussion, asking the questions the fans are wondering about. That's his job. The interesting thing about guys like Rauter is that they have to cover a number of sports, and I recall seeing Rauter involved in coverage of another sport, (tennis or curling, I think), and it was kind of weird to see him slip easily so into the role of covering that sport too. Vic is not an F1 specialist like Murray Walker, but I have to say that the coverage that Canadians get from TSN doesn't give us a lot to complain about. Read some of the posts of our Austrailian members sometime.
#4
Posted 13 May 2001 - 21:45
mark
#5
Posted 13 May 2001 - 22:07
#6
Posted 14 May 2001 - 01:26
Defending Vic Rauter!!!!!!!!!!!
I have had to put up with this ''journalist'' for over 8 years,Have you?
Please,someone,HELP!!!!!!!!!
I cannot let it rest that some of us think that Rauter is doing his job effectively.
Some outside opinions,please!!!!!!!!
#7
Posted 14 May 2001 - 02:28
#8
Posted 14 May 2001 - 02:50
Speak french? If Vic really bugs you, there's always RDS for pre race and wrap up.
Or, depending on availability, Speedvision.
I won't accuse Vic Rauter of being Canada's essential motorsports expert , but "a life-long hatred of F1" seems a bit much.
#9
Posted 14 May 2001 - 02:52

#10
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:00

Seriously, I'd like an example or two of something Vic said that really deserves the villification he's getting here. Sheesh he's only onscreen for maybe fifteen or twenty minutes out of each race, and he's just the lead-in for the real race announcers.
The one thing I'll admit is that once when they actually had him and Donaldson do play-by-play for qualifying, they made a royal mess of it. TSN was smart enough to can that idea real quick, and otherwise, the guy has done just fine, for what he's needed for.
#11
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:04
Shaun
#12
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:13
#13
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:41
#14
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:43
Originally posted by JayWay
I see more dumb comments on this board then Vic has made in his whole F1/TSN carrer.
oh yeah...
Shaun
#15
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:49
#16
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:51
Originally posted by JayWay
What do you have to say?
that was me agreeing with you. like 'oh yeah there certainly are more dumb comments here'
I know me agreeing with you is strange.. but it can happen. It may happen again one day ;)
Shaun
#17
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:51
Shaun
#18
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:53
And the sig stays

#19
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:53
Love Vick, you could be FORCED to watch speedvision. I'm not joking. If I had heard just one more "RU-Binz Barrrrrrrrrry-kellow" I might have become violent.
BTW, SPEEDVISION is the reason F1 isn't more popular in the states. It was such a horrible experience, that had it not been for Ralf's first win, I would have turned it off...
Advertisement
#20
Posted 14 May 2001 - 03:53
#21
Posted 14 May 2001 - 04:17


#22
Posted 14 May 2001 - 05:02
SV for pre-race and the only reason I watch the TSN post race thing is to find out when the next CART race is being broadcast.
Vic is annoying but today I thought Donaldson and Watson were pretty annoying too. They seem to have forgotten he gave BAR their first podium last race.
"Spanking" ...that was good for a laugh.

Villenevue is still stuck in a mediocre car with a strong engine. How many years has it been now since he was able to fight at the front... I'm sure it gets frustrating after winning the WDC especially when he see's Williams handley out perform them and Sauber outqualify them too. They have gone backwards so far this year and the Reynard chassis still seems like it has a very long way to go.
BTW... Anyone notice how easy Panis made it for the people to pass him for position in todays race? Almost like he was politely giving up his spot... not very impressive.
#23
Posted 15 May 2001 - 01:43
It really isn't that bad. Us Canucks have it better than a lot of other places. I recall an Aussie talking about their horrendous coverage and Speedvison's is not much better.
My only gripe is that TSN goes right to the start sequence before passing the audio feed to ITV. I don't like to miss Murray's "GO GO GO!"
#24
Posted 15 May 2001 - 01:53
The BAR is a dog what's the point of fighting a pass,also when Schumacher passed him he had a funny wiggle under braking in the rear which Murray and Martian missed.
mark
#25
Posted 15 May 2001 - 02:07
#26
Posted 15 May 2001 - 02:17