You didnt really catch my point here.Hmm, not sure I'd agree with that. If the pecking order changes by a large degree from one season to the next then it brings unpredictability to races which has been sorely lacking. If RB is a second ahead of the field then yes it will be dull but no more dull than what we have now where Merc has had that kind of advantage depending on circuit. But if we assume that the timings themselves are not necessarily accurate (and even they admit that it's almost impossible to tell) but say for the sake of argument that the pecking order is, then I don't really see how swapping Lewis up front with Max is any worse than what we have now. And assuming the gaps aren't that big (and I have a hard time imagining that not just RB but AT and Ferrari have all managed to leapfrog Mercedes) then it has the potential of offering a proper fight, not just a procession
I'm not talking about the gap from 1st to the rest but from 2nd to the rest. Vettel didnt almost finish 2nd in 2015 because he was brilliant for example, but because he always had default finishes in 3rd with occasional peaks. I really doubt that somebody in the 3rd or 4th best car could do it, especially if there are two drivers as good as Leclerc and Hamilton. And even if one of them manages that - and only then - you would be like last year, otherwise it's worse.
In either scenario though there wont be a championship fight. If you put Max or Lewis in the quickest car by 1-2 tenths they will win. You need them either in (near-)equal cars, or somebody with less skills or a intra-team battle has the quickest car (but not by a big margin either)
Edited by Marklar, 19 March 2021 - 17:08.