I sort of agree, but sort of don't.
There without question are drivers who could beat Max on their day, maybe or maybe not over a season, but there is no reason the second driver should be regularly 0.5+ per lap off. Leclerc, Ricciardo, Norris, Sainz Jr etc are going to be there or there abouts.
Now I don't expect Perez to regularly be this far off, but the idea that it should be accepted the second driver won't put a car that is equally best on at least the second row just isn't on.
I never really expected Perez to meet their Saturday expectations simply due to him not being an accomplished Saturday driver.
That's not really what I said or implied either. I mainly meant that for that 2nd Red Bull seat I don't see any candidate that can fulfill that 2nd driver role as good as Bottas can at Mercedes.
I agree that's normally not acceptable to not put that car on the 2nd row, but outliers happen. Perez wasn't feeling well yesterday so that should also be taken into account in this case.
The previous 2 weekends he qualified .144 behind and .052 in front of Verstappen. The person I was responding to was IMO very prematurely talking about rehiring Gasly.
Leclerc et al. would be there or there abouts, probably more consistently in qualy than Perez. But I did mention available drivers. None of those you mentioned realistically are, and some of them wouldn't even be interested.
So I was talking more realistically, that of the options Red Bull has and likely will have, I don't see any better options than Perez, and to talk about replacements now after 4 races is anyway premature.
Additionally, while Max and Lewis might show that the cars should be roughly equal, I keep having the feeling that if you would swap Perez and Bottas, Perez would perform better than Bottas.
Edited by Lights, 09 May 2021 - 08:51.