Another thought about the Goodwood commentary is that it is intended primarily for the people who have actually bought tickets and attended in person . For the reasons outlined above, reference to numbers is actually far more useful than names, as one can see at a glance who is where. The TV audience , unlike for modern F1 , is of secondary importance and , to be blunt, can take what they're given from the circuit live feed .
As ever , TV concentrates on what they will insist on calling 'the battle for the lead' ,with lower placings being of diminishing importance - whereas live it can be the car in 19th place which offers the best spectacle. And therein lies one of the key shortcomings of TV coverage of non championship racing , at standalone events like Goodwood - it thinks the audience cares about the results . TV not only often ignores most of the field, but even wastes everybody's time by showing the detailed results, down to thousandths of a second. Who cares ? I like to see a good scrap for the lead , but my good memories of this year's MM are of the hugely sideways Bizzarini in No Name , the perfect proportions of a Tecno F3 car and that feral howl from Franchitti's GTO. Others will have entirely different memories, but they wont be confined to winners.
Re internet coverage , the potshot Doug refers to my having taken was aimed at wherever the buck stops for ensuring it works. I assumed this was Goodwood itself, unless the local council decides that taxpayers money would benefit the event - which it might, of course, given how much income the area must receive from the event , if the cost of my own weekend is typical....