
playstation laptimes at brazil [no cheats please]
#1
Posted 12 March 2000 - 14:46
1:10.725
1st sector 17.5
2nd sector 53.5
really high downforce .
now , i know that theres a pretty big shortcut here at brazil , down that bank and over the grass , you know the one g-r , so just keep away from there and it'll be a good compitition.
by the way that race today was very boring after lap 18 .
but atleast villeneuve got some pionts.
--------------------
irvine = w@nker
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 March 2000 - 15:15
I'm at least 3-4 sec faster around brazil.
Ah well, never mind, I'm sure you'll get heavily beaten here

#3
Posted 13 March 2000 - 15:59
Any quicker than about a 1:06.7 or so in my mind is cheating. Just a guess though.
regards,
doohanOK.
#4
Posted 13 March 2000 - 16:08
I expect to get into the low 1:07's, but a 1:06 is pretty much out of the question.
#5
Posted 13 March 2000 - 21:24
1.08.579
I can see a high 1.07 or possibly a mid 1.07 but no way a 1.06 so I probably won't be on the pace again.
#6
Posted 14 March 2000 - 11:00
Ferrari
s1 17.198
s2 52.932
f 1:10.388
The lap after this, I got a first split of 16.6 and so surprised I ran off the track....doh!!
#7
Posted 14 March 2000 - 16:13
It looks like I am damn good at Interlagos because I have already got a 1:08.2 !
With a first split of 16 flat
I think I could go a fair bit faster as well
16.076
51.266
1:08.234
#8
Posted 15 March 2000 - 08:06
looks like ive got pro. pole now
1st - 16.447
2nd - 51.353
Final 1:07.902
sweet!

------------------
Check Out Atlas F1 results page
#9
Posted 15 March 2000 - 11:05
16.785
51.888
1:08.109
I can go a bit quicker through thee first split so i should be able to get a 1:07
#10
Posted 15 March 2000 - 13:12
1S / 16.491
2S / 50.674
F / 1:07.709
I'll post a few other times later next week.
regards,
doohanOK.
#11
Posted 15 March 2000 - 16:13
Hey, I though we had to say what car we use, or doesn't that apply?
#12
Posted 15 March 2000 - 16:39
s1 16.731
s2 52.669
f 1:09.167
Plenty of room for improvement
#13
Posted 15 March 2000 - 22:40
No official statement from RAD yet, but I've been lapping in the high 1:08s. I'll make some adjustments then hopefully I'll be in the territory my teamate secured.
Cheers!
#14
Posted 16 March 2000 - 11:36
just ribbin ya mate... dont get ya panties in a bunch.
I assume the "short cut" mentioned is the one round the back between the two hairpins? theres the first right hand hairpin, then in the middle of the next long left you go straight, cut across a heap of grass and get spat out after the last right hairpin and just before the first of the 4 or 5 lefts back around to the pits?
i did a lap yesterday where i ****ed up the 1st chicane and was 3,5 down at S1, cut the short cut just to see what it was worth, and ended up doing a time that was only 1/10th slower than my best....so i reckon we might be able to spot that somehow*l*
anyway...just for your info. did a few sighting laps yesterday just getting used to the place again and figuring out if high or low DF is better and did a mid-high 9.
seems ive still got some work to do, but i didnt really flog it, and i havent worked out what cars best yet...
when i do ill fire ya off a mail G-R and we can sort out what were gonna use.
hope thats the way it works.. if your supposed to nominate a care BEFORE you start lapping then i guess toms right.. ive been cheating all along*lol*
so DQ me ;)
#15
Posted 16 March 2000 - 12:51
I'm on a potential 1:06 lap, granted a high 1:06.
I had a good 1st sector, then F'd up the second sector, but still had a reasonably good end time. Still, faster than the times here.
I then worked out from my fastest ever 2nd split time, and found if I had got my act together in the middle sector, I could have had a 1:06.8 or 9!
Anyway, I'll keep trying, like always.
ANZFOR-2000 is also keeping our testing times secret, mine anyway, as to not give anything away.
McNasty, I'll email you now.
#16
Posted 16 March 2000 - 16:27
#17
Posted 16 March 2000 - 17:17
[This message has been edited by G-R #4 (edited 03-16-2000).]
#18
Posted 16 March 2000 - 19:55
But who cares, there are plenty of the races to achieve high points.
regards,
doohanOK.
#19
Posted 17 March 2000 - 09:25
Stewart
1:09.938 Final
Front Row Honda Official Times must be in Ferrari. A disadvantage as I'm convinced the Williams is quickest here. Time will tell.
FRONT ROW HONDA press release:
OHIO-USA (FU2) ATLAS PSX F1 97 Championship contender "The Jac Man" of Team Front Row Honda suffered a broken left forefinger in an early morning testing shunt at the teams test track "Flatulancia" in Italy this morning. Team manager, Jean Todstool acknowledged the incident but downplayed any possible performance handicap that may result from the incident.
[This message has been edited by Jac Man (edited 03-17-2000).]
Advertisement
#20
Posted 17 March 2000 - 09:34
s1 16.343
s2 51.712
f 1.08.860
I can only improve on this by working on the turn in on the last corner, running over the inside kerb so that you can stay in 2nd, but it's damn hard to get all 3 sectors right. Once I do I reckon I'll be looking at a 8.3 or 8.4. So look out!!
#21
Posted 17 March 2000 - 10:32
1st Intermediate- 15.996
2nd Intermediate- 49.563
Finish Line- 1.07.946
If it were arcade...

Well, Sim is better anyday.
------------------
http://www.angelfire.com/ns/f1
Don't crack open the champagne yet, UPRC's here!
#22
Posted 17 March 2000 - 10:35

Although I bet faster times will come and they will send me waaaayyyy down the list!
1st- 14.204
2nd- 48.277
Fin- 1:07.066
I command you all to do horrible.

------------------
http://www.angelfire.com/ns/f1
Don't crack open the champagne yet, UPRC's here!
#23
Posted 17 March 2000 - 10:37

------------------
http://www.angelfire.com/ns/f1
Don't crack open the champagne yet, UPRC's here!
#24
Posted 17 March 2000 - 14:27
1:08.429 .......thats faster than you isn't it nasty?------so you now suck soryy pal.
1st sector 16.8
2nd 52.3
pretty lowish dforce.
i'm goner go even faster too, might even use the grass if i have to....
-----------------------------------
irvine = w@nker
#25
Posted 17 March 2000 - 15:54
2nd- 48.277
c'mon, you have to be kidding with these split times.
There's no way they are possible. I find them very hard to believe, as I've tried many set-ups and the fastest I've been at the first split is a 16.0, and at the 2nd split in the 50's.
I just find these splits a bit sus.
#26
Posted 17 March 2000 - 16:42
It is impossible to get a 14.whatever on the first split. The best time I have achieved on the first sector was a 16.134, and to be honest, that was absolutely blindingly quick through the Senna 'S'. As for the 48.9, totally impossible. No one could ever get lower than a mid-50. The best time I've gotten for a second sector was a 50.6 .
Fellow participants, do not fool yourselves by posting bogus times. G-R, myself and others can and will make sure to hell that SalutGilles looks into these times and insist that you "sit out" a few races.
Interlagos contains many tight hairpins, and thus a low-downforce configurations is not an excuse for these "times".
It's a wonder why I try and be on the edge and have sore fingers/hands/wrists after 30-45 minute sessions of solid quick laps, whilst some of you don't care. This championship is for people that don't cheat, and your times will be suspect for the rest of the season following these times.
"regards"
doohanOK.
#27
Posted 17 March 2000 - 17:28
I just cant see myself getting into a 1.09 let alone a 1.06...
Agreed Tom, the Aussie GP was crap after lap 18, or, mid 20s. because after Frentzen went out, i HATED IT!!
------------------
16 M New Zealand
#28
Posted 17 March 2000 - 18:10
I too have a best 2nd split of 50.6, and really find it hard to beleive that these splits ae genuine.
I'm faster in the end anyway ;)
#29
Posted 17 March 2000 - 18:25

It'll be interesting to see who comes out on top at Brazil!
The problem is that the 1st sector contains the main straight, the tight Senna 'S', followed by a straight. That alone can conquered using medium-dforce.
The 2nd sector contains a longish straight just after the 1st sector timer, but the problem is that this sector contains hairpins that are tighter than Sir Frank Williams' wallet.
The 3rd is merely the last corner followed by a long straight.
My point is that, it is impossible to find a "perfect" set up, e.g. either low or high downforce, as there has too be enough allowance for speed on the 1st and 3rd sectors, and enough cornering and handling on the 2nd sector.
It is more of a compromise to set up the car for Interlagos.
regards,
doohanOK.
#30
Posted 18 March 2000 - 04:38
he just make up his times , he doesn't bother cutting corners he just makes up his times , thats why his sectors are so far out.
well thats what i think anyway.
g-r, i'm about 2 seconds slower than you in the 2nd sector , so whats going on there?
are you taking to the grass?
no , just kidding.
i haven't mastered the 2nd sector , i get so much understeer , cos i've been running with 5 % dforce on the rear , and about 35 on the front ,
but today i'll sought out a good setup for myself .
jacs man , no i'm not useing the ferrari , the williams is clearly the fastest , so i'm using the williams.
well i'm heading off for a quick spin on my little motorbike to get some kfc , then i'll be back too take pole.
--------------------------------
irvine = w@nker
#31
Posted 18 March 2000 - 07:32
s1 16.663
s2 51.839
f 1:08.380
Getting close to my limit with my current setup. I'm going to try out a setup from my new teammate Benz now.
Later
#32
Posted 18 March 2000 - 08:27
#33
Posted 18 March 2000 - 09:00
#34
Posted 18 March 2000 - 10:51
I've managed a 1:08.195 in a Williams. The course is very tricky to master. I get easily distracted by nailing a great split time. I've got to quit looking at my splits!
#35
Posted 18 March 2000 - 11:09
s2 50.647
f 1:07.803
thought i'd put in this time to go up the table at walk.to/atlas
[This message has been edited by OverSteer #18 (edited 03-18-2000).]
#36
Posted 18 March 2000 - 12:29
i found that after spending lap after lap with the normal controller , i found i just couldn't go quicker than 1:08.397.
so i switched to the twitchy, crap ass, 'look backwards everytime your on a flying lap', duel schock , and it took me a couple of hours to ajust properly , i ended up with a 1:08.214
1st 16.7
2nd 51.6
and you wouldn't believe the amount of times i've got a 1st sector time of 16.3 or 4 and then stuffed up at the next corner.......this track is very hard.
but i really hope i can win this one, so i'll keep trying.
i went and read the drivers profiles for us , and why don't i have a profile ? i've been here as long as anyone else?
got any good reasons other than can't be arsed making a profile for me?
i'd like to see my profile thanks.
------------------------------------
irvine = w@nker
[This message has been edited by tom (edited 03-18-2000).]
#37
Posted 18 March 2000 - 12:59
look at the time in the corners of his posts , hes set those times within 2 minutes of each other so . CHEAT ?
yes of course he is , he's just trying to ruin this compitition so , piss off would you .
------------------------------------
irvine = w@nker
#38
Posted 18 March 2000 - 15:24
Tom, how can you handle a car with 5 front 35 rear downforce????? at Interlagos? I just cant drive a car with that setting on the track like that, i like oversteer if anything, lots of turn in, quickly on the power again, that requires lots of front downforce especially.
By the way, at Interlagos, if you choose 65% rear and 70% front you are NOT significantly slower on the straights, i can still match my top speeds with less downforce, and then you absolutely nail the rest of teh course which is tight left and open right handers.
------------------
16 M New Zealand
#39
Posted 18 March 2000 - 15:28
About the profile, you should see Benz about that. The reason you don't have one is that you haven't given him any info. There was a thread a while ago asking for compeditors for there profile info, but only McNasty replyed to it.
So, get Benz's email and get the info to him.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 18 March 2000 - 17:00
1S / 15.979
2S / 51.630
F / 1.07.417
I'll post my other quicker times later in the week.
regards,
doohanOK.
#41
Posted 18 March 2000 - 17:53
#42
Posted 18 March 2000 - 18:07
No, I haven't, I've lapped in the very low 1.07's, but I don't believe a 1.06 is possible with the set-up I'm using, definite no.
If it is actually possible, that's tough to say, I'd say maybe, but I believe a 1.06 is going to be a one-off; but ultimately less than a 1.07.100 or 1.07.000 would be very tough.
regards,
doohanOK.
#43
Posted 19 March 2000 - 06:38
#44
Posted 19 March 2000 - 10:05
you can keep your crap ass dual shock g-r.
1:07.711
1st 16.6
2nd 51.2
and i got 2 16.0's in the 1st sector .
-----------------
irvine = w@nker
#45
Posted 19 March 2000 - 10:43
It's just not worth it.
We'll just have to wait and see.
regards,
doohanOK.
#46
Posted 19 March 2000 - 10:59
#47
Posted 19 March 2000 - 12:54
I HAVE SPEED !
1:07.318
AND I can go about a second faster still !
Admittedly I got a first sector record of 15.928, but the rest of the lap was crap except for the last corner.
51.498 for the second sector which is nothing special - I got a 50 .9 earlier but I stuffed up the last bend. - And that 50.9 came from a first split of 16.4 or somethin !
So if I can wing everythin together mid 1:06s have my name on them.
About the cheating.......now UPRC is my teammate so I obviously dont want him to lose any points, but a 14.2 first sector is about as funny as a fart in an elevator so Salut can do what he wants
#48
Posted 19 March 2000 - 14:41
Andrew
------------------
16 M New Zealand
#49
Posted 19 March 2000 - 14:42
1:07.653--------with the hard tyres , --does anyone know if it makes a difference , soft or hard compuonds?
1st sector 16.7
2nd 51.1
andrew 2001,
i know what you mean about the understeer , and i hate it to , i've switched to higher dforce now and i'm lapping alot faster especially in the midle sector.
it's so bloody hard to do a perfect lap around this track, i reckon if i could get the lap together i'd be able to do a 1:07.1 or something but it's just ****in impossible to do a perfect lap.
g-r, salut's been calling the shots around here since the start , i think he started it up , so that'll be why he makes the dicisions.
------------------------------------------
irvine = w@nker
#50
Posted 19 March 2000 - 15:03
Day 1 Mika Hakkinen MP4/12
Interlagos Circuit
........Split 1...Split 2....F.Lap
Lap 1...18.539....56.171.....1.14.139
Lap 2...17.725....54.285.....1.15.943
Lap 3...18.118....54.574.....1.12.929
Lap 4...17.790....54.398.....1.12.525
Lap 5...18.067....54.984.....1.12.817
Lap 6...18.132....54.964.....1.12.763
Lap 7...18.132....54.507.....1.27.771
(In Lap)
Lap 8...30.330....1.07.930...1.17.338
(Out Lap)
Lap 9...18.187....59.708.....1.17.338
Lap 10..17.990....54.398.....1.12.525
Fastest Lap
S1: 17.790
S2: 54.398
Lap: 1.12.525
Those 10 laps are the only laps i have done at Brazil this entire year. When i finally get enough time to do 20 or so, i will and HOPEFULLY I can get into the 1.10 bracket...
------------------
16 M New Zealand