Michael Schmidt (AmuS) wrote an article about the AMR underfloor dilemma.
Most of the things are well known:
- there are 2 underfloor "families" in 2024
- they tried to combine the 2 families with the Austin floor
- as it is very expensive to bring a lot of floors to each track
- bouncing returned, instability in braking and accelerating
- turn in understeer, exit oversteer
- they lose up to 50% of the DF with turned wheels
- this was a long known problem but never that big as in Austin
- Engineers didn't have the balls to accept that their concept is wrong
- instead they developed wrong underfloor concepts only further
- Brazil with the bumps was bad for the car
- as the car has the 2nd lowest ground clearence next to Mercedes
- Engineers chase for peak DF numbers in the tunnel
- with the low ground clearence the working window is very small
- turned the car into a monster
- Last year only their launch floor really worked
- wind tunnel numbers worked also on track for the launch spec
- but with every floor update it got worse and worse
- They could not return to the launch floor for 2024 because they didn't find any more DF in development
- Schmidt says that there won't be a replacement for Fallows
- As Newey will join as the creativeguy and Cardile as the organizer of the technical department
Edited by blacky, 18 November 2024 - 12:18.