
Martin Brundle - Mr Fair and Unbiased
#1
Posted 28 May 2001 - 01:37
Furthermore, he always has it in for Frentzen. When Frentzen started doing the fastest laps he said (dont quote me) "whats frentzen doing - if he had a car this fast why didnt he do these times before" - well duuhhh Martin - as a driver of 158 GP's - you should know - maybe Frentzen was heavier on fuel before, maybe Frentzen was in TRAFFIC (just like your boy DC!!). Remember Frentzen was caught up in the trail of four cars. Then he was in free air when he was doing thos quick lap times.
I personally enjoy Brundles commentary but sometimes he can really piss me off with his bias towards DC and against others.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 28 May 2001 - 01:40
I think you have to just laugh at it...
I get ticked at MW because he's always inferring (this year) thart OP is taking JV to the cleaners, but when JV is in front there is no mention of it... same thing. Laugh it off. They're human.
#3
Posted 28 May 2001 - 01:42
what a wanker:p
#4
Posted 28 May 2001 - 02:01
#5
Posted 28 May 2001 - 02:22
#6
Posted 28 May 2001 - 02:22
#7
Posted 28 May 2001 - 03:08

#8
Posted 28 May 2001 - 03:13

#9
Posted 28 May 2001 - 03:48
Ive never had a prob with martin...dc's manager or not. He dishes it out where its due generally. I remember some arse chewings hes given dc when he deserved them (eg indy).
But hes happy enough to say so when MS or mika (2 guys who you think if he had any bias hed be extra critical of) have a great race or do something special.
Atleast hes doesnt seem to have that almost 'hatred', hunt had for people like patrese.
#10
Posted 28 May 2001 - 03:58
#11
Posted 28 May 2001 - 07:35
#12
Posted 28 May 2001 - 07:44
#13
Posted 28 May 2001 - 07:48
#14
Posted 28 May 2001 - 07:51
#15
Posted 28 May 2001 - 08:00
Originally posted by silver fan
The problem is easily fixed just do what I do turn the volume off on the TV and put a CD on and listen to some music while I watch the race. I don't need that idiot Murrey Walker telling me what's happening, I can see for myself. As for having the volume down well since the reintroduction of traction control the cars sound like shite now anyway, so i'm not missing mutch.
Couldnt have said better. The people at Speedvision here in the US are pretty sad too. There is this British guy (dont even know his name since I take turns listening to music, and to the commentators) that was saying how Barrichello had no right to complain because he was 20 seconds behind MS, etc... And at the end RB had cramps! Not that I think RB would have passed MS, but I had a good laugh when I heard that -- I wished I could have seen the commentators face! He took such a big bias and spoke so snobbly, so sure of himself, I would have given my right arm to see his face when he finally realized RB had cramps! LOL
We should all beware of Media Bias.

#16
Posted 28 May 2001 - 08:12
Regarding his comments about Frentzen, (a) I have heard him say this about different drivers many times before, and (b) it's not like ITV gave extensive coverage of Frentzen's race, so at worst, you could accuse Martin of making an ignorant comment, not a malicious one.
I think Brundle is pretty damn objective (esp considering he's DC's manager), I think any pro-Brit bias he has is normal -- what else do you expect from British commentators?
The race sucked though...
#17
Posted 28 May 2001 - 08:17
Brundle was never urging DC to drive Bernoldi off the road. He just said that if he was in his position, he'd have nerfed him. He also said that if he was Bernoldi, he'd let him through due to the time he was losing trying to delay the inevitable.
Mark Blundell later also said he'd have the guy off too in that position.
Obviously, being in the paddock and being envolved so closely with the sport you have your favourite drivers - let's not forget Murrays love affair with Nigel Mansell and Damon Hill - but I don't see bias affecting their commentary in any way at all.
Now ITV's Manchester United Champions League love affair is another story all together...
#18
Posted 28 May 2001 - 08:20
#19
Posted 28 May 2001 - 09:13
Had it been Hakkinen who couldnt get past....
Advertisement
#20
Posted 28 May 2001 - 09:55
It's pretty normal for him to bias towards McLaren and Brits, since he drove for them and knows the guys in McLaren. Anyway I think Martin did a good job most of the time. Anyone want Dr Pamler back?
#21
Posted 28 May 2001 - 10:09
#22
Posted 28 May 2001 - 10:42
#23
Posted 28 May 2001 - 12:41
It reminds me of his "You hit the wrong part of him my friend!" comments at Jerez '97
About the one sensible thing I heard abpout the entire incident.
#24
Posted 28 May 2001 - 12:48
Originally posted by klipywitz
The people at Speedvision here in the US are pretty sad too. There is this British guy (dont even know his name since I take turns listening to music, and to the commentators) that was saying how Barrichello had no right to complain because he was 20 seconds behind MS, etc... And at the end RB had cramps! Not that I think RB would have passed MS, but I had a good laugh when I heard that -- I wished I could have seen the commentators face! He took such a big bias and spoke so snobbly, so sure of himself, I would have given my right arm to see his face when he finally realized RB had cramps!
Rubens was on the rag? The problem with Rubens is 24 races for Ferrari and 23 excuses. I don't think Speedvision commentator Derek Bell was feeling too rebuked by Rubens whining about his tootsie.

#25
Posted 28 May 2001 - 12:54
#26
Posted 28 May 2001 - 12:58
#27
Posted 28 May 2001 - 13:23
#28
Posted 29 May 2001 - 11:32
http://www.planet-f1...f1/ENG?ref=6276
"May 29: An open letter from Planet F1 to British race commentator Martin Brundle
Dear Martin,
...."
it's a long letter so if you are interested use the link above
Gemini
#29
Posted 29 May 2001 - 11:43
Originally posted by Williams
Am I the only one who thinks that Brundle was at least half-joking when he made those comments about nerfing DC off the circuit ? I know I laughed about it. There's no way a commentator would say something like that seriously, and there's no way it should be taken serioulsy. It was just some dark humour on the part of MB, and quite welcome, I thought, too. Sometimes the broadcasts are a bit too serious about the the whole thing. Good on Brundle for lightning things up a bit.
The problem is, kids don't have the same perception as we do Williams. I watch each GP with my uncles and cousins. My cousins are all under 15, and the 12 was going on and on how he should "Smash that idiot out of the way" right after Brundle opens his trap. Great way for kids that age to be talking about not only racing, but driving cars.
Personally, I laughed and at the same time thought, Martin you fool, that'll come around to kick you in the ass.
#30
Posted 29 May 2001 - 11:55
As for Bernoldi, I can see both sides of the coin, no reason to move over as they are fighting for position, however as MB said Bernoldi was slowing himself down by fighting DC, rather than keep blocking and risk DC going for a chance and putting them both out why not let the faster car through??
Monaco being as it is regarding crashes and general reliability if he had stayed on the road at a faster pace to the end he may have had a chance of a point re Alesi
As for Frentzen, again fair comment as far as I can see, on his own on the track and then suddenly starts setting blisteringly fast times, can't be a fuel thing as this happens over the course of a couple of laps, if I was EJ i'd want a good reason why this happened..
#31
Posted 29 May 2001 - 13:23
Originally posted by jmcgavin
As for Frentzen, again fair comment as far as I can see, on his own on the track and then suddenly starts setting blisteringly fast times, can't be a fuel thing as this happens over the course of a couple of laps, if I was EJ i'd want a good reason why this happened..
Frentzen started doing the fastest laps when he was ALONE - meaning Raikonnen and Panis were no longer infront of him and slowing him down - so obviously in free air - Frentzen had to go faster. Just like DC was going 2 seconds a lap faster after he finally got by Bernoldi
#32
Posted 29 May 2001 - 13:26
It says it all really!
#33
Posted 29 May 2001 - 18:13
Originally posted by CZM
Did anyone notice, that all the people who Martin Brundle talked to on his grid walk were all DC supporters?
And you are of course including Hakkinen and Ecclestone in this. The latter actively stated that he thought Hakkinen would win.
So, no I did not notice this at all.
#34
Posted 29 May 2001 - 18:16
Originally posted by Williams
Am I the only one who thinks that Brundle was at least half-joking when he made those comments about nerfing DC off the circuit ? I know I laughed about it. There's no way a commentator would say something like that seriously, and there's no way it should be taken serioulsy. It was just some dark humour on the part of MB, and quite welcome, I thought, too. Sometimes the broadcasts are a bit too serious about the the whole thing. Good on Brundle for lightning things up a bit.
No you're not but unfortunately some people take things literally on this BB and are unwilling to sit back and consider things before coming up with a rational argument.
#35
Posted 29 May 2001 - 20:57
Maybe that's too harsh. I don't really hate him. In fact I'm quite fond of him and his ability to translate what Murray is going on about... What is my point? I don't have the faintest idea!



#36
Posted 02 June 2001 - 09:35
As for having Bernoldi off, who cares. I for one would have been fustrated enough to run Bernoldi off the road and into the harbour/swimming pool (besides the Arrows would make a better boat than Gp car), despite the fact I don't believe Bernoldi did anything wrong. After all Jos passed Alonso and Button after Bernoldi let him by at St Devote so why couldn't DC have a proper go at Bernoldi, it may have ended in tears for either or both drivers but I would have been more impressed if DC had the balls to stick a move either way on the arrows.
#37
Posted 04 June 2001 - 03:48
MARTIN BRUNDLE IS DAVID COULTHARD'S MANAGER
whenever Brundle starts talking
#38
Posted 04 June 2001 - 05:19
#39
Posted 04 June 2001 - 10:07
I feel sorry for Kryten (DC)

Advertisement
#40
Posted 04 June 2001 - 10:20
BAD MCLAREN BAD!!!

#41
Posted 04 June 2001 - 14:50
He lambasted JV as someone unworthy of the Williams in '96 until Villeneuve's charge on (his favourite) Damon Hill quieted him
Firstly Martin Brundle didn't start commentating until 1997 with ITV. Also if Martin Brundle was able to commentate on the race while driving in it at the same time, he's up there with MS, AS, and AP, if not at a higher level than them!!!
ITV have only one problem, ad breaks. Apart from that they are excellent. Jim Rosental at last seems to be interested in F1, Tony Jardine and Mark Blundell (who unfortunatly can't say anything other than DC or JPM) aren't too bad analaysts, and the commentary team is just simply brilliant. Murray Walker is a living ledgend (and has done more than anyone bar Bernie to raise the profile of F1), and Martin Brundle is an excellend side kick. They are a bit biased but not obviously so.
#42
Posted 04 June 2001 - 16:48
Originally posted by Raelene
funny thing about Martin - he's always haveing a go at how agressive Michael is, his start line "chops" etc.
what a wanker
Raelene;
Martin is NOT a wanker(I would have been castigated had I offered up THAT one) why not have a "go"at Michael's "chops",they can be rather dis-tasteful,no?
Now on to the heart of the matter;
One must enjoy life and NOT take this SO SERIOUSLY:stoned:
MB knows the inner working of the whole circus so take what he offers to you as if you had a friend on the grid telling you what is REALLY happening.
Mr McBastard had the right idea...ish, although I loved hearing James Hunt and his NON PC comments...
I look forward to MB's little quips,they make me chuckle which in turn... keeps me awake!!!
ps.ITV has Rosenthal and Goodman to berate.. NOT MARTIN..He's the good one!!
"No Michael..that's NOT good enough" MB Jerez'97
Jp

#43
Posted 04 June 2001 - 22:53
very commentator worth listening to is biased in some way. To be able to report on something means they have spent time in or around the sport. Human Nature will dictate that these experiences will inspire some bias, either pro or anti people or teams you deal with or spend time with.
I thought Brundle's comments were fine and took them in the spirit in which they were intended. So did my 7 year old son, who had also said that "DC was a "dufus" and if he can't pass in a McLaren, he should just tap him under brakes".

Hey, it works for him on GP3!!

I'm sure the stop for a new nose would have cost him much less than the 4secs a lap for 44 laps!!!

I like the fact that Brundle is there, at least he's been there and understands the racing and all the things happening over the course of the weekend. It also means less of MW's ramblings.
#44
Posted 04 June 2001 - 23:11
Maybe it was '97 but I have a very clear memory of Brundle's comments on JV at Monaco, intimating Williams should be looking for someone who wouldn't be running 7th or 8th AND at marvelous pass on Schumacher sometime during the season-- a pass Brundle then called 'the Pass of the Season" right after saying something derogatory about him. The pass that had Michael calling JV the most dangerous man in Formula 1, i'm trying to remember where. But if it was 97 (who was in the box in 96), it is all the more reason he should have been clued into Jacques potential.Originally posted by AD
arcwulf7,
[b]
Firstly Martin Brundle didn't start commentating until 1997 with ITV. Also if Martin Brundle was able to commentate on the race while driving in it at the same time, he's up there with MS, AS, and AP, if not at a higher level than them!!!
#45
Posted 05 June 2001 - 05:16
imo he is a wanker
he has a go at the dangers of the "schumacher chop" as he likes to call it, where no contact is actually made, yet tells his driver (he is DC's manager) to nerf another guy off - actually make contact.
I'll say it again - wanker




#46
Posted 05 June 2001 - 05:26
Originally posted by Raelene
he has a go at the dangers of the "schumacher chop" as he likes to call it, where no contact is actually made, yet tells his driver (he is DC's manager) to nerf another guy off - actually make contact.
I'll say it again - wanker![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Precisely. No disagreements here. 1 rule for Schumacher, and another for the Brits.
#47
Posted 05 June 2001 - 15:27
Originally posted by Raelene
jonpollock
Liebes armes schmales gekümmertes Mädchen
it's not "ock"
You needn't connect me to the BAR team principal
ak... if you please
Ps.Who would you prefer to hear in the booth?
Jp
#48
Posted 05 June 2001 - 17:46
How many did Brundle or Blundell win?
#49
Posted 05 June 2001 - 20:16
I don't have a problem with Martin in the box... I have a problem with his hypocritical statements he made last week and his bias...
#50
Posted 06 June 2001 - 14:27
Originally posted by Raelene
sorry for the misspelling of your name.
I don't have a problem with Martin in the box... I have a problem with his hypocritical statements he made last week and his bias...
No worries on the misspelling...after 40+ years of it, if it still bothered me I would be swatting flies that didn't exist(if ya get my drift).
Hypocracy(in this case) is in the ear of the listener.
Everyone has a Bias and it is this that forms our opinions and personality.....
Next time he upsets you with his point of view just think of a snappy retort and post it on this here BB.(you get to mull it over till it sounds perfect as well as having the benefit of hindsight and all that armchair based wisdom)
think of it as Martin therapy....;)
bon chance
Jp