My preferred gt3 was the Z4, but it's also not really a GT.
![Photo](https://forums.autosport.com/uploads/av-60752.jpg?_r=1258192492)
2024 24 Hours of Le Mans - the 92nd Épreuve d'Endurance
#2501
Posted 17 June 2024 - 10:59
Advertisement
#2502
Posted 17 June 2024 - 11:10
Although Chinetti's co-deriver was 'Phi-Phi' Étancelin and not Raymond Sommer like in 32.
My bad, thanks for the correction.
#2503
Posted 17 June 2024 - 11:56
It has to be political; I can't think of another reason for the leniency in penalties......Added to the favourable BoP, again.
The sooner Ferrari leaves the better; they can take their toxic F1 fans with them.......
Toyota vs Ferrari
Min weight (kg)
1053 vs 1043
Max Power below 250kph (KW)
508 vs 508
Power Gain after 250 kph
+ 0.9%(positive) vs – 1,7%(negative)
Max Stint Energy (MJ)
906 vs 889
Toyota is penalised in weight but Ferrari is penalised in power gain over 250kph and Max stint energy available. Which is beter?
#2504
Posted 17 June 2024 - 11:58
Were we ever told what Ferrari's technical infringement was? Maybe I'm blind, but I can't find it among the stewards' decision documents. http://fiawec.alkame...noticeBoard.php
#2505
Posted 17 June 2024 - 11:58
#2506
Posted 17 June 2024 - 12:03
Were we ever told what Ferrari's technical infringement was? Maybe I'm blind, but I can't find it among the stewards' decision documents. http://fiawec.alkame...noticeBoard.php
DOC 197 ;)
ERS Deployment.
#2507
Posted 17 June 2024 - 12:06
It has to be political; I can't think of another reason for the leniency in penalties......Added to the favourable BoP, again.
The sooner Ferrari leaves the better; they can take their toxic F1 fans with them.......
Can all the manufacturers leave and take their toxic fans with them?
#2508
Posted 17 June 2024 - 12:15
Were we ever told what Ferrari's technical infringement was? Maybe I'm blind, but I can't find it among the stewards' decision documents. http://fiawec.alkame...noticeBoard.php
According to Danish television it was an oil leak discovered on both cars. They were told to fix it and they managed to do so.
#2509
Posted 17 June 2024 - 12:18
at the NĂĽrburgring 24h I heard the Gt3 BMW being called Warzenschwein by spectators (Warthog). actually fitting BC of the tusk grill. dunno what they would have called the hypercar, Moby Dick or Walrus is my guess
The nickname `Moby Dick` is already taken by what is probably the most extreme example of a racing 911 with its engine behind the rear axle.
I don't think that anything ever will come close to have the right to also use this nickname
Porsche 935/78 „Moby Dick“
#2510
Posted 17 June 2024 - 13:28
DOC 197 ;)
ERS Deployment.
Ah, thanks. I searched for Car 50 and 51...
Full explanation: "The Stewards have received reports from the Technical Delegate stating that cars 50 and 51 did not respect the ERS deployment speed in lap 261." (Breach of Article 5.3.2 of LMH Technical regulations.)
#2511
Posted 17 June 2024 - 15:01
It seems everyone is a bit cranky. I suppose understandable if one has not had any sleep. I think the beauty of a 24 hour race is there is potential to see everything: the ebb, the flow, the good, the bad, the excitement, the tedium, good officiating, bad officiating and so on. My feeling is after dawn, it seems the officials were loathed to "interfere" with the race, particularly when it came down to the critical last 4 hours. To a degree, I can accept that. All in all, it was a very fine race in my opinion.
#2512
Posted 17 June 2024 - 15:15
Yes, I must admit that a lack of sleep contributed to my grumpiness yesterday. I remain uneasy with some of the decisions that were made by race control/the stewards yesterday, but that's racing, and in such a competitive race, there is no neutral decision.
With Leclerc managing to break his curse at Monaco, I have to hope Kubica will break his curse at Le Mans too. Maybe next year...
#2513
Posted 17 June 2024 - 15:50
Something you might have missed.
![]()
https://x.com/gran_c...177199270707703
And that was BEFORE the 4hr safety car. I wonder how nuts they went during that
#2515
Posted 17 June 2024 - 19:28
Edited by registered, 17 June 2024 - 19:35.
#2516
Posted 17 June 2024 - 19:40
The contact was really unfortunate, regarding the conditions. More clumsy than intentionnal.
#2517
Posted 17 June 2024 - 19:57
- those were the earliest engine failure that they had to face in terms of mileage since 2023
- those are valves failures
- they knew that the valves were a weak point and an upgrade is planned for Austin race
- they were hoping to do around 4000km before encountering technical problems
Edited by Viryfan, 17 June 2024 - 19:57.
#2518
Posted 17 June 2024 - 20:59
It was only my second visit (first being 2007!), exhausted but really enjoyed it. The race was what we hoped for being wide open into the last few hours.
The weather was challenging and have to say the size of the crowd was so big it was overwhelming, it was a real struggle to find space in the spectator areas and it never really thinned out into the night.
WEC is more popular than ever! And that’s no bad thing
Edited by Silverstone96, 17 June 2024 - 20:59.
#2519
Posted 17 June 2024 - 21:30
Going through post race quotes, Cannizzo’s ones (Ferrari) were very interesting and affirmed clearly that BoP was far from favorable.Toyota vs Ferrari
Min weight (kg)
1053 vs 1043
Max Power below 250kph (KW)
508 vs 508
Power Gain after 250 kph
+ 0.9%(positive) vs – 1,7%(negative)
Max Stint Energy (MJ)
906 vs 889
Toyota is penalised in weight but Ferrari is penalised in power gain over 250kph and Max stint energy available. Which is beter?
He basically said they had less energy/stint and less power above 250km/h (2.6% combined difference in power from your numbers) than Toyota; that made them easily attackable from Toyota in their slipstream and hadn’t enough energy to counter attack on the subsequent straight, so they had to control the gap and never allow Toyota get near them in the last two stints.
He also said Nielsen was managing the gap in the wet and responded with very fast laps when needed, so that made Toyota understand that they had reserves if needed and caused Lopez making small but decisive mistakes.
Advertisement
#2520
Posted 17 June 2024 - 21:38
If anyone knows where I can find high quality/resolution pics from the race then do let me know please.
#2521
Posted 17 June 2024 - 22:37
Alpine, Peugeot, and Porsche all have large galleries of high resolution photos in their media centres on their websites. Toyota have some, but take a lot fewer photos. Ferrari gatekeep their photos a lot more.If anyone knows where I can find high quality/resolution pics from the race then do let me know please.
#2522
Posted 18 June 2024 - 07:05
The weather was challenging and have to say the size of the crowd was so big it was overwhelming, it was a real struggle to find space in the spectator areas and it never really thinned out into the night.
Multiple separate contacts on the ground refered to it as the 24hrs of queueing.
#2523
Posted 18 June 2024 - 07:25
Going through post race quotes, Cannizzo’s ones (Ferrari) were very interesting and affirmed clearly that BoP was far from favorable.
He basically said they had less energy/stint and less power above 250km/h (2.6% combined difference in power from your numbers) than Toyota; that made them easily attackable from Toyota in their slipstream and hadn’t enough energy to counter attack on the subsequent straight, so they had to control the gap and never allow Toyota get near them in the last two stints.
He also said Nielsen was managing the gap in the wet and responded with very fast laps when needed, so that made Toyota understand that they had reserves if needed and caused Lopez making small but decisive mistakes.
Yet, I recall a Toyota chasing a Ferrari, but never got passed it. It was in the later stages of the race, prior to the final pitstop sequences. Was it the #8 chasing the #51? Or were it the #7 and #50?
#2524
Posted 18 June 2024 - 09:36
Multiple separate contacts on the ground refered to it as the 24hrs of queueing.
I never seen so many queues like it, even at 1am on Saturday night we queued for ages to just scan out of the circuit and then again to get out of the car park.
Don’t want to moan as it’s a sign that the series is healthier and more popular than ever, but I would think twice about going again when you can go to other WEC races which aren’t quite so full on.
#2525
Posted 18 June 2024 - 10:03
According to my informations regarding Alpine failures:
- those were the earliest engine failure that they had to face in terms of mileage since 2023
- those are valves failures
- they knew that the valves were a weak point and an upgrade is planned for Austin race
- they were hoping to do around 4000km before encountering technical problems
Were they running higher rpm or higher turbo pressures?
#2526
Posted 18 June 2024 - 11:18
I never seen so many queues like it, even at 1am on Saturday night we queued for ages to just scan out of the circuit and then again to get out of the car park.
Don’t want to moan as it’s a sign that the series is healthier and more popular than ever, but I would think twice about going again when you can go to other WEC races which aren’t quite so full on.
Not sure about the attendance this year, but last year with 400k or so people there scanning out didn't take much longer than 15-20mins I'd say. I don't think I queued up for more than 30mins to any of the services either (aside from the museum - took me 2h-ish to get in there), but that might be down to the gate/area that I was in.
#2528
Posted 18 June 2024 - 21:31
THAT is a cool photo, wow.
#2529
Posted 19 June 2024 - 07:57
Genuinely surprised that this has never happened. I’d also expect Ferrari are one of the very few constructors able to have done so.
Mmm. Well. Alain Prost won Monaco a few times with a car with an engine made by Porsche in the back in the same year as Porsche won Le Mans…
Edited by TennisUK, 19 June 2024 - 07:58.
#2530
Posted 19 June 2024 - 08:18
Mmm. Well. Alain Prost won Monaco a few times with a car with an engine made by Porsche in the back in the same year as Porsche won Le Mans…
Funny enough for 1984 and 1985 it can be said that this Monaco winning Porsche F1 engine was a customer job while the winning car at Le Mans in those two years was a customer car as well
#2531
Posted 19 June 2024 - 08:39
Don’t want to moan as it’s a sign that the series is healthier and more popular than ever, but I would think twice about going again when you can go to other WEC races which aren’t quite so full on.
Speaking from experience this year - it's getting full at non-LM WEC races as well. I went to Spa, and the queues for food/drinks/toilets there were pretty much as bad as people describe the ones from Le Mans last week.
#2532
Posted 19 June 2024 - 09:14
Speaking from experience this year - it's getting full at non-LM WEC races as well. I went to Spa, and the queues for food/drinks/toilets there were pretty much as bad as people describe the ones from Le Mans last week.
Organizers need to get used to way more interest and attendance figures because of that?
#2533
Posted 19 June 2024 - 11:03
Speaking from experience this year - it's getting full at non-LM WEC races as well. I went to Spa, and the queues for food/drinks/toilets there were pretty much as bad as people describe the ones from Le Mans last week.
Getting onto the track wasn't bad. Tons of people blocking the entrance but the queue went fast .
4 hours later I needed something out of my car,but I couldn't leave the track because the entrance at combes was still packed with people with no path for exit left .
#2534
Posted 19 June 2024 - 11:49
It’s a very nice problem to have if this proves to be the case.Organizers need to get used to way more interest and attendance figures because of that?
A thriving WEC is a great thing for the sport as a whole, and this time there’s no Max and Bernie to derail it.
#2535
Posted 19 June 2024 - 12:25
It’s a very nice problem to have if this proves to be the case.
A thriving WEC is a great thing for the sport as a whole, and this time there’s no Max and Bernie to derail it.
Sure,
About the biggest danger I see right now is that with so many competitive team participating even for a facory team an 8th or 9th or so place can be deemed as decent but not being good enough for retain support from within the board rooms that care for victories.
And beware for factory teams that remain out of the point scoring positions and end up with nothing to show. How long will they continue?
#2536
Posted 19 June 2024 - 12:48
Depends on what that costs them. And that's where the BoP intervenes.
Same was said about GT3, and it's almost 20 years old now. Sure, some manufacturers come and go, but there's alwways been a good number present.
On the other hand, TCR works also with a BoP, and it's less successful.
#2537
Posted 19 June 2024 - 19:02
It will be interesting to see if they can convince anyone to visit Austin, during LMP1 spectator numbers looked similar to a track day - I have no idea if hypercar has made enough of an impression there to help numbers - though the promise of Porsche v Ferrari may help?