Oval based racing is almost a uniquely American discipline in the world of motorsport.
Many underestimate the level of refinement that has been reached in oval base racing, and it is very deceptive how difficult it is to run at the top level. No one coming from a road course background will ever be as good as someone like Larson that has been racing ovals of varying types since they were a kid.
Kyle Larson is certainly one of the best at what he does.
That being said; Kyle Larson is #&$%ing Delusional here:
“There’s no way (Verstappen) can get into a Sprint Car and win the Knoxville Nationals. There’s no way he can go win the Chili Bowl. There’s no way he can go win a Cup race at Bristol,” Larson continued. “There’s probably no way I can go win a Formula 1 race at Monaco, but I think I’d have a better shot at him (doing what he does than him doing what I do) just because of the car element.
“That’s what gives me ease and confidence that, like, I know I’m better than him. Maybe not in an open-wheel IndyCar or Formula 1 car, but that’s one discipline. I think I would beat him in everything else. You can quote that.”
His entire claim is based entirely on oval racing... A discipline no one outside the US does.
Jimmy Johnson at least had the fortitude to run a full season in Indycar and see what's up. Mad respect.
And Larson isn't even close to Jimmy Johnson levels of achievement in Nascar. Van Gisbergen gave him the business when they raced on road courses together. Scott McLaughlin would do the same.
In F1, GT3, prototypes, or touring cars, Verstappen would cook him.
In Indycar Larson would do well on the ovals. On street and road courses; he would be regularly lit up.
ARTGP has it about right.
The fact is that American oval fans can be very myopic with their motorsport worldview.
Out of morbid curiosity; Where did all this 'Larson is the best in the world' nonsense start?
Edited by Wes350, 15 August 2024 - 05:07.