Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Nealy 5400 bhp on a hub dyno


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 mariner

mariner
  • Member

  • 2,394 posts
  • Joined: January 07

Posted 09 January 2025 - 10:19

Lots and lots of pure power here 

 

https://www.enginela...400-horsepower/

 

 

Very wisely I think nobody stands near the car when its under load !

 

 

What is interesting  is how much the nose of the casr rises despite a very strong looking hld down strap under the nose .



Advertisement

#2 gruntguru

gruntguru
  • Member

  • 7,697 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 09 January 2025 - 22:33

Not that long ago, top fuel was making similar power - with nitro - and replacing rods and pistons after every pass. That motor did 8 pulls in a day with no maintenance.

 

I just watched the whole video. You can see the turbo blanket on the driver's side being pulled toward the compressor inlet. Needs to be better secured of course but - it suggests pretty extreme air velocity to the side of the inlet - I would be trying a small bellmouth on the turbo inlet.



#3 Slumberer

Slumberer
  • Member

  • 135 posts
  • Joined: June 04

Posted 10 January 2025 - 14:15

“This thing is making 5,400 [horsepower] to the hubs — I guarantee you this thing is making 6,000-plus horses to the crankshaft,”

 

That seems an awful lot of drivetrain losses, or am I missing something?



#4 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 6,491 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 10 January 2025 - 22:40

Diffs are horribly inefficient. But try and find any measured numbers on that and I'll bet you are out of luck. 85% is the usual guess, it isn't far wrong. Around town they are worse.



#5 gruntguru

gruntguru
  • Member

  • 7,697 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 10 January 2025 - 23:00

So 0.15 x 6000 = 900 hp

 

Need a very big radiator for that diff.



#6 GreenMachine

GreenMachine
  • Member

  • 2,796 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 10 January 2025 - 23:27

Are those sorts of drivetrain losses linear with power output?  Revs?



#7 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 6,491 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 11 January 2025 - 03:00

Complex, to say the least. There's very little published literature on it which is odd since the instrumentation -driveshaft torque strain gages and wireless transmitter-is commercially available

 

https://metromatics....a torque sensor.



#8 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 6,491 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 11 January 2025 - 03:14

Quick literature survey

 

https://www.geartech...es/0786x/Yu.pdf

 

There is an SAE paper but it didn't pop up



#9 GreenMachine

GreenMachine
  • Member

  • 2,796 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 11 January 2025 - 05:17

Thanks Greg!



#10 gruntguru

gruntguru
  • Member

  • 7,697 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 11 January 2025 - 23:01

VwrvLGk.png



#11 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 6,491 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 12 January 2025 - 10:20

NFW, for hypoids



#12 404KF2

404KF2
  • Member

  • 22,474 posts
  • Joined: October 99

Posted 12 January 2025 - 20:02

Worm on my 1966 404C! 4.25:1

468210652_10161743548843934_239468704856



#13 MatsNorway

MatsNorway
  • Member

  • 2,830 posts
  • Joined: December 09

Posted 14 February 2025 - 10:21

VwrvLGk.png

How does one make a hypoid overlap with the Helical Bevel? And why does the graph start at 0?

 

Hypoid i new was bad. But I am assuming they run Helical in a drag car.

 

But don't you get a little bit of extra ratio possible with hypoid? You sort of do the worm gear thing. More sliding less pushing.

 

1:1 worm made me curious, is this graph from a theoretical/mathematical paper?

 

Here is a sketch i found on a possible 1:1 worm. I struggle to see the engagement after a full rotation. It seems a 1 : 1 worm would function/look differently than the normal worm gear.

 

https://i.sstatic.net/o4tU7.jpg

 

 

Is Manolis? still around? he could pull of a model better i guess. Autodesk Inventor does not allow me to go below 1 : 6 on worm gear.

 

Tried to make a screw with a 1:1 ratio on the coil and a counterpiece. I managed to constrain them and it moves to a point. But a full rotation is beyond my modelling capabilites. At least with only a few minutes of fiddling.

 

OD0BJCK.pngNvnfO7W.pngAab19SF.png Even with 1:1 on each coil sweep it looks to be not 1:1 Ratio.


Edited by MatsNorway, 14 February 2025 - 10:44.


#14 Greg Locock

Greg Locock
  • Member

  • 6,491 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 14 February 2025 - 22:45

grunguru's graph ignores the huge effect of stiction and other low speed friction effects. Crucially it also assumes constant mesh engagement, whereas a real hypoid diff is only correctly meshed at one torque. That's why when you set the pinion clearance it is a compromise. If you set it to be perfect at 50% torque then at full torque the losses go through the roof, and if you haven't got it perfect at a sustained power (eg towing up a hill) then again the oil cooks.


Edited by Greg Locock, 14 February 2025 - 22:52.


#15 gruntguru

gruntguru
  • Member

  • 7,697 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 15 February 2025 - 06:39

Yeah, I did find it on an industrial gearing site where gearboxes often find themselves in constant torque applications.