For the first time (see my earlier post) I really agree with people posting that Red Bull is not a professional enough F1-team any more. Who's leading the team? Who's picking the drivers? Who's mentoring the talents at the Red Bulls and in F2? I have no idea.
Then: the car. It's not only that the car is not good, it shows that for about 1,5 years now the team is not able to use feedback of their drivers to improve the car in a sustained way. Finding a sweet-spot in one race (in Suzuka) is all very nice, but there seems something fundamentally wrong in the concept of design and development. Is it windtunnel correlation? Simulations related?
About the possible transfer of Max, which I feel is a bit off-topic, but here are my five cents: I don't want Max to go to Aston Martin. I want his talent to be tested in a team without Newey. Not that I doubt Max his talent, far from it, I just would want him to see him excel (or not, I am open for anything at my wise old age) outside of Red Bull and beyond Adrian Newey.
Great posts!
Some members seem to think this is all because of Mateschitz, and in some sense, it's true. With Mateschitz, nobody dared stepping out of line and do funny stuff.
However, I think this is on Horner. RBR without Mateschitz could have worked easily, and Didi took all the precautions for the team to maintain success. Horner having that affair with an employee though (and the aftermath that came with it) led to a downward spiral. Cunningly (in a non-ironic way I take my hat off for that), he managed to gather a lot of power once that affair created a power vacuum within the organization. However, he only did so on paper, because his leadership lost a lot of credibility and legitimacy. He is supposed to be the one making the important decisions and be the public face of RBR, but he can't. People don't trust him. Those who are talented enough to go elsewhere do, and those who are not or feel some sense of loyalty are left in a team that's lost morale. If I were an employee at RBR and Horner gave me task, I'd do it, but I wouldn't go the extra mile, because in a way that would be beneficial to Horner's succes. Also, Horner's public appearances are miles off what they used to be. He used to be a dog in the positive sense of the word, attacking every single PR related issue fiercely. If nothing else, it's great for a team to have a boss like that. You know he always has your back, no matter what. Nowadays, he's rather humble in public and chooses to appear in public less frequently. It's easy to see why: Even after well over a year, it's still awkward to see Horner in front of a camera. Everybody knows what he's done, and many people think it's weird it didn't have any consequences.
My last point is a bit speculative from my part and I cannot provide any concrete examples, but it wouldn't surprise me if Horner cemented his position by giving loyal followers of his key positions. That, in turn, almost necessarily leads to merit being less important in the organization.