Jump to content


Photo

Views on ageing drivers through the years


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#1 Dunc

Dunc
  • Member

  • 947 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 20 January 2025 - 12:35

In 2025, Lewis Hamilton will turn 40 and Fernando Alonso will turn 44. For a millennial like me, it's going to be something new to have two of the most high-profile drivers being over 40. To me, it seems surprising that we haven't had more top-rated drivers race into their 40s, given advances in fitness, training, nutrition etc this century. What's especially interesting is that both are still competitive and taken very seriously by the rest of the grid. 

 

For those who can remember other greats who raced in F1 into their 40s (off the top of my head I can think of Fangio, Trintignant, Brabham, Graham Hill, Regazzoni, Andretti and Mansell), what has been the reputation of drivers who do this? Impressive or kind of sad? 



Advertisement

#2 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,831 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 20 January 2025 - 14:13

Interesting question...

 

Not F1, but it reminds me of the questioning I did of several V8 Supercar drivers some years ago for a potential story.

 

Pretty much universally they said they were quicker now than ever, and these drivers were either nudging 50 or in their fifties. Top drivers, all of them.

 

What they mentioned, however, was that they were taking less of their speed out of themselves and achieving what they were by getting more out of the car, that is making the car work mor efficiently.

 

One thing I think all of them were doing that they didn't do so much in their early years was working out, putting in time with body-building machinery etc. And while I doubt that the likes of Peter Brock and Colin Bond ever did much of this at all early in their careers, there's no doubt that their (much) younger competition were no strangers to the gym.



#3 messy

messy
  • Member

  • 8,216 posts
  • Joined: October 15

Posted 20 January 2025 - 14:31

So persionally I've always believed that it's not really a question of physical decline in a driver. Not primarily, anyway. It's a mindset thing, that any driver after 10-15 years of driving in F1 - of the constant travelling, PR duties, commitment to training, politics, pressure and sacrifices made to stay at that level - will get sick of it, even subsconsciously. Especially given that as you get older you'll probably need to train harder, rather than less. So whether they make their debut at 17 or 27, they'll probably begin to lose that complete focus at a similar time and potentially a driver who debuts aged 32 (thinking Damon Hill) will hit that point at a later age than someone like Max Verstappen, who is only 27 but already maybe starting to consider life after F1. There's absolutely no way I expect Max to continue into his late thirties, no chance at all. 

 

Complicating that however is the stigma about 'older' drivers meaning that even if they're still completely focused, fit and hungry to keep going with no decline in their ability, they'll often still find themselves off the grid because they're just not a fashionable hiring unless they're a Hamilton or an Alonso. See Valtteri Bottas. 

 

What I think keeps Alonso and Hamilton going is that they're quirky characters who probably don't carry a lot of the off-track baggage most drivers by their mid thirties do. So they can somehow stay completely fixated on success in F1 and can just keep going and going. Also, I feel like that sabattical Alonso took probably made a big difference, as it did for Kimi and Hulkenberg. 

 

Look at Indycar or NASCAR where there's a slightly different atmosphere in the paddock and maybe less intensity around the level of commitment required to compete (and less stigma around age) - drivers regularly keep going, and keep winning, well into their forties and look every bit as good as they did in their mid twenties. Physically and taking aside the issue of stigma/fashion, I have no doubt that someone like Nico Rosberg, Mark Webber, Jenson Button or Seb Vettel could still be out there competing - if they really wanted to and of they were prepared to still make all the sacrifices required. But they're human beings. 



#4 absinthedude

absinthedude
  • Member

  • 6,169 posts
  • Joined: June 18

Posted 20 January 2025 - 15:10

Recently F1 has been through a period where nobody has continued into their 40s until Schumacher and then Raikkonen decided to. Whereas up to the early 90s it wasn't uncommon. Though Mansell is still the last to win a grand prix over the age of 40. 

 

In the 50s and before, it's likely that fitness levels simply weren't what they are now. Endurance was a thing because races were often much longer than today. But you didn't have gyms, special diets, fitness gurus and so on. The cars, while heavy to drive without a whiff of power steering, also had no downforce and little grip from the tyres. As cars evolved, so drivers needed to become stronger in certain areas. Lauda in his 80s comeback was one of the first to take fitness seriously. Mansell took things up a level for 1992 and then Schumacher took it further still. 

F1 also became more professional with testing every week during the season, and often during the off season. Drivers were physically and mentally drained. Safety meant that long careers were certainly very feasible but a lot of drivers still decided to retire from F1 in their late 30s and either enjoy their retirement or race elsewhere. IndyCar, being less physically and mentally hard, had several top drivers winning in their 40s and AJ Foyt was hardly uncompetitive on ovals into his mid 50s. Emmo was fully competitive right to the crash that ended his topline career in his late 40s. Guys like Rick Mears, Mario Andretti, Al Unser Sr, Johnny Rutherford and so on continued to race competitively well into "elder statesman" territory. Indeed former FIA president Jean-Marie Balestre once dismissed the Indy 500 as "a veterans race".

 

Now it seems that some of the top F1 drivers are looking to have extra long careers again. Schumacher was the very first to have 20 years between his first and last grand prix. It's entirely possible that Alonso will be the first to have 20 years between his first and last victory. If not, then it'll probably be Hamilton. 

 

I think it's a combination of the full on pressure of F1 and the physical demands. A lot of drivers, while physically capable of continuing, just decide they want out of the pressure cooker after 10-15 years. It's worth noting that ALonso, Kimi and Michael took time out of F1...whether voluntary or not it permitted them time to recharge a bit. Hamilton hasn't had that luxury but it can certainly be argued that 2021/22 seasons he wasn't performing at his best. 


Edited by absinthedude, 20 January 2025 - 15:14.


#5 D28

D28
  • Member

  • 2,148 posts
  • Joined: April 14

Posted 20 January 2025 - 15:29

 

For those who can remember other greats who raced in F1 into their 40s (off the top of my head I can think of Fangio, Trintignant, Brabham, Graham Hill, Regazzoni, Andretti and Mansell), what has been the reputation of drivers who do this? Impressive or kind of sad? 

It all depends on the results, which is pretty easy to gauge in motor racing as that is the whole purpose. In the case of Jack Brabham in 1970 he was absolutely at the top of his game, as quick as he ever was. Save for a very rare miscue and a mistake from his mechanics on fuel mixture, he would have won 3 GPs in his final year, rather than the 1. In his last GP at Mexico he had resigned himself to 3rd, behind the 2 Ferraris when his engine blew, and that was it for his a very impressive racing career.

 

Later he admitted to retiring because of family pressure, and commented that he regretted it, thinking he had a few more years in the tank.



#6 WINO

WINO
  • Member

  • 770 posts
  • Joined: April 04

Posted 20 January 2025 - 15:30

As for the regular fitness levels in the fifties not being what they are today, there were those little pills that Fangio, Moss, etc. swallowed to compensate for that.



#7 Risil

Risil
  • Administrator

  • 67,483 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 20 January 2025 - 15:32

It's entirely possible that Alonso will be the first to have 20 years between his first and last victory.

 

It's entirely possible that Alonso will be the first to have 20 years between his last and next victory. But that's more of a Racing Comments comment...



#8 Dunc

Dunc
  • Member

  • 947 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 20 January 2025 - 16:18

It all depends on the results, which is pretty easy to gauge in motor racing as that is the whole purpose. In the case of Jack Brabham in 1970 he was absolutely at the top of his game, as quick as he ever was. Save for a very rare miscue and a mistake from his mechanics on fuel mixture, he would have won 3 GPs in his final year, rather than the 1. In his last GP at Mexico he had resigned himself to 3rd, behind the 2 Ferraris when his engine blew, and that was it for his a very impressive racing career.

 

Later he admitted to retiring because of family pressure, and commented that he regretted it, thinking he had a few more years in the tank.

 

What was the take on Graham Hill at that time? He was a similar vintage to Brabham and had been the WDC not that long before but his 70s F1 career does seem to be one of pretty sad post-accident decline considering the heights he had been to.



#9 10kDA

10kDA
  • Member

  • 1,166 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 20 January 2025 - 16:41

Passing judgement on a driver's decision to continue at the level of their own choosing is pointless. A factor that seems to encourage contemporary pointing and clucking is the circumstance within F1, such as it is, that mandates a finite number of available seats. It's possible this is the case now with IndyCar and NASCAR as well, I couldn't say as I have not read the rules regarding "charters" etc. In any event, as long as a driver feels the urge, why not? Judgement by others should be an inconequential factor in the decision. That being said, a friend who followed NASCAR in depth and had insider information told me Curtis Turner's opportunities faded away because team owners were not willing to give him the ride that might have ended in his death, in their car. So there's that.



#10 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 20 January 2025 - 20:56

What was the take on Graham Hill at that time? He was a similar vintage to Brabham and had been the WDC not that long before but his 70s F1 career does seem to be one of pretty sad post-accident decline considering the heights he had been to.

 

Jack Brabham was three years older than Graham. Rather sniffily by some neither was rated in the Fangio, Moss, Clark, Stewart mould so far as natural talent was concerned.  My belief is that Jack was more gifted in that respect than Graham but it's arguable.  Jack's great attributes were phenomenally acute eyesight and technical understanding by which he instinctively adapted his driving.  Graham's great attributes were a phenomenally competitive nature combined with a realism which recognised his 'probable' deficit of natural gifts and compensated for that with sheer commitment, stamina and determination.  

 

Don't make the error common these days of judging frontline drivers solely by their Formula 1 records.  

 

Mario Andretti might have been the most versatile frontline star of them all, but the likes of Moss and Graham were surely right there before him. Brabham was more single-seater centric, but that was more by happenstance and choice than capability - ditto Clark and Stewart.  One can add many rated drivers to the list - but as all-rounders Moss was stupendous, and Graham not really that far behind him.  While he might have been in decline in F1 terms from mid-1969 onward, don't overlook his Le Mans win - on merit - in 1972, nor his F1 International Trophy win (admittedly with luck on his side) in 1971.  In period he was highly respected, and generally well liked...though in anger he could be a thoroughly nasty piece of work...

 

DCN 



#11 Collombin

Collombin
  • Member

  • 9,550 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 20 January 2025 - 21:10

Pescarolo was famously unhappy about being teamed with Hill for Le Mans in 1972. In his recent interview in Automobilsport he describes Hill as the best teammate he ever had.

Edited by Collombin, 20 January 2025 - 21:12.


#12 Vitesse2

Vitesse2
  • Administrator

  • 43,085 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 20 January 2025 - 21:20

Can I just mention Scott Dixon here? He's one year and seven days older than Alonso, and while he's never been in F1 I'd argue he's the nearest thing to a modern-day Moss, given that he still competes at the highest level in IndyCar and sports cars.



#13 Bob Riebe

Bob Riebe
  • Member

  • 3,141 posts
  • Joined: January 05

Posted 20 January 2025 - 21:33

More mature drivrers, personally I think one reason is -- Been there, Done that  -- sets in.

 

I remembe Andretti , in his later years, was just average most places , BUT, when he got to Indy, the Andretti of old showed up, as that was still some thing he REALLY wanted to get a second win at.



#14 Tom Glowacki

Tom Glowacki
  • Member

  • 546 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 20 January 2025 - 21:39

A look at any starting grid of the 1950's and 1960's would show that relatively few of the drivers ever saw their 40th birthday.



#15 chr1s

chr1s
  • Member

  • 499 posts
  • Joined: December 12

Posted 20 January 2025 - 21:53

Also, back then drivers tended to get to Formula one later, in their mid to late twenties or early thirties, so it was not uncommon for them to race into their early forties.

        But one of the consequences of this new generation of teenage drivers racing into their forties is that they're locking out competitive seats for a decade or more!  Verstappen, for example has already been at Red Bull for eight years! And could potentially be there for another fifteen! Hamilton has been in Formula one since 2007 and shows no sign of leaving anytime soon. So the next two generations of Verstappens, Hamiltons or Alonsos may never get to sit in a competitive car!



#16 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 21 January 2025 - 08:07

Very good point re current drivers' longevity and effective bed blocking.  Mr E - no less - once told the late Adrian Hamilton and me, only half in jest, "Too many drivers today are hanging around too long.  We just don't kill 'em off as often as we used to...".

 

DCN



#17 Glengavel

Glengavel
  • Member

  • 1,346 posts
  • Joined: September 06

Posted 21 January 2025 - 08:51

As for the regular fitness levels in the fifties not being what they are today, there were those little pills that Fangio, Moss, etc. swallowed to compensate for that.

 

They were to help them stay awake on long-distance events. I don't think they would compensate for lack of fitness.

 

Grands Prix back in their day were marathon events, lasting up to three hours. Drivers would have to be pretty fit, or at least have the stamina, to last the distance. 



#18 absinthedude

absinthedude
  • Member

  • 6,169 posts
  • Joined: June 18

Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:22

It's entirely possible that Alonso will be the first to have 20 years between his last and next victory. But that's more of a Racing Comments comment...

 

May I ask if there's a reason why you picked this one line from my multiple paragraph post? 



#19 absinthedude

absinthedude
  • Member

  • 6,169 posts
  • Joined: June 18

Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:27

Very good point re current drivers' longevity and effective bed blocking.  Mr E - no less - once told the late Adrian Hamilton and me, only half in jest, "Too many drivers today are hanging around too long.  We just don't kill 'em off as often as we used to...".

 

DCN

 

Didn't he refer to it as "natural culling"?

 

Brutal words but not incorrect.



Advertisement

#20 Risil

Risil
  • Administrator

  • 67,483 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:33

May I ask if there's a reason why you picked this one line from my multiple paragraph post?

Because I thought it was funny. I only have minor insignificant quibbles about the rest.

I also should note that as late as 1986 Jacques Laffite was having one of the best seasons of his career aged 42 in a Ligier, before it came to a premature end at Brands Hatch. I do think there was something about the mental and physical demands of 1990s-2000s F1 (and who knows, perhaps the prejudices of team bosses as well) that made it a young man's game.

#21 Collombin

Collombin
  • Member

  • 9,550 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:55

Grands Prix back in their day were marathon events, lasting up to three hours


Indeed, and for the few world championship races scheduled for duration rather than distance the three hour rule in those days was a minimum!

#22 ian senior

ian senior
  • Member

  • 2,173 posts
  • Joined: September 02

Posted 21 January 2025 - 13:05

F1 careers are so long these days, presumably because most drivers are plonked on a kart about 5 minutes after they drop from the womb, it’s no surprise that “bed blocking” is a problem- especially as there are now only around 20 cars in each Grand Prix. I wonder if they should introduce a rule to say that a driver should take a 2-year sabbatical after he has started, say, 200 races. Given the number of races we have these days, it wouldn’t take too long a time to reach that number, and there might be a chance that new talent could get a break.

#23 garoidb

garoidb
  • Member

  • 9,410 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 21 January 2025 - 17:23

Very good point re current drivers' longevity and effective bed blocking.  Mr E - no less - once told the late Adrian Hamilton and me, only half in jest, "Too many drivers today are hanging around too long.  We just don't kill 'em off as often as we used to...".

 

DCN

 

Of course, alongside the direct effects of the tragic accidents themselves, an eye to self preservation would contribute to many unforced retirements . 


Edited by garoidb, 21 January 2025 - 17:59.


#24 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 21 January 2025 - 19:32

As exemplified by Tony Brooks of course - a gifted driver who was always far too intelligent and thoughtful ever to have decided to become a racing driver.

 

DCN



#25 Lee Nicolle

Lee Nicolle
  • Member

  • 11,263 posts
  • Joined: July 08

Posted 22 January 2025 - 03:02

Mike Wallace, brother of Rusty  and Kenny was going to run at Daytona this year. Nascar have knocked him back because he has not done much racing in recent years. AND he is 65 y/o. Not the oldest driver by any circumstances. Evidently he had asked all the questions ad was told it would be ok, until last week.



#26 absinthedude

absinthedude
  • Member

  • 6,169 posts
  • Joined: June 18

Posted 22 January 2025 - 09:11

Because I thought it was funny. I only have minor insignificant quibbles about the rest.

I also should note that as late as 1986 Jacques Laffite was having one of the best seasons of his career aged 42 in a Ligier, before it came to a premature end at Brands Hatch. I do think there was something about the mental and physical demands of 1990s-2000s F1 (and who knows, perhaps the prejudices of team bosses as well) that made it a young man's game.

 

Good point, I had forgotten about Laffite in the mid 80s. Terrible of me since he was one of the drivers I really liked at the time. Arnoux continued until he was 41 too but with rather less success. Subsequently F1 became a younger man's game until fairly recently. Maybe it took Schumacher and Raikkonen to remind everyone that 37-40 isn't a cut off age for everyone. 



#27 nmansellfan

nmansellfan
  • Member

  • 452 posts
  • Joined: April 02

Posted 22 January 2025 - 12:49

I heard David Coulthard say on a GP commentary a few years back when talking about driver ages (at both ends of the scale) 'If you're good enough, you're old enough.  If you're still good, you're not too old'.


Edited by nmansellfan, 22 January 2025 - 12:50.


#28 Sterzo

Sterzo
  • Member

  • 6,157 posts
  • Joined: September 11

Posted 22 January 2025 - 14:08

My view on ageing drivers is that I rather like them. It's not unusual to see 80 year-old drivers in Vintage Sports Car Club races. One from many years ago was Cecil Clutton, then head of Clutton's London estate agents (established 1765). Someone who knew him told me that when he reached 80, his doctor banned him from flying his microlight, so he responded by turning over a Ferrari on the M1 motorway - but carried on racing. Stirling Moss decided he'd retired too early, made a come-back, and eventually raced a fifties Osca into his eighties too.



#29 sabrejet

sabrejet
  • Member

  • 1,013 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 22 January 2025 - 15:14

Ben Keating is 53 and still competing very competently at the top level.



#30 malomay

malomay
  • New Member

  • 79 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 22 January 2025 - 22:22

Stirling Moss decided he'd retired too early, made a come-back, and eventually raced a fifties Osca into his eighties too.

 

Slightly digressing, but I've never been able to understand Moss, after having 1 test session after his accident & deciding (quite quickly) he didn't quite have "it" for racing F1 anymore, why he then didn't slot back into GT/Sports cars instead?

 

In which I've no doubt he would have still easily had the reflexes & skill to drive at the highest level.



#31 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 22 January 2025 - 23:20

Stirl had a huge insurance pay out in the offing.  Tough call - when he appreciated his apparent shortcomings - to pay it all back...    :cool:

 

DCN



#32 john aston

john aston
  • Member

  • 2,852 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 23 January 2025 - 07:04

I heard David Coulthard say on a GP commentary a few years back when talking about driver ages (at both ends of the scale) 'If you're good enough, you're old enough.  If you're still good, you're not too old'.

This was a variation of the similar homespun wisdom provoked by the likes of Kimi Raikkonen ,and their entry into F1 at what then seemed a very young age . And in Raikonnen's case, little car experience . While JYS furrowed his brow about young Kimi . another name (perhaps Brundle?) said "If you're fast enough , you're old enough " . 

 

But like similarly facile remarks ("it is what it is " . "I'm taking the positives from this" and similar thought free guff ) it's a lot more complicated than that.    



#33 70JesperOH

70JesperOH
  • Member

  • 167 posts
  • Joined: January 21

Posted 23 January 2025 - 16:06

Passing judgement on a driver's decision to continue at the level of their own choosing is pointless. A factor that seems to encourage contemporary pointing and clucking is the circumstance within F1, such as it is, that mandates a finite number of available seats. It's possible this is the case now with IndyCar and NASCAR as well, I couldn't say as I have not read the rules regarding "charters" etc. In any event, as long as a driver feels the urge, why not? Judgement by others should be an inconequential factor in the decision. That being said, a friend who followed NASCAR in depth and had insider information told me Curtis Turner's opportunities faded away because team owners were not willing to give him the ride that might have ended in his death, in their car. So there's that.

 

I might wonder if Turner's declining offers in stock car racing also had to do with him being very vocal for a drivers union - something Bill France of NASCAR opposed totally.

 

Jesper



#34 Bob Riebe

Bob Riebe
  • Member

  • 3,141 posts
  • Joined: January 05

Posted 23 January 2025 - 18:05

I might wonder if Turner's declining offers in stock car racing also had to do with him being very vocal for a drivers union - something Bill France of NASCAR opposed totally.

 

Jesper

 

  • Turner and his business partner Bruton Smith tried to organize a union for drivers in 1961.
  • The union was called the Federation of Professional Athletes.
  • The union's goals included better purses, retirement benefits, and a share of broadcasting rights.
  • NASCAR founder Bill France Sr. refused to allow any union drivers to race.
What happened after the ban? 
 
  • Turner and Tim Flock were banned for life.
  • Turner continued to race under other sanctioning bodies.
  • France lifted Turner's ban in 1965.
  • Turner won the 1965 American 500 at North Carolina Motor Speedway.
  • Turner was inducted into the NASCAR Hall of Fame in 2016.


#35 Jim Thurman

Jim Thurman
  • Member

  • 7,788 posts
  • Joined: February 01

Posted 23 January 2025 - 18:15

That being said, a friend who followed NASCAR in depth and had insider information told me Curtis Turner's opportunities faded away because team owners were not willing to give him the ride that might have ended in his death, in their car. So there's that.

Smokey Yunick literally said he wasn't going to be the guy that built the car that killed Curtis Turner, which came after Turner violently flipped Yunick's Chevelle at Atlanta. I can't help but think that despite some still stunning moments, "Pops" lifestyle was catching up to him and that was the main factor in others not hiring him more often.



#36 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 81,831 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 24 January 2025 - 02:01

Originally posted by Risil
.....I also should note that as late as 1986 Jacques Laffite was having one of the best seasons of his career aged 42 in a Ligier, before it came to a premature end at Brands Hatch.....

I was so looking forward to Jack Lafferty equalling and going on to eclipse Graham Hill's record for WDC starts, a very sad event.

Then if we look at the prospects outside the square...

Zoomtempleton-FFroadatlanta75.jpg
Showing them all. Harvey Templeton about to go out and lead the way again. The race number is 75 - his age at the time.

...we can find some striking examples. This bloke was on pole for the SCCA runoffs in Formula Vee when he was 57 and again when he was 62, then went to Formula Ford, again built his own car and showed the young guys its exhausts on more occasions than not. He raced until he was 80 or 81.

 

I found these comments online:

 

 

At my first June Sprints in a FV, I qualified very near the rear. i was in awe of all the top National drivers and about halfway through the race, I spun out in Canada Corner and couldn't restart.

 

After the corner workers pushed me out of the way, I heard people booing me and throwing empty beer cans down at me. I watched the race for several laps, whel Harvey attempted a pass for the lead there and got pushed off the track.

 

He performed a rolling 360 and by the time the car was pointed in the right direction, he had it in 2nd gear (Vee driver's can appreciate that) and continued on losing only one place. I have never seen anything like that ever.

 

He was a gentleman. I do know that his FF was labeled HR7260 after the House bill that made Social Security a law. He was fierce, friendly and fair. He will not be replaced.

 

Frank Vella

 

 

 

I met Harvey and his wife at Road Atlanta when I pitted next to them and he invited me over for a gin and tonic one friday evening after unloading the car. I always admired him and his FF, man was that car slick.

 

The last race I competed in was the SARRC race in Savannah where I fought most of the race with Harvey. I believe he was 76 at the time (it was also his car number). I ended up wearing some of the orange paint from his nose cone and had a great race. It was one of those races I have always remembered and I have always hoped that I am half that quick when I get in my sixties let alone at 75 plus.

 



#37 Dunc

Dunc
  • Member

  • 947 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 24 January 2025 - 16:40

Jack Brabham was three years older than Graham. Rather sniffily by some neither was rated in the Fangio, Moss, Clark, Stewart mould so far as natural talent was concerned.  My belief is that Jack was more gifted in that respect than Graham but it's arguable.  Jack's great attributes were phenomenally acute eyesight and technical understanding by which he instinctively adapted his driving.  Graham's great attributes were a phenomenally competitive nature combined with a realism which recognised his 'probable' deficit of natural gifts and compensated for that with sheer commitment, stamina and determination.  

 

Don't make the error common these days of judging frontline drivers solely by their Formula 1 records.  

 

Mario Andretti might have been the most versatile frontline star of them all, but the likes of Moss and Graham were surely right there before him. Brabham was more single-seater centric, but that was more by happenstance and choice than capability - ditto Clark and Stewart.  One can add many rated drivers to the list - but as all-rounders Moss was stupendous, and Graham not really that far behind him.  While he might have been in decline in F1 terms from mid-1969 onward, don't overlook his Le Mans win - on merit - in 1972, nor his F1 International Trophy win (admittedly with luck on his side) in 1971.  In period he was highly respected, and generally well liked...though in anger he could be a thoroughly nasty piece of work...

 

DCN 

 

Thanks for this. I learned a long time ago not to judge on their stats alone and on the subject of Graham Hill think he is really one of the most under-appreciated drivers for those of us who take an interest in F1 history, he's really overdue a fresh biography.

 

Given that he went from a regular winner and WDC challenger in the 60s to someone who - in F1 at least - was a lot less competitive, was there any talk of him being past his prime/should retire etc?



#38 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 26 January 2025 - 05:56

Yes - absolutely so even before his US GP accident in '69.  For some he was certainly regarded as being near the end of his Formula 1 shelf life even when he joined Team Lotus in '67...

 

DCN



#39 BRG

BRG
  • Member

  • 27,273 posts
  • Joined: September 99

Posted 26 January 2025 - 11:35

Yes - absolutely so even before his US GP accident in '69.  For some he was certainly regarded as being near the end of his Formula 1 shelf life even when he joined Team Lotus in '67...

 

DCN

Of course, Louis Chiron raced in F1 when he was almost 56 years of age.

 

Tom Delaney raced until his death in 2006 at the age of 96, even winning a race when he was just 95.  He had raced at Brooklands in 1930. 

 

Poland's premier rally driver, Sobieslaw Zasada, who celebrates his 95th birthday tomorrow, came out if retirement to compete on a rally in 2021.  And not just any old rally, the Safari Rally in Kenya, a round of the WRC.

 

Age is just a number.  



Advertisement

#40 Sterzo

Sterzo
  • Member

  • 6,157 posts
  • Joined: September 11

Posted 26 January 2025 - 11:38

Tom Delaney raced until his death in 2006 at the age of 96, even winning a race when he was just 95.  He had raced at Brooklands in 1930.

And wasn't he still racing the same Lea Francis that he'd driven in the thirties?



#41 David Lawson

David Lawson
  • Member

  • 981 posts
  • Joined: November 03

Posted 26 January 2025 - 14:48

I took this snap in 2005

 

143-4321.jpg

 

David



#42 68targa

68targa
  • Member

  • 1,282 posts
  • Joined: October 19

Posted 26 January 2025 - 15:36

Another who raced into his 80s was Frank Lockhart known for his white beard and Rover Special.

 

img832.jpg



#43 john aston

john aston
  • Member

  • 2,852 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 27 January 2025 - 07:07

I recall seeing an older gent racing  in the TVR Tuscan Challenge  series in the 90s who had flown Typhoons in the war. Google AI tells me the oldest driver in the series was Mike Jordan- I don't think so ....... 



#44 AJCee

AJCee
  • Member

  • 367 posts
  • Joined: August 15

Posted 27 January 2025 - 07:43

Typhoons, impressive! Surely that would make him that rare beast: an old, bold pilot!

#45 blackmme

blackmme
  • Member

  • 1,073 posts
  • Joined: September 08

Posted 27 January 2025 - 14:00

Typhoons, impressive! Surely that would make him that rare beast: an old, bold pilot!

A TVR series would be natural to join for someone who had flown Typoon’s and would therefore have a good knowledge of temperamental power plants….  :rotfl:

 

Regards Mike



#46 Dunc

Dunc
  • Member

  • 947 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 28 January 2025 - 12:10

Yes - absolutely so even before his US GP accident in '69.  For some he was certainly regarded as being near the end of his Formula 1 shelf life even when he joined Team Lotus in '67...

 

DCN

 

I didn't realise that! As I understand history, Ford had wanted him at Lotus in '67. What was the basis of that argument, considering he had been a WDC challenger for four of the previous five seasons?



#47 BRG

BRG
  • Member

  • 27,273 posts
  • Joined: September 99

Posted 28 January 2025 - 12:38

I didn't realise that! As I understand history, Ford had wanted him at Lotus in '67. What was the basis of that argument, considering he had been a WDC challenger for four of the previous five seasons?

Hill started off as a mechanic at Lotus, so I imagine the Biblical saying that "A prophet is not without honour except in his hometown..." may well apply. 



#48 10kDA

10kDA
  • Member

  • 1,166 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 28 January 2025 - 20:56

Something to consider - interest in worldwide racing was exploding in the US in the mid-60s, mostly traced back to Ford's GT program. The Big Three automakers were in a PR battle for customers and had huge promotional budgets. "Sell the sizzle, not the steak" was a common strategy, implemented very successfully by those marketing types who were excellent at reading the room(s) as it were. Ford and GM recognized a market could be tapped beyond the fan bases of NASCAR and drag racing. It took Chrysler a bit longer, until the Trans-Am series get appropriately big.

As far as Graham going to Lotus in 1967, some factors may have been:

1. Ford's GT40s had begun to win WSC/IMC races including Le Mans in 1966, to much fanfare in the US;
2. Ford engines had won the Indy 500 in 1965 (Clark) and 1966 (Graham Hill - in spite of Bobby Unser's claims);
3. Graham had been running Alan Mann-entered GT40s in WSC events;
4. Ford had sent big funding in Cosworth's direction, to the tune of casting FORD not once but twice on each cam cover of the DFV, and had every reason to expect success.

Just speculating on the connections and how circumstances worked out but I could understand Ford (Dearborn) encouraging Lotus to sign Graham. And:

5. "Oh by the way - We've got this NEW FORD 3 Liter engine run exclusively by LOTUS, driven by the '65 and '66 Indy winners..." ~ Ford marketing dept., just before the Dutch GP
 



#49 Doug Nye

Doug Nye
  • Member

  • 11,872 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 29 January 2025 - 08:36

Indeed.  Other factors were:

 

1 - Graham was regarded by some as having struggled to overcome inadequate Formula 1 equipment through 1966 with the BRM H16's persistent problems.

 

But 2 - Jim Clark was admired, and loved, by many insiders but he was not an extrovert, naturally radiant, 'media personality' to front Ford's reputation-risking speculative adventure into Formula 1 with Lotus.  In contrast Graham was absolutely that man, as he had proved before a US audience with his public appearances after his Indy win with the Lola-Ford.

 

Viewed overall Graham might have been ageing - he might be regarded as being a notch below the proven natural talent of Clark or of the relatively new boy Stewart - but as a package, already an F1 World Champion, like Jimmy already an Indy '500' winner, an immensely experienced driver in all kinds of cars, plus being a humorous, publicly-engaging, very British, PERSONALITY...what a front man for the new Ford-engined Formula 1 foray to have...

 

DCN



#50 Alan Baker

Alan Baker
  • Member

  • 225 posts
  • Joined: January 03

Posted 29 January 2025 - 09:20

With their investment, Ford obviously expected the number two Lotus to perform rather better than had been the norm. Getting Hill in the car was perhaps a way of making Chapman up his game in this respect, the theory no doubt being that if Clark's car failed, Graham would be there to pick up the pieces. Unfortunately, it was usually Graham's car that was in pieces....