Jump to content


Photo

Poll!


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 The Kanisteri

The Kanisteri
  • Member

  • 11,192 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 06:33

Heheh!

How many times Ferrari will broke the rules without consequences in this season!?

1. More than one

2. Over 7.

3. all the time.



[This message has been edited by The Kanisteri (edited 03-07-2000).]

Advertisement

#2 Andy

Andy
  • Member

  • 3,483 posts
  • Joined: February 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 06:35

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

:D

#3 mono-posto

mono-posto
  • Member

  • 1,674 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 08 March 2000 - 07:11

I think the icing on the cake is when they run a race on slicks and no-one points it out untill AFTER the race. :)

#4 130R

130R
  • Member

  • 3,509 posts
  • Joined: January 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 11:24

They will push the envelope just like any other team. But, necessity is the mother of invention.

#5 Laphroaig

Laphroaig
  • Member

  • 456 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 08 March 2000 - 16:23

Let's make it more evil then...

"How many times is Ron Dennis gonna run to the FIA claiming that teams are cheating?"
(hehe ;) ... prolly once already, can't imagine anyone else shouting that the cockpit sides of the Jordan and Ferrari are illegal ;)

________________________________
- "Everyone cheats... maybe except for Minardi, that's why they only scored 1 point in the past 4 years..."

#6 Daemon

Daemon
  • Member

  • 5,452 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 19:58

I pose another quiz -

Who thinks Kanisteri has anything pointfull to add to the BB??

#7 yahoo

yahoo
  • Member

  • 183 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 08 March 2000 - 08:11

how cares, could some people buy a dictionary before coming on to this topic "will broke" AND "pointfull".

FOR **** SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[This message has been edited by yahoo (edited 03-08-2000).]

#8 The Swerve

The Swerve
  • Member

  • 5,702 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 08:17

Aw yeah. Big Ron is always bleating about something.

I'll bet you the first controversy is the McLaren wailing exhasts..

#9 Daemon

Daemon
  • Member

  • 5,452 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 08:27

yahoo, dude, you should go see a doctor so he can remove whatever it is that is jammed up your ass! Did your english language teacher have it in for you or something??

This is a place to post opinion, not to compare spelling or diction. If you want pickup on peoples spelling, then you could possibly do it in a nicer way. Although you seem to have superior intellectual skills, both in the areas of spelling and diction, and punctuation as well I am most certain, some of us cretins, dregs and illiterate rednecks do know how to control their tempers and the way in which they express this pent up (over years im sure) anger.

I for one, truly look up to your most impressive and excellent spelling and your posts are just so enlightening, I will in future try to emulate your perfection.

Yours most sincerly, faithfully, an anticipaitingly,

Daemon


#10 Ursus

Ursus
  • Member

  • 2,411 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 08:28

Yahoo, I suggest that you try to post in finnish without any spelling or grammatical errors.

------------------
Ursus
Trust me, send money.



#11 MrAerodynamicist

MrAerodynamicist
  • Member

  • 14,226 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 08:43

Or:
Do the FIA have the consistancy off...
....lumpy mash patato
....poo the night after that curry
....sheeps brain
....Jaxs hair colour?

------------------
MrA
All hail King Jaxs
"Have you wondered, that perhaps, all the world's lunatics are in one place?"

#12 RaggedEdge

RaggedEdge
  • Member

  • 2,051 posts
  • Joined: November 98

Posted 08 March 2000 - 21:05

I think a fairer question is "Will Ferrari again win the Paris GP this year?"

1999: Sepang - Paris GP win for Ferrari
1998: Silverstone - Paris GP win for Ferrari
1998: Brazil - Paris GP was not won despite illogical banning of McBrakes

Daemon, I share your feelings about it being highly irritating when someone bitches about typos. It is pointless. However, it is almost equally pointless to say "Kanister never contributes to BB". If you don't like the topic or attitude of a post, steer clear of it, that is my advice, which of course you do not need. ;)



#13 Daemon

Daemon
  • Member

  • 5,452 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 08 March 2000 - 21:13

Ragged - I see your point about me being hypocritical. What I was getting at was that certain people do nothing but rubish and slag off certain people and teams, and contribute nothing to the usual high standard debates and conversations that we have on Atlas. I was trying to stimulate a response from one of the posters who falls into this category.

I call DC cubehead, and Mika boring, but still contribute and post topics on other things. It is hypocritical of me, so sorry to you Kanisteri, and thanks for pointing out the obvious RaggedEdge.

#14 RaggedEdge

RaggedEdge
  • Member

  • 2,051 posts
  • Joined: November 98

Posted 08 March 2000 - 22:35

Daemon,

I see your logic. My response was in fact prompted because some loser replied to my post by saying "Why you are always posting anti-Schumacher stuff?".

I found it extremely irritating, since the thread was "Did Schumi imply 4xWDC in McLaren or Williams?", which was pretty non-judgemental question anyway.

Even if it were not, I think such comment is basically just a non-inventive way of expressing disagreement without having any factual basis to do so with a well written argument.

Again, this has nothing to do with you Daemon, since Kanisteri's "point" was pretty vague and even insulting.

Since we are at the topic, my AtlasF1 netiquette "Do Nots":

1. Bitching about typos:
(e.g "Did you know it is "Schumacher" not "Shcumacher"?")

2. Bitching about poster's attitude:
(e.g. "Why do you always write anti-Hakkinen posts?")

3. Bitching about thread:
(e.g. "This is a stupid thread.")

4. Bitching about the supposedly inferior knowledge level in a belittling way in a cleary complex situation:
(e.g. "You stopid tool. You show that you have absolute no understanding of F1 by claiming that "Newey and good aerodynamics were important in 1992-93". Active ride ensured optimal underbody downforce without his aerodynamic genius, you tool.")

That is just me, though.  ;)



[This message has been edited by RaggedEdge (edited 03-08-2000).]

#15 yahoo

yahoo
  • Member

  • 183 posts
  • Joined: March 00

Posted 08 March 2000 - 22:37

Calm down you crazy bitches!!!



[This message has been edited by yahoo (edited 03-08-2000).]

#16 The Kanisteri

The Kanisteri
  • Member

  • 11,192 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 09 March 2000 - 18:24

RaggedEdge! Way to go!
That Paris GP was GOOD :) heheh

Daemon! break your nick!

Hey creeps! ~Where are the votes?
My vote is 2.



#17 slc

slc
  • Member

  • 1,169 posts
  • Joined: September 99

Posted 09 March 2000 - 08:57

1