
Was the Judd as bad as Patrick Head says?
#1
Posted 28 June 2001 - 11:16
I remember March having a few good runs and Mansell even had a couple of seconds with it. Was it really that bad?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 28 June 2001 - 11:48

#3
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:03
#4
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:04
#5
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:17
#6
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:28
To illustrate, a look at qualifying times for Silverstone & Paul Ricard, both in 1987 and 1988 in the second quarter of a season (when the worst hickups should be solved and the heads don't hang down in disappointment yet):
Williams switched from Honda to Judd
March switched from Ford to Judd
Ligier switched from Megatron to Judd
Silverstone
Average difference in qual time : 1.5 seconds slower in 1988
Williams : 6.1 seconds slower in 1988
March : 4.7 seconds faster in 1988
Ligier : 2.9 seconds slower in 1988
Paul Ricard
Average difference in qual time : 0.8 seconds slower in 1988
Williams : 3.0 seconds slower in 1988
March : 1.7 seconds faster in 1988
Ligier : did not qualify in 1988 while 13 and 17 in 1987
So all in all, for the small March outfit the Judd was a big improvement over the standard Cosworth, while for Williams and to a lesser extend Ligier it was a big step down from the big turbos.
#7
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:34
But wasn't it also a step forward to the new non-turbo era which gave Williams a head-start with atmo cars?Originally posted by Marcel Schot
for Williams and to a lesser extend Ligier it was a big step down from the big turbos.
#8
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:43
The speed of Judd engine is comparable to the Cosworth of Benetton, but it was very unreliable and overheat easily.
In Hungary 88, Mansell was attacking Senna's Honda for the lead until he made a mistake/ran wide/overheat engine.
The March Judd of Capelli also finished 2nd in the Portugal GP after passing Senna in the straight. and then in Japan, he was challenging Prost for the lead before the car failed.
Gugelmin finished 3rd in the 1989 Brazil GP, then, it was never competitive again that year.
1990, Capelli finished 2nd again in France after leading for the majority of the race. 3 laps to go, engine warning, had to let Prost passed him.
Capelli was in 3rd in Britain, moving up fast until the car failed again.
any other cars using the Judd engines during that period?
#9
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:46
So once again we're faced with a seemingly trivial second place finish that might have had quite an enormous impact on the history of Formula One


#10
Posted 28 June 2001 - 12:51
Originally posted by Louis Mr. F1
any other cars using the Judd engines during that period?
Judd supplied:
1988 : Williams, Ligier, March
1989 : Brabham, Lotus, March, Euro Brun
1990 : Brabham, March, Euro Brun
1991 : Lotus, Dallara
1992 : Brabham, Andrea Moda
That is under the Judd name. I'm pretty sure Hart engines were basically Judds too at some point in time, but I'd have to check my "library" at home for that
#11
Posted 28 June 2001 - 13:20
In 1993, Judd started building Yamaha engines. They did so until 1997 when a confrontation between TWR (who wanted Hart) and Yamaha ended with Yamaha leaving F1.
#12
Posted 28 June 2001 - 13:22
You forget the BEST team to ever to use Judds, the incomprable Life effort.
FIRST were also to run Judd engines in 1989, but that fell apart.
#13
Posted 28 June 2001 - 13:28
#14
Posted 28 June 2001 - 13:44
Still, it was about 200 horsepower more than what the team had with the F35 W12!
I think that Bruno managed a couple of demonstration laps in Portugal and that was it.
#15
Posted 28 June 2001 - 20:33
#16
Posted 29 June 2001 - 10:09
From the interview I read, Rahal seems like he is still made about Horne going with Judd to this very day!!

