
OT: What would happen if a Nascar driver died at Daytona on July 7th
#1
Posted 06 July 2001 - 23:59
Anyway, I'd like to hear what you guys think the ramifications would be if say a Jeff Gordon or other NASCAR star/champion crashes during the race and dies. Now clearly no one hopes that will happen. But since NASCAR mandated no changes (in fact they seemed to follow a policy of hush-hush and business as usual), if something tragic would happen they would be doubly accountable. Afterall, the only effect of DE death is that NASCAR has been made richer and more famous (notoriety slash popularity). In fact, I find it disgusting that DE's legacy--things that have occurred since the crash--is limited to the 3-finger salute and lap of silence.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 07 July 2001 - 00:01
#3
Posted 07 July 2001 - 00:07
Damn man, could you please change the subject? In all seriousness, it's a pretty tasteless topic to me. I didn't see the "IF" and it frightened me pretty badly...

#4
Posted 07 July 2001 - 00:15
Seems like one of those post which is meant to attract the (m)ass than the class.


#5
Posted 07 July 2001 - 00:18



#6
Posted 07 July 2001 - 01:01
Engage brain,post.
Not the other way around.
#7
Posted 07 July 2001 - 01:02



I'm sorry to have looked into this thread.



#8
Posted 07 July 2001 - 01:09





#9
Posted 07 July 2001 - 01:19
#10
Posted 07 July 2001 - 01:37
#11
Posted 07 July 2001 - 02:07

#12
Posted 07 July 2001 - 02:27

#13
Posted 07 July 2001 - 02:55
I guess none of you are Dale Jarrett fans?
;)
#14
Posted 07 July 2001 - 04:26
By the way, even though the rules of NASCAR concerning safety haven't changed, there are a lot more drivers wearing the HANS device now. The drivers (at least the smart ones) decided not to wait for NASCAR to do something.


#15
Posted 07 July 2001 - 04:40

#16
Posted 07 July 2001 - 10:14
http://www.thatsraci...7osfamilies.htm
#17
Posted 07 July 2001 - 10:42
#18
Posted 07 July 2001 - 22:37
If it was a champion driver they'd spend the year pretending to care with meanlingless gestures like lap
If it was a newbie they'd just ignore it because hell, who cares (Petty, Irwin etc)
#19
Posted 07 July 2001 - 22:51
Originally posted by Locai
I don't think anybody wants to consider it.
I think that's the big problem with NASCAR. They don't want to consider it. They should. Then they should take whatever appropriate steps are needed to prevent what it is they've been considering. The only thing that they've even considered considering, is how many more shares of Budweiser Bill France can buy with the increased revenues since Earnhardts death. But since no one in the orginazation has higher than a high school equivilent, the numbers were to staggering and they've decided not to even consider that.
Morbid maybe...but that's the way it looks to me.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 08 July 2001 - 03:31
Just like pro wrestling, it's pre-programed and predictable.
Dale Earnhardt, Jr wins at the track his dad died at.
Who would of thunk it? Jeez, how fake can racing get!
#21
Posted 08 July 2001 - 03:49
http://www.washingto...0-2001Jul6.html
This report intimates that NASCAR is fixed - all for the sake of the almighty buck. And seeing the results of the Pepsi 400 (Dale Earnhardt Jr. won the race @ the track where his father was killed), I would not in the least bit be surprised, especially since this was NBC's first broadcast of the sport.
#22
Posted 08 July 2001 - 05:01
Originally posted by LoxyLotus
NASCAR has done it again!
Just like pro wrestling, it's pre-programed and predictable.
Dale Earnhardt, Jr wins at the track his dad died at.
Who would of thunk it? Jeez, how fake can racing get!
of course the question is
do the fans care if real or staged ?
junior wins
tomorrow nascar fan wakes up still drunk
f1 fan friend calls up
asking if staged outcome
nascar fan says so what ?
then quote announcer saying jr
was 3/4 throttle til last 8 laps
#23
Posted 08 July 2001 - 13:14
Thanks for the great link. Should I hate NASCAR more or the fans that put up with this crap? I feel bad for DEjr, he seems like one of the better guys in the series, and last night's race doesn't pass the smell test.
#24
Posted 08 July 2001 - 14:03
1. For a start the cars are pracitcally Bullet Proof. Hence the winner can be pre chosen without him being done with mech failure.
2. How the hell can 50 year old men keep going agains't 0 year olds while in F1 teh drivers can't match teh new people by the time they reach 35.
3. That win just bloody proves.
its just a complete scam to make money
Niall
#25
Posted 08 July 2001 - 14:13
Originally posted by Newtsche
Goggles,
Thanks for the great link. Should I hate NASCAR more or the fans that put up with this crap? I feel bad for DEjr, he seems like one of the better guys in the series, and last night's race doesn't pass the smell test.
The fans will just tune in whatever NASCAR gives them, since, given the large audience of NASCAR, you have to figure that a large proportion are uninterested in the the inner workings of the sport, and just watch for the spectacle. NASCAR is responsible for the integrity of the sport, not the fans, IMO.
#26
Posted 08 July 2001 - 14:17
i have never seen so much crap in my life. I can't believe that NASCAR are getting away with such lapse safety conditions.
What got me was teh bit at the end about Bodine.
Getting reprimanded while trying to improve safety conditions.
That would never happen in any other racing series in the world.
Niall
#27
Posted 08 July 2001 - 14:34
Originally posted by Ali_G
i just read through the article.
i have never seen so much crap in my life. I can't believe that NASCAR are getting away with such lapse safety conditions.
What got me was teh bit at the end about Bodine.
Getting reprimanded while trying to improve safety conditions.
That would never happen in any other racing series in the world.
Niall
Niall NASCAR is not the only motorsports governing body with a bad attititude towards drivers' safety concerns. I don't believe that the GPDA has ever been recognized as an official body by the FIA, though that's not exactly the same as reprimanding someone for trying to improve safety.
The other item in that article I found a bit disturbing is that drivers that talk about safety issues tend to have their cars scrutinized a lot closer at races.
#28
Posted 08 July 2001 - 14:41

#29
Posted 08 July 2001 - 16:33
NASCAR doesn't do everything perfectly - the business with the wrecked cars being destroyed or given away is head-shaking material (stuck throttles may have originated the earlier crashes at New Hampshire, but not explained how the impact killed the drivers, and had Petty or Irwin's crash been investigated as thoroughly as DE's it could have advanced the safety timetable by months).
There's a similar thread over in Nostalgia right now.
#30
Posted 08 July 2001 - 17:26
Worse than that is when one team gets an advantage. I think Ford got some sort of advantage with new aero bits last year. The NASCAR officials just threw a bigger resrictor flap on the Ford than on the other cars to equal it up.
Disgraceful. Why the hell are these companies producing cars for this champsionship if inovation in anyway is frowned upon and hence no company can produce a beter car than another. ?
Niall
#31
Posted 08 July 2001 - 18:02
Disgraceful. Why the hell are these companies producing cars for this champsionship if inovation in anyway is frowned upon and hence no company can produce a beter car than another. ?
It would be cheaper and easier to go to a one-make series, then let Ford, Chevy etc. pay to stick their names on the sides of the car, like every other sponsor. The car manufacturer has gotten to be irrelevent to the series, in fact they are just getting in the way of the goals of the series.
#32
Posted 08 July 2001 - 18:26
#33
Posted 08 July 2001 - 18:52
Originally posted by Williams
It would be cheaper and easier to go to a one-make series, then let Ford, Chevy etc. pay to stick their names on the sides of the car, like every other sponsor. The car manufacturer has gotten to be irrelevent to the series, in fact they are just getting in the way of the goals of the series.
Essentially you can't call this a racing series. The primary purpose of this sport is to create money. i am pitty sure F1 is more about racing than any one other factor.
originally posted by HouseOfDesai
NASCAR is not a sport, its entertainment, they use car wrecks as a selling point for there sport. What’s even worse is the drivers go along with it, I was watching a bit of it yesterday to see what they would say about DE, and I heard one of the drivers say he wasn’t sure if the HANS device would help or hurt in a car wreck (I believe this is what I heard) and I was really amazed and quite disgusted with what NASCAR dose, hell they still allow open faced helmets.
I still cannot believe that NASCAR is so lapse in its safety standards. i hear a lot of the drivers refuse to wear the HANS device. For what reason. Wasn't DE not wearing one when he died.
What i cannot nderstand is how this series can get away with it. The Federal Government has to see that with the number of deaths is NASCAR, that something is drastically wrong. F1 has faster speeds yet a death hasn't occured since 94.
Even NASCAR's reaction to DE's death is pathetic. After 94 the FIA tried everything to make the sport safer. Chicanes, new restrictions on cars ,everything. they even put a ridiculous chicane through eau Rouge to slow things down.
What have NASCAR doen yet. nothing. The cars are essentially a death trap. no crumple zones. These are the basis for driver safety in a crash scenario.
Shame on you.
Niall
#34
Posted 08 July 2001 - 21:14
Originally posted by Williams
It would be cheaper and easier to go to a one-make series, then let Ford, Chevy etc. pay to stick their names on the sides of the car, like every other sponsor. The car manufacturer has gotten to be irrelevent to the series, in fact they are just getting in the way of the goals of the series.
Brand identity is one of the features which make the series popular. Look how people reacted whenever Ferrari pulling out of F1 used to be mentioned. Dodge's return to racing this year has received extensive media coverage, and their ads are visible on TV and elsewhere. Many fans identify with brands; I've personally rooted for Pontiac teams

I disagree with in-season rules changes. If a particular car in any league dominates a year or two, that's not too big a deal for me as we remember those cars and it makes others work to catch up. The races were boring, but I liked watching the Williams of 92-93.
#35
Posted 08 July 2001 - 21:21
Oh.
And I had a choice of four cars: The 24, 3, 6, and Petty car. Guess which one I chose...
Yup, and I got to wear an open-face helmet too.

#36
Posted 08 July 2001 - 21:52
Originally posted by Williams
It would be cheaper and easier to go to a one-make series, then let Ford, Chevy etc. pay to stick their names on the sides of the car, like every other sponsor. The car manufacturer has gotten to be irrelevent to the series, in fact they are just getting in the way of the goals of the series.
Along these lines NASCAR does want to eventually go to a single
NASCAR approved body, that will be distinguished from one another
by the decals that represent the headlights, grill etc. etc.
This way any aero advantage that actual body shapes will be
negated, hence no more race to race "keep 'em even" tinkering.
Just read the link.
Maybe "The Rock" or "Stone Cold" should take up racecar drivin'