
Why did Schumacher slow down?
#1
Posted 12 March 2000 - 19:45
"Towards the end, I had no need to push and I let Rubens pass, as he had to make a second stop and he was fighting for second place."
??
No need to push? He was 2-4sec a lap slower. Also why did he slow down before Ruben's pitstop but speed up after it?? "I let Ruben's as he had to make a second stop." What kind of reasoning is that?
Karl
(Totally confused)
#3
Posted 12 March 2000 - 08:01
[This message has been edited by Arnaldo (edited 03-12-2000).]
#4
Posted 13 March 2000 - 00:53
#5
Posted 13 March 2000 - 01:20
Slowing down is one thing, but lapping 2-4s slower than his already slow pace, according to MS post race comments, is quite another. Anyway that doesn't explain why he increased his speed again after Barrichello overtook him.
#6
Posted 13 March 2000 - 01:22
1.Vibrations(they weree mentioned by szs,it might be true)
2.Fuel.He could have slowed down in order to save some fuel to make it to the finish safely.
Why he really slowed down?Your guess is as good as mine.Does it really matter now?
#7
Posted 13 March 2000 - 01:35
I'm not sure whether to believe this or not, but it's one possibility.

#8
Posted 13 March 2000 - 02:02
#9
Posted 13 March 2000 - 02:07

------------------
Ed
Going for my 1st GP (USGP) in 2000!, I think??!! (Hey Tony George, where are my tickets?)
#10
Posted 13 March 2000 - 02:07
Apparantly our commentator didn't know that when he made up his theory, which is not much of a surprise since he doesn't seem to know anything anyway (and that's what makes him worth listening to because you can always laugh at his mistakes).

#11
Posted 13 March 2000 - 04:13
#12
Posted 13 March 2000 - 05:25
Also it dosn't hurt Ferrai's image to have had both cars lead the race. So this was a good move by Micheal and is typical of his ability to manage a situation for both his and the teams advantage.
#13
Posted 13 March 2000 - 05:41
LMAO!
Thanks for the insight. Here's a theory for you to chew on...maybe the team let him know what was happening on the radio, and Michael slowed a bit so Rubens could see him and start pushing even harder. Maybe it was a personal favor...
Maybe Rubens wasn't swatting a fly...maybe that was a little wave of 'thank you'.
NAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH....
#14
Posted 13 March 2000 - 07:15

[This message has been edited by Lantern (edited 03-12-2000).]
#15
Posted 13 March 2000 - 09:03
I don't think that Ferrari was particularly worried about Ralf. The Ferrari engine has enough power advantage on the straights to easily overtake the Williams had they fluffed the pitstop totally.
Rubens 2 stops to get past Frentzen who then retires.
MS slows to let Rubens pass cos someone forgot to tell him that Frentzen was out.
OR
MS slows as a good PR exercise for both team and himself
#16
Posted 13 March 2000 - 09:10
#17
Posted 13 March 2000 - 14:54
That's what I meant when I said he was slowing "just in case". If Jenson could hold him off for a while then you know Ralf fighting for 2nd would be nearly impossible....and a little dangerous as far as finishing at all is concerned.

#18
Posted 13 March 2000 - 15:32
#19
Posted 13 March 2000 - 19:14
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 March 2000 - 23:40
#21
Posted 14 March 2000 - 00:02
I can only think of one reason for Schumacher to take it easy: there was no pressure from behind and no need to go faster. Barrichello in the lead was nice Ferrari choreography, but it didn't make the race anymore exciting.
#22
Posted 14 March 2000 - 00:25