
Peter Sauber admited negotiations about Kimi Raikkonen with MacLaren!
#1
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:32
Well, IF (very unlike if) Mika doesn't drive next year, maybe we'll see Kimi at MacLaren.
Also it was reported today that Kimi's and Peter's relationship isn't that great anymore, since Peter feels "betrayed" becouse Kimi is in his thoughts already in a more competitve car.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:35
Sorry if this is already posted by someone else, but here goes: Finnish media (MTV3) just reported that according to Italian press McLaren and Sauber are negotiating KR next week:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sauber-tallin johtaja Peter Sauber myƶntƤƤ neuvottelevansa McLarenin kanssa Kimi RƤikkƶsen sopimuksen myynnistƤ.
Italian yleisradioyhtiƶn RAI:n haastattelussa Peter Sauber myƶnsi McLarenin kiinnostuneen Kimi RƤikkƶsen pestaamisesta.
Samalla Sauber paljasti neuvotelevansa ensi viikolla McLarenin kanssa RƤikkƶsestƤ.
Sauber huomauttaa RƤikkƶsen olevan tulevaisuuden tƤhti ja hƤn aikoo ottaa sen huomioon neuvotteluissa. Huomautus merkinnee ainakin sitƤ, ettei RƤikkƶsen Sauber-sopimus katkea halvalla.
Huipputallien kiinnostus RƤikkƶseen on tiettƤvƤsti hankaloittanut RƤikkƶsen ja Peter Sauberin vƤlejƤ, kun tallipomo on saanut havaita kultakimpaleensa lipeƤvƤn vƤkisin kƤsistƤ - ei tosin ilmaiseksi.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My brief translation:
Peter Sauber admits to negotiations with McLaren concerning KR, i.e. about selling KR's contract. In an interview with the Italian RAI P. Sauber admitted McLaren's interest in hiring KR. At the same time Sauber revealed negotiating with McL about KR next week. Sauber makes it clear that KR is a star of the future and he is going to take that into account in the negotiations. The remark probably means at least, that KR's contract won't be a cheap buy. The interest by top teams toward KR has apparently caused friction in the relations between KR and Peter Sauber when the team boss has had to witness his "prize" slipping through his fingers. But not for free(!).
#3
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:36
#4
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:44
Does either article say, or speculate?
#5
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:49
#6
Posted 03 September 2001 - 12:53
I dunno.. this whole silence from Hakkinen thing upsets me, why can't he just be honest. He really is hurting his fans at the moment.
#7
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:05
#8
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:07
McLaren want to sign up Kimi as a test driver in 2002, here is their plan...
McLaren sign up Kimi as a test driver for 2002, and guarentee him a race seat in 2003.
2002 McLaren line up is : Coulthard, Hakkinen. This is to retain stability in what will be an important year for McLaren to try and regain their form.
2003.. DC leaves McLaren for a team such as Jaguar, he is offered big money, good status, and sees the chance of getting out of a situation he knows he can never win in.
2003 McLaren line up is : Raikkonen, Hakkinen. This is to allow Kimi, who now has a years testing under his belt for McLaren, to learn from Hakkinen before Hakkinen retires at the end of 2003.
2004 McLaren line up is : Raikkonen and another young driver, such as Justin Wilson, or possibly Jenson Button. Someone like that.
Quite possibly the reason for the McLaren delay is simply because they are trying to fill in a test driver role for Hakkinens replacement. It makes sense. Why bring in a brand new driver to the team now, throw him in to the race seat and then watch him struggle in 2002, a year McLaren really do need to up their game in. This way, they can best prepare for the switch. Hakkinen has alreaddy said he wants to stay at McLaren for two more years, so McLaren will be trying to best prepare for his departure.
Just a theory

#9
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:09
had said that 1st September was the deadline for Mika to re-sign?
I'd prefer McLaren to keep both MH and DC, for at least next year
anyway. DC has given them no reason to get rid of him this year, but
when has that mattered in F1?
#10
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:11
He was having a very good race until gear-box failed him, running 7th. What does Sauber want more from him? Kimi, like everybody else is hungry for victories and of course wants to get into the very best car available. Sauber isn“t exactly the winning team and never will be.
#11
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:39
#12
Posted 03 September 2001 - 13:49
and btw why would mclaren want jenson button how abou nick heidfeld and panis both ex test drivers for the team.
also as a replacement for kimi at sauber how about karthikeyan considering that kimi and karthikeyan hasve the same managaer.
#13
Posted 03 September 2001 - 14:57
Well, this pretty-well sounds the end for Mika. I've been suspecting it since May and all the hints coming my way haven't been very positive. Even the latest off-the-record chat on the day Keke claimed Mika had signed a contract contradicted Keke.
If I gaze into my crystal ball, I will make the following prediction: Suzy predicts that Mika HAS signed a contract with McLaren for 2002 - but NOT to race! I reckon he's accepted the advisory/test/third driver role that Norbert Haug mentioned back in May. One of Mika's gripes has been that McLaren's testing hasn't been particularly good - and if you want something done, do it yourself! That way, there is "no goodbye" (as Keke phrased it) for Mika as he'd still effectively be a member of the team, he would be working with his engineers (so he'd get them back - which he wanted), Kimi will benefit from Mika's guidance and Ron will be happy because Mika won't go to another team. As for me, well I'll have Kimi (with any luck) to squeal at and still be able to see Mika:) This is assuming that I am right of course...

All the best
Suzy
#14
Posted 03 September 2001 - 15:13
#15
Posted 03 September 2001 - 15:26
More to spice up the silly season:
An unnamed middle-orient investor can ruin Diniz hopes on F-1. According to brazilian newspaper Folha de S. Paulo, this millionaire is willing to pay more money per share than Pedro Diniz, and would keep Alain Prost in charge, something the brazilian will not do.
That means probably a tought luck on Zonta, Marques and other brazilians willing to take the Prost second seat.
And would this extra money keep HHF driving?
#16
Posted 03 September 2001 - 15:43
#17
Posted 03 September 2001 - 20:29

You outdrive your teammate, yet he gets more praise and hype than you. Even worse he gets offers from all the bigger teams. Yes Kimi is good, but the simple facts show that Nick is even better.
#18
Posted 03 September 2001 - 20:39
#19
Posted 03 September 2001 - 23:45
;)
Kimi should not take a test seat anywhere, he's already proven he deserves a race seat.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 04 September 2001 - 01:44
Having a personal experience with near death too I have learned two things. One, when your number is up, it's up and it doesn't matter what your're doing and two, cut out the crap and live your life. No matter what you choose to do, there will always be tough decisions and compromises to make, it's just the way it is so deal with it and go for what you want 100 percent. If he wants to continue as a driver in F1 then take it from Michael, beat it down, knaw on it and tell the world its his (dammit);). If he wants to do something else, then go for it and be happy too. All I can possibly say to Mika is for him to be the boss of him. Do what makes him happy. Yeah, they will be folks who won't understand, but if they really support and care about you, they'll come around and accept it.
#21
Posted 04 September 2001 - 01:53
Originally posted by AD
And no mention of Nick Heidfeld![]()
You outdrive your teammate, yet he gets more praise and hype than you. Even worse he gets offers from all the bigger teams. Yes Kimi is good, but the simple facts show that Nick is even better.
He should be after 5 more years in race cars and 2 more years in F1. The fact is that he is not that much better if any and Kimi had so little expereince, he barely got a SL.
#22
Posted 04 September 2001 - 02:01
From that interview it appears that PS is extremely unhappy about it. PS went so far to say, that the contract he has with KR is absolutely tight, and because of that he could make sure that Kimi doesn't have a seat next year at all! Strong words. Seems to be all about money, obviously McLaren doesn't want to pay as much for Kimi as they do for Mika or DC, while PS will want to make sure he get's enough money from the deal. And that will be certainly more than they pay for Mika or DC.
#23
Posted 04 September 2001 - 02:07
#24
Posted 04 September 2001 - 03:59
Originally posted by jimm
He should be after 5 more years in race cars and 2 more years in F1. The fact is that he is not that much better if any and Kimi had so little expereince, he barely got a SL.
They gave him a new Mercedes? Wow that Peter Sauber must be a great guy to work for.
#25
Posted 04 September 2001 - 04:23
But some common views and some facts are:
⢠Miki doesn't like to develop
⢠RD wants to pay Mika less
⢠No one is signed yet
⢠RD and PS had a talk
⢠DC is a good developer
My view on McLaren and KR:
⢠KR would be mad not to race
⢠A promise to drive next year in F1 is worth little
⢠Promises themselves are worth little in F1
⢠Broken promises in F1 can be worth a lot though
⢠Doesn't the current McLaren tester have almost a promise to drive?
⢠Two Finns at McLaren: I can't see it, maybe I am a racist or is that a nationalist?
⢠Even simple things are starting to confuse me
⢠I give up, this whole thing is just too strange ...

#26
Posted 04 September 2001 - 04:43
Maybe DC is going to be MacLaren's new test driver.
But still... 2 Finns at MacLaren - that would be something sponsors would find hard to accept.
#27
Posted 04 September 2001 - 04:48
MH and DC drive for Maclaren in 2002
MH moves to Jag for 2003
JV moves to Maclaren 2003
DC stays with Maclaren, as 2003 is bound to be his year

#28
Posted 04 September 2001 - 04:57



#29
Posted 04 September 2001 - 05:52
thought...

Hmm... seems like DC is going to Jaguar after all. Mika will
be Kimi's tutor in McL next year (yeah, two Finns in the same
team!) and retires after that. Mika and Kimi have spent a lot
of time together recently here in Finland - talking about what?



#30
Posted 04 September 2001 - 06:18
It would be great, but I still doubt that there would be 2 finns at MacLaren. Even if it would be just for one year. But Petri has a point there - why they are spending so much time together?
#31
Posted 04 September 2001 - 06:27
Its got the new Launch Control add on which Sony are developing.
The software is not suitable for adults of course.
Its the one JPM wanted, but no one would give him.
;)
#32
Posted 04 September 2001 - 06:31
1. Go to Mac as a test driver in 2002. Race and learn at 2003 -- >
possible WDC at 2004 or 2005!
2. Have one more Sauber year at 2002. Then to Ferrari, replace Rubens. After Michael retires, maybe after 2003 season, Kimi could fight for WDC.
Now which way sounds better? I“d say, GO TO MAC, NOW, after this season! Make your fans impatient in 2002 and blow the bank seasons after.
#33
Posted 04 September 2001 - 06:45
Kimis contact with Sauber is including 2003. So he could go straight to Ferrari after 2003. Being a test driver is a bad idea when you have at least a very decent (not top though) drive. Since he still would have to test as a driver, he get's much more mileage and track experience. Also McLaren isn't in the best position for tyres fo next year, has shown a lot of problems with reliability. I'd wait at least a year, and see whee McLaren is heading. Next year no-one expects Kimi to take the WDC, and seeing where the top teams are when he is ready for it, makes much more sense than commit himself now. Because if M&M buys Kimi out of the contract with Sauber, it will be long term, as it's not comming cheap for them. If the McLaren sucks, then he is stuck there.Originally posted by malc
I think Kimi is in a happy positition to choose from the 2 following options.
1. Go to Mac as a test driver in 2002. Race and learn at 2003 -- >
possible WDC at 2004 or 2005!
2. Have one more Sauber year at 2002. Then to Ferrari, replace Rubens. After Michael retires, maybe after 2003 season, Kimi could fight for WDC.
Now which way sounds better? I“d say, GO TO MAC, NOW, after this season! Make your fans impatient in 2002 and blow the bank seasons after.
Bottomline, don't sacrifice long term prospects for short term profits.
#34
Posted 04 September 2001 - 06:51
even the driving style and set up kimi and ms like is similar. kimi with 1 year under ms to get used to ferrari team would be a massive career move.
?maclaren - don't they have the smell of a team on the slide? ferrari look so much more compsed and organised - on and off track - and not cause their winning but because of their ongoing development etc.
#35
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:26
For 2002--
A big shakeup at McLaren occurs: Kimi goes to McLaren as a driver, not as a tester. McLaren exercises their Mercedes option and brings Heidfeld over, too, also as a driver.
Sauber gets a works engine and Würz (maybe some cash, too).

#36
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:31
#37
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:39
McLaren sucks, then he is stuck there. "
Yep, just like Mika was several years. I'd say: "cool down Kimi,
drive another year in Sauber and then try to get seat in Ferrari"
(Williams would also be better option than McL in next few years).
#38
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:44
#39
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:56
Advertisement
#40
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:57
Assumptions:
PS DOES NOT want to pay for one year old Ferrari engines
McLaren wants KR for 2002 and beyond
so what happens?
2002
KR goes to McLaren as test driver #2 for 2002
Sauber gets a 2 (or possibly 3 year commitment) for Mercedes engines at discounted price
MH helps KR settle down in McLaren
KR and AW do testing, a lot of testing as Ferrari has raised the bar
2003
MH retires from racing, remains in McLaren in some consultant capacity
DC leaves for another team (possibly Benetton, Jaguar, Toyota)
NH comes to McLaren to satisfy Mercedes' german driver requirement
NH & KR driver line up
feel free to tear this apart

#41
Posted 04 September 2001 - 07:57
#42
Posted 04 September 2001 - 08:54
I wouldn't compare Kimi and Jenson, becouse Jenson started in a good team and he had more racing experience at that time than Kimi did when he started F1. Kimi doesn't have a that great car this year, even though Sauber seems to be a decent package, but it's no williams.
#43
Posted 04 September 2001 - 09:05
Remember it was Sauber who used the Mercedes engine first, until McLaren booted them out. So why do we expect Sauber to really want Mercedes engines? PS isn't stupid. He rather would want an up to date Ferrari engine, meaning a works engine. He might want to keep Kimi for such deal. Also with Paul Morgan's death, it remains to be seen where the Illmor (Merc) engine is heading too. Really, to make any deal with a team in slight turmoil, and that did coin the phrase "Piranha club" isn't the best idea IMO. And I'm sure Ferrari has had already some talks with Peter Sauber about Kimi.Originally posted by Sid
Sauber gets a 2 (or possibly 3 year commitment) for Mercedes engines at discounted price
#44
Posted 04 September 2001 - 09:10
kind regards,
just a bystander
#45
Posted 04 September 2001 - 09:28
driver like Kimi. JB was a big hype last year but Kimi seem
to be even bigger. Go figure: this guy drives his first season
and already he stirrs a big soup in which Mercedes, Ferrari, Sauber and God knows who else are involved!! A potential bastard,
maybe? I hope not!
#46
Posted 04 September 2001 - 09:31
And now I have read another totally unsubstantiated rumour that David Coulthards tests for the balance of the season have been cancelled. For what it is worth he has not tested since the end of June. Perhaps Ronzo is thinking he has a better shot at getting Mika fired up again than pushing David into a real title contender postition. How was it: Form is temporary, class is permanent. Dont know though, still hoping Mika retired or took a sabatical (schizophrenic I admit) my bosses do also.
- Oho -
#47
Posted 04 September 2001 - 09:36

Must have a sky high marketing value!
#48
Posted 04 September 2001 - 10:05
Think about how much money it would cost just to get a guy who's salary is lower than low.
#49
Posted 04 September 2001 - 10:21
Wow - what a media savvy team we might be facing at: Ron, Mika & Kimi
Good grief, this is astounding! There's a connection between all three of them. They all are somehow special with their way how to express their thoughts. Though all of them have a style of their own! So doesn't that give us enough evidence that Mc's line up will be Ron, MH and KH:lol:
kind regards,
just a bystander
#50
Posted 04 September 2001 - 11:14
Someone above mentioned that both MH and KR prefer oversteer, and DC understeer. (I'm not sure whether this is true, but let's assume it is.) In that case, the logical thing would be to hire MH and KR and build the car to suit both drivers at the same time. The thing is, Mika has shown at Silverstone, and probably Barcelona and a few other occasions that even in a 3rd best (or maybe 2nd best) car he can work wonders if only it suits his driving style. So which you're going to keep: DC or MH? Remember, all you have to do is to tell AN and the rest that the car will be made to the liking of... Well, the choice is obvious, isn't it?
Could it be that Ron is only making sure KR will be driving for him in 2003? I mean, he could still let KR drive for Sauber next year, just like NH is contracted with McL and on loan at Sauber. This could be RD's tactic to keep KR away from Ferrari, AND of course make sure he gets the next great (greatest?
