
Is Silverstone the only track in England?
#1
Posted 13 December 2001 - 19:16
Advertisement
#2
Posted 13 December 2001 - 19:31
#3
Posted 13 December 2001 - 19:40
All crappy circuits though adn no grand stands or facilities.
Niall
#4
Posted 13 December 2001 - 19:43
Can anyone post the in field layout ?
#5
Posted 13 December 2001 - 22:54
Donnington would be fine but would need a little bit more time even if the money was found.
#6
Posted 13 December 2001 - 23:03

#7
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:11
#8
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:14
#9
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:26
At least the track undulates a bit rather than being completely flat & boring!
#10
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:32
#11
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:33
And IMHO, Brands always provided better races than Silverstone.

#12
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:52
Regardless, I'd love to see the GP go to Brands. Or they could have let Silverstone alone and that would have been just fine. The only good part of the new Silverstone are the switchbacks before the Hanger Straight (forgive me for forgetting the names

#13
Posted 14 December 2001 - 01:53
Ross. there is no passing at Silverstone, so Brands would be no worse.
#14
Posted 14 December 2001 - 02:51
#15
Posted 14 December 2001 - 03:36
#16
Posted 14 December 2001 - 05:01
#17
Posted 14 December 2001 - 10:53

(n.b. the infield has various different configs. I believe this is the one for "big boys" racing, but I could be wrong. The others are all in the same section of the web-site.)
Having driven this, it seemed a bit slow and twisty to me. Brands (both layouts!) seem far less so. Of course, Rockingham has the long banked section, like the Indy F1 layout - could someone post this as a comparison? (And Donington is a 100 times nicer to drive!)
As a Brit, I'm pretty depressed about the British GP situation. I went to the race this year with a team-freeloader ticket, and still didn't think much of it - Silverstone is a bit pants. So in a way, I think it deserves to go. HOWEVER, all my "home of motorsport" type feelings say that it would be tragic to lose the British GP.
I've been to other race meetings at Donny and Brands, and enjoyed them all more than the GP. But that may be because the whole GP-circus is a bit crap, isn't it?
Ideally, we would throw money at this problem (preferably at a better track, but Silverstone would be OK) so that we keep the race. Then all the Paddock Clubbers and corporates could pay the outrageous prices to fund the thing.
UNFORTUNATELY I know plenty of grass-roots fans who will keep going, and they are already being ripped off (cheapest ticket is £199 for 2002, IIRC).
Maybe we need cheaper tickets for the true fans, and more "luxuries" for those that don't care about the cost?
Anyway, that's my patriotic perspective...
To you folks from foreign lands, please be nice to us! Remember we build many of the cars that you see running at your nearest tracks! Support the British GP

p.s. Ross - you won't get many invites back if you keep slagging our circuits. I don't recall you spending much time ON the last track you drove....

#18
Posted 14 December 2001 - 11:06
Originally posted by MattC
p.s. Ross - you won't get many invites back if you keep slagging our circuits. I don't recall you spending much time ON the last track you drove....![]()
I agree entirely with Ross, although fun to drive compared to Silverstone most of Britain's tracks are only suitable for National racing. I've been to WSB at Brands, and I'm sure the number of bikes in the carparks has a slight bearing on the traffic situation being good :-) Brands is like Ross says, too twisty and tight for modern F1, although the sight of one going thru Dingle Dell would be amazing. (Incidentally they were going to change Dingle Dell completely when there was talk of moving the GP there).
#19
Posted 14 December 2001 - 11:37
Originally posted by Vitesse2
And you can see a third of the circuit from a grandstand seat!! Unlike Silverstone, where you can see ****-all apart from what's right in front of you!
Sooo, I guess I should consider myself VERY lucky(in GP viewing terms) to have been seated in the highest region of the NW Vista at the USGP where about 70% of the track is visable? Of course those poor bastards in the tower terrace get what I guess we should call the "Silverstone view";)
I have noticed that placement of the stands at current F1 tracks really sucks. I mean I can understand the circumstances when you have a track that runs through a forest, but Silverstone shouldn't have the same problem.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 14 December 2001 - 12:00
The layout is great, however they would need to make huge alterations to the surrounding layout to get the gravel traps etc in.
#21
Posted 14 December 2001 - 12:20
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
Yes, the others are worse. Both in facilities and track layout
C'mon Ross, Snetterton is on a par with Indy, surely???

#22
Posted 14 December 2001 - 13:45
I agree - they're an embarrassment to any sport.
Bumped into a bunch of them at Monza this year.
They wanted to know why we were off to the circuit on a Saturday when the race wasn't until the following day.
An brief explanation from me on qualifying just mystified them.
Even then, they were more interested in watching Inter Milan play than going to the GP.
My brother knows of a guy who can get free general admission tickets to most European GP's - never takes them as he has no interest.
It's not just F1 - A friend of mine scored some international rugby tickets a few years back - He was in the corporate entertainment section - most of those around him spent the entire match talking business, barely looking at the pitch.
#23
Posted 14 December 2001 - 13:59



#24
Posted 14 December 2001 - 14:08

CC
#25
Posted 14 December 2001 - 15:37
Originally posted by mikedeering
C'mon Ross, Snetterton is on a par with Indy, surely???![]()
Ill tell you if I ever find the medical center

#26
Posted 14 December 2001 - 17:32
Originally posted by Crazy Canuck
I think Mallory Park would be great for an F1 race!! You can see nearly teh whole track from the hill on the outside of the pit strait.![]()
CC
Fantastic idea! In fact, you could probably see all of it if you chopped out that silly, slow, hairpin/chicane section. I guess the track would then be sort of oval. Hmm...
;)
#27
Posted 14 December 2001 - 17:56

#28
Posted 14 December 2001 - 18:05

Anyway, it is a moot point in that Silverstone has been awarded next years race.

#29
Posted 14 December 2001 - 18:25

Now in terms of the alternatives I would say that rockingham would look like a good option, can anyone tell me if there are gradient changes in the infield?
#30
Posted 14 December 2001 - 21:16
Compared to other countries Englands variety and standard of circuits is very poor.
You can't really compare England to the USA but just look at countries like Japan, Italy, and Germany.
Germany - Hockenheim, Nurburgring (Both old and new), Sachsenring, Lauzitz Ring. I'm sure there are more.
Niall
#31
Posted 14 December 2001 - 23:13
#32
Posted 14 December 2001 - 23:16

#33
Posted 14 December 2001 - 23:18

#34
Posted 15 December 2001 - 03:17
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
The hairpin is the best part. If you overshoot the braking you hit the track building, if you over shoot turning in you go out the main gate and into the village
![]()
Yeah, goin' into the village is cool

CC
#35
Posted 15 December 2001 - 03:53
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
![]()
I was dying to grab the old black sidepod and post a pic of it but I never plucked up the courage..
Rockingham is streets ahead of Silverstone in so many ways ( save access) but it is probably too small at the moment as the entire complex is within a mile and a half oval. however from the main grandstand you can see 100% of the track which is a major selling point.
#36
Posted 15 December 2001 - 03:55
#37
Posted 15 December 2001 - 04:36


#38
Posted 15 December 2001 - 10:40
Yeah, that was the car I saw, although it got about 3 quarters of a second of coverage, mostly when someone got punted ahead of it.
#39
Posted 15 December 2001 - 17:54