
Post your Gp3 (2000) times here !
#301
Posted 20 May 2002 - 06:09
(b) setup. I have fun though.
I should also mention that I am still running the original GP3 (not the 2000 add-on).
The only track where I have been reasonably competitive was Melbourne. Other than there, I've usually been 2-3 seconds off the pace.
I did another session today at Austria and am now down to 1m 12.956s (-0.618).
#303
Posted 20 May 2002 - 17:32
Originally posted by markzed
I'm using a Sidewinder Precision Pro Joystick and I'm not particularly great at (a) driving and
(b) setup. I have fun though.
I should also mention that I am still running the original GP3 (not the 2000 add-on).
The only track where I have been reasonably competitive was Melbourne. Other than there, I've usually been 2-3 seconds off the pace.
I did another session today at Austria and am now down to 1m 12.956s (-0.618).
Just for the record Markezd I am using the original GP3 with an updated carset (year 2000 , 810 HP) and I can only manage a 1:10.977 and I am no rocket either so I guess were both in the same boat (a slow one at that).
#304
Posted 24 May 2002 - 22:28
#305
Posted 25 May 2002 - 09:34
I just bought, installed and tested the GP3 2000 add-on.
In the old game, I worked hard in Austria to get a 1m 12.956s.
In the 2000 game, on my first hot lap in Austria with default setup I did a 1m 12.628s.
Now this says that either a) the 2000 game supplies more grip and power, or b) I can't setup a car for ****.
Either way, my time is still not competitive. Gimme another few sessions and see what happens.
I'll try Monaco too while I'm here.
#306
Posted 26 May 2002 - 00:36
Well Marrkzed if I could find the 2000 Add on I would buy it but I haven't seen it so I guess I'll just struggle on.

Of course I could just use one of those fantastic utilities to reduce my car weight and up the grip but that wouldn't be kosher would it.

Watch out Pepper F1 I'm closing on you. I was 2.2 secs behind at Austria, a power track, and now only 1.6 at Monaco, a finesse track.

#307
Posted 28 May 2002 - 04:54

#308
Posted 30 May 2002 - 03:14
Originally posted by markzed
Gee, even with the extra oomph of the 2000 car, I have only managed at 1m 22.somethingat Monaco so far. Give me time (LOTS of it...)
practice makes perfect.. 1.19.360 during the race using default setup(qualified at pole with a 1.19.555..

#309
Posted 30 May 2002 - 10:27

#310
Posted 31 May 2002 - 15:05
#311
Posted 03 June 2002 - 11:23
couldn't run GP3 as the framerate took a 50% hit....down to 10 or 11 with no mirrors and the sound drove me crazy so i spat the dummy and went back to 98se
loaded GP3-2000 and did a 1:13.006 at Canada with Emac's Carset and Matti's Trackpak for 2002
#312
Posted 04 June 2002 - 10:18
#313
Posted 04 June 2002 - 12:44
Originally posted by confucius
That's a great time, even with Emac's carset. I haven't got the track pack, but I have got a patched track by some guy. It's quite a good patch, but my setup sucks. I just can't get a better car no matter which direction I go. My best time is exactly 4secs (!!) slower than yours, and I can't go more than 2 or 3 laps without crashing the damn car.
I figure that if I'm not crashing every two or three laps I'n not trying hard enough.

#314
Posted 04 June 2002 - 14:09
Two things have a profound effect on laptimes
1. the physics that come with emacs carset are somewhat extreme : 860hp, 18100 revs and some very sticky tyres not to mention the increased Aero effeciency of the bodywork which allows lower wing settings, higher gearing and more straightline speed.
2. the magic data that is built into the track file, in particular the track grip figure which is usually around 16384 in a default track. i have seen this cranked up as high as 17100 or thereabouts which can make the difference of 1.5 secs on a lap
all of which means that when you see a time of 1:13.006 for canada you should ask yourself "what the hell has the cheating bastard done to his game-code?"
which is probably what Ron and Frank think when that cheating bastard in the red car gets pole by a second or more
This GP3 thingy really is a "Simulator" isn't it?
#315
Posted 05 June 2002 - 17:59
The important points to remember are;
1. Set skill level to ACE.
2. Unselect your driver to allow the computer to qualify your car.
3. Enter a Non-Championship race session and go directly to a qualifying session. Hit escape when in the car and then select 'accelerate time'.
4. Note the resultant times of your car for three sessions and average to obtain a benchmark. (Generally sessions are +- 0.25 seconds).
5. No fiddling with driver ability levels please! The standard ability level is 16210 for a Schumacher class driver and should be confirmed with the excellent GP3Edit utility. It's no good picking a car driven by an Alex Young just to make yourself look fast!

This quick and dirty measure of speed removes most of the variables that make our comparisons here rather meaningless. Very few tried this system when I mentioned it previously. Could it be too revealing?
My Canada time (so far) is 1:16.781 which compares favourably with the computer driven benchmark of 1:18.423.
#316
Posted 07 June 2002 - 07:55

#317
Posted 09 June 2002 - 13:22
there is nothing better than a four way dice for the lead over a whole race distance......slight mistake and you're history!
that's a fair departure from the real thing i know, but that's what i want MY F1 to be like....Bernie and Max can shove thier concept where the sun don't shine.
so to achieve that i use all of the tools at my disposal; C-Magic files, Physics files and Set-ups
The biggest disappointment with GP3-2000 is that no-one has updated any of the Carset Editors to make it as easy as GP3 1.13 was to configure
lets hope GP4 is so good that it will spark a re-surgence of interest from the Stephen Youngs, Paul Hoads and others
Yelnats.......I'll re-install GP3 1.13 and GP3Edit and give your technique a try see if we can't get a level playing field going on the forum, and uhh , yeah...i reckon the truth will hurt....
but you'll get over it

BTW just nailed a 1:12.638 at canada

#318
Posted 11 June 2002 - 10:53
Originally posted by Frederick
The biggest disappointment with GP3-2000 is that no-one has updated any of the Carset Editors to make it as easy as GP3 1.13 was to configure
you can still configure things like car power, drivers performance, car reliability etc. if you are using RH 2002 casrset for GPX 2.2x Patch
#319
Posted 11 June 2002 - 13:24
frankly it does my head in, ......... overloads my two remaining braincells