
OT- Broken timing belt- automatic vs manual transmission.
#1
Posted 17 February 2002 - 20:37
Two identical cars, both with 'interference' engines. One is manual, one is automatic.
If the timing belt breaks the manual transmission car is almost guaranteed engine damage due to the fact that the there is a direct connection to the drive wheels with the transmission in gear. True or False?
Same situation, only the vehicle has an automatic transmission. If the belt breaks, the engine just dies with very little chance of damage because it's an automatic transmission and there is no 'direct' relationship between the wheels and the crankshaft. True of False?
or is it none of the above. A friend asked me this question and although I'm fairly confident of the answer with a manual transmission car, I am not so certain regarding the same vehicle with an automatic transmission. He thinks that with the automatic, the engine would just die and there would be almost no chance of the valves and the pistons getting 'intimate'.
any thoughts would be appreciated.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 17 February 2002 - 21:18
For the manual transmission car, there will be much more rotations of the crankshaft, but since the first one will bend the opened valves, it will not do much more damage...
RGagne
#3
Posted 18 February 2002 - 11:54
So yes you are going to mash your valves! with both.
I had an auto car that I switched off the key at the top of a 1 kilometer hill and gave the accelerator some pumps and at the bottom of the hill turned the key on and bang........exit one muffler!
#4
Posted 18 February 2002 - 19:41
As for breaking at speed,see above.
There is no rule as to why one engine will bend valves and another won't.Cam belts have been a life line to the auto repair industry,and they are my bread and butter,so I have seen them all.I have seen total engine destruction with an auto trans,so don't think that makes you safe.Valve benders just mean I can charge more money.
A lot would depend on if it was a break,or a stripping of teeth.Belts breaking is rare,they usually strip teeth.
Of course diesel valves will hit pistons,if it uses rockers,the rockers will sometimes just break,that is an easy fix.If they use buckets,we have big time damage as the valves push up through the camshaft.Why anyone would design a diesel with cam belt drive is beyond me,as for buying one - spin,click...spin ,click...spin ,click....spin....?
#5
Posted 18 February 2002 - 23:18
#6
Posted 18 February 2002 - 23:32
#7
Posted 18 February 2002 - 23:41
Yes you used to be able to push start some early automatic transmissions, but after the early 1960's GM did a way with that capability. I think this occured before the advent of the THM-300 and THM-400 series transmissions. Old trannys used to have two hydraulic pumps, now all of them to the best of my knowledge have only one hydraulic pump. This was the design change that impacted push starts. I don't believe any modern automatic car can be push started, but I could be wrong.
#8
Posted 19 February 2002 - 00:19
#9
Posted 19 February 2002 - 14:31
When modified for racing you shave the head and block to raise compression from about 8:1 to 12:1 and this means that the clearance is now gone! But we can replace the fibre gear with an aluminum gear and this keeps the opposing forces apart a bit longer! I did strip a crank gear once (steel gear) and bent every valve! The Aluminum cam gear was brand new and the steel gear was being reused and they didn't like being run in during qualifying!
#10
Posted 19 February 2002 - 19:30
At the time, I couldn't figure out what had happened; the car simply died. I was low on gas, but not on "empty" and after I coasted to a stop, I tried repeatedly to start it.
There was no valve damage at all.
$200 or so for a new belt and water pump and I was on my way.
#11
Posted 20 February 2002 - 01:37
The 4 cyl motor can't use the alloy gear,but I guess Holden don't want to be reminded that they chopped 2cyls off the six,then tryed to get rid of then to the stupid Kiwis.It was a sad car,and only the Lada saved it from being a laughing stock.
Then they had another go when they put the Camira engine in the VN, just for us.It died on the floor.
#12
Posted 20 February 2002 - 04:57
do timing belts deteriorate with age or do you just go by mileage. if you have a 10 year old car with 40000Km's, do you have to change the belt or can you wait till 160000kms.(which is what his manual says)
#13
Posted 20 February 2002 - 08:44
Check out a very old,but unworn tyre,it has gone hard and cracked,the same with cam belts and condoms.Use at your own risk.
#14
Posted 20 February 2002 - 22:38
The later European engine with hydraulic ' lifters' will reduce the amount of damage. The Renault and the VW diesel engine can escape with just damage to the hydraulic 'lifters' . The ' Renault' dealer recommends hydraulic ' lifter ' replace first before major dismantling.
The primary cause of belt failure is loss of correct tension, the later GM engines rely on an automatic tensioner to maintain correct operation. Timing chains are begining to replace the belt.
All teh manufacturers give an approved mileage and time before replacemetn is necessary. Some are as much as 4 years or 80.000 miles.
Rgds
Jaxs.