Hmmm, very interesting development indeed if it is true.VW chairman Bernd Pischetsrieder is a known fan of the sport and was the man behind BMW’s Formula 1 entry when he was chairman of that company. Pischetsreider is quoted in The Observer as saying: "Everyone knows that I have always been an F1 fan and I would love to own a team there one day." The article also claims that the VW boss refused to deny that VW were behind the Prost bid.

HEARD THE ONE ABOUT SKODA ENTERING F1?
#1
Posted 03 March 2002 - 16:57
Advertisement
#2
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:11
Anyway, I believe its true. Private people or investment groups have nothing to do in Formula 1 because the knowledge and experience you need to succeed is far too expensive.
#3
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:17
#4
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:21
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
If I were VW I wouldnt go this route. Id go to Ford and buy Jag at garage sale prices, and move most of the Audi Sport (global) people over there. Audi Sport UK has a pretty good facility in East Anglia where they developed the R8c and Bentley Le Mans cars. Maybe buy some engine designs from Cosworth, unless Cossie continues to supply some other team. I have a feeling Dr Ulrich, Reinhold Joest (if interested) could run a team out of Milton Keynes a lot better than Jag could. Just look how much better Stewart were, and imagine them blended with the Audi Le Mans team.
I would think that VW would want to introduce their own engine in due time.
Ford/Cosworth providing engines for VW? Highly unlikely!
#5
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:24
#6
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:26
After the bankrupcy, buying the assets and stiffing the creditors and partners, is not in VWs interst.
#7
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:28
#8
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:39
This is a very bad joke


can you imagine this?.......Skoda and Ferrari fighting it out for the lead?
i hope FIA start implenting this rule which would control the name of the F1 team. Not any TOM DICK AND HARRY are supposed to be in or allowed to be in F1. Otherwise, the image of F1 is going to drop down to Touring Cars level.
Part of F1 that captures the imagination of the fans is the pedigree and history of the teams. Next are we going to hear that KIA and HYUNDAI are entering F1???????



#9
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:44
i wouldn't mind seeing VW get into F1 but till it happens I won't be holding my breath.
#10
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:48
#11
Posted 03 March 2002 - 17:58
Ford's history and pedigree dates back many many decades. Ford name is always associated with many forms of top level motorsports.

and Ford has that famous Cosworth.
But, i agree the name Asiatech is **** and sucks. Asiatech shouldn't be there.
#12
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:00
Ferrari was just Enzo as a privateer Alfa Romeo team, Lotus is just as made up name.
Pinserwhatshisname is leaving the top job at VW isn't he? VW seemed very sure they were NOT entering F1. Skoda is a part of VW, and runs a rally team anyway, so it would be a Skoda badge on VW's entry if it happened. VW are much more likely to use Seat, the sporty part of VW as the badge.
I can't see VW in F1 for a good few years.
#13
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:01
My Hyaundai would be faster... on old tires... backwards... in the rain.
#14
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:02
#15
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:03
Originally posted by cv2000
They'll never make it onto the grid under any name.
Not for 2002 that is.
#16
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:07
Kia or Hyundai
Actually 1 of these manufactures DOES intend to get into the sport - the latter one I believe. Anyhow I wouldn't say Honda is anything great either...infact I'd say that they are not only an embarassment to themselves but also becoming one to F1.

As far as Audi are concerned...lets face it either Jordan or BAR are going to be dumped by Honda after Toyota is through with them. IMO Audi would rather pick up the pieces of one of these 2 teams rather then deal with the paperwork and legalities of buying what essentially amounts to a French IRL team which got lost and wound up in F1.
Ford... This is the end of Niki and Jags IMO. In fact I'd put money down that by Canada the team will get a severe shake down which will see Niki and possibly even IE booted - after EI refuses to take a pay cut. Who steps in? Who knows...perhaps Stewat? Hey maybe if CART has another year like last year - Rahal or even Chip Ganassi may step in. But does it really matter??? Jags like Honda IMO are just crap anyhow.
Thank god we have Renault, Toyota and Sauber!
#17
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:17
Originally posted by Papaya Man
Ford is miles better than Skoda and the Koreans.
Ford's history and pedigree dates back many many decades. Ford name is always associated with many forms of top level motorsports.![]()
and Ford has that famous Cosworth.
But, i agree the name Asiatech is **** and sucks. Asiatech shouldn't be there.
Ford is American and Cosworth is English, yes?
Never driven a Skoda but drove a Seat once. Not a bad car and both owned by VW. Would not touch a Ford. Give me a Lexus anyday.
Mercedes V10s are built by Ilmor.
What's in a name unless it is Ferrari?

By they way, who owns Lamborghini (VW ;))? Now, that is a name I wouldn't mind seeing in F1.
#18
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:39
For me, I'd say go with Bugatti. There's a very big likelihood it would be Audi, because of their Le Mans success, but Bugatti has a name recognition in Grand Prix Racing from the 1920's and 1930's, and, although Romano Artioli never managed to make with it, the EB110 was a prestigious car in the eyes of many low- and medium-level car enthusiasts (don't ask me to define that). It would also fit in a marketing strategy like this:
F1 - Bugatti
Sports - Audi
GT - Bentley
Trophy - Lamborghini
Touring - Seat
Rally - Skoda
ATV - VW
pc13
#19
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:43
Advertisement
#20
Posted 03 March 2002 - 18:58
#21
Posted 03 March 2002 - 20:52
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
Bugatti wouldnt be cost effective I dont think. They'll go VW or Audi because thats their main line. Probably Audi because its the slightly more upscale brand. Audi USA sold something like 85,000 Audis last year at atleast 30k a pop.
That depends how much money they could make from the F1 operation, including sponsorship deals and merchandising. Still, on this level, they'd be nowhere near Ferrari, of course. That also depends on their future model line-up. So far, only the Veyron is up for commercial release in 2003 or 2004, and it ain't gonna be cheap.
pc13
#22
Posted 05 March 2002 - 12:34



#23
Posted 05 March 2002 - 14:13
That leaves VW, SEAT, Lambourghini and Bugatti. The latter two are great names, but I can't see them having the sales potential to make an F1 entry worthwhile (and let's not pretend the F1 operation would make money: certainly not enough to justify it to VAG). So, VW or SEAT? Well SEAT is part of VAG's "sporty" brand group, but is supposed to be positioned as a cheap option, which doesn't ideally suit the F1 image. They'd be better off in DTM, where Audi are presently running the TT in addition to their Le Mans efforts.
Volkswagen means "People's Car". Again, not an ideal brand synergy, even if they've now released a Mercedes S-Class competitor (the Phaeton). I can't see it, somehow: the kind of people influenced by F1 don't buy Golfs, not even the GTi...
It would have to be Audi; I'll only believe that when they announce that they're dropping the R8 programme (in favour of Bentley), and maybe quitting DTM to leave that open for Seat or VW. There's good engineering experience and brand fit, and Audi could benefit from being an engine supplier, given the "engineering" focus of the brand.