Jump to content


Photo

Now they are even! Schumacher vs. Senna (161 to 161 GPs)


  • Please log in to reply
314 replies to this topic

#1 holiday

holiday
  • Member

  • 3,473 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 07:42

They both have raced 161 GPs at this point..... Exactly even...A good opportunity for a review.


I firmly believe in the ability of results to tell about class and skill of a driver. More generally, to tell about the class of any sportsman. In any professional sports all participants, from athlet and trainer to physiotherapist and back door groupie are ultimately in solely for one reason, that is to win. Everything else is window dressing. This is particularly true for presumbly the most professional sports of all, of formula1-racing. As somebody hit the mark:The object of a race is not to look spectacular, be the fastest, pass the most people, or take the most risks. The object of a race is to win. At the end of the day, in the world of sports it's simple like that, you win and the world is purple, you don't, well the next Briatore is never far away...

That said, I view career statistics as the single most meaningful way to rate a driver; the longer the career, the smaller naturally the amount of luck involved, the more valid a comparison. Both, Senna like Schumacher, have raced long enough to provide a substantial basis for this comparison.

And there is also the question of the competitiveness of the cars in motorsport and their influence on the career results. I claim that at least for greats drivers, in the long-term this sometimes distorting influence is equalized by something like the 'invisible hand': In terms of demand, it is clear that every pilot desires the best cockpit available (with a very few notable exceptions) and admits so openly; as for the supply of competitive drives: Extraordinary pilots visibly show their skill in f1 as soon as they enter the stage in f1, if not already in lower formulas. Both Schumacher and Senna were 'hot' on the transfer market almost from the word go, AS for instance even before his entry in f1, his decision to go to a midfield team like Toleman was a personal one, he had better options at hand, but he chose deliberately otherwise. In later stages then great pilots like MS and AS are key figures on the driver market anyway, with their jus primae noctis at almost any team only rivaled by the moves of other great contemporary pilots.

The bottom line is simple: The door for exceptional pilots at any team is in f1 always open, it's up to them to make the most of this, if not, there can't be no bonus for driving competitive cars less than available.

This as a preliminary, now the head-to-head comparison which contrary to the impression given below was not initially intended as Prost vs. Schumacher, but as..well you know already:



[list=I]

[*][b]Career Results[/b]

==============



Championships: 	3	 vs.	 4 (Schumacher +)

Wins: 		41	vs.	54 (Schumacher +)

Points: 	614   vs.   811 (Schumacher +)

Podiums: 	80	vs.	98 (Schumacher +)

Fastest Laps: 	19	vs.	44 (Schumacher +)

GP led: 	86	vs.	90 (Schumacher +)

Lap led: 	2986  vs.  3156	(Schumacher +)

KM led: 	13674 vs. 14630 (Schumacher +)



and:



Poles: 		65	vs.	43 (Senna +)









[*][b]Opposition[/b]

==========



[b]Wins[/b]

During Senna's Career 		During M Schumacher's Career

============================================================



 1.)  41 Prost			 1.)  54 Schumacher (33,5%)	

	  41 Senna (25,5%)		 2.)  20 Hill

 3.)  30 Mansell		 3.)  19 Hakkinen 		

 4.)  13 Piquet	 	 	 4.)  12 Mansell	

 5.)   8 Berger		 	 5.)  11 Villeneuve	

 6.)   5 Lauda		 	 6.)  10 Senna	

	   5 Schumacher		 7.)   9 Coulthard	

 8.)   4 Patrese		 8.)   7 Prost

 9.)   3 Rosberg	 	 9.)   5 Berger	

	   3 Alboreto		10.)   3 RSchumacher		

	   3 Boutsen		11.)   2 Patrese	

	   3 Hill	   			   2 Herbert	

13.)   1 de Angelis		   		   2 Frentzen	

	   1 Nannini		   		   2 Irvine	

					15.)   1 Alesi	

					   1 Panis	

					   1 Barrichello	

					   1 Montoya





The 2 races Senna missed were won by Prost & Lauda. The 9 missed by MS

were won by Hill (2), DC (2), EI (2), Häkkinen, Frentzen & Herbert.







[b]Pole Positions[/b] 

AS' Career 			MS' Career

===================================================

 1.)  65 Senna (40,4%)	   1.)  43 Schumacher (26,4%)

 2.)  31 Mansell		   2.)  21 Häkkinen 

 3.)  23 Prost		   3.)  20 Hill 

 4.)  15 Piquet		   4.)  15 Mansell 

 5.)   8 Berger		   5.)  13 Prost 

 6.)   6 Patrese				13 Villeneuve 

 7.)   3 Rosberg		   7.)  12 Coulthard 

	   3 Fabi 	 		 8.)   8 Senna 

 9.)   2 de Angelis		   9.)   5 Berger 

	   2 Alboreto		  10.)   4 Barrichello 

	   2 Hill 	 		11.)   3 Montoya 

12.)   1 Tambay		  12.)   2 Patrese 

	   1 Boutsen		  13.)   1 Alesi 

					   1 Frentzen 

					   1 Fisichella 

					   1 RSchumacher 





Senna's DNQ and MS' DNS are included here because they took part in

qualifying. The Pole Positions in races excluded were set by Piquet

(in Senna's case), and by MH (5), Alesi, Berger & HHF (in Michael's).







[b]Fastest Laps[/b] 

AS' Career 			MS' Career

===================================================

 1.)  33 Prost		   1.)  43 Schumacher (27,3%)

 2.)  30 Mansell		   2.)  20 Häkkinen 

 3.)  19 Senna (11,8%) 		 3.)  19 Hill 

 4.)  16 Berger		   4.)  15 Coulthard 

 5.) *13 Piquet		   5.)  10 Mansell 

 6.)  10 Patrese		   6.)   9 Villeneuve 

 7.)   9 Schumacher		   7.)   8 Berger 

 8.)   5 Lauda		   8.)   6 Prost 

	   5 Hill 	 			   6 Frentzen 

10.)  *4 Alboreto		  10.)   4 Patrese 

11.)   3 Rosberg				 4 RSchumacher 

12.)   2 Arnoux				 4 Montoya 

	   2 Fabi			  13.)   3 Senna 

	   2 Nannini				 3 Alesi 

15.)   1 Warwick				 3 Barrichello 

	   1 Tambay		  16.)   1 Moreno 

	   1 Laffite				 1 Fisichella 

	   1 Palmer				 1 Wurz 

	   1 Gugelmin				 1 Irvine 

	   1 Nakajima				 1 Raikkonen

	   1 Boutsen			  

	   1 Alesi 

	   1 Gachot 

	   1 Moreno 





* Piquet and Alboreto were both credited with the fastest lap at

the 1984 European GP. The fastest laps in Senna's missed races

were set by Piquet and Lauda; and in Schumacher's by MH (4), DC (3),

Hill and Ralf.







[b]Points Scored[/b] 

AS' Career 			MS' Career

========================================================

 1.)  648.5 Prost   (+34.5)	   1.)  811 Schumacher 

 2.)  614   Senna   (+26) 	 2.)  396 Häkkinen 

 3.)  444   Mansell (+16) 	 3.)  356 Hill 

 4.)  298.5 Piquet  (+12)	   4.)  323 Coulthard 

 5.)  268   Berger   (+5)	 5.)  209 Villeneuve 

 6.)  212   Patrese  (+1)	 6.)  207 Alesi 

 7.)  144.5 Alboreto (+3) 	 7.)  202 Berger 

 8.)  139   Schumacher	   8.)  186 Barrichello 

 9.)  130   Boutsen  (+3)	 9.)  158 Senna 

10.)   85   Johansson		  10.)  153 Irvine 

11.)   82.5 Rosberg  (+3) 	11.)  144 Mansell 

12.)   80   Alesi		  12.)  143 Frentzen 

13.)   77   Lauda	(+6)	13.)  112 Prost 

14.)   76   Hill		  14.)  107 RSchumacher 

15.)   67   Brundle		  15.)   97 Patrese 

16.)   65   Nannini  (+1)	  16.)   83 Brundle 

17.)   63   Angelis  (+1) 		   83 Herbert 

18.)   59   Warwick		  18.)   75 Fisichella 

				19.)   60 Panis 





Numbers in brackets represent the additional points IF the races

before 1991 had awarded 10 points for a win instead of 9.



Only drivers with at least 50 points in either era are shown. An

additional 45 drivers scored points during Senna's career, and

another 39 during Schumacher's.







[b]Podium Finishes[/b] 

AS' Career 				MS' Career

			   1st 2nd 3rd Total 				1st 2nd 3rd Total

=====================================================================

 1.)  Prost	  41 29 18 88		   1.)  Schumacher  54 29 15 98 (60,9%)

 2.)  Senna	  41 23 16 80 (49,7%)	 2.)  Häkkinen	19 13 14 46

 3.)  Mansell	30 17  8 55 			  Coulthard	9 21 16 46

 4.)  Piquet	 13 13 11 37 		 4.)  Hill		20 15  5 40

 5.)  Berger	  8 13 13 34 		 5.)  Alesi		1 14 14 29

 6.)  Patrese	 4 13  9 26 		 6.)  Berger	   5  7 12 24

 7.)  Schumacher  5  8  7 20 			  Barrichello  1 11 12 24

 8.)  Alboreto	3  8  8 19 		 8.)  Villeneuve  11  5  7 23

 9.)  Boutsen	 3  2  9 14 		 9.)  Irvine	   2  5 14 21

10.)  Johansson   -  4  8 12 		10.)  Senna	   10  6  3 19

11.)  Hill		3  5  3 11 		11.)  Mansell	 12  4  - 16

12.)  Alesi	   -  3  8 11 		12.)  Prost		7  4  3 14

13.)  Lauda	   5  4  -  9 		13.)  Frentzen	 2  3  9 14

14.)  Nannini	 1  2  6  9 		14.)  Patrese	  2  7  4 13

15.)  Rosberg	 3  4  1  8 		15.)  RSchumacher  3  2  7 12

16.)  de Angelis  1  1  4  6 		16.)  Fisichella   -  5  4  9

17.)  Brundle	 -  1  5  6 		17.)  Brundle	  -  2  7  9

18.)  Laffite	 -  2  3  5 		18.)  Herbert	  2  1  3  6

19.)  Warwick	 -  2  2  4 		19.)  Panis		1  3  1  5

20.)  Capelli	 -  2  1  3 		20.)  Montoya	  1  4  -  5

21.)  Arnoux	  -  1  2  3 		21.)  Blundell	 -  -  3  3

	  Tambay	  -  1  2  3 		22.)  Verstappen   -  -  2  2

23.)  Modena	  -  1  1  2 		23.)  Larini	   -  1  -  1

24.)  Larini	  -  1  -  1 		24.)  MiAndretti   -  -  1  1

	  Moreno	  -  1  -  1 			  Bernard	  -  -  1  1

26.)  Blundell	-  -  2  2 			  Heidfeld	 -  -  1  1

	  Cheever	 -  -  2  2 			  Morbidelli   -  -  1  1

	  de Cesaris  -  -  2  2 			  Piquet	   -  -  1  1

	  Fabi		-  -  2  2 			  Wurz		 -  -  1  1

	  Häkkinen	-  -  2  2			  Raikkonen	-  -  1  1

31.)  MiAndretti  -  -  1  1

	  Barrichello -  -  1  1

	  Gugelmin	-  -  1  1

	  Lehto	   -  -  1  1

	  Streiff	 -  -  1  1

	  Suzuki	  -  -  1  1









[*][b]Compared to Team-Mates[/b]

======================



Season	Team 	 Drivers	 1st 2nd 3rd  Pts  PP  FL

=========================================================

1984	Toleman  Senna 			  -   1   3   13   0   1

		 Cecotto (10)	 -   -   -	0   0   0

		 Johansson (2)	-   -   -	0   0   0



1985 	Lotus 	 Senna 		  2   2   2   38   7   3

		 de Angelis (16)  1   -   2   33   1   0



1986 	Lotus 	 Senna 		  2   4   2   55   8   0

		 Dumfries (16) 	  -   -   -	3   0   0



1987 	Lotus 	 Senna 		  2   4   2   57   1   3

		 Nakajima (16)	-   -   -	7   0   0



1988 	McLaren  Senna 		  8   3   -   94  13   3

		 Prost (16) 	  7   7   -  105   2   7



1989 	McLaren  Senna 		  6   1   -   60  13   3

		 Prost (16) 	  4   6   1   81   2   5



1990 	McLaren  Senna 		  6   2   3   78  10   2

		 Berger (16) 	  -   2   5   43   2   3



1991 	McLaren  Senna 		  6   3   2   96   8   2

		 Berger (16) 	  1   3   2   43   2   2



1992 	McLaren  Senna 		  3   1   3   50   1   1

		 Berger (16) 	  2   2   1   49   0   2



1993 	McLaren  Senna 		  5   2   -   73   1   1

		 Andretti (13) 	  -   -   1	7   0   0

		 Häkkinen (3) 	  -   -   1	4   0   0



1994 	Williams Senna 		  -   -   -	0   3   0

		 Hill (3) 	  -   1   -	7   0   1

				 ---------------------------------------

		 Senna		 41  23  17  614  65  19

		 Team-mates	 15  21  13  382   9  20	







Season 	Team 	 Drivers	 1st 2nd 3rd  Pts  PP  FL

=========================================================

1991 	Jordan 	 Schumacher 	  -   -   -	0   0   0

		 de Cesaris (1)   -   -   -	0   0   0

	Benetton Schumacher 	  -   -   -	4   0   0

		 Piquet (5) 	  -   -   -	4.5 0   0



1992 	Benetton Schumacher 	  1   3   4   53   0   2

		 Brundle (16)	 -   1   4   38   0   0



1993 	Benetton Schumacher 	  1   5   3   52   0   5

		 Patrese (16) 	  -   1   1   20   0   0



1994 	Benetton Schumacher 	  8   2   -   92   6   9

		 Verstappen (8)   -   -   2	8   0   0

		 Lehto (4) 	  -   -   -	1   0   0

		 Herbert (2) 	  -   -   -	0   0   0



1995 	Benetton Schumacher 	  9   1   1  102   4   8

		 Herbert (17) 	  2   1   1   45   0   0



1996 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  3   3   2   59   4   2

		 Irvine (16) 	  -   -   1   11   0   0



1997 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  5   3   -  (78)  3   2

		 Irvine (17) 	  -   1   4   24   0   0



1998 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  6   2   3   86   3   6

		 Irvine (16) 	  -   3   5   48   0   0



1999 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  2   3   1   44   3   5

		 Irvine (9) 	  2   1   2   40   0   1



2000 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  9   2   1  108   9   2

		 Barrichello (17) 1   4   4   62   1   3



2001 	Ferrari  Schumacher 	  9   5   -  123  11   3

		 Barrichello (17) -   5   4   56   0   0



2002	Ferrari	 Schumacher	  1   -   -   10   0   0 

		 Barrichello (1)  -   -   -	0   1   0

		 ---------------------------------------

	 	 Schumacher	 54  29  15  811  43  44

		 Team-mates	  5  17  28  357,5 2   4







Brian Lawrence (slightly revised by Holiday)

Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK

[email]Brian_W_Lawrence@msn.com[/email]

[/list=I]


Clear case.

Advertisement

#2 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 07:54

Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje

#3 Mammoth

Mammoth
  • Member

  • 1,226 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:01

Originally posted by Vrba
Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje


artificially-created??? :

Most idiotic post I have ever read ever :down:

I don´t really care who is better.... they are both great..... if convincing yourself that your favorite driver is better lets you sleep at night, then fine, but please spare us reading this idiocy.

#4 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:04

Originally posted by Mammoth


artificially-created??? :

Most idiotic post I have ever read ever :down:

I don´t really care who is better.... they are both great..... if convincing yourself that your favorite driver is better lets you sleep at night, then fine, but please spare us reading this idiocy.


If your opinion about my opinion lets you sleep at night, that's perfectly fine with me. Senna's "greatness" was created after his death. And yes, I'm old enough to remember Formula 1 before Senna's career started.

Hrvoje

#5 Makebelieve

Makebelieve
  • Member

  • 84 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:05

Great work and an interesting read Holliday :up:

However, different times, different circumstances blah blah blah... They are both among the absolute greats! I don't think statistics can make it a clear case who was the best between them.

You're not by any chance an old Prost fan are you? ;)

#6 Nikolas Garth

Nikolas Garth
  • Member

  • 12,019 posts
  • Joined: January 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:16

Originally posted by Vrba
Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje

Why would Senna be an artificially created great??? :confused:

If Senna wasn't one of the all time greats, do you really think so many prominent people in F1 would speak so highly of him, just because he died in a race? :

#7 Estwald

Estwald
  • Member

  • 4,442 posts
  • Joined: March 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:23

Nice research.
To deny Senna as one the greats is to deny facts though. They are both great drivers, the best of their era's. It's too bad Imola 94 denied us the opportunity to really see them go head to head.

#8 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:28

Originally posted by Nikolas Garth
Why would Senna be an artificially created great??? :confused:

If Senna wasn't one of the all time greats, do you really think so many prominent people in F1 would speak so highly of him, just because he died in a race? :


He *was* a very good driver, maybe even a great one (although I'll never admiti it :-)) but his presence in media during last 10 years is unproportionally and unjustifiably high and that harms other drivers who may be not much lesser or may be even better but that overwhelming Senna myth is swallowing them all.
How many threads on this BB we saw about Caracciola or Ascari? Lauda (as a driver not as Jaguar chief) or even Clark or Stewart? One or two in best case.
On the contrary, there are at least dozen or more threads about Senna.
Pull yourselves together guys, he is dead for almost 8 years now, his results weren't so great and his sportsmanship was in best case very questionable. It's time for him to be quietly "forgotten" at least to the point as e.g. Piquet or Stewart are.
If there's a driver Schumacher could be compared with, it's Alain Prost.

Hrvoje

#9 Daveofoz

Daveofoz
  • Member

  • 153 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 08:49

A facinating post Holiday. Thanks. It got me thinking...

Whilst total races is a wholly appropriate measure, it bears thinking about how well Senna would have done in the Williams between 94 and 97. I'd suggest his totals/averages would have improved, and that at say by the 225th race (161 plus 4 yrs @ 16 races - tho there may have been 17 race seasons in there) it's quite possible (read: likely) that MS' figures in this period would be reduced due to the increased competition from Senna - particuarly in the 94 and 95 seasons - thus affecting MS' totals/averages. All this really means that for MS to be the 'ultimate', given Senna some longevity, would possibly require him to stay in the sport for additional years past Senna.


Their respective years competing in the sport were Senna 9 and a bit years, versus MS' now 10 and a (smaller) bit. This doesn't take away from the overall signficance of the outright races raced, but it does raise the question of longevity. Having said that, when Senna died he was 34 and MS has only just gone 33. MS is making retirement noises about then end of '04 - a total of 13 seasons, and who knows, but a 'sensible' time for Senna to hang up his helmet would (obviously with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight) have been at the end of 97 - a total of 13 seasons as well.

Still, to use a rather misplaced phrase, if ifs and buts were chips and puts, we'd all be Tiger Woods... I guess the point is that I appreciate the validity of these types of statistical analysis - or pissing competitions ;) - and the reality is that the figures are there, as plain as daylight, for all to see, but what we are debating is something like "Who is/was the Greatest?".

Another reality is that Senna, IMHO had a fair amount of unfinished business. When MS retires, he likely won't have left anything unfinished. Frankly, there are probably only a couple of pieces of pending bits of business that I can think of for MS and they are Most WDC's and Most Poles.

The sad shame is, and has always been, that we never got to see Senna and MS genuinly battle it out for Championship glory :cry:

A couple of other minor points:

Why doesn't Hakkinen appear in Part II Opposition wins in the Schumacher's Career years?

A stupid niggling thing i know - for a whole bunch of reason - but aren't MS' result for 97 supposed to be left out of all this?

Thanks again for the post.

D

PS 'Artificially Created' can go right up where the sun don't shine VRBA - Read: shove it up your arse mate!!!!!

Deep breath...10 seconds....okay, schumi and Senna could/can both be real hard to 'like', but there is positively, absolutely no taking away there abundant talent, and their most emphatic achievements.

#10 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:04

Originally posted by Daveofoz
....
Their respective years competing in the sport were Senna 9 and a bit years, versus MS' now 10 and a (smaller) bit....have been at the end of 97 - a total of 13 seasons as well.....


Quick correction: Senna was 10 and a bit years in Formula 1 and by the end of 1997 he would have driven 14 full seasons.


PS 'Artificially Created' can go right up where the sun don't shine VRBA - Read: shove it up your arse mate!!!!!....


Time will judge where sun shines.

Hrvoje

#11 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:15

Holiday, really nice work! On the other hand, the results aren't so surprising, and we all know that both AS and MS are among the greatest drivers. But Hakkinnen is missing from the Wins table, it seems.

One would hope that similar data were available for every driver. Although statistics should always be studied with some care, it is almost always a tell-tale indicator. For that reason, some people always reject stats, in particular when it doesn't support their opinion.

#12 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:19

A stupid niggling thing i know - for a whole bunch of reason - but aren't MS' result for 97 supposed to be left out of all this?


No, he was only excluded from the champinship. His points and other scores remained his.

#13 Gudrun

Gudrun
  • Member

  • 619 posts
  • Joined: September 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:21

Thank's holiday
Wonderfull statistics
...............................

#14 se7en_24

se7en_24
  • Member

  • 21,470 posts
  • Joined: March 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:46

One small error I noticed, Johnny Herbert won 3 GPs, not 2 :)

#15 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:47

great stats.
verdict:

senna was quickest ( 65x pp), ms is luckiest ( 54x vic).

note:
too bad the stats do not show senna was rammed out of a wdc, and ms rammed himself into one.

#16 Ricardo F1

Ricardo F1
  • Member

  • 61,849 posts
  • Joined: August 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:53

It's time for him to be quietly "forgotten" at least to the point as e.g. Piquet or Stewart are.



Great another complete nutjob on the BB. Senna is and will always be one of the greats, as will Stewart in my opinion, as is Clark, Fangio, etc. There aren't many discussions about them because they raced in a totally different era whereas Senna and Schumacher at least overlapped. So is your argument is that Senna can't be compared with Schumacher???

Personally I'm fed up with this comparison - both are great, nobody has ever been as quick over one lap as Senna though and he'll always reign in my view.

#17 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:54

Originally posted by magic
great stats.
verdict:

senna was quickest ( 65x pp), ms is luckiest ( 54x vic).

note:
too bad the stats do not show senna was rammed out of a wdc, and ms rammed himself into one.


Too bad statistics don't show that Senna rammed himself into 1990 WDC and set the precedent for all subsequent rammings.

Hrvoje

#18 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:55

note 2:
how would ms have fared statswise with a bloke like prost on the grid for 9 seasons in mostly a better car?

note 3:
imagine what senna would have done in the '94'95'96'97 williamses and then think of the impact it would have had on ms's stats.

note 4:
mh was very close to ms in equalish cars but in the stats he looks like a tosser.

#19 stevew

stevew
  • Member

  • 495 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:56

OK, statistically, Schumacher is a "better" driver than Senna, but somehow, Senna invoked more emotions in people.

Guess it's just a human thing.

Advertisement

#20 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 09:59

Vrba quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by magic
great stats.
verdict:
senna was quickest ( 65x pp), ms is luckiest ( 54x vic).
note:
too bad the stats do not show senna was rammed out of a wdc, and ms rammed himself into one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Too bad statistics don't show that Senna rammed himself into 1990 WDC and set the precedent for all subsequent rammings.
Hrvoje

------------

ms rammed mh out of the '89 macao finale.
prost (suzuka'89) must have been his inspiration, or is it just his kartingbackround.

#21 West Mclaren

West Mclaren
  • New Member

  • 19 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:01

They both have raced 161 GPs at this point..... Exactly even...A good opportunity for a review.




How can you even begin to compare Senna to Schumacher. Senna will always remain the best. Then again, Senna is not here to defend himself anymore who knows how many championships he would have racked up if he were. :cool:

#22 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:05


ms rammed mh out of the '89 macao finale.
prost (suzuka'89) must have been his inspiration, or is it just his kartingbackround.


I don't remember any ramming in Suzuka 1989. It was obvious who was in front and had the right to choose the line.
How is it possible that in both 1989 and 1990 Senna-Prost incidents Senna was behind and you blame Prost for 1989 one and Senna (because he admitted it) for 1990 one?
Senna is guilty for both.

Hrvoje

#23 holiday

holiday
  • Member

  • 3,473 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:06

Originally posted by se7en_24
One small error I noticed, Johnny Herbert won 3 GPs, not 2 :)


Notice the annotations below the tables.

#24 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:18

Originally posted by West McLaren
How can you even begin to compare Senna to Schumacher. Senna will always remain the best. Then again, Senna is not here to defend himself anymore who knows how many championships he would have racked up if he were.


:lol: Who cares! Read what Ricardo wrote above:

Senna is and will always be one of the greats, as will Stewart in my opinion, as is Clark, Fangio, etc.


Of course you might not remember Stewart, Clark or Fangio for that matter as it was quite a while ago. But mind you, F1 didn't start with Senna. And much less does it end with Schumacher.

#25 Peter

Peter
  • Member

  • 1,402 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:20

I was never a Senna fan but I think the most telling thing about his "greatness" is the way Michael Schumacher respects him and his achievements. I remember the emotion when Michael equalled Senna's record last year.

It is pointless to argue which of the two is better. They never competed against each other, in equal machinery, for long enough for us to find out.

Curiously, I had just spent 5 minutes comparing the two on Forix before I found this thread!

#26 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:20

Vrba quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ms rammed mh out of the '89 macao finale.
prost (suzuka'89) must have been his inspiration, or is it just his kartingbackround.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't remember any ramming in Suzuka 1989. It was obvious who was in front and had the right to choose the line. How is it possible that in both 1989 and 1990 Senna-Prost incidents Senna was behind and you blame Prost for 1989 one and Senna (because he admitted it) for 1990 one?
Senna is guilty for both. Hrvoje



http://www.atlasf1.c...&threadid=14396

have a nice reading, see you tomorrow and please apologize. :up:

note 5:
statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really?
i was curious about that myself in '87, and after 2 seasons in equal cars as teammates i knew enough.
nothing beats a driver in front of his rival in the same car, in equal conditions at the same time and place.

like ruby being quicker than ms in qualifying means more to me than ms 10 points, ruby 0 thanx to ralf forgetting to brake for a corner.

#27 B.Verkiler

B.Verkiler
  • Member

  • 571 posts
  • Joined: January 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:29

"statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really? "

After 161 gps, I doubt Prost is ahead of Senna statwise.

Stats always mean something, not everything, but something.

#28 Frans

Frans
  • Member

  • 8,765 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:33

artificially-created "great"

:rolleyes: I can come up with ONE driver in F1 history what is allowed to carry that name besides his real name. The name of this "driver" is Michael Schumacher.

THE artificially-created "great" from the FIA. M$ is the FIA-pet......

In overall I am very pleased that Schumacher has achieved those somehow for many people impressive statistics. Don't make me laugh, STILL he is not the best, and he won't ever get that title, how hard and how long he tries.

His fans and addorating people DO know this, but wished this was not the case.
Schumacher's WAY of winning has questioned many people in the past and present, from people who are for him and against him, that doesn't matter, because on an objective kind of scale, we are ALL the same and we ALL think alike, we want to see RACING on a sunday. Sadly this is not what Schumacher can deliver. With his superior machinery, and many illegalities and other items on and in the car what bend the rules of the regulations book, YEAR after YEAR after YEAR.

Sure, he is fast, sure he can overtake. But so can ANY driver in that car in that team under those circumstances and conditions. ( won't go into the sickening contractual conditions where other ferrari drivers have to drive under. ) This way of earning points or even wins AND CHAMPIONSHIPS is never ever considered respectable and THE WAY to do it.

Schumacher's ramming moves are tasteless, but very agressive. Many people like this, RACE-loving people would like to shoot a V1 rocket in his ass if he pulls such arrogantic unbelievable tricks off. But we all know whatever will be will be because everything is written in the stars, that's just the way it is, and everything has a reason. So then, whatever happens, whatever IS, is meant to be. So are the Schumacher wins. I'm sure, but people must try to understand, it's no coincidence, no no. Coincidence is a word thought of for people who really cannot comprehend the illusion called reality.

Senna was the all time greatest.

No question about it, and why ? Because you could see it, a CHAMPION in EVERY sence, a man what could win and take his lost...... He only rammed Prost in the name of revange. Schumacher did it in name of himself and arrogance, (94+97) and .... words I won't use in public areá's like fine-good-old-atlasf1...;) but you know what I mean. You can see it in a man's eye, if he has it or not.

Schumacher deffinitifly hasn't got any of that. No real personality, and the little bit he has a personality, it's known to be not so positive.

His tactics have always been questionable, disliked an not so beloved, on the other side these ver ysame actions are also ADORRED by a whole bunch of other people, who most certainly do not care so much about THE SPORT in overal AT ALL. This is raping the sport since years.

Schumacher the best, because just a bunch of numbers say so?

You know what statistics say? Plain **** nothing.

So if you win a race, your the best. If you win over 50 races, you THE BEST? Silly way of thinking, but I accept that people think like this. How else can I? But don't ever think that those stupid statistics are in any way an reference worthy to call that one driver called Schumacher with an M, the best.... or something closely related.

And you know what the best thing is? Those things mentioned above in little, DOES INDEED block the man's to get the people's title "the best" something he is unable to achieve, ever.

Because the be the people's champion, the people must accept the way it is be done. And this won't ever happen, so sad for his statistics. They maybe will work in 20 years from now, when nobody remembers the man many of us do not like so very much.

"Schumacher the best", don't make me laugh, and hell what give it a try to explain why you claim those words? WHahahahahahaaaaa.

People who totally life a life, where they make decisions all time based on some bunch of statistics, and base idea's and believe PURELY on statistics is round uply bizar, wierd and not totall understandable at all.

But, hey, whatever will be, will be. Even when Schumacher DOUBLE's the statsitcis he has today, and quits, he will have not be allowed to prize himself the best based on those numbers.

It is very common people only see an part of an event, and based upon that they're make they're thoughts and believes. Partial views are very common. Therefore : cheers.

M$ will never be no AS, not even close..... :smoking:

kind regards,

Frans

#29 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:35

Originally posted by magic


http://www.atlasf1.c...&threadid=14396

have a nice reading, see you tomorrow and please apologize. :up:

note 5:
statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really?
i was curious about that myself in '87, and after 2 seasons in equal cars as teammates i knew enough.
nothing beats a driver in front of his rival in the same car, in equal conditions at the same time and place.

like ruby being quicker than ms in qualifying means more to me than ms 10 points, ruby 0 thanx to ralf forgetting to brake for a corner.



I read that case when it was current and I don't agree with the verdict, pure and simple. That's my right.
After two seasons in same car, Senna had 14 wins, Prost 11, both had one world title. That can be hardly called beating, isn't it so? Poles and who lead the race before retirement is absolutely irelevant for that.
Was Prost better than Senna? Beyond doubt.

Hrvoje

#30 West Mclaren

West Mclaren
  • New Member

  • 19 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:41

THE artificially-created "great" from the FIA. M$ is the FIA-pet......




You couldn't have put it better. :clap:

#31 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:44

Vrba quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by magic
http://www.atlasf1.c...&threadid=14396
have a nice reading, see you tomorrow and please apologize.
note 5: statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really?
i was curious about that myself in '87, and after 2 seasons in equal cars as teammates i knew enough.
nothing beats a driver in front of his rival in the same car, in equal conditions at the same time and place.
like ruby being quicker than ms in qualifying means more to me than ms 10 points, ruby 0 thanx to ralf forgetting to brake for a corner.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I read that case when it was current and I don't agree with the verdict, pure and simple. That's my right.
After two seasons in same car, Senna had 14 wins, Prost 11, both had one world title. That can be hardly called beating, isn't it so? Poles and who lead the race before retirement is absolutely irelevant for that.
Was Prost better than Senna? Beyond doubt. Hrvoje



senna except for 3 or 4 races in 2 seasons is in front of prost, winning 14 vs prost 11, and prost is better beyond doubt?

i'm beginning to doubt your mental wellbeing :drunk:

#32 Christiaan

Christiaan
  • Tech Forum Host

  • 1,834 posts
  • Joined: May 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:45

The most shocking thing to come from these stats is that Johnny Herbet won 3 Gps.

#33 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:46

Originally posted by Frans
artificially-created "great"

:rolleyes: I can come up with ONE driver in F1 history what is allowed to carry that name besides his real name. The name of this "driver" is Michael Schumacher.

THE artificially-created "great" from the FIA. M$ is the FIA-pet......

In overall I am very pleased that Schumacher has achieved those somehow for many people impressive statistics. Don't make me laugh, STILL he is not the best, and he won't ever get that title, how hard and how long he tries.

His fans and addorating people DO know this, but wished this was not the case.
Schumacher's WAY of winning has questioned many people in the past and present, from people who are for him and against him, that doesn't matter, because on an objective kind of scale, we are ALL the same and we ALL think alike, we want to see RACING on a sunday. Sadly this is not what Schumacher can deliver. With his superior machinery, and many illegalities and other items on and in the car what bend the rules of the regulations book, YEAR after YEAR after YEAR.

Sure, he is fast, sure he can overtake. But so can ANY driver in that car in that team under those circumstances and conditions. ( won't go into the sickening contractual conditions where other ferrari drivers have to drive under. ) This way of earning points or even wins AND CHAMPIONSHIPS is never ever considered respectable and THE WAY to do it.

Schumacher's ramming moves are tasteless, but very agressive. Many people like this, RACE-loving people would like to shoot a V1 rocket in his ass if he pulls such arrogantic unbelievable tricks off. But we all know whatever will be will be because everything is written in the stars, that's just the way it is, and everything has a reason. So then, whatever happens, whatever IS, is meant to be. So are the Schumacher wins. I'm sure, but people must try to understand, it's no coincidence, no no. Coincidence is a word thought of for people who really cannot comprehend the illusion called reality.

Senna was the all time greatest.

No question about it, and why ? Because you could see it, a CHAMPION in EVERY sence, a man what could win and take his lost...... He only rammed Prost in the name of revange. Schumacher did it in name of himself and arrogance, (94+97) and .... words I won't use in public areá's like fine-good-old-atlasf1...;) but you know what I mean. You can see it in a man's eye, if he has it or not.

Schumacher deffinitifly hasn't got any of that. No real personality, and the little bit he has a personality, it's known to be not so positive.

His tactics have always been questionable, disliked an not so beloved, on the other side these ver ysame actions are also ADORRED by a whole bunch of other people, who most certainly do not care so much about THE SPORT in overal AT ALL. This is raping the sport since years.

Schumacher the best, because just a bunch of numbers say so?

You know what statistics say? Plain **** nothing.

So if you win a race, your the best. If you win over 50 races, you THE BEST? Silly way of thinking, but I accept that people think like this. How else can I? But don't ever think that those stupid statistics are in any way an reference worthy to call that one driver called Schumacher with an M, the best.... or something closely related.

And you know what the best thing is? Those things mentioned above in little, DOES INDEED block the man's to get the people's title "the best" something he is unable to achieve, ever.

Because the be the people's champion, the people must accept the way it is be done. And this won't ever happen, so sad for his statistics. They maybe will work in 20 years from now, when nobody remembers the man many of us do not like so very much.

"Schumacher the best", don't make me laugh, and hell what give it a try to explain why you claim those words? WHahahahahahaaaaa.

People who totally life a life, where they make decisions all time based on some bunch of statistics, and base idea's and believe PURELY on statistics is round uply bizar, wierd and not totall understandable at all.

But, hey, whatever will be, will be. Even when Schumacher DOUBLE's the statsitcis he has today, and quits, he will have not be allowed to prize himself the best based on those numbers.

It is very common people only see an part of an event, and based upon that they're make they're thoughts and believes. Partial views are very common. Therefore : cheers.

M$ will never be no AS, not even close..... :smoking:

kind regards,

Frans



Now I see how far a disease called "Senna madness" can go. In fact its symptoms make me laugh loudly! Things written above are about as true as USA is a free country.

Hrvoje

#34 holiday

holiday
  • Member

  • 3,473 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 10:54

Originally posted by magic
statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really?
i was curious about that myself in '87, and after 2 seasons in equal cars as teammates i knew enough.


I have given you my opinion about that already above in my preliminary:


1988 	McLaren  Senna 		  8   3   -   94  13   3

		 Prost (16) 	  7   7   -  105   2   7



1989 	McLaren  Senna 		  6   1   -   60  13   3

		 Prost (16) 	  4   6   1   81   2   5



Originally posted by B.Verkiler
"statswise prost is probably better than senna, but was he really? "

After 161 gps, I doubt Prost is ahead of Senna statwise.

Stats always mean something, not everything, but something.


A comparison on the basis of 161 races would be pointless in the case of Prost and Senna. You have to take into account the races both raced together in f1 , of course, theses are 141 GPs.

Prost leads Senna in almost every category.

#35 ebe

ebe
  • Member

  • 556 posts
  • Joined: January 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:10

@ holiday:

what a great post ! Good job to find out all that. :up:


@ Vrba

--------------
Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje
---------------

Yes,vrba, but you won't put it in those heads, that fame is different to results.

#36 tifosi

tifosi
  • Member

  • 23,935 posts
  • Joined: June 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:13

About the only thing I can figure from all of this is that anyone who believes in Frans line of reasoning and still watches Formula One, must be among the world's all-time most pathetic losers. Even NASCAR is not as fixed and contrived as Frans claims F1 is. You guys must really have no lives what-so-ever to comtinue watching a sports as fixed and contrived as Formula One is.


from holiday

The object of a race is not to look spectacular, be the fastest, pass the most people, or take the most risks. The object of a race is to win



So what was the point of all those statisitics, if the ONLY if the ony object is to win, that then should be the ONLY statistic that matters in your view.

Personally I couldnt stand Senna since he drove for th eevil-empire, but then I couldn't stand Schumacher either until '96.

from out beloved Frans

( won't go into the sickening contractual conditions where other ferrari drivers have to drive under. )


As far as I know, no human in existense HAVE to drive for Ferrari. Don't blame their decision on whatever contract they willingly signed. The ability of liberals to renounce any and allk responsibilities for their own actions is remarkable.


Any anyway Frans, shouldn't we all be working on getting Jos a seat in F1. I'm in, just tell me what we have to do.

#37 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:14

Prost leads Senna in almost every category.



that's stats for you.
i followed prost's and senna's entire career, senna was better.

#38 Nikolas Garth

Nikolas Garth
  • Member

  • 12,019 posts
  • Joined: January 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:21

Originally posted by magic


that's stats for you.
i followed prost's and senna's entire career, senna was better.

When Senna and Prost raced, Senna was 5 years younger. What would have been the results if Prost was 5 years younger to an aging Senna????

Food for thought.

#39 Makebelieve

Makebelieve
  • Member

  • 84 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:36

When Senna and Prost raced, Senna was 5 years younger. What would have been the results if Prost was 5 years younger to an aging Senna????



It's defenitely a pattern among the great drivers I've watched to be very fast an aggressive in their early years and as time goes on they become more experienced and starts using their heads a bit more to maximize their results, though slighlty less entertaining I'd think the latter aproach is best if you wanna gather as many points as possible.

I think Prost was bloody fast and more agressive when he came up against Lauda (who by then was in his "using his head stage") and later when he came up against Senna, Prost turned into an even more thinking driver, while Senna was at his most agressive stage.

So my guess is that Senna would have had more points than he had and Prost would have been faster than he was (during 88-89) if your hypothetical question somehow were possible to make happen.

Advertisement

#40 Smooth

Smooth
  • Member

  • 10,359 posts
  • Joined: March 99

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:38

Originally posted by magic
like ruby being quicker than ms in qualifying means more to me than ms 10 points.



:lol: :rotfl: :lol: :lol: :rotfl: :lol:

You bumped your head, I think.

#41 Papaya Man

Papaya Man
  • Member

  • 46 posts
  • Joined: March 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 11:50

Originally posted by Vrba
Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje



I second that. :clap:


Senna is a myth. Did you guys see Senna's face before the race at Imola 94?? He looked God Damn worried. Michael drove Senna into a state of depression in 1994. :wave:

#42 holiday

holiday
  • Member

  • 3,473 posts
  • Joined: October 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 12:05

Originally posted by Nikolas Garth
When Senna and Prost raced, Senna was 5 years younger. What would have been the results if Prost was 5 years younger to an aging Senna????

Food for thought.


Excellent point :up: I think generally this generation thing is grossly underrated and what constantly strikes me that people only look on names, but not on the age. What had say, the 38-year-old Prost with the 26-year old Prost-version in common? What Biaggi a few years ago and now, what Sampras, what Kasparow, etc.

Take a look at it this way:


difference of age
Piquet - Senna: 8 years
Mansell - Senna: 7 years
Prost - Senna: 5 years

Senna - Schumacher: 9 years
Prost - Schumacher: 14 years

Schumacher - Montoya: 6,5 years
Schumacher - Massa:13 years



From the Fabfour-Bunch, Senna was clearly the youngest one. This began playing immensely into his hands from the late eighties onwards, when it became first obvious that Piquet was beyond his peak, then Mansell, finally Prost. At the beginning of the nineties, Senna was the last one of the FabFour who wasstill in a really competitive racer age, the other three ones one were above 35 years, imo mas o menos the rough watershed for a pilot.

Now take Schumacher and Montoya. Nobody would argue they are from the same generation of drivers, yet their difference of age is only slightly bigger than that between Prost and Senna, and even smaller than those of AS and Mansell respectively Piquet.

Finally Schumacher and Senna. When it comes to MS - AS comparisons there is constant talk of 'different driver generations' and that therefore those two are incomparable. Of course, this is true to a certain degree, yet Senna and Piquet are as much apart in terms of age...

In the end this common phrasing of driver generations imo constantly sheds a better light on Senna in rearview, coz NP, NM and AP had to duke it out with Senna until they were brought in a wheelchair to the races, while the above line of interpretation simultaneously shields Senna from Schumacher's competition when the German was beginning to give him really heat.

A matter of Motorsporthistory-Exegesis...

#43 Frans

Frans
  • Member

  • 8,765 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 12:37

This entire thread is an insult for people who have some knowledge on R-A-C-I-N-G. An insult for the name Senna, and the treu meaning of racing in overall.

insane how people can trully think like that.

but hey, that's just the way it is. right? ..

:smoking:

#44 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 12:41

Originally posted by ebe
@ holiday:

what a great post ! Good job to find out all that. :up:


@ Vrba

--------------
Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje
---------------

Yes,vrba, but you won't put it in those heads, that fame is different to results.


I know, it's impossible. But as I always say, time will put Senna in his rightful place.

Hrvoje

#45 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 12:52

Originally posted by Papaya Man



I second that. :clap:


Senna is a myth. Did you guys see Senna's face before the race at Imola 94?? He looked God Damn worried. Michael drove Senna into a state of depression in 1994. :wave:


Thank you.
Of course he was worried because he sensed a really strong competition turned up in the shape of Schumacher.
Imagine this situation: Senna continued his career and his last few years were as Piquet's (bar Piquet's 1990, one of his best seasons)....a win here and there, several stupid mistakes in a semi-competitive car.......he wouldn't have been lesser driver but perception of his qualities would have been rather different. That is why I insist his death created his myth.

Hrvoje

#46 AndreasF1

AndreasF1
  • Member

  • 1,200 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 13:03

Wrote:

Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje

_________________________________________________________________________

Hroje, no offense but you are well know in this forum for writting very controversial postings. Your comments not only insult all the Senna fans out there put it puts expert opinions such as F1 Magazine, Walker, Stewart, Dennis, Berger who worked with Senna to shame. I have watched Senna since he started in F1 and I also witnessed Schumachers career. Both men are exceptional and will stand above everybody else in the sport for a long time to come. But your comments dont only disqualify you as a knowledgable F1 fan but they also show that you dont know what you are talking about.
Schumacher carreer statistics look better but are also due to the fact that he did not have a world champion as a teammate who ranks 2nd on the all times win list. If Senna had the teammates Schumacher had he would have destroyed them equally thus his statistics would look different. Everybody who is interested in F1 statistics knows this fact and history will keep a good record of it. Some degree of comparison can be achieved when looking at the 1993 season where both drivers had equally matched cars. McLaren had the better chassis but Benetton had the works Ford Cosworth Zetec V8 engine where McLaren had to do with customer engines of the same type about 25-30 horespower down in power. Yet Senna won 5 times to Schumachers 1 win. Senna also came in second in the championship only beaten by Prost in the superior Williams. Now let me ask you, was this season arificially created in my mind or did it really happen that way?

AndreasF1

#47 Vrba

Vrba
  • Member

  • 3,334 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 13:11

Originally posted by AndreasF1
Wrote:

Very nice and studious work showing what objective observers see easily: Schumacher is way better and it's an insult for him to compare him with artificially-created "great" called Senna.

Hrvoje

_________________________________________________________________________

Hroje, no offense but you are well know in this forum for writting very controversial postings. Your comments not only insult all the Senna fans out there put it puts expert opinions such as F1 Magazine, Walker, Stewart, Dennis, Berger who worked with Senna to shame. I have watched Senna since he started in F1 and I also witnessed Schumachers career. Both men are exceptional and will stand above everybody else in the sport for a long time to come. But your comments dont only disqualify you as a knowledgable F1 fan but they also show that you dont know what you are talking about.
Schumacher carreer statistics look better but are also due to the fact that he did not have a world champion as a teammate who ranks 2nd on the all times win list. If Senna had the teammates Schumacher had he would have destroyed them equally thus his statistics would look different. Everybody who is interested in F1 statistics knows this fact and history will keep a good record of it. Some degree of comparison can be achieved when looking at the 1993 season where both drivers had equally matched cars. McLaren had the better chassis but Benetton had the works Ford Cosworth Zetec V8 engine where McLaren had to do with customer engines of the same type about 25-30 horespower down in power. Yet Senna won 5 times to Schumachers 1 win. Senna also came in second in the championship only beaten by Prost in the superior Williams. Now let me ask you, was this season arificially created in my mind or did it really happen that way?

AndreasF1


While I may agree that Senna showed better than Schumi (for whom by the way I never said he's the best ever) in 1993, I think it's unfair to compare 3 times world champion in his 10th year with a rookie who only drove his second full year in Formula 1.
I admit that I push the boundaries with my anti-Senna tirades but that's the only way to challenge the minds of blind Senna fans.

Hrvoje

#48 magic

magic
  • Member

  • 5,678 posts
  • Joined: June 00

Posted 05 March 2002 - 13:48

While I may agree that Senna showed better than Schumi (for whom by the way I never said he's the best ever) in 1993, I think it's unfair to compare 3 times world champion in his 10th year with a rookie who only drove his second full year in Formula 1.
I admit that I push the boundaries with my anti-Senna tirades but that's the only way to challenge the minds of blind Senna fans.

Hrvoje



interesting.
first you guys say that the aging prost was no match for the young agressive senna, but when senna is aging and ms is the young agressor, it's the other way around.

anyway, age is a factor, good input.

was prost better in '85 than in '90?
experience and racewit also count when winning races and wdc.

i personally liked the young senna ( '84-'90) best.
and prost in '93 was burned out and washed up, no longer the shadow of the real prost.
nige on the other hand peaked in the latter stages of his career.

i also have the feeling ms fans prefer the attacking '95/'98 ms.
the post-silverstone'99 ms a bore.

#49 DOHC

DOHC
  • Member

  • 12,405 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 05 March 2002 - 14:13

It's sort of fun to see how many people like to dismiss stats as irrelevant. Yet, stats of any kind is completely and overwhelmingly dominated by the great drivers. It's true that stats is an analysis tool and that it doesn't prove things, in particular it doesn't answer the "who's best" question. But the fact is that it can refute or disprove certain claims. Of course it doesn't get a lot popular for that either. The problem is that people sell out their hearts to their idols, and then stats might stand in the way for the "ever-greatest" driver.

I think that holiday has done an interesting and nice job here, and that it's worth a second of tought. In my opinion, Senna had tougher competition than MS. This is even seen in the stats, because during MS's career, there's no other driver so far who has reached the true heights of achievement in the same way as was the case during Senna's career. But what we know from the stats (as if we weren't already convinced), is that MS and AS both belong to the most successful F1 drivers. I find that a rather uncontroversial statement. The fact that both AS and MS have been highly controversial as drivers is a different matter.

To have a look at a case when stats can disprove something, we have Gilles Villeneuve. Many people think that he was one of the greatest, and even Atlas F1 Court found that he belonged among the top three F1 drivers of all time. I find that to be a grossly exaggerated view. In fact, the statement "GV was a very successful F1 driver" is refuted by statistics. He had roughly the same number of starts as Stirling Moss or Jim Clark, but the latter two scored three to four times as many wins, fastest laps, poles, podiums, points whatever. They were more successful in every department. There's just no comparison.

But GV was spectacular, and had fantastic car control. He did chalk up six wins and he turned in a number of very fast laps. He was undoubtedly a good driver, but the fact is he wasn't successful. Still, some people make claims about greatness and compare to Fangio. They have lots of what ifs, suppose his career had been longer, then... But that's pure speculation. You just can't say that he was great but unfortunately drove an inFeriorrari. (In fact, in 1979 Ferrari won the WDC. But it was GV's teammate, who was even new to the team, even if he was a more experienced driver.) Moreover, the competition wasn't that great during GV's career either.

This sport is about scoring. Victories, podiums, points, fastest laps, pole positions, lap records, laps in the lead, km in the lead, smoking your team-mate etc. And those things can be measured. Results count. You may not like stats, but if you prefer to claim things that have no support in stats, you really want to add something of your own to the sport, points for style, just like in figure skating or whatever. Is that R-A-C-I-N-G?

As long as you're a fan of a particular driver you end up in these eternal "who's best" discussions. It's a whole lot easier if you just like the sport (and that's not a misspelling of "Prost"). Why take things so seriously? Give holiday some credit for having worked out some interesting numbers!

#50 troyf1

troyf1
  • Member

  • 2,551 posts
  • Joined: July 01

Posted 05 March 2002 - 14:17

Originally posted by DOHC
It's sort of fun to see how many people like to dismiss stats as irrelevant. Yet, stats of any kind is completely and overwhelmingly dominated by the great drivers. It's true that stats is an analysis tool and that it doesn't prove things, in particular it doesn't answer the "who's best" question. But the fact is that it can refute or disprove certain claims. Of course it doesn't get a lot popular for that either. The problem is that people sell out their hearts to their idols, and then stats might stand in the way for the "ever-greatest" driver.

I think that holiday has done an interesting and nice job here, and that it's worth a second of tought. In my opinion, Senna had tougher competition than MS. This is even seen in the stats, because during MS's career, there's no other driver so far who has reached the true heights of achievement in the same way as was the case during Senna's career. But what we know from the stats (as if we weren't already convinced), is that MS and AS both belong to the most successful F1 drivers. I find that a rather uncontroversial statement. The fact that both AS and MS have been highly controversial as drivers is a different matter.

To have a look at a case when stats can disprove something, we have Gilles Villeneuve. Many people think that he was one of the greatest, and even Atlas F1 Court found that he belonged among the top three F1 drivers of all time. I find that to be a grossly exaggerated view. In fact, the statement "GV was a very successful F1 driver" is refuted by statistics. He had roughly the same number of starts as Stirling Moss or Jim Clark, but the latter two scored three to four times as many wins, fastest laps, poles, podiums, points whatever. They were more successful in every department. There's just no comparison.

But GV was spectacular, and had fantastic car control. He did chalk up six wins and he turned in a number of very fast laps. He was undoubtedly a good driver, but the fact is he wasn't successful. Still, some people make claims about greatness and compare to Fangio. They have lots of what ifs, suppose his career had been longer, then... But that's pure speculation. You just can't say that he was great but unfortunately drove an inFeriorrari. (In fact, in 1979 Ferrari won the WDC. But it was GV's teammate, who was even new to the team, even if he was a more experienced driver.) Moreover, the competition wasn't that great during GV's career either.

This sport is about scoring. Victories, podiums, points, fastest laps, pole positions, lap records, laps in the lead, km in the lead, smoking your team-mate etc. And those things can be measured. Results count. You may not like stats, but if you prefer to claim things that have no support in stats, you really want to add something of your own to the sport, points for style, just like in figure skating or whatever. Is that R-A-C-I-N-G?

As long as you're a fan of a particular driver you end up in these eternal "who's best" discussions. It's a whole lot easier if you just like the sport (and that's not a misspelling of "Prost"). Why take things so seriously? Give holiday some credit for having worked out some interesting numbers!




:up:......:up:.......:up: