9 replies to this topic

[lumepojo]

Test results


60 100 1/4 mile@mph 80-0 60-0 100-0

1)Benetton B186 BMW 3.0 4.8 9.4@169 123 77

2)Ferrari 312B3 2.4 4.3 9.0@153 258

3)Ferrari 333sp 3.6 6.7 11.3@133 105 185

4)Cobra 427 S/C 5.0 11.2 13.4@109 148 276

5)Lancia M/C G5 Turbo 3.6 7.2 11.3@123

6)McLaren F1 3.4 7.7 11.6@125 127 215

7)Mercedes CLK-GTR 3.4 5.7 9.4@137

8)Porsche 935 3.3 6.1 8.9@135 92 164

9)Porsche GT1 3.4 6.2 10.9@139 98 154

10)Riley & Scott MK3 3.1 6.4 10.9@133 91 162

11)Swift FF 4.6 10.3 12.6@110 84 141

12)BTCC touring car 5.0 9.98 13.09@114

13)Dallara Renault F3 3.2 6.9 11.3@124

14)Stewart F1 (1997) 3.0 4.6 8.6@147

15)Lola F3000 (1991) 2.2 4.2 8.4@148

16) Top Fuel Dragster .68 1.5 5@299

17) Jaguar R1 F1 (2000) 2.7 4.2 9.4@181 72 118

F1 Boats are even faster, but that is another story!

ACME Brick

[Menace]

Originally posted by lumepojo
Test results


60 100 1/4 mile@mph 80-0 60-0 100-0

1)Benetton B186 BMW 3.0 4.8 9.4@169 123 77

2)Ferrari 312B3 2.4 4.3 9.0@153 258

3)Ferrari 333sp 3.6 6.7 11.3@133 105 185

4)Cobra 427 S/C 5.0 11.2 13.4@109 148 276

5)Lancia M/C G5 Turbo 3.6 7.2 11.3@123

6)McLaren F1 3.4 7.7 11.6@125 127 215

7)Mercedes CLK-GTR 3.4 5.7 9.4@137

8)Porsche 935 3.3 6.1 8.9@135 92 164

9)Porsche GT1 3.4 6.2 10.9@139 98 154

10)Riley & Scott MK3 3.1 6.4 10.9@133 91 162

11)Swift FF 4.6 10.3 12.6@110 84 141

12)BTCC touring car 5.0 9.98 13.09@114

13)Dallara Renault F3 3.2 6.9 11.3@124

14)Stewart F1 (1997) 3.0 4.6 8.6@147

15)Lola F3000 (1991) 2.2 4.2 8.4@148

16) Top Fuel Dragster .68 1.5 5@299

17) Jaguar R1 F1 (2000) 2.7 4.2 9.4@181 72 118

F1 Boats are even faster, but that is another story!

ACME Brick

Source would be nice...

[Toxicant]

Originally posted by lumepojo
Test results


60 100 1/4 mile@mph 80-0 60-0 100-0

ACME Brick

something is missing, 80-0 60-0 100-0 doesn't make sense??

[TazioN]

That´s a good post, thanks!

It should be said, however, that the race cars will have different acceleration based on gearing and aerodynamics.

[kober]

How come F3000 is faster than F1?

[lumepojo]

Sources for this information are numerous.

Road & Track magazine, Performance car, Sport Auto (french and german issues).

Interesting notes are that the acceleration figures for the F1 turbo car do not show that
the car had wheelspin all the way through to top gear, as did the 1966 AC Cobra.

****I tried to format the page several times but DATA shifted every time, sorry. You should be able to decipher the information. I will try to scan the Road & Track test results when I can access a scanner capable of it!

For those of you who dispute these figures, please contact the source for your complaints.

ACME brick

[da Silva]

Suzuki GSX1000R 0-100 <3 sec. 0-200 <9 sec. 285 KM/h $11 000 new
Suzuki GSX1300R Hayabusa 0-100 < 3 sec. 0-200 ~8 sec. 305 KM/h good one used $ 7 000

God damn what a lot of straight line performance you get from stock motorcycles.

[Ali_G]

Kober: I too disagree with the F1 car results.

Latest figures put 0 - 60 of an F1 car at 2.2 seconds.

And considerign that F3000 and F1 cars weigh the same yet the F1 car has just under double the power, this has to be false.

Niall

[917k]

N

[917k]

No way posssible that a F3000 does the quarter faster than an F1.It totally defies all physical laws.I'm not falling for it.
So,a F3000 would make it down to the 1st corner before an F1?

Back up your source for the F3000 accel.