

Can F1 go bankrupt?
#1
Posted 02 May 2002 - 14:28

Advertisement
#2
Posted 02 May 2002 - 14:36
FOM, FOA or which ever of Bernie's company oversees the dealings with the individual tracks, guarantees a minimum grid of (I think) 18 entrants. So, should enough individual teams go under, brining the total grid below the guaranteed figure, Bernie could be facing 17 breaches of contract.
That just one possible scenario.
#3
Posted 02 May 2002 - 14:39
#4
Posted 02 May 2002 - 14:44
Originally posted by Scudetto
FOM, FOA or which ever of Bernie's company oversees the dealings with the individual tracks, guarantees a minimum grid of (I think) 18 entrants. So, should enough individual teams go under, brining the total grid below the guaranteed figure, Bernie could be facing 17 breaches of contract.
That just one possible scenario.
Interesting. But to whom is the grid of not less than 18 guaranteed? To the TV companies who buy the rights to cover it?
#5
Posted 02 May 2002 - 14:50
Originally posted by Robbie
Interesting. But to whom is the grid of not less than 18 guaranteed? To the TV companies who buy the rights to cover it?
Yeah, I think so. I read a piece about the minimum grid thing somewhere last season in connection with either the Kirch debacle or the GPWC.
I does make sense that the deal is with the broadcaster, though I do think the event promoter is a factor in this as well.
If I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me.
#6
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:02
They will begin to act as a unit and push for changes to the series which will cut costs and make for better racing... perhaps cost caps - R&D caps and so forth. Either way I think it's clear that all but VW and GM feel that this series IS the series for them to market the success of their brand. IMO they will want to maintain that but will do so in a far better "managed" way then in the past. In essence they will introduce a level of pro-active management that F1 has lacked.
This hopefully, will solve alot of problems

#7
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:06

#8
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:08
#9
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:09

#10
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:11
Yes, F1 can go bankrupt, just like any business!
BTW, I think Bernie's nest of companies, and the whole F1 scene, is at considerable risk right now. I'm not sure bankruptcy is in the cards, but serious contraction strikes me as almost inevitable due to the money-gobbling direction F1 has taken. And I'm not sure the car companies, which ultimately are run by some pretty conservative people, will be interested in a rescue much less setting up their own series.
#11
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:27
#12
Posted 02 May 2002 - 15:53
Then the teams still in will start to cut costs (as Jordan are now doing) to fit the new economic climate.
In order to fill the grid Bernie will be forced to cut the deposit that he makes new entrants pay.
In turn, more privateers will come in.
That will in turn put more pressure on for cost cutting excercises as the balance shifts towards small poorer teams rather than the big corporate beasts we currently have
In other words F1 as a sport will continue, and chould even flourish in a harsher economic climate - it might even - God forbid - become a sport again...
#13
Posted 02 May 2002 - 16:02
#14
Posted 02 May 2002 - 16:22

#15
Posted 02 May 2002 - 17:18
Originally posted by aportinga
I think that as soon as the issue with ACEA and BE buying back the TV and therebe the money interest in F1 that things are going to change. Some here think that F1 will hit the crapper without the Private teams. I understand that posistion, but I honestly feel that once the manufactures take control with BE at the helm, that F1 will actually stablize itself.
They will begin to act as a unit and push for changes to the series which will cut costs and make for better racing... perhaps cost caps - R&D caps and so forth. Either way I think it's clear that all but VW and GM feel that this series IS the series for them to market the success of their brand. IMO they will want to maintain that but will do so in a far better "managed" way then in the past. In essence they will introduce a level of pro-active management that F1 has lacked.
This hopefully, will solve alot of problems![]()
I know that the popular belief is that if you put F1 in the control of the automakers (in other words, the team owners) that its future will be secured. And it does sound like it should work, too.
The problem is that CART has been run by the team owners since its inception and it's not quite worked as well as you would think it should. The team owners have huge egos and they can never seem to agree on much. Even though CART has a person "in-charge", that person is hired by, paid by, and (on a regular basis) fired by the same owners he has to regulate.
I still think that the automakers should buy into F1. The automakers would at least ensure that the broadcasts remain free and they should do a better job of marketing the sport than the current arrangement. But, F1 needs to have someone independent of the automakers regulating the sport. They need to keep the FIA (just get rid of Max

#16
Posted 02 May 2002 - 17:37