
ALESI: The greatest injustice of life...
#1
Posted 26 May 2000 - 04:26
Advertisement
#2
Posted 26 May 2000 - 05:51
Originally posted by Goofy:
but one thing you can NEVER blame is his performance.
I can and I will
#3
Posted 26 May 2000 - 06:01
Originally posted by ClashCityRocker:
I can and I will
For the sake of the argument, would you care to develop?
#4
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:25
#5
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:52
#6
Posted 26 May 2000 - 08:56
#7
Posted 26 May 2000 - 13:51
In 1996 every race Alesi finished was in the points. Of 11 races he finished that year, 9 times he was on the podium. The worst he qualifield that year was 9th in Japan, mainly due to the excessive preasure placed on him by Flav. Other than that race he averaged a grid position of 5th. He was the 3rd most consistant driver behind the Williams drivers completitng 80% off all the laps and ranked 2nd in avg lap time for all the tracks and all the drivcers. 2nd. Ahead of both Hill and Schumacher. He outqualifiled Berger 13 times. Come on here!
Guys this guy is amazing. And considering the 96 Benetton was the same as the 95 in major design details, which was for Schumacher, I say pretty good. Give him a decent car and support, this man is a Mika Hakkinen.
#8
Posted 26 May 2000 - 15:13
#9
Posted 26 May 2000 - 15:25
As for Hakkinen. Many have said he has gotten better because of the confidence he has, and now that he sees what he can do. He wasnt this fast before 98. Im sure if Jean got some good wins, he would realize how to control his emotions and how to drive smart and faster. Jean like Mika needs to see results before he can provide more and consistanty.
#10
Posted 26 May 2000 - 17:56
Originally posted by Nathan:
And considering the 96 Benetton was the same as the 95 in major design details...
I think it's a bit too simple to put it that way. No team in Formula 1 can afford to have its cars remain basically the same as the previous year, and of course Benetton didn't in 1996. The car that year introduced many changes compared with its predecessor, and that alone could explain part of the difference in performance.
But I actually have another theory. In 1995, Benetton was in fact Team Schumacher, pretty much the same way Ferrari is nowadays. By that, I mean that the team relied solely on Michael to give the feedback needed to develop the car. Because of the German's talent, and thanks to the great team built around him, the system worked flawlessly. But when Schumacher decided to leave for Ferrari, the whole team lost guidance, and had to adapt to TWO new drivers in order to develop the new car. And it is quite documented that Alesi and Berger do not have exactly the same requirements when it comes to car-handling. I therefore believe that the team got lost in its development work, simply because they were not used anymore to receive two conflicting views on what should be improved. I'm pretty sure that if Ferrari was to lose Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello at the end of the season, and got two new drivers in replacement with equal status, they would encounter the same kind of problem over at least the first half of the following season.
My opinion is that Berger and Alesi did not fit in a system that Benetton was unwilling to change since it had worked so well with Schumi. And that may explain in part the slow degradation of the team's atmosphere in 1996, that led to the departure of many of its best human elements.
[This message has been edited by Pascal (edited 05-26-2000).]
#11
Posted 26 May 2000 - 18:49
Post Bennetton Alesi's career has seemed to slide, a couple of years at Sauber just as they peaked & now at Prost just as everyone realized they are crap.
It seem's unfortunate that a lot of Alesi's best moments came so earley in his career (the classic battle with Senna while driving a TYRELL). To me Alesi has been blighted by managing to join a team in decline, going to Ferrari instead of Williams IMO was his biggest mistake.
P.S. During the European GP coverage Martin Brundle said that he & Alesi once stood toe to toe with Alesi saying "I'm going to kill you" anyone know when & where ?
#12
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:01
#13
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:24

How about Melbourne '97 - that was a brilliant drive, ignoring the screams on his radio and the frantically waved pit boards, only to realize a couple of laps later that an F1 car does indeed need fuel to run properly.
This is a qualitative remark, but it also seems to me that when Alesi blows an engine he is more adept at continuing along the racing line, spreading oil as he goes, than any other current driver.
I think Alesi is a good driver, but certainly no better than someone like Irvine.
#14
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:26
He was coming up to lap Brundle, who kept Alesi back for several corners and then spun in front of him going into Tabac - Alesi never had a chance. On that day, Jean looked amazing - especially when you consider that DC trashed both Ferrari's on the first start and the team was forced to the spare and/or hurriedly repaired car(s).
As a Ferrari fan, that day just kept getting worse and worse...
[This message has been edited by Duane (edited 05-26-2000).]
#15
Posted 26 May 2000 - 07:41
#16
Posted 26 May 2000 - 20:17
Can you give me some examples of when Alesi's engine has blown he runs for a while spreading oil all over the track. For you to bring this point up must mean it sticks in your mind and that he may have done it on a few occasions so can you enlighten me where and when please.
#17
Posted 26 May 2000 - 20:55
#18
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:04
#19
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:19
Advertisement
#20
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:28
Compare this with:
In 1995 Benetton had Rory Byrne designing the cars, Ross Brawn calling the races, Renault providing the same spec engines they supplied WCC-runner up Williams with, and Michael Schumacher signed as #1 driver.
1996: 68 points, 3rd in WCC, 0 wins, 0 poles
1995: 137 points, 1st in WCC, 11 wins, 4 poles
What was different?
------------------
Forza Michael Schumacher,
Todd
#21
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:36
#22
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:43
I've also bothered to read everything I can find about Schumacher and his teams. The B195 wasn't built around Schumacher's style. It was a difficult to drive car because it was a difficult to drive car. Did you read the interview where Damon asked Michael about the in-car shots of him feverishly working the wheel to keep the B195 pointed forward? Michael said he didn't do it because of preference, that is just the way the car handled. Michael constantly adapts to whatever style suits the car or the rules. If Schumacher had really wanted the hyper twitchy B195 to suit his own style, he would have been SOL when 4 groove front tires came out. Somehow, he is still a very competitive driver. If Alesi were as good as Michael, he would have made his cars work for him and been just as adaptive as Michael's teams know him to be. Speaking of the B195, I thought Alesi rather liked it. Wasn't it Berger that crashed them all?
------------------
Forza Michael Schumacher,
Todd
#23
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:49
Jean is the only one who is a match for MS in the wet.
His car control is the best of ANYONE. I saw him last season, in Montreal friday practice lock up all 4 tyres for over 100 meters and still make the corner.
His weakness is all off-track. He should sue his manager for incompetence. Alesi could have been a world champ no problem. He NEVER drove a WDC-level car. NEVER.
What he's doing in the worst car onthe grid this season is unbelievable. Go to Forix and pull up the lap charts. Here they are:
http://www.forix.com...l=0&r=10001&c=6 http://www.forix.com...l=0&r=10002&c=6 http://www.forix.com...l=0&r=10003&c=6 http://www.forix.com...l=0&r=10004&c=6 http://www.forix.com...l=0&r=10005&c=6
he easily has the most overtakings this year in the worst car with regulations that make it impossible for MS to pass Villeneuve, RB to pass Trulli, etc. Can't passs in these cars unless you're Alesi it seems...
#24
Posted 26 May 2000 - 21:57
And for the record, I have never stated that Alesi was a superior driver than Schumacher, but I still believe that the gap between them is less than what raw figures would lead us to believe. I just believe that comparing team situation from one year to another is not really relevant. On the other hand, putting both drivers in exactly the same car would.
#25
Posted 27 May 2000 - 01:53
He may not be as good as Gilles, Prost, Senna, Shumacher (he's there no doubt) but he surely deserves a championship much more than Mika deserved being a repeating champion... Mika barely deserved being champion at all....
------------------
"When everything is under control, you're not going fast enough."
Mario Andretti
Goof
#26
Posted 27 May 2000 - 02:24
#27
Posted 27 May 2000 - 02:39
Originally posted by Damop:
It's easier to overtake when you are starting at the back of the grid....
That statement would be true if Jean was driving a superior car, which is clearly not the case this year...

#28
Posted 27 May 2000 - 07:13
#29
Posted 27 May 2000 - 08:02
#30
Posted 27 May 2000 - 08:47
He was and is too emotional to be a top driver. He's sort of like a slower Gilles Villeneuve with a bit too much emotion. Fun to watch, though!
#31
Posted 27 May 2000 - 09:05
Hakkinen = FAST DRIVER
I'll take the Alesi's of the World over the Hakkinen's, even if they don't win races or championships.
#32
Posted 27 May 2000 - 09:25
Agreed!
P.S. with a handle like that, shouldn't you only post once?

#33
Posted 27 May 2000 - 11:03
[This message has been edited by vroom-vroom (edited 05-27-2000).]
[This message has been edited by vroom-vroom (edited 05-27-2000).]
#34
Posted 27 May 2000 - 18:20
I second that.
I am still waiting for these Alesi dumping oil antics from you guys. Do I detect you were making it up.
#35
Posted 27 May 2000 - 23:52
BTW, where's AlesiFan? I figured he'd be in the think of this post...
These kinds of posts always end up with the old 'who's better' or 'let see them in equal cars' discussions, so here's my fantasy match race:
Schumacher and Alesi, one on one, in identical 1961/2 Ferrari Tipo 156s. Skinny tires, wire wheels, no aerodynamic aids, 1.5 liter V-6s. A two-race series - one at Spa and one at the old 'Ring.
Any thoughts on who would clean up?
#36
Posted 28 May 2000 - 00:21
Seems to me that Alesi rather "races" (if you will) and loses than thinks and wins.
No matter how much you "race" if you lose, you're still a loser.
Oh, and please don't pull GV into this Jean ain't no Gilles.
#37
Posted 28 May 2000 - 03:31
He is still living off his phoenix race.
Done nothing since.
#38
Posted 28 May 2000 - 05:07
PS Alesi is renowned for being a RainMaster, ala Schummy, but since I started watching in '97 I havent seen him display superior driving in the wet at all, on the contrary I remember him spinning out in the rain in some races. Where did this legend come from?
#39
Posted 28 May 2000 - 05:17

Thanks for your enlightening contribution anyway.

Franco, Alesi's reputation in the wet comes from several occasions when, while driving his Ferrari, he managed to stay on track with slicks while all other competitors had chosen rain tyres (I remember one time in Spa, but the year escapes me right now). I actually believe that he is actually better on a drying track than on a really wet one, where several other drivers are at least as good as he is.
[This message has been edited by Pascal (edited 05-27-2000).]
Advertisement
#40
Posted 28 May 2000 - 05:49
I think you are spot on about Alesi being better on a drying track than a full wet track.
Andretti
I would also say Schumacher is stealing money from Ferrari also. How many years has it taken him to try and win the driver and constructor title for them and failed? They had to rely on there no.2 to do the job for them last year. At least Alesi is not ripping off so much money out of his team.
I am still waiting for these reports of Alesi dumping oil all over the track guys. If you can't back up your comments with proof then don't bother posting. It seems like a lot of posters here are doing that in this thread.
#41
Posted 28 May 2000 - 22:49
[This message has been edited by Red27 (edited 05-28-2000).]
#42
Posted 28 May 2000 - 23:33

#43
Posted 28 May 2000 - 23:59
#44
Posted 29 May 2000 - 01:09
I beleive they were contesting 9th place. In the rain. I can't seem to recall who won.
(Doesnt matter, much. Both showed their skills that day).
#45
Posted 29 May 2000 - 01:15

I have no doubt that Alesi's passion (admirable thing in modern F1 I must admit) would be better off in some series with less cutthroat atmosphere. Like in CART or American Le Mans.
I'm just attempting to analyce F1 from the commonmans viewpoint and for your average BernieCam watcher F1 just seems to be all about winning.
"The second is first of the losers." -Keke Rosberg
#46
Posted 29 May 2000 - 03:05
#47
Posted 29 May 2000 - 23:43