
OT Atlas F1 Subscription
#1
Posted 08 August 2002 - 23:24
Please give your opinion:
for those who are a seasoned Atlas F1 subscribers - is it worth money? how would you describe the overall quality of the magazine.
for those who didn't subscribe - do you suffer/how much are you tempted to subscribe?
personally I can find all the information on free internet sites. But I may be missing quailty articles I enjoyed reading when Atlas was free. So really I'm curious about their quality at the present time.
to the administration: please allow this thread a couple of days.
Thnx
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 August 2002 - 23:32
Originally posted by ZZMS
for those who didn't subscribe - do you suffer/how much are you tempted to subscribe?
if you are content with www.autosport.com, then everything is alright for you as they are the pros among the amateurs - normally they spare you with nonsense speculations which in 95% lead to nothing but a waste of web space. they simply have the biggest experience in motorsport coverage and it shows.
#3
Posted 08 August 2002 - 23:37
Francesco
#4
Posted 08 August 2002 - 23:48
And AtlasF1 is the only site with FIA press acreditation, which speaks volumes to me.
#5
Posted 09 August 2002 - 00:19
Although I'm late with my renewal and so have had my access cut off, as I'm jobless and penniless at the moment, it has become quite worth it over the year, and when I scrape up the money I'll send it along.
The news section has improved vastly since subscriptions came into effect last year.
The race info is good, comprehensive and well illustrated, with just enough tang to make it interesting without tipping it over into a particular bias.
The "magazine," in which bias is the whole point, it is rarely the entire point, which I mean as a compliment. The names on the bylines are well known around the paddock with books to their credit, so it amounts to having a magazine subscription that has stuff arrive at your door more often and does less harm to the environment.
Mitch McCann, resident satirist, used to be worth the price of admission, but he has been on sabbatical since November.
As of now, Richard Barnes and Roger Horton alone make it worthwhile, and Karl Ludvigsen gets hot too.
Jo Ramirez (formerly of McLaren) blows hot and cold. Sometimes he's interesting, sometimes less so, but he's great when he reminisces, and as far as I know you can't get his stuff anywhere else.
Although you can find Fisichella's columns elsewhere, I've liked his contributions here.
If you'd rather live in racing's past (an increasing number of us do) Don Capps does it peerlessly.
There is an extensive and very valuable archive of Atlas stuff dating back to 1995, also very worthwhile.
Of course, this BB is not a bad substitute for doing without, and you can access it for nothing. However, quite a number of discussions are based on Atlas material, and members have been fairly scrupulous (i.e. wary of editorial thunderbolts) about NOT posting it here.
On the downside, Jane whatserface's (a Williams PR type) contributions strike me as gasbaggish and gossipy, but it's easy enough to avoid clicking on one thing.
Otherwise, the site is well organized and IMO is the cleanest and fastest around (although if you're working with a 56K modem, the doubleclick ads could give you some hemorrhoids), and leaves little or no garbage in your computer.
By this point, I hope you're sold, and an editor is tempted to give me access for nothing...;)
#6
Posted 09 August 2002 - 00:29
I am now firmly in the camp of being a subscriber. I subscribed about 2 weeks after the subscription model was introduced after not making it through cold turkey. I have to say that I rarely go to other sites now for my F1 news, views and opinions. The quality and quantity of the material has improved markedly since April last year. I was already of the opinion last year that Atlas F1 was amongst the top sites on the net. I think they have raised the stakes to now be the best. I have stopped buying print magazines as I find the articles show bias or are tripe written to pander to a particular audience.
My advice would be to stop buying the magazines and put that money into an Atlas F1 sub. The news is fresher, the articles well researched and presented and the site is interactive with the publishers. Where else can you correct mistakes, suggest new features or correspond directly and almost imeadiately with the editors and journalists?
Long live Atlas F1. May it continue to grow and prosper.
#7
Posted 09 August 2002 - 00:39

Sample of things that cannot be found anywhere else other than Atlas F1:
- The only website to offer dynamic (user selected) laptimes data - ALL laptimes from the entire race:
See http://www.atlasf1.c...r/laptimes.html and http://www.atlasf1.c.../tour/laps.html to get the actual understanding of what I am talking about
- The only website to offer lapchart with ALL gaps (formerly, Gale Force was the only other website to offer this.) See http://www.atlasf1.c...r/gapchart.html to see what I am talking about (there is also a simple, positions only, lapchart. See http://www.atlasf1.c...r/lapchart.html )
- The only website to offer the sector times and speeds for every session (total of 7 sessions) during a GP weekend, added to the news immediately after a session ends. Also added as a comparison (dynamic) compilation after the race. See http://www.atlasf1.c...ur/sectors.html
- The only website to offer all its photographs in high-res quality - see http://www.atlasf1.c...-4&w=1200&h=820 as a sample.
- The only website to offer a weekly magazine who, quantity wise (quality I will defer to personal taste), has more F1 content than ANY other publication, offline or online
- The only website to offer the personal columns of Giancarlo Fisichella, Jo Ramirez and Ann Bradshaw. See http://www.atlasf1.c...fisichella.html for an example
- The only website to separate rumours and speculations from factual news. Our reliability is unmatched by any other F1 website or publication. When something appears in our newsroom, we make sure you can rely on it to be true and verified (and if you want an example off the top of my head of wrong reports reputed places such as Autosport put in their news, take their lovely "Stop Press: FIA Decide Not to Reinstate Traction Control" headline, 30 minutes before we broke the news that the FIA decided to reinstate electronic driver aids as of San Marino
).
To this I'll add the fact that we have - hands down - the best GP weekend coverage any other website or publication can offer, with at least 3 writers in every GP; the fact that we have the BIGGEST cadre of staff writers to be found anywhere on the Internet (something like 20, in fact, whose work cannot be found anywhere else on the Net); the fact that we are among the very few (can be counted on 1 hand!) websites to produce everything originally and by ourselves (rather than copy or recycle the news from other websites!); the fact that we do NOT carry advertising (with the exception of public pages, and even there we do NOT work with popups and the likes); and the fact that have the cleanest, most formidable and balanced presentation - design and content wise...
For more details and more examples, go to http://www.atlasf1.com/subs - and click on "Click Here to Tour Atlas F1". I doubt you will find a SINGLE website or publication, or even a COMBINATION of websites or publications - that offer you that much quantity AND quality of information on Formula One.
#8
Posted 09 August 2002 - 01:04
#9
Posted 09 August 2002 - 01:32
I started my subscription in May. All I have to say is this is light years ahead of what is reported on other websites and being a fairly new fan to F-1 I enjoy reading the various opinions of people who are much more knowledgeable than I.
It's well worth the money.
Oh yeah and it's up to date!!!!
If it's not on Atlas it's not worth reading

#10
Posted 09 August 2002 - 01:43

But the news can be gotten of other sites. http://www.autosport.com, http://www.itvf1.com, and http://www.grandprix.com are the most reliable. But the funny thing is I always go to Atlasf1 when I get up to read the headline and then find the news elsewhere. I guess I am still drawn to Atlas

But $40 is a bit high for me, for the articles. But as I say I will be a member before to long. Atlas is a great site and the staff should be commended.
JanUsa
#11
Posted 09 August 2002 - 01:46
I realized that I hadn't bought a print mag since subscribing. No need to. IMO it's well worth it.
#12
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:03
Richard Barnes
Karl Ludvigsen
Roger Horton
Between them they write articles of currency and quality that I can not find anywhere else, irrespective of cost.
Thus the Subscription cost is a complete non-issue for me, and should be for you too.

P.S. I am amazed that the money men at F1 Racing or F1 Magazine don't attempt to buy Atlas and shut it down, coz I just can't bring myself to buy their magazines any more, where as I used to be a faithful purchaser of them.
#13
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:05
Mark
#14
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:07
Originally posted by bira
I doubt you will find a SINGLE website or publication, or even a COMBINATION of websites or publications - that offer you that much quantity AND quality of information on Formula One.
This would mean that all f1sites on the net and/or all print publications together weren't as good as atlasf1 alone which I find very hard to believe, to say the least.;)
IMO the imminent problem with a subscription (I take it it's a one year-long contract) is that one is always buying a opinion with it and with your information sources it's like with your diet - you have to change it frequently in order to stay healthy. No way around it.
@ all
As for the statistical material also interesting: www.tagheuer.com being the consequent attempt at quantifying a race weekend into a world of numbers. It's worth a look for forum members with latent ambition on the 'real-expert-status'.;)
#15
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:15

I am a subscriber since they introduced the Subscription method, cause before when it wasstill free, the information was great. Not, it became greater.
It is better to subscribe here than buy an F1 Magazine.
I love the columns, they are quite objective just like this week's issue.

So what are you waiting for?
#16
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:31
However, I do not agree that magazines are lost with the advent of great quality sites like AtlasF1.
I consider the web as a quick source of info for real-time use, and occassional editorial reading.
But mags you can keep archived, hi-rez photography (good) is essential for sports material, and mags can offer interesting in-depth analysis of events and topics which can be read at more convienient times. Mags are great companions 'after-event' to websites.
I cannot stand reading a monitor for more than a few minutes, we are not used to it yet I guess. The average time spent visiting websites by surfers has been calculated at 30 secs.

But AtlasF1 is a champion in its category. i would never dream of subsribing to anything else except for AtlasF1. The editorial board is state of the art. I wish them well and maybe one day publish their first magazine (need an art director AtlasF1?

Ciao
#17
Posted 09 August 2002 - 02:54
Originally posted by holiday
This would mean that all f1sites on the net and/or all print publications together weren't as good as atlasf1 alone which I find very hard to believe, to say the least.;)
I am of the belief that there are a few drivers who have more raw talent than Michael Schumacher but at the same time have grave flaws in other areas; that there are a few drivers who perhaps have better technical understanding than him but at the same time have less talent than him; etc. But that there is NO other driver who is as complete as Michael Schumacher - and is as good in each and every category as him combined.
Capish?

Originally posted by holiday
IMO the imminent problem with a subscription (I take it it's a one year-long contract) is that one is always buying a opinion with it and with your information sources it's like with your diet - you have to change it frequently in order to stay healthy. No way around it.
Welll that's fair enough, but it's plain ignornace on your part then - because we also offer a 1-week, 13-weeks (3 months) and 26-weeks (6 months) options.
#18
Posted 09 August 2002 - 03:05
The staff are excellent and responsive, I have had issues with more than 1 article which has appeared in the magazine. Many of the authors of these articles have cheerfully responded to my emails, to either clarify an issue, or to offer another insight.
Bira et al do an excellent job and are extremely responsive to their readers, I challenge you to find any print magazine which matches Atlas in this area.
I highly recommend this site to everyone who will listen!!



#19
Posted 09 August 2002 - 03:52


Advertisement
#20
Posted 09 August 2002 - 04:04


Oh, a warning if you do join, the chat room is full of idiots.

#21
Posted 09 August 2002 - 04:19
#22
Posted 09 August 2002 - 04:41
Top marks, and highly recommended.
#23
Posted 09 August 2002 - 05:49

#24
Posted 09 August 2002 - 07:12
Quite exciting to get a Swedish F1 magazine. I thought.
But after reading it for a while, i discovered that having a subscription on Atlas was more than enough for me. Not that there were anything wrong with the magazine.
Atlas has always been good and accurate. This spring it evolved into something even better.
Everything else is completely redundant. Except F1live when you want to follow practice sessions live on the net perhaps.
I have subscribed since the first days of Atlas as a subcribed service.
Keep it up

Fredrik
p.s I miss Mitch too

#25
Posted 09 August 2002 - 07:25
Those that give their time in running and writing for the site are genuine formula one fans that want the best for the sport and that comes across in the finished product. I don't always agree with what is written but on atlas you have the opportunity to put your own opinion across, often to the writer him or herself. What other site offers you that?
Most info can be found elsewhere, Bira has already described what can't, but I found it impossible to find the accurate stories among the rumours and guesses on other sites. No other site gives the combination of quality and reliability as atlas.
#26
Posted 09 August 2002 - 07:44
For me the main reasons for that are:
1. The articles are generally very good. The great ones easily outweighs the bad ones and the bad ones are easy to skip and the content is extensive anyway. The quality is comparable with the other top magazines, but usually from a different angle, and if you compare the article with other sites then Atlas is clearly superior.
2. You get them faster than any other mag can manage and there’s a connection between the articles and the forums where you can discuss with other knowledgeable people in a way that you normally can’t do easily with a mag.
3. The news section is much more serious than other sites. If there’s a hesitation of whether a piece of news is true, then they put it in grapewine. Meaning, if Atlas has the news in the news section then you can count it as a reliable piece of news, which certainly isn’t the case with most, if not all, other sites.
4. The prize is cheaper than any mag I know of. And the content is at least as as extensive and of comparable quality.
Finally, I’m of the opinion that the Forums at Atlas has the most knowledgeable and interesting people on the net. If you enjoy the BB as a reader or contributor you will contribute a little bit to keep this excellent site alive for all to enjoy by being a subscriber.
#27
Posted 09 August 2002 - 07:48
I renewed this year without even considering for a moment not to do so.
Atlas represents real value for money IMHO. I got an extra 2 weeks of access for free because there were apparently problems accessing the site one weekend. As I don't tend to access the net at weekends it didn't actually affect me...but I felt the 2 week extension on my subscription was a class move by Atlas!
The coverage just gets better and better - since going to the subscription model Atlas has increased in quantity and quality...which considering it was so impressive as a free site is a fine achievement.
Mike and AtlasF1

(So Bira, about that free extension...)

#28
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:12
But I'd like to stress something else: in my mind atlasf1 is one of the most *usable* sites I know. The layout is pleasant, it allows fast orientation for the user and keeps download times as low as possible. The huge depth of the site is easily accessible via well constructed theme-centered navigation pages, an aspect of the site architecture that has continously improved over the last months. Print versions of articles allow sensible off-screen reading. I like using atlasf1. I find the stuff that I look for, I don't get frustrated with waiting, waiting, waiting and finally ending up with an unsatisfactory result, and -bliss for my sore, screentired eyes- I don't have to deal with garish pop-ups.
The new dynamic laptime data and the season statistics are not only awesome in themselves - I can choose my own ways of looking at them. This is a great demonstration of the advantage of digital publishing over paper. It just cannot be done in a magazine.
For me atlasf1 has all the good sides of a quality print publication, plus the greater speed of reporting and the much improved access and retrieval of a digital archive. No question in subscribing ...
#29
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:19
Only think I can say I am missing is the GP tickets booking. Hope it will be developed one day...
#30
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:35
#31
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:38
Originally posted by holiday
if you are content with www.autosport.com, then everything is alright for you as they are the pros among the amateurs - normally they spare you with nonsense speculations which in 95% lead to nothing but a waste of web space. they simply have the biggest experience in motorsport coverage and it shows.
I used to go to Autosport and still get the mag delivered at home, but their web site now is so full of garbage popups, adverts and crap that I do not go there - same for ITV-F1.com, despite some good articles - the price of free info I guess.
AtlasF1 is worth the subscription to me because:
Editorial and articles are 1st class.
Guest writers are entertaining and add another view with credibility.
News is up to date enough for my needs most of the time.
The Readers Comments BB is often entertaining, sometimes gives advance rumours, etc
#32
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:38

Both are good value for money in their own separate ways.
#33
Posted 09 August 2002 - 08:40

#34
Posted 09 August 2002 - 10:15

(Oh yeah, I'm also in my second year of Atlas!)
#35
Posted 09 August 2002 - 10:52
This is the first site I visit every morning - even come into work early so I can have a little 'quiet time' reading through the thread topics.
I find the magazine a great read every week. And the BB well worth the effort - Unlike some of the 'Zoos' out there.
#36
Posted 09 August 2002 - 10:53
I've read Atlasf1 for quite some time, started to visit regulary about 1.5 years before it got to the subscription. Before that i visited Atlasf1 from time to time, but not that regulary. I think my first visit to the site was when i was still at school, back in late 96, and i've allways had high regards for the content here.
The subscription is worht the money, and then some. If you are going to buy different magazines to get all the news you get here, it will get more expensive (quite much so here in Norway). Also, since i feel a bit part of the Atlasf1 community (with the chat and BB) i felt subscribing was "the right thing to do", so that i helped, if only in a small economical way by subscribing.
#37
Posted 09 August 2002 - 11:52
#38
Posted 09 August 2002 - 12:32
Originally posted by Jackman
Since subscribing to Atlas I've stopped buying any of the magazines, as I no longer need them.
Same here . I never thought i'd stop buying the mag i used to buy to get F1 info but now whenever i see a copy and have a look all i see is last months news .
#39
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:26
BTW, can you print the entire magazine in PDF format or some other format for easy travel?
McBain.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:28
McBain
WOOOOOHOOOOO!!!!
#41
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:30
Originally posted by McBain
BTW, can you print the entire magazine in PDF format or some other format for easy travel?
Yes.
You can print one or all articles; and you can download one or all articles in PDF. The Magazine (as well as News and the Daily Grapevine) also come in Palm-friendly version.
#42
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:31
#43
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:36
McBain
WOOOHHOOOOO!
#44
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:37
Originally posted by McBain
Wow I just downloaded the magazine in PDF, and it was 63 pages!! Now that is alot of information!
McBain
WOOOHHOOOOO!
Umm... that's a small issue, heh (no GP). I think our record was the post-Austrian GP issue - 111 PDF pages. In terms of print magazines (the likes of F1 Racing et. al.), with ads and all, that's the equivalent of about 220 pages or so

#45
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:46
The "My Atlas" page is my preset home page whenever Netscape is fired up. My Sony handheld syncs to the site via Avantgo, so I can read news and the longer articles on the fly. I subscribed within a week of the site going to the subscription format and firmly believe it's worth the investment.
If I can get this sort of news and insight while it's still timely, then I don't need F1 Mag or F1 Racing so long as I have my Atlas.

#46
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:48
Free advertising!
Testimonials from happy people!

#47
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:55
It is the first web site I check when I at home. Then the same thing at uni or work.
As Bira said, it really is a 'one-stop-shop'! I find no need to go to any other web sites. If there is something of note worth checking out on another website, i am told in Readers Comments!
It saves so much time, and is a bargain compared to anything else ont he market.
Mat
#48
Posted 09 August 2002 - 13:58
Originally posted by Scudetto
My Sony handheld syncs to the site via Avantgo, so I can read news and the longer articles on the fly.
You can't read the really long articles on your handheld! They exceed the AvantGo file size limit. That's my only complaint with AtlasF1. I raised it a while OK but nothing was ever done about it - it now usually only affects "Elsewhere in Racing" though...so I can live with it. And with this weeks issue it isn't a problem at all - all the articles fit.
#49
Posted 09 August 2002 - 14:01
Self promotion has always been a very weak point for us. You don't see Atlas F1 beat its own drum - in fact we probably should - and as funny as it may sound, it comes down to feeling rather awkward yelling at everyone's face how good we think we are.
When I saw this thread, sure enough my initial 'admin' instincts told me to move it to the Atlas F1 forum. But then I thought, hang on a minute, if I can't promote what I think is a great product ON Atlas F1 of all places, then where can I?
I didn't start this thread, but I take the opportunity to perhaps remind some people that there's a great website right here that offers a great service. And quite frankly, awkward as it may feel, I really shouldn't be ashamed - in fact I'm very proud

A couple of comments while we're at it:
Subscription allowed us to survive. That is first and foremost. Every person who wonders 'what if' should know - Atlas F1, Bulletin Board included, wouldn't be here today without subscription.
But rather charge for what already existed, we set about expanding and offering bigger and better service. You need only look at pre-subscription magazine issues or news to see the vast difference.
And it does not stop here. To me, the subscribers are 'share holders' and their money is an investment, so I need to justify it every year with more added value and the raising of the bar even further. I most certainly plan to offer more features, more unique content and services.
I think we make mistakes, but we don't make that many and the general direction is good. And the satisfaction seems to be vast: the test was how many subscribers will renew their subscription once their initial one ran out. 95% did. I think that speaks for itself...
#50
Posted 09 August 2002 - 14:02
Originally posted by mikedeering
You can't read the really long articles on your handheld! They exceed the AvantGo file size limit. That's my only complaint with AtlasF1. I raised it a while OK but nothing was ever done about it - it now usually only affects "Elsewhere in Racing" though...so I can live with it. And with this weeks issue it isn't a problem at all - all the articles fit.
Mike during the winter I'm redoing the entire Palm section (it will be entirely user-customisable). Among other things, long articles will be split to 2 pages.