When the German GP was held at the old Nurburgring, did they complete a warm up lap? I mean.....14 odd miles is some warm-up, right?!

Posted 15 November 2002 - 11:05
Advertisement
Posted 15 November 2002 - 11:09
Posted 15 November 2002 - 11:13
Posted 15 November 2002 - 11:26
Posted 15 November 2002 - 12:48
Posted 15 November 2002 - 12:52
Posted 15 November 2002 - 12:54
Posted 15 November 2002 - 13:19
Posted 15 November 2002 - 13:21
Posted 15 November 2002 - 13:29
Posted 15 November 2002 - 19:13
were used for the German Grand Prix nowadays, it would instantly become the BEST circuit in the world!the bit going down to Boxberg
Posted 15 November 2002 - 20:44
Posted 16 November 2002 - 01:27
Posted 16 November 2002 - 08:44
Posted 16 November 2002 - 08:58
Posted 16 November 2002 - 09:38
Posted 16 November 2002 - 10:49
Posted 18 November 2002 - 17:38
Originally posted by 2F-001
Steilstrecke is often open as part of the hiking and mountain-bike trail around the track - but I guess one would need to be uncommonly fit...
Posted 18 November 2002 - 18:14
Advertisement
Posted 18 November 2002 - 23:30
Posted 20 November 2002 - 21:37
Posted 21 November 2002 - 08:59
Posted 21 November 2002 - 09:03
Posted 21 November 2002 - 19:16
Posted 21 November 2002 - 19:28
Originally posted by Barry Boor
Rather than start another thread, I have a Nurburgring question.
While reading 'Racing the Silver Arrows', again, a sentence from the Autocar report of the 1935 German Grand Prix has me really puzzled. The report tells of the start of the race, wherein the cars roar off to the South Turn (described as a hairpin!), then back up behind the pits, again in full view of the grandstand. Then comes the sentence I find puzzling. I quote:
"Then we see them again, dropping with incredible rapidity down the winding valley that leads into the Eifel mountains."
This puzzles me because although I have been to the Ring I saw virtually nothing of it, but what film I have seen gives the impression that once the cars take the second left-hander behind the pits, they would immediately be lost from sight. Is it simply that the Hatzenbach forest was no more than a copse of baby trees in 1935?
What is the truth of the matter?
Posted 21 November 2002 - 19:30
Nowadays the trees are mostly gone
Posted 21 November 2002 - 19:42
Originally posted by Barry Boor
What's this! Sounds like a serious breach of conservation issues. Who has removed the trees and why?
Posted 21 November 2002 - 19:48
Posted 21 November 2002 - 20:22
Posted 27 November 2002 - 13:11