http://espn.go.com/r...18/1462603.html
The show catered mostly to the NASCAR crowd, but they did run stories quite often on the IRL, CART, ALMS, and F1.
Most of all, I'm going to miss the reports from Robin Miller on open wheel racing.

Posted 20 November 2002 - 17:26
Advertisement
Posted 20 November 2002 - 17:31
Originally posted by Locai
ESPN has cancelled RPM2Night after 7 years.
http://espn.go.com/r...18/1462603.html
The show catered mostly to the NASCAR crowd, but they did run stories quite often on the IRL, CART, ALMS, and F1.
Most of all, I'm going to miss the reports from Robin Miller on open wheel racing.
![]()
Posted 20 November 2002 - 17:38
Posted 20 November 2002 - 18:02
Posted 20 November 2002 - 18:20
Originally posted by mika911
John Kernan has hosted the weeknight RPM 2 Night since 1996 (when it began).
I enjoyed the show, I'd record it and fast forward to find the important parts (which was not too often).
Posted 20 November 2002 - 19:06
Posted 20 November 2002 - 19:18
Perhaps they hosted the weekend version, but Kernan was the original host of the weekday RPM 2 nite. And he's been the only host of the weekday RPM for all 7 years of it's existance.Originally posted by KenC
I don't think so. Remember Kenny Mayne? Rece Davis?
Posted 20 November 2002 - 19:57
Posted 20 November 2002 - 20:51
Originally posted by random
Perhaps they hosted the weekend version, but Kernan was the original host of the weekday RPM 2 nite. And he's been the only host of the weekday RPM for all 7 years of it's existance.
I think he does a fine job, but it was certainly Nascar's ridiculous practice of prohibiting media coverage of their events killed the show. I can't believe Nascar has gone to the lengths of forbiding all video clips of of their events, and even banning press passes to major media outlets and forbiding interviews within the tracks... ESPN has been forced to interview all the drivers at the local airport. sounds like something F1 would do...
Posted 20 November 2002 - 21:01
Originally posted by Lee Roy
NASCAR was the engine that fueled RPM2Night's creation in 1996, and other racing series were the beneficiary of this. They've been freeloading off of NASCAR's success for years now, and the NASCAR sugar daddy that allowed a daily RPM2Night to exist is now gone.
Posted 20 November 2002 - 22:04
Free media coverage is always a benefit and Nascar has been extremely short sighted in prohibiting media coverage. ESPN has spent millions of dollars producing a show revolving around their series, and Nascar is stupid enough to see it taken off the air.Originally posted by Lee Roy
NASCAR was the engine that fueled RPM2Night's creation in 1996, and other racing series were the beneficiary of this. They've been freeloading off of NASCAR's success for years now, and the NASCAR sugar daddy that allowed a daily RPM2Night to exist is now gone.
Posted 20 November 2002 - 22:32
Originally posted by random
Perhaps they hosted the weekend version, but Kernan was the original host of the weekday RPM 2 nite. And he's been the only host of the weekday RPM for all 7 years of it's existance.
Posted 20 November 2002 - 22:38
I thought the tv contract was for $240million last year, and that $400million was the average over the life of the deal.Originally posted by Lee Roy
FOX and NBC pay NASCAR over $400 million a year for the rights to show NASCAR races, who do you think NASCAR is going to give prefernce to????
As vapaokie notes, ESPN was the engine that fueled the NASCAR-craze.Originally posted by Lee Roy
NASCAR was the engine that fueled RPM2Night's creation in 1996, and other racing series were the beneficiary of this. They've been freeloading off of NASCAR's success for years now, and the NASCAR sugar daddy that allowed a daily RPM2Night to exist is now gone.
Of course not, didn't Fox and NBC write off a couple hundred million last year on their motorsports contracts? I'm sure ABC/ESPN are happy it wasn't them.Originally posted by Lee Roy
But don't feel too bad for ABC/ESPN.
Posted 20 November 2002 - 22:38
Posted 20 November 2002 - 22:39
Didn't a couple Indianapolis tv stations boycott USGP coverage, as Bernie wanted to get paid for newsclips?Originally posted by random
ESPN has been forced to interview all the drivers at the local airport. sounds like something F1 would do...
Posted 21 November 2002 - 00:06
Posted 21 November 2002 - 01:51
Nascar's popularity will certainly peak (and wane) sometime...
Posted 21 November 2002 - 03:08
Originally posted by vapaokie
And ESPN was the major engine that grew the NASCAR out of a backwoods Southeastern niche sport into the major league sport that it is now. It was disgusting what they did to ESPN in eliminating video and interview accesss to the drivers. If the drivers were fine with it, I don't think they would have been traipsing off to the "back forty" of the track properties to give interviews. No other sport has eliminated video footage to any broadcast network for news/sports shows.
They forgot PT Barnum's dictum in this regard- "all publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell my name right."
I don't have time to watch the entirely NASCAR racing news shows on FOX, and I rarely know when Speed's version of RPM2nite is on.
Posted 21 November 2002 - 03:13
Originally posted by KenC
Of course not, didn't Fox and NBC write off a couple hundred million last year on their motorsports contracts? I'm sure ABC/ESPN are happy it wasn't them.
Advertisement
Posted 21 November 2002 - 03:14
Originally posted by Lee Roy
Although ESPN was A vehicle that NASCAR used to show it's races, it certainly wasn't the only one. NASCAR races were also shown for years on the Nashville Network, ABC, the Turner Broadcasting System (TBS), CBS and, if I'm not mistaken, FOX. To claim that ESPN was THE "engine" that grew NASCAR, is to ignore the efforts of several other networks. ESPN showed NASCAR qualifying and also the RPM2Night, but they only did this after the NASCAR broadcasts were getting some pretty big ratings and make if financially viable to do so.
Posted 21 November 2002 - 04:26
Posted 21 November 2002 - 20:40
Posted 21 November 2002 - 20:54
As vapaokie has noted, ESPN was virtually the only game in town, and due to exposure on ESPN, made it all possible for TNN, TBS, CBS and others. I'm sure if you asked the Frances' they'd tell you the same.Originally posted by Lee Roy
Although ESPN was A vehicle that NASCAR used to show it's races, it certainly wasn't the only one. NASCAR races were also shown for years on the Nashville Network, ABC, the Turner Broadcasting System (TBS), CBS and, if I'm not mistaken, FOX. To claim that ESPN was THE "engine" that grew NASCAR, is to ignore the efforts of several other networks. ESPN showed NASCAR qualifying and also the RPM2Night, but they only did this after the NASCAR broadcasts were getting some pretty big ratings and make if financially viable to do so.
Posted 21 November 2002 - 21:08
Posted 21 November 2002 - 21:16
Originally posted by Lee Roy
Don't know if it was all that much, but overall, TV networks wrote off about a billion dollars on losses for NFL, MLB, NHL and NBA. Not bad company to be keeping.
Things might be better this year. Have been reading where NASCAR tv ratings were up around 13% this year.
Posted 22 November 2002 - 13:03
Posted 22 November 2002 - 20:36
Originally posted by Lee Roy
NBC will be okay. Here's a little something I found on www.motorsportstv.com
Did you catch that part about the TV ratings being 59% increased over 2000, when ABC/ESPN was still a major player?
Here's a little something else, too.
Oh, and sorry you don't think that being in the same category with the NFL and Major League Baseball is good company. It's nice when a company thinks your presence on their network is worth more than the money that they can actually generate. There are other measures to consider. FOX essentially held cable companies hostage by putting several races on it's Fx Cable Channel. My cable company had just upgraded, and did not include Fx, until FOX was going to show races on that channel. They quickly added Fx. How much do you think that was worth to FOX?
Posted 22 November 2002 - 21:02
Originally posted by KenC
As far as the 59% increase over 2000, what did you expect? That's an apples to oranges comparison, or have you forgotten that many more of the races back in 2000 weren't on broadcast tv, but on cable, where the ratings are clearly going to be lower.
Posted 22 November 2002 - 22:56
Originally posted by vapaokie
No other sport has eliminated video footage to any broadcast network for news/sports shows.
Posted 23 November 2002 - 00:31
Posted 23 November 2002 - 07:31