
The Most Prestigious MotorSport Event In The World
#1
Posted 09 January 2003 - 06:16
I'm the new boy here, I am afraid to say, so please forgive any newbie errors or posts. Having read this forum for the past few months you lot seem like a decent bunch, so I'm sure you wont moan too hard, but if I do do anything wrong, please let me know.
I thought I'd start of with a simple enough question really. Which of the above events do you view as the most prestigious. Put basically, which would you have like to have won most?
Your Comments Below Please
Advertisement
#2
Posted 09 January 2003 - 06:29

To me to win INDY would be the best it,s more for the driver than to do it with team mates
like you would have to do at LEMANS. An you get more coverage an MONEY.

#3
Posted 09 January 2003 - 06:42
#4
Posted 09 January 2003 - 06:51
#5
Posted 09 January 2003 - 07:07
My top three are Le Mans, Indy 500 and Monaco.
Indy is still an American race. Yes, it has become more international in recent years, but when you look at the teams there, you won't find any of them NOT coming from the USA.
Monaco is just another race in the F1 calender. Apart from being raced on the streets or with only 20 cars allowed on the grid, it's just an ordinary F1 race.
Le Mans is something different, something extraordinary. A totally different experience and top teams from all over the world take part in it. Not the best of racing I would admit, it's more a tactical race, but whenever the name "Le Mans" is mentioned, you will immediately link it up with the 24-hour race.
#6
Posted 09 January 2003 - 07:24
Not nowadays, but at one stage the Tourist Trophy (TT) would have rated a mention.
#7
Posted 09 January 2003 - 11:32
Monaco may have lost some of its status...but there is still amusement value in seeing today's F1 cars on a totally unsuitable circuit. Do ITV make public the viewing figures for the various Grands Prix..this would be enlightening.
#8
Posted 09 January 2003 - 12:28
Originally posted by RacingCrusaderUK
Dear Everyone
I'm the new boy here, I am afraid to say, so please forgive any newbie errors or posts. Having read this forum for the past few months you lot seem like a decent bunch, so I'm sure you wont moan too hard, but if I do do anything wrong, please let me know.
I thought I'd start of with a simple enough question really. Which of the above events do you view as the most prestigious. Put basically, which would you have like to have won most?
Your Comments Below Please
Got to be Le Mans. Everyone who matters has raced there, and you're performing in front of the most knowledgeable and enthusiastic crowd in motor sport. Oh, and you get as much racing in 24 hours as in a season of F1!
pete
#9
Posted 09 January 2003 - 12:39
As a single race, for a manufacturer, Le Mans.
Endurance racing is all about the car. At Indy the focus is on the driver.
Yeah Monaco is important, but its one race out of 17 whereas Indy, up until a few years ago, was a non points event.
#10
Posted 09 January 2003 - 13:14
I also think, that winning the Targa Florio is a very special achievement. As far as "prestige" is concerned I also vote for Le Mans.
Why did you include the "Race of Champions" in your list?
#11
Posted 09 January 2003 - 13:34
Indy, not bad for a speedway. Be nice if anyone ever put in some right handers.
Monaco, not bad not the circuit's a bit tight and it costs $2.50 for a can of Oxygen.
Daytona, used to be good when the ran around on the beach but well it's a bit too much like Indy now.
RAC, meh - it's a bit muddy.
Monte Carlo Rally? Too much snow.
Belgian Grand Prix? Spa almost there as a circuit, but too many open wheelers.
Dakar Rally? How can you race in sand drifts, don't be daft. Where would you have you pit stops.
Le Mans? Not bad some nice cars, but its in France. If they could move it to another country it would be sweet.
Is there nothing on this list??????
ooooo hang on......
BATHURST!!!!!!!!
NOW yer talkin'

#12
Posted 09 January 2003 - 13:39
Originally posted by RacingCrusaderUK
On a purely personal level I have to go with Le Mans, just ahead of Indy in my opinion. Its purely a gut reaction, but you only have to look at the pictures of Jochen Rindt and Masten Gregory on the podium there, weighed down with flowers to realise that its a race that created hero's. Plus ever since I saw Steve McQueen in the film Le Mans I was in love with Sports Cars. Did they really smash that Porsche up?!? When oh when will they get that out on DVD. . . .grumble. . .mutter. . . .
The Porsche they smashed up was a Lola T70 with Gulf Porsche body work bolted on. Look at the crash and notice how the bodywork doesn't match at the bottom of the car. The roundels are wrong and the bottom of the car is yellow instead of Gulf blue.
#13
Posted 09 January 2003 - 13:53
Originally posted by Udo K.
Having been an inhabitant of the Eifel mountains, I, of course, have to ask: "What about a Nürburgring-Nordschleife victory"? From the sheer driving point of view a win there is surely at least of the same value as e.g. in Monaco, maybe more. Fangio's German Grand Prix win in his epic drive with the Maserati or Moss' victory in the 1000 KM cannot be rated high enough.
I also think, that winning the Targa Florio is a very special achievement. As far as "prestige" is concerned I also vote for Le Mans.
Why did you include the "Race of Champions" in your list?
Yes Udo, Nordschleife!

#14
Posted 09 January 2003 - 14:35
Welcome aboard, even if it is a belated (or just plain late) one.
Interesting choice of races. I guess, that, from my perspective as a benighted colonial, that this is as international a list as you could come up with. I could add a few others, but they probably don't have the "wider" appeal. They are:
Any GP at Nurburgring (Nordschliefe, of course!)
1000k at the 'Ring
24 hrs at the 'Ring (Is there a pattern here??)
Mille Miglia
Darlington 600
Sebring 12 Hrs
And I suppose moswt of you other folks have your own favorites.
Oh, yeah. I voted for Le Mans. Always been a sucker for that one!
Bobbo
#15
Posted 09 January 2003 - 17:14
#16
Posted 09 January 2003 - 17:33
#17
Posted 09 January 2003 - 18:21
But Le Mans seems the tougher one. It's long, it's on day and night, it has pitstops, long straights, history, Ferraris (there are no Ferraris in Indy!!).
I don't know. Le Mans for me.
#18
Posted 09 January 2003 - 18:40
#19
Posted 09 January 2003 - 18:44
The only real candidates, in my lowly opinion, would perhaps be:
The International 500 Mile Sweepstakes....
The 24 Hours of Le Mans....
The Italian GP at Monza....
....and either the Daytona 500 or the Darlington Southern 500 -- a toss-up to me
The Monaco GP is perhaps living on manufactured memories and glamor, although at one time it was not too bad of a race....
The German GP and the 1000kms at the Nurburgring were once looked upon as real Racer sorts of events, but modernity has not been kind to the place....
The Monte Carlo Rallye was, once upon a time, the one which attracted the most attention even though there were those much more difficult (something the scrutineers often made up for as compensation) such as the Liege-Sofia-Liege dash or the Acropolis -- but the RAC???? Hmmmm, sorry but....
The Mille Miglia was wonderful and absolute, sheer lunacy -- which is why it had such appeal....
The Targa Florio was another one of those that 'moderns' seem to have trouble comprehending, but what a wonderful, nutty idea for a race....
So, I am abstaining......
Advertisement
#20
Posted 09 January 2003 - 18:44
10 years ago I would say that it was Indy. Hands down. But Tony George has turned it into just another date on the IRL schedule.
Le Mans would be great, but it's turning into just a PR opportunity for Audi.
Monaco is a high-speed parade. The cars have outgrown the track.
Most of the other races mentioned are barely known outside of the hard-core race fans.
#21
Posted 09 January 2003 - 19:15
#22
Posted 09 January 2003 - 19:22
Indy 500 with lots of advertisment got the attention of lots of people, even of us who don't live in USA... Yet for me it's only another oval race... it is big because the money that is invested on it... but not for being a great racing event by itself... I mean is just another big event created by the media more than skill of the people who competes on it.... I mean, I don't feel envy of tracy/castroneves.
well but this is not about why I didn't vote for the same most of you did... but answering your question about wich one I'd like to win more...
It has to be Belgian Grand Prix (Spa) It should be really great to race there, let alone winning
#23
Posted 09 January 2003 - 19:59
#24
Posted 09 January 2003 - 20:23
However that is my current/modern choice.
If I was asked the same question in the 50's (long before I was born but stick with me) then events you don't mention, but others have Nuerburgring 1000km, Mille Miglia, then Le Mans (wouldn't have liked to be there in 55 though).
In the 60's it would have easily been the Monte Carlo Rally, then Le Mans, followed by the Indy 500 (but only after Clark won), then the RAC, it used to be a real event back then.
In the 70's without a doubt Le Mans followed by Monaco GP.
80's Indy 500.
90's Le Mans when the GT cars really were GT cars.
I think when you look through the events there are some which really stick out. My opinions as someone based in the UK (it does make a difference) are as follows.
Le Mans has attracted the best drivers and manufacturers throughout it's history, it is better known for the cars but who cares, D-Types, GT-40's, 917's, TWR Jag's, McLarens etc. It is the best known race in the world, I just wish Audi would leave.
Indy 500 was poor in the 50's, improved dramatically in the 60's, don't know much about the 70's the 80's with andretti, unser etc were good, since then I feel it has lost it's way, the Mansell years were probably the beginning of the end and now it is a nothing event although the last 2 years have been better than most.
Monaco GP was THE GP in the 60's and 70's even into the 80's but in the 90's the win for Panis and Arnoux's infamous mobile traffic jam made it a joke. It is difficult to win but it's all about sponsors and nothing else (a bit like GP as a whole).
Daytona 500. Never really been interested in this except as an endurance event at a time when motorsport is scarce. Probably due to the fact it's in the US and I'm in the UK, I have more of an interest in Sebring 12hr.
Bathurst 1000. Similar to Daytona really although watching the event on Grandstand was always good. When the BTCC was big and the drivers did Bathurst it got a lot of interest in the UK but that has reduced. We just don't get to hear enougfh about it in the UK. My main interest in this event is the 60's when the Mini Coopers took part (got the video).
RAC Rally. This was a monsterous event in the 60's and 70's, even into the 80's. FIA have made this almost as easy as a club rally. I own a car which did this rally in 1962 (9 years befor I was born ;)) and when you read the reports, of almost 4 days non-stop, stages on the south coast and almost as far north as Inverness. The whole event is almost in walking distance today by comparison.
Monte Carlo Rally. This used to be the event everyone wanted to do. In the early 50's it was a bit of a rich mans tour of europe to show off the Roller etc it improved in the late 50's but it became a real rally in the 60's and 70's which every manufacturer wanted to win, even into the 80's. It was a real challenge with varying conditions etc. Again recently with the removal of the concentration run, the night leg it's another FIA club rally.
Not quite sure what you mean by the Race of Champions.
Belgian GP. Stunning circuit in the 60's and 70's, became a Normal GP in the 80's and early 90's then became THE GP to win in recent years as a racers circuit. Shame it is no-more.
Paris-Dakar. Always thought I'd quite like to do this, but despite the fact it is a huge event with, at times, great manufacturer support it's pretty anonymous outside France. Most famous in the UK for Mark Thatcher.
Sorry for waffling so much but re-reading the above, to my mind shows how motorsport as a whole has lost it's way. Very few of the big events are note worthy today. Any challenge has effectively gone, even Le Mans is almost a 24 hour sprint race, no need for drivers to 'save' the car as much as they used to. In recent years the demise of the Safari Rally in WRC (and the facsimile the others have become), Belgium & Hockenheim in F1, the chicanes at Le Mans, Indy 500 to the 750MC (sorry 750MC for the insult;)).
In my opinion the only event which still has a real challenge to it is the 24h Nuerburgring race. The best active race circuit in the world and over 100 cars entered, just wish I could raise the sponsorship money.
#25
Posted 09 January 2003 - 21:52
1 - Mille Miglia
2 - Belgian GP on the pre-1968 but postwar Spa-Francorchamps circuit
3 - German GP on the pre-1970 Nurburgring Nordschleife - preferably mit all the trimmings, rain, mist, fog, snow etc
4 - Indianapolis 500-Miles pre-IRL
5 - Any race on the long Mugello road circuit
5B (permit me?) - Any race on the long Pescara circuit
5C - French GP at Lyons-Givors
If you had that set in your locker, you could - indeed - die a happy man.

DCN
#26
Posted 09 January 2003 - 21:57
#27
Posted 09 January 2003 - 22:03

#28
Posted 09 January 2003 - 22:10
Originally posted by RacingCrusaderUK
...you view as the most prestigious...
I obviously NEED a dictionary, to avoid misunderstanding the question :
prestigious adj. respected, highly esteemed, favorably regarded, having a good reputation.
From the list proposed --that includes both the past and the present, don´t lose sight of it-- I have few doubts¨: Le Mans is the most prestigious, although I was taught when kid that both Indy and the Monaco Grand Prix will, together with Le Mans, constitute the Unholy Trinity (no disrespect intended).
Felix
#29
Posted 09 January 2003 - 22:11
I'm also a pretty new contributor after a long time reading and trying to summon up the courage to add my amateur opinions to a forum that boasts such prestigious names as this one, but in the end I just went for it and I'm sure you'll be glad you did too.
Anyway...
I agree with several of the above who have pointed out that the only sensible answer to "What would you most like to have won?" is "When?". For my part, I've always had a soft spot for the World Land Speed Record. In the twenties and thirties it was so prestigious it could get you a knighthood (not that that is any reason for doing it, the point is that race wins wouldn't) but even today it is one of the finest achievements mankind can attempt just because "it's there".
One of the best motorsport related experiences I've ever had was attending a talk by Andy Green and others of the Thrust SSC team at a British Aeronautical Society meeting at Heathrow. I'm not a patriotic person by any description but when the film was played of the record run, with the sonic boom rumbling round the hangar, it came pretty close! A magnificent achievement done for all the right reasons.
A few days later someone wrote to the The Times to say it was a "waste of time". Humanity is doomed.
APL.
#30
Posted 09 January 2003 - 22:36
You should visit the Motor Museum here in Coventry, they have Thrust SSC and Thrust 2 on display, complete with film etc.
#31
Posted 10 January 2003 - 02:11
#32
Posted 10 January 2003 - 02:28
Although I agree that LeMans is a very important race, in the world of motorsport (if not the most important)... it's about sharing your seat which is something I don't like...
Pierre Laveigh would agree with you. He almost won that race (1954?) without sharing the car with a second driver.
I love Le Mans, but to me it hasn't been the same since the demise of the Group C cars. The Indy 500 is just a shadow of its former self (oh, to join the hallowed ranks of men like Buddy Lazier...). So, I voted for Monaco. The track is still a challange and the fact that for twelve years in a row only Prost, Senna, and Schumacher won the race would put a winner in some pretty heady company.
#33
Posted 10 January 2003 - 03:25
Currently, it'd be a hard choice. I really tend to agree with Doug Nye (perhaps because we're of the same generation).
If pressed, I'd say LeMans. But it ain't what it was 40 yrs ago....
I'm not sure we'll see a pre-eminent event again anytime soon, or ever. There's been a lot of sanitization and homogenization in the past few decades.
#34
Posted 10 January 2003 - 13:40
#35
Posted 10 January 2003 - 14:32
Originally posted by mera308gtb
Pierre Laveigh would agree with you. He almost won that race (1954?) without sharing the car with a second driver.
Levegh drove 23 hours or so alone in the lead (at least in the 23th hour) in 1952 on a Talbot. This could be what has been fatal to him because in 1955, the Mercedes team (Neubauer ?) engaged him on a 300 SLR for his 52's performance.
But Levegh is not the only one to achieve such a performance. Chinetti in 1949 won, his copilote staying in the pit all the race (he was, let say ... to tired after drinking !).
The next year, Rosier also on a Talbot won driving all the race minus ... 2 laps.
Lemans is also a driver race, otherwise how Olivier Gendebien-Phill Hill, Jacky Ickx, Henri Pescarolo and a few others have been able to win so repeatidly ? Remember also the victory of Gurney-Foyt in 67 with the MKIV ? They have been designated to be the front runners (le "lièvre") and put the highest pressure on the Ferrari.
And they have been able to maintain the same rythm during 24 hours !
My "tiercé" is the same as the majority here : Le Mans, Indy 500 and Monaco.
But I have probably prefered to win as many times as possible at the Nurburgring Nordschleife but on wich event ? the german GP or the 1000 kms ? Of course, both

As a pilot, the Nürbürgring is undoubtly the ultimate juge of fame with the greatest names of motor racing history : Caracciola, Rosemeyer, Nuvolari, Fangio, Moss, Stewart, Clark (remember the small Lotus 23 in 62 ?). This race will be missing for the eternity in Senna, Prost and Schumacher log books ;)
Y.
#36
Posted 10 January 2003 - 15:31
#37
Posted 10 January 2003 - 16:43
2. As someone usually out of step with the general view of things, I have always been more inclined to view the International Sweepstates and the 25 Hours of Le Mans as Constants in an ever-changing world. I have not had all that much enthusiasm about Monaco for a variety of reasons, losing what little I had after 1972 or 1973.
3. As far as Grand Prix races go, I have to wonder aloud about whatever happened to the GP de l'ACF -- now merely the GP de France -- in the Order of Things? Along with the German GP at the Nuerburgring and the Italian GP at Monza, I always sensed that these were the GP event somewhat "more equal" than the others.
4. "Prestigious" is such a mercurial word. It is so subjective. It is also a prisoner of time and place. The "most prestigious" event of, say 1954, may not be event around in 1994, for instance. And "prestigious" for whom? Driver? Entrant? Sponsor/ Promoter/ Organizer? The Press? The Fans? Of which nation? Of what age? Then or in retrospect? What category or categories of racing?
5. For me, Le Mans lost a great deal when the Mulsanne Straight As We Knew went away. Not to mention that chicane before the pits. Or the ending of the Le Mans start. Or having few clues as to who those guys were on the "podium." Well, maybe not so much that last one, since there were always a few pleasant surprises among those who brought the cars home.
6. I would much rather go to Goodwood these days. And someday, I certainly hope to make it back for the first time since about 1960....
#38
Posted 10 January 2003 - 17:52
You won't regret it Don

#39
Posted 10 January 2003 - 18:05
The last good Indy 500 was 1995. Jacques won and Penske couldn't even qualify. Talk about a tough race!
Surely the most challenging racing nowadays is Rallying, or the Paris-Dakar. Real danger out there. No sanitized circuits, just trees and cliffs.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 10 January 2003 - 19:12
When you go to Goodwood, save me a seat . . . at least in spirit!
Bobbo
#41
Posted 10 January 2003 - 19:55
Originally posted by Don Capps
1. I would be interested to see how today's generation would respond to this question. With F1 being about all they know, I think that the Le Mans race would not garner quite as much support and enthusiasm.
OLD Don, which age has "today's" generation?
The question may would be, what could the "todays" generation look on TV?
They have the chance to see "Le Mans" on special channels may for 12 hours for the whole "Le Mans week". But for the F1 weekends, they have always the chance to look also 12 hours and more. So how should that generation learn to think in alternatives? (And in the real heroes?)
#42
Posted 10 January 2003 - 21:34
Let me first address the "problem" of Le Mans: perhaps we -- or at least many of us it seems -- are contemplating the event that it once was, rather than the event that it is today. Both are most certainly challenges, but today there is an unfortunate void where once drivers from other premier formulae and series went at it hammer and tongs with the Specialists. I still have a fondness for Le Mans (in spite of my experience in 1955), but I think today's Le Mans is most certainly not the Le Mans it could be nor what it once was. No reflection on those who do battle today, but time and changes do not always produce a better vintage.
Second, with the FIA & WMSA placing its weight solidly behind only one series for about a decade or more now, Formula 1 (F1), I think that it would be unreasonable to expect to have most of those to international racing to have any term of reference except F1. A similar story in the US of A with the emergence of NASCAR in roughly the same period. It is not beyond anyone's comprehension today that the Brickyard 400 is perhaps bigger (and even 'better' in the literal view of many when ratings are compared) than the International Sweepstakes, once the clear and undisputed champion in the US of A. The shift has clearly been to Daytona Beach, Florida from Speedway, Indiana.
With the demise of Grand Prix racing and the triumph of Formula 1, the events are so uniform that they literally blend together. Monaco persists simply because it fulfills an unstated but concrete need to keep the sponsors satisfied with at least one "glamor" event -- regardless of much the 'glamor' being more of the faux variety than the real sort. I think that those following racing -- F1 in other words -- for the past decade or less would pick Monaco as the "prestige" event given a choice.
Had I to select only one from the Grand Prix -- Formula 1 -- ranks, my vote would perhaps have to be cast for the Gran Premio d'Italia -- with the GP de l'ACF being the other candidate. Why? Depite the horrific disfigurement of the circuit and the various other abominations inflicted upon that plot of ground, it is the only event left with even a modicum of a true racing heritage left. Agree with me or not, I think it is about the only one with the potential to be restored to its former status prior to all the track neutering.
Besides, I am beginning to understand better why I am so much happier dealing with The Past the more I bump up against The Present when these sorts of items get discussed.
#43
Posted 10 January 2003 - 23:33
Besides, I am beginning to understand better why I am so much happier dealing with The Past the more I bump up against The Present when these sorts of items get discussed.
Yes Don, I could understand that, but (and I hope it's understandble in english) it always deals with your presence in the reality. Or by other words: You can only understand, what you 've learned to understand (e.g. in motorsport history.
And back to this thread, although I'm an Audi (Auto Union) >Fan, and Audi won for three times, Le Mans will be Le Mans! With Audi, without Audi, that's no question. Butt will Le Mans survive Le Mans without TV -coverage?
#44
Posted 10 January 2003 - 23:54
The second inclination was the Indy 500. Ask any driver who ever won the race and I’d bet the majority would say that it was their crowning glory. I recall many stating, that if they were to only win one race, that would be the one. For if anyone remembers a race won, it would be Indy. (with the caveat of it being prior to the IRL sanction.)
But there are so many that could qualify and you’ve got one up there with no votes… The Paris / Dakar Rally. Which has to be the most strenuous test of man & machine in this day and age.
Another, the Isle of Man event should be there as well. As a test of courage and skill, I don’t know of another event that comes as close to being “prestigious”.
Others that should have been placed among that most prestigious list, in my mind anyway, the Milla Miglia, Targa Florio, and the 24 hours of Spa.
This sort of thing is subjective as hell… Perhaps there should be a division that draws to a more exact standard, the types of racing and those events that would be deemed, “The Most Prestigious”. Even at that, it could be a tough decision.
I ultimately went for Le Mans, but again with the caveat that it was for the events prior to the emasculation of the circuit.
#45
Posted 11 January 2003 - 14:40
Mind you, the old Midland Motor Museum near Bridgnorth was only twelve miles away when I lived in Shropshire and I only went there once. I'm a disgrace to motorsport fandom...
APL
#46
Posted 11 January 2003 - 15:38
But anyway, Le Mans survived. Bruised, surely. As a shelter for F1 rejects, yes, we can still say so. But for me it is still the Big One.
#47
Posted 11 January 2003 - 15:47
#48
Posted 11 January 2003 - 16:13
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
How is New York to Paris a rally? You get on a boat in New York harbor and sail to Europe. Shouldnt it be the Normandy>Paris rally or something?
They went the other direction, approaching Paris from the east....
#49
Posted 14 January 2003 - 06:44
Seems like there will be another edition of the race this yearOriginally posted by Don Capps
They went the other direction, approaching Paris from the east....
http://www.newyorktoparisrace.com/