
Ducati MotoGP Bike hits 202.5 MPH in Spain
#1
Posted 15 March 2003 - 22:07
#3
Posted 15 March 2003 - 23:06
#4
Posted 16 March 2003 - 00:28

#5
Posted 16 March 2003 - 00:31
Originally posted by madmac
202 MPHI mean 202 MPH not bad for Dukes GP's bike & to go faster in a straight line than an F1 car bloody hell, but I would like to see lap time compared with F1 machinery.
Let's see the MOTOGP's keep in touch with the F1 cars in the corners.
Not a chance...
#6
Posted 16 March 2003 - 01:20
#7
Posted 16 March 2003 - 01:39
Originally posted by control
I was just wondering, if a F1 car was set up purely for strait line speed, would it be as fast as a GP bike?
Easily. The straightline speed of the F1 cars at Barcelona is about 25 mph slower than their Monza trap speeds, so Monza shows what they can do when trimmed out. The outright lap record for the GP bikes is about 29 seconds slower than the F1 record at Barcelona, and they're only a few mph faster on the straight.
#8
Posted 16 March 2003 - 10:59
Originally posted by control
I was just wondering, if a F1 car was set up purely for strait line speed, would it be as fast as a GP bike?
The bikes have much better aerodynamics, but their power is not enough grunt to push them beyond those speeds.
#9
Posted 16 March 2003 - 11:45
#10
Posted 16 March 2003 - 17:56

#11
Posted 18 March 2003 - 21:01
Originally posted by schuy
The bikes have much better aerodynamics, but their power is not enough grunt to push them beyond those speeds.
Not true.
If an F1 car is trimmed out (set for min downforce) it has a much lower CD than a Motorcycle.
#12
Posted 18 March 2003 - 23:51
But I'd be happy if you would show me the truth.
#13
Posted 19 March 2003 - 00:03
Originally posted by schuy
The bikes have much better aerodynamics, but their power is not enough grunt to push them beyond those speeds.
I would ask what you mean by "better"? I bet Rory and Adrian would say that downforce with low drag is much more important that just low drag. That said, the rider will always screw up the aero on bikes.
#14
Posted 19 March 2003 - 00:19
Thanks for pointing out my innacuracy, I felt I had missed something.

#15
Posted 19 March 2003 - 01:59
Still, Kudos to those who have the balls to do it.


#16
Posted 19 March 2003 - 02:44
Originally posted by molive
Still, Kudos to those who have the balls to do it.![]()
![]()
Pah, going fast in a straight line doesn't require balls!! Its the corners where they're need them.
#17
Posted 19 March 2003 - 07:45
Originally posted by 100cc
Pah, going fast in a straight line doesn't require balls!! Its the corners where they're need them.
But still, I'd imagine riding such a thing at such high speed must be quite the hairy moment?
#18
Posted 19 March 2003 - 08:23
Originally posted by molive
I have a vid of a Suzuki Hayabusa (1300cc) doing 360Km/h on the road. 330Km in a race-built Ducati doesn't impress me that much.
Still, Kudos to those who have the balls to do it.![]()
![]()
I have a video of my neighbor's 490 rear wheel horsepower turbo hayabusa doing 227 mph on the highway. Crazy.
#19
Posted 19 March 2003 - 11:22
Originally posted by schuy
But still, I'd imagine riding such a thing at such high speed must be quite the hairy moment?
Hairy perhaps, but from personal experience I can tell you that 110kph in a kart feels a lot faster than 220kph on a bike.
doing 300kph+ is a different story however.

and going that fast on public roads is just plain stupid!
Advertisement
#20
Posted 19 March 2003 - 13:08
Originally posted by 100cc
Pah, going fast in a straight line doesn't require balls!! Its the corners where they're need them.
The guy was one-wheeling the thing up to 260Km/h


#21
Posted 19 March 2003 - 14:30
http://www.irishroad...y/history98.htm
Riders are occasionally doing 200mph+ at the North-West 200. Motorbike Road Racing, think Isle of Man TT, *real* motorsport


#22
Posted 19 March 2003 - 16:23
#23
Posted 19 March 2003 - 16:56
#24
Posted 19 March 2003 - 17:08