
Why the hype about Geoff Willis?
#1
Posted 24 March 2003 - 12:06
Advertisement
#2
Posted 24 March 2003 - 12:33
The best thing is not to read such things.
Now, that doesn't mean Willis isn't excellent engineer. It simply means that press hype i snever to be paid attenton on.
Hrvoje
#3
Posted 24 March 2003 - 12:45
Willis couldn't design a contender when he was with willams-even with the best engine but now he getting praise as he has designed a car that is about the 5-6 best on the grid(Ferrari,Mcl,Renault,Sauber,Willams)
Mike Gascoyne designed a jordan that was a championship contender with an over weight Mugen-honda engine, and has now has moved on to renault where again he has designed another great car. Getting on the podium with the worst engine in F1 is pretty impressive.
#4
Posted 24 March 2003 - 12:48
#5
Posted 24 March 2003 - 13:06
#6
Posted 24 March 2003 - 13:15
Willis has received praise from Anderson (of Jordan) and Rampf (of Sauber). In this respect, Vrba's comment: "People who are praising him or whatever designer entering fashion are not engineers by themselves and know noting about actual process of designing the car" is not entirely accurate.
The performance of the BAR in the first two races seemed a little inconsistent and it is difficult to place a verdict on the BAR.
#7
Posted 24 March 2003 - 13:31
Originally posted by Vrba
The answer is simple. People who are praising him or whatever designer entering fashion are not engineers by themselves and know noting about actual process of designing the car.
Heh, funny you should say that, considering Karl Ludvigsen's and Will Gray's extensive experience in design and engineering. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that you know nothing about the actual process of writing an article?

[edit]
I just remembered that you're not a subscriber, so that means you also don't have a clue what these articles say. Interesting that you would then elect to make judgement on people's knowledge, considering you have absolutely none.
[/edit]
#8
Posted 24 March 2003 - 14:06
Originally posted by bira
Heh, funny you should say that, considering Karl Ludvigsen's and Will Gray's extensive experience in design and engineering. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that you know nothing about the actual process of writing an article?
[edit]
I just remembered that you're not a subscriber, so that means you also don't have a clue what these articles say. Interesting that you would then elect to make judgement on people's knowledge, considering you have absolutely none.
[/edit]
I was speaking in general and not necessarily about Karl Ludvigsen's and Will Gray's article that you're right to point out I haven't read.
My point was that in large part judgments and praisings (as well as diminishing one's value) are crap. Statistically it's always safer to presume this than otherwise.
That's at least my experience from the magazines. Even Giorgio Piola, whose drawings are really worth seeing, often makes wrong technical calls.
Therefore I believe only Willis's peers are justified to judge him but that doesn't necessarily mean they are right in judgments.
Hrvoje
#9
Posted 24 March 2003 - 14:47
If the team can make use of it is another story...
#10
Posted 24 March 2003 - 15:06
As well, the team themselves have underperformed! From what I read online, Jacques struggled with his radio again this weekend!
In Australia, no decent amount of practice due to reliablity. Wrong tire choice ruined their race + the pitstop mess.
This weekend, heavier engine (more reliable one) caused the car to react badly. JVs car ruined by electronics during the initial firing of the engine on Sunday. Then again on the grid.
Basically, if BAR had a better engine and work better as a team - you'd see them much higher up the grid. Miracles don't come over night. Just ask McLaren.
Willis has taken them from a team that was looking to fall to the back of the grid quicker than you can blink an eye to a definitely "best of the rest contender' in the less than 18 months. Not bad.
It'll take 2-4 years to see if he can actually play with the big boys and take a 2nd or 3rd place constructor's championship.
Newey being one of the best has taken several years to bring McLaren back to the front, we'll have to see what this years McLaren produces when it comes out.
Don't be too surprised to see BAR or Renault take 3rd spot in the championship. That can only be done with a top notch design team!
Paco
#11
Posted 25 March 2003 - 11:22
Originally posted by Paco
Don't be too surprised to see BAR or Renault take 3rd spot in the championship. That can only be done with a top notch design team!
Paco
I would be very surprised to see BAR take 3rd.
#12
Posted 25 March 2003 - 12:24
#13
Posted 25 March 2003 - 13:51
#14
Posted 25 March 2003 - 14:30
Under GW's aegis the team has improved a lot . There is a noticable improvement in the performance of the car. As for the relative pace against toyota and sauber BAR were better. Toyota ran Panis very light and yet he qualified behind button and stopped at least 5laps earleir for fuel . Sauber didn't look that quick in the race at all . Even with all their probs with the pitstops they wouldn't have scored points IMO.
I think BAr need to get more work on their tyres . I mean to say they need to make tose tyres work for them . A lighter and morepowerful engine will help as well.
edited

#15
Posted 25 March 2003 - 15:21

Gary A is better than Willis.

#16
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:15
Originally posted by Ghostrider
Kodandaram, you old joker, you know Jordan will crush BAR this year.![]()
Gary A is better than Willis.![]()
Maybe if Fisi remebers which grid slot is his....

#17
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:22
Originally posted by Rene
Maybe if Fisi remebers which grid slot is his....![]()
Fisi will astonish you guys. Just watch him at Brazil. Podium is on the cards. Believe my words.

#18
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:24
Originally posted by Nustang70
People have been raving about him, Atlas hints that he may join Newey and Byrne as the top designers in F1. I dont think he has done anything that impressive. The past two Williams werent winning races because of a superior chassis...and this year's BAR, although a vast improvement to the crap they produced in the past, doesnt seem that great either. So why is he being heralded as the next great one? Mike Gascoyne deserves much, much more recognition.
When your starting point is last years BAR,its not hard to look like god.
Willis is definalty nothing special.
#19
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:25
Originally posted by Ghostrider
Fisi will astonish you guys. Just watch him at Brazil. Podium is on the cards.
It won't matter if Fisi will finish in the top 3 as he'll probably be walking down some corridor looking for the podium when the ceremony starts.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:27
Originally posted by karlth
It won't matter if Fisi will finish in the top 3 as he'll probably be walking down some corridor looking for the podium when ceremony starts.

Fisi has had 10 podiums, and no podiums missed so far. Don't jinx it.

#21
Posted 25 March 2003 - 21:40
1. Is the new Williams better or worse than the last wiilis designed ( it is maybe worse, defintly not better yet ).
2. Is the new BAR better or worse than the old one ( it is better )
so considering these 2 points, most thinks that willis is a better designer than Head made him when he quit Williams
Bjørn
#22
Posted 25 March 2003 - 21:48
#23
Posted 25 March 2003 - 23:57
Adrian Reynard

Malcom Oastler


#24
Posted 26 March 2003 - 08:51
So the only people who are worthy of reviewing a car's design is another designer, and maybe not even them? No wonder you don't subscribe - according to you no one could ever write an article about the cars themselves.Originally posted by Vrba
Therefore I believe only Willis's peers are justified to judge him but that doesn't necessarily mean they are right in judgments.
#25
Posted 26 March 2003 - 11:00
Originally posted by karlth
It won't matter if Fisi will finish in the top 3 as he'll probably be walking down some corridor looking for the podium when the ceremony starts.


#26
Posted 26 March 2003 - 15:11

I think this is another car like the EJ12 . I hope fisi gets a drive at some team like sauber where he can be assured of a chassis better than this shitbox.
Oh ! I still have my voodoo Jordan . Don't let ur cars come near the BAR's or I will blow the engine !

#27
Posted 26 March 2003 - 16:12
Originally posted by kodandaram
Ghost your driver burnt the clutch after he saw a BAR missing its slot ...........and you say he is going to be on the podium ? Well to be honest I expected Jordan Ford to be strong at the beginning of the year. So far nothing .![]()
I think this is another car like the EJ12 . I hope fisi gets a drive at some team like sauber where he can be assured of a chassis better than this shitbox.
Oh ! I still have my voodoo Jordan . Don't let ur cars come near the BAR's or I will blow the engine !![]()
Jordan Ford is very strong. As long as they get away from grid and pit stops properly.

I will work on an anti-vodoo doll for next weekend because I expect Fisi to pass both JV and Button.

#28
Posted 26 March 2003 - 17:01
Originally posted by Jackman
So the only people who are worthy of reviewing a car's design is another designer, and maybe not even them? No wonder you don't subscribe - according to you no one could ever write an article about the cars themselves.
It's easy to judge a car's performance after the season is over. But I doubt anyone but engineers know what they write or say when they judge a car that had only been presented. After every launch we have magazines full of articles about how this or that car is excellent or has a great potential. How do they know that?
Hrvoje
#29
Posted 26 March 2003 - 18:55
Originally posted by Rene
Maybe if Fisi remebers which grid slot is his....![]()
Fisico Fantastic!!

A true-blooded Roman just like me.

He don't give a **** where he parks his car, just as long as it isn't where he is supposed to.
