
Scrubbing tires.
#1
Posted 24 March 2003 - 23:59
Advertisement
#2
Posted 25 March 2003 - 15:27
Of course, last years' Michelins required 10 laps or so before stabilyzing, but since those were race laps, it is improper to talk of scrubbing there.
Scrubbed tyres are indeed a lot more consistent, but , at least with some compounds , they lack the ultimate performance of a brand new set.
Unscrubbed tyres will be therefore the best choice for a single fast lap, but their performance will then drop rapidly.
These are rules of thumbs, anyway : it changes a lot with different types.
#3
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:40
Scrubbing tyres takes usually one or two laps, to be made at moderate speed
Does that mean that "unscrubbed" tires - those which start a race brand new and immediately do hard fast laps - will not ever be as good as scrubbed tires?
#4
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:46
#5
Posted 25 March 2003 - 18:52
Originally posted by Aubwi
I wonder why Michelin and Bridgestone don't pre-scrub the tires before they supply them to the teams. Surely there's some manufactuing process they could do to make the equivalent of a scrubbed tire.
It's a good question. Maybe different chassis (teams) have different requirements / interactions?
#6
Posted 25 March 2003 - 20:43
Originally posted by Aubwi
I wonder why Michelin and Bridgestone don't pre-scrub the tires before they supply them to the teams. Surely there's some manufactuing process they could do to make the equivalent of a scrubbed tire.
If Michelin were to pre-scrub the tyres they would probably contradict FIA rules due to insufficient groove depth.
#7
Posted 26 March 2003 - 15:49
#8
Posted 26 March 2003 - 18:32
#9
Posted 26 March 2003 - 18:38
#10
Posted 26 March 2003 - 23:05
Originally posted by zppd
why is a scrubbed tire better then a brand new one? and if a scrubbed one is better, then why don't Bridgestone & Michelin manufacuture a tire that is just as good brand new as when scrubbed, saves time and energy to scrubb the tire and why not take the advantage all the way?
The tyres go through phases ->
Extreme example from 2001 season: 2 laps very fast, 6 laps very slow, 12 laps fast.
Now scrubbing would then mean fitting the car with tyres having run 2+6 laps so they are immediately fast. You'd on the other hand want brand new tyres for a qualifying lap as the first two laps are faster than the last 12 lap's stint.
#11
Posted 27 March 2003 - 15:03
The best lap time with the tyres is always the first lap. Then, since we use threaded tyres with grooves, the process in building up temperature in the front and in the rear tyres makes between the third and eighth or tenth laps tricky to drive. The driver and the car have to find the right balance and the tyre is in the process of stabilisation. Then after 8 or 12 laps you reach this stabilisation and then the tyres are stabilised and even going better and better because of the load reduction because of fuel consumption.
#13
Posted 27 March 2003 - 20:21

#14
Posted 27 March 2003 - 21:01
'cos then they wouldn't be homogenous -- the chemical composition of the surface would be different to the remainder of the and the tyres would not conform to the rules.Originally posted by Aubwi
I wonder why Michelin and Bridgestone don't pre-scrub the tires before they supply them to the teams. Surely there's some manufactuing process they could do to make the equivalent of a scrubbed tire.
#15
Posted 28 March 2003 - 07:11
#16
Posted 18 May 2003 - 22:32