
Kimi Raikkonen, World Champion 2003
#1
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:05
Now with the new point system (which I have to say I'm in two minds about, I like the 8 points places, but think that 3 points for a win would be better), and the new McLaren on the way, a Raikkonen WDC seems more and more possible.
Of course there is a long long way to go and a lot of things could change, but I was very impressed with Kimi this weekend. I'm not saying 100% that he will be Champion, in my mind it is much to early to stick my head on the block by saying that, but what does everyone else think? If the new McLaren is as close to Ferrari as it could feasibly be then, especially with the new scoring, Raikkonen's conistancy will stand him in very good stead.
What are your thoughts? Any of you willing to actually say 100% one way or the other? If so you've got more guts than I have. As for me, I'm abstaining.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:08

#3
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:12
Kimi definetly has all the qualities to be world champion

#4
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:17
Originally posted by The RedBaron
He could do a Roseberg this year......win just 1 race with whole bunch of podium finishes!![]()
I agree that that is entirely possible, is this a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not sure. . .
#5
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:22
Originally posted by BorderReiver
Now with the new point system (which I have to say I'm in two minds about, I like the 8 points places, but think that 3 points for a win would be better)
I disagree with you, 3 points for a win is not enough

#6
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:24

He could do a Roseberg this year......win just 1 race with whole bunch of podium finishes!
Believe me he'll win with the MP4-18.
#7
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:24
There is no question Kimi has the abillities to become WDC, he has proven he is a fast, clean, mature and fair driver. The only problem is Schumacher and Ferrari, untill the new McLaren starts racing, he must stay close to Schumacher and put him under pressure. So let's hope the new McLaren is a beast and a reliable one too, although I fear that will be the biggest issue since it's proven not to be McLaren's strongest point in the past. Forza Kimi


#8
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:39
It also depends on how the tyre situation plays out for the next few races. BStone and Ferrari have shown in the past an incredible ability to move up a gear in the last half of a season when under pressure.
Whoever wins (MS or KR - I don't think there are any other serious candidates) I hope they do in a way that they would have won with the old points system aswell because otherwise there will be no end of arguments about it and it will, in many people's eyes, be a devalued WDC. I like points going down to 8th place but there should be a bigger margin for the winner, even if it's only 3 points instead of 2.
Michael.
#9
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:44
I'm a fan of the guy, but the fact that he's still leading the championship is almost surreal. Every time the WDC standings pop up on my TV screen after a race with Kimi's name still on top it feels like the world makes no sense whatsoever, like it's some gigantic practical joke and I'm waiting for the punchline, in vain.
#10
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:46
I personally don't think the MP4/18 is going to be all that. At best it will be on par with the 17D.
Not much point in even introducing the new car then?
#11
Posted 01 June 2003 - 19:55
Originally posted by michaelab
I personally don't think the MP4/18 is going to be all that. At best it will be on par with the 17D.
Michael.
Dear Michael, please enlighten us why you think Mclaren would be dumb enough to use MP4/18 if it was "at best" on "par" with MP4/17d?

#12
Posted 01 June 2003 - 20:05
Kimi could crush the myth about MS fighting against superior machines.. This time it´s the other way around.
#13
Posted 01 June 2003 - 20:09
#14
Posted 01 June 2003 - 20:11
#15
Posted 01 June 2003 - 20:22
Kimi needs all the luck available to win it but it's not impossible

#16
Posted 01 June 2003 - 20:37
But if it is not this year, it will be some other year. I'm beginning to be more and more sure about that...
#17
Posted 01 June 2003 - 21:01
It reminds me a bit of 1991. Mclaren-Honda had been the dominate package and did end up beating Williams in the end. But in doing so, they compromised the following year and IMO it led to the end of the relationship with Honda which took until 1997 for them to recover.
#18
Posted 01 June 2003 - 21:28
In this season Kimi has shown speed and reliability and while people keep waiting for him to slip up and for Ferrari to dominate, he still sits on top of the points table. I think that Ferrari has suffered from three strange races at the start that belied their true speed and potential, and I think that Monaco is an anomaly among races, and I think that all could be back to normal business in two weeks time in Canada. On the other hand Ferrari could continue to find ways to lose, Kimi could find a bit of luck here and there and McLaren's new car could make a whole new season of it.
The bottom line is: Kimi arriving in Suzuka with the lead or at least a shot at the Championship would not surprise me in the least. Even if there are still lots of races left in the season.
#19
Posted 01 June 2003 - 22:24

The next tracks/races will favour MS/Ferrari heavily, and the latter will be very hard to beat (mp4-18 or not), however if KR comes in second, which he could, then he should be very proud of the achievement.
It took MS nothing to nearly wipe-out KR's initial WC points advantage, and frankly if Ferrari stop making strategy and pitstop (twice on RB) mistakes (and didn't make driver mistakes early), then KR would be quite behind by now. But that is if, if, if, and...Atleast MS stopped making driver errors.
So vote is no. But soon...
Advertisement
#20
Posted 01 June 2003 - 22:28
Originally posted by Williams
In a way Kimi today reminds me... races left in the season.
Nice post Williams.


#21
Posted 01 June 2003 - 23:28
#22
Posted 01 June 2003 - 23:47
So basically all he has to do is match that with the new car and hes WC.
I think its highly possible and almost probable.
Unless hes hit with major reliability problems i think he will win the WC.
He might not be the most likable guy but shes shown himself to be a excellent finisher and hes always fast,unlike DC who as usual has fallen into his habit of mass mediocrity.
#23
Posted 02 June 2003 - 00:05
I am fascinated by all the confidence in the new McLaren; why is this?
PdeRL
#24
Posted 02 June 2003 - 00:17
He has the speed and skill to win the championship but the Ferrari is still the best car and Michael is still very strong. However, what worries me most is the reliability of the MP-18

#25
Posted 02 June 2003 - 00:33
#26
Posted 02 June 2003 - 00:55
#27
Posted 02 June 2003 - 01:13

#28
Posted 02 June 2003 - 02:50
Originally posted by OpenWheelGuru
... but I think that MS will turn it up a notch and win most of the remaining races. I hope I am wrong.![]()
I hope you are right about the first part, and not the second.

#29
Posted 02 June 2003 - 03:03
#30
Posted 02 June 2003 - 03:51
#31
Posted 02 June 2003 - 04:56

Williams has improved their FW25, and they seemed to have solved many problems with the car from the beginning of the season.
Ferrari are not likely to make the same strategic mistake that they made in Monaco.
Renault's development seems to have slowed, but they still have a competitive car that may score podiums at tracks like Hungary.
McLaren needs to continue developing their current car, the 17D, while bringing out the 18. The fact that they keep pushing back the release date indicates that McLaren is having problems with the car, and this doesn't bode well for KR.
I voted no, but my degree of certainty isn't very high. If the MP4-18 turns out to be much better than the others, KR definitely has a shot.
#32
Posted 02 June 2003 - 05:08
Originally posted by BorderReiver
I agree that that is entirely possible, is this a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not sure. . .
I actually like how the new points system works, it rewards reliability over someone who wins a couple of races and does not finish another bunch of them. Kimi has won one race but has finished all on the podium except the Spain in which he DNF (which was not his fault), while Schumi has won three races but was not on podium in one (rd 1) and DNF another (Brazil), Im also not counting the fact that Kimi has a larger amount of 2nd places than Michael.
I hope that Kimi would win a few more races this year, but if he doesnt but continues to be a very reliable finisher, then I would have no problem with him winning the WDC with only one win.
#33
Posted 02 June 2003 - 05:17
As for some of the posts, talking about 1 win only -- what is actually better ?? CONSISTENT drive the year around , he has been on the podium EVERY race he has finished (all but 1 ) and hence consistency should also be regarded as a factor -- considering his opponent is the Racing God himself with a car he is in love with.
#34
Posted 02 June 2003 - 05:21

#35
Posted 02 June 2003 - 11:57
Originally posted by michaelab
I personally don't think the MP4/18 is going to be all that. At best it will be on par with the 17D.
hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe!
#36
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:03
Originally posted by kismet
:
I'm a fan of the guy, but the fact that he's still leading the championship is almost surreal. Every time the WDC standings pop up on my TV screen after a race with Kimi's name still on top it feels like the world makes no sense whatsoever, like it's some gigantic practical joke and I'm waiting for the punchline, in vain.
Yeah, bit it's also AWESOME! I mean think about it. If before the season started we'd have been told that KR would be four points ahead of MS after Monaco, having lead WDC since Sepang, and with the OLD car against the mighty F2002 and F2003, would we have believed it? Any of us?
For the sake of argument let's say KR indeed wins the WDC title this year having the old car for the first half of the season and the new car for the second half. That against the F2002 for the first 25% and the F2003 for the rest 75%. Against MS and the (currently) most powerful team in F1. Now has ANY driver EVER won the title against such odds? Certainly not in the past couple of decades, but I think possibly never. Not that it will happen necessarily of course...

#37
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:05
#38
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:10
Originally posted by mach4
Would he become the youngest WDC ever if he makes it?
Yes. He'd beat Fittipaldi's record by almost two years. He has the chance next year as well, but in 05 he'd have to win the title by July I think, which isn't going to happen.
#39
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:13
Result? Leads the championship.
Australia he was lucky to finish 3rd, because of safty cars.
Had Montoya not been hit in Malaysia, Kimi would not win but instead Montoya.
He was also lucky that in Brazil, both Michael and Juan crash their car due to bad luck.
Then in Imola, Montoya and RB having the problem allowing Kimi to finish 2nd.
This Monaco race is the first time, that he got a result without any good luck.
Can you onestly tell me HJS, that Kimi hasnt been one lucky bastard?
Common!
But I have a feeling Kimi will become world champion this season!
Just looking at everything that has happened so far this season, it seems like its just mean to be.
Kimi is getting these good luck for a reason, and Schumi not winning races is a sign also.
Who knows.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:17
Originally posted by dan2k
Kimi has been one lucky bastard, and at the same time lighting quick.
Result? Leads the championship.
Australia he was lucky to finish 3rd, because of safty cars.
Had Montoya not been hit in Malaysia, Kimi would not win but instead Montoya.
He was also lucky that in Brazil, both Michael and Juan crash their car due to bad luck.
Then in Imola, Montoya and RB having the problem allowing Kimi to finish 2nd.
This Monaco race is the first time, that he got a result without any good luck.
Can you onestly tell me HJS, that Kimi hasnt been one lucky bastard?
Common!
But I have a feeling Kimi will become world champion this season!
Just looking at everything that has happened so far this season, it seems like its just mean to be.
Kimi is getting these good luck for a reason, and Schumi not winning races is a sign also.
Who knows.

JPM was lucky Kimi's limiter was not set properly, Kimi would have won instead

Malaysia was a great drive from Kimi, don't think Montoya would have been able to keep up

In Brazil Kimi was clearly faster and your man threw himself off the track, how can Kimi be lucky

In Imola Kimi was on a complete different strategy, Montoya was lighter and so it looked like he was faster, but he wasn't

In Monaco, Kimi was the faster driver too, although Juan wasn't slow either

#41
Posted 02 June 2003 - 12:36
It's not possible to actually win a WDC before the end of a season. FIA can always strip you off your points, remember a threat to MS and Ferrari prior to US GP 2001.Originally posted by HSJ
Yes. He'd beat Fittipaldi's record by almost two years. He has the chance next year as well, but in 05 he'd have to win the title by July I think, which isn't going to happen.
#42
Posted 02 June 2003 - 15:02
Kimi has the speed, knows how to overtake and defend, he's
great in wet and in changing conditions, he also never falls
asleep during races like say Trulli. But the most important
thing IMO is his Schumi-like consistency which means he is
always there, any track, any conditions, any grid position,
you can count on him being in podium or atleast very close.
This is what makes the difference. Drivers like DC, RB, RS,
JV or Fisi etc have all just plain avarage perfomances every
now and then. Also other drivers of new generation like
JPM, FA and MW have their mediocre races once in a while.
That is something where KR and MS really stand out from
other drivers.
#43
Posted 02 June 2003 - 15:04
#44
Posted 02 June 2003 - 16:00
I guess everyone who says that knows Kimi personally. I mean, its easy to play a role in the pressconferances. And to be someone different in real life.
If Kimi doesnt have a personality, its still better then to have a arrogant personality.
anyway, Kimi was so unlucky last season, with all failures on the car that cost him lots of points, so this year he should atleast have a reliable car!.
#45
Posted 02 June 2003 - 16:03
Originally posted by yr
Kimi has the speed, knows how to overtake and defend, he's
great in wet and in changing conditions, he also never falls
asleep during races like say Trulli. But the most important
thing IMO is his Schumi-like consistency which means he is
always there, any track, any conditions, any grid position,
you can count on him being in podium or atleast very close.
This is what makes the difference. Drivers like DC, RB, RS,
JV or Fisi etc have all just plain avarage perfomances every
now and then. Also other drivers of new generation like
JPM, FA and MW have their mediocre races once in a while.
That is something where KR and MS really stand out from
other drivers.
This is absolutely correct; although I think it's a little early to tell about Alonso.
PdeRL
#46
Posted 02 June 2003 - 16:11
#47
Posted 02 June 2003 - 17:45
#48
Posted 02 June 2003 - 19:08

In my opinion Michael Schumacher has had quite some luck too in his career, just like Kimi Räikönen has had on a few occassions perhaps...
But I never hear anybody saying Michael Schumacher is one lucky bastard and that he has only won his WDC's by pure luck.


#49
Posted 02 June 2003 - 20:03
Originally posted by Frank Rijk
I agree to my friend Enkei...![]()
In my opinion Michael Schumacher has had quite some luck too in his career, just like Kimi Räikönen has had on a few occassions perhaps...
But I never hear anybody saying Michael Schumacher is one lucky bastard and that he has only won his WDC's by pure luck.![]()
![]()
Welcome to Atlas Frank


#50
Posted 02 June 2003 - 20:12
