
Derek Bell - the best ever?
#1
Posted 21 August 2003 - 08:40
"... I've been reluctant to say this until now but I've never lost a position in a race through fault of my own since 1971."
I find this an extraordinary achievement considering the length of his career and the quality of the competition he has met in this time. Surely there can be no other driver - extant or otherwise - that could come close to such a claim.
Does this make him the best ever?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 21 August 2003 - 08:46
Would that make me the best driver?

mat1
#3
Posted 21 August 2003 - 08:54

the bad luck he would have been WDC at some time, a slightly ambiguous statement me
think's.

#4
Posted 21 August 2003 - 09:19
#5
Posted 21 August 2003 - 11:25
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE JOKING!!
#6
Posted 21 August 2003 - 12:12
Originally posted by Ralliart
I believe Bell made that claim in his autobiography, also. In any event, I've read or heard of it before. Also, Bell did not crash much in his very lengthy career. One of the best racers ever, for my money.
I re-read "My Racing Life" recently, and don't recall seeing that claim!
#7
Posted 21 August 2003 - 13:56
#8
Posted 21 August 2003 - 14:58
Neil
#9
Posted 21 August 2003 - 15:40
Originally posted by Ralliart
... Bell did not crash much in his very lengthy career. One of the best racers ever, for my money.
I believe that he is still is a pretty fair shoe, as he's driven an Audi S4 in the SCCA Speed World Challenge earlier this year, having been replaced on the team by Randy Pobst, due to Bell's committment to the Bentley Le Mans effort.
D. Bell has often driven with an in car camera and a two way audio link, through which he engages in banter with the commentators, and provides amusing insight. Good stuff.
#10
Posted 21 August 2003 - 15:45
Originally posted by nick stone
"... I've been reluctant to say this until now but I've never lost a position in a race through fault of my own since 1971."
Originally posted by Option1
I agree with Paul, I've got memories of Bell being passed a number of times last year(?) and Derek giving a running commentary and the camera following the passing car at the time.
Well, it wasn't his fault the other guy was faster, now was it.

/Andreas
#11
Posted 21 August 2003 - 15:50
#12
Posted 21 August 2003 - 16:32
It's just a question of putting the right spin on things. But not too much spin, or you'll end up in the gravel and get passed...
#13
Posted 21 August 2003 - 20:24
The best what ever?????

DCN
#14
Posted 21 August 2003 - 20:37


DCN
#15
Posted 21 August 2003 - 21:47

To have never lost a position in a career that spans 30-odd distinguished years and includes five Le Mans wins is pretty damned special. Not to mention hard to believe.

#16
Posted 21 August 2003 - 21:55
Yup, heard he did so.

#17
Posted 22 August 2003 - 19:27
Bell stands in the competition for Greatest Sports Car Driver, and has few if any peers in that category.
As for that Speedvision gig, I can't believe anybody took that seriously.
And "... I've been reluctant to say this until now but I've never lost a position in a race through fault of my own since 1971." makes it pretty obvious he is saying that lame A4 "b" car he was driving wasn't cutting it - as his most recent LeMans effort with his son should show.
#18
Posted 22 August 2003 - 20:40
Originally posted by Spirit of '67
Bell stands in the competition for Greatest Sports Car Driver, and has few if any peers in that category.

#19
Posted 23 August 2003 - 16:53
Bell has always struck me as rather conceited. "My Racing Life" has a comment about how he would have conquered F1 if only etc...
Advertisement
#20
Posted 23 August 2003 - 17:20
Neil
#21
Posted 24 August 2003 - 10:31
Extraordinary achievement? Hmm... sounds more like extraordinary bullshit to me! Unless, of course, it's been said with the tongue firmly in cheek!Originally posted by nick stone
"... I've been reluctant to say this until now but I've never lost a position in a race through fault of my own since 1971."
I find this an extraordinary achievement (...)

#22
Posted 26 August 2003 - 14:57
So would someone please point out the driver who makes NO "egotistical" statements in their autobiography, please - especially ones like this, which sound like a firmly entrenched tongue in a ruefully smiling cheek, as is this reply?
#23
Posted 26 August 2003 - 21:14
Spirit... welcome to the forum. And welcome to minor corrections and additions to what you post...
Apart from driving alone, Fangio had a car problem during that Mille Miglia. If you recall, Moss didn't know he'd passed him because the car was stopped and surrounded by people.
#24
Posted 26 August 2003 - 21:53
....have you ever noticed how much quicker a car goes when you drive it alone, without the weight of any passengers.... ???

DCN
#25
Posted 26 August 2003 - 23:00
Originally posted by Doug Nye
Fangio was pretty confident of his personal ability on an open road, in daylight, and over a distance easily covered in one day...
....have you ever noticed how much quicker a car goes when you drive it alone, without the weight of any passengers.... ???![]()
DCN
Are you meaning that Moss' passenger could be considered as a useless weight ???

Arturo
#26
Posted 27 August 2003 - 02:07
He always seemed to me quite a sportsman, not a bit arrogant. But, of course, he was confident on his powers, and he is quite entitled to that - the record speaks for itself.
And, of course, Siffert and Rodriguez were faster than him too. And Beloff.
About Fangio and Moss and the Mille Miglia, there was the problem of the misfiring engine - the 7 cylinder thing. Certainly that amounted to something.
#27
Posted 27 August 2003 - 18:29
Reading back, my post sounds a bit harsh... I quite agree with you about the merits of Fangio v Moss and it was never my intent to suggest people should not have ego's!
I had a poster of the winning Bell/Ickx 956 from 1982 on my wall for years and wouldn't have bought his book if I didn't like the man.
#28
Posted 27 August 2003 - 22:59
What is pretty unarguable however is that he was a great in his chosen field. I think he'd settle for being described as one of the greats.
#29
Posted 27 August 2003 - 23:23
Originally posted by masterhit
.....What is pretty unarguable however is that he was a great in his chosen field. I think he'd settle for being described as one of the greats.
'Very good' perhaps, if not 'great', or maybe 'one of the best'...
I think Derek would be happy simply to be remembered as a winner and one who conquered in many spheres of the sport.
Must try again to get him to join us on TNF...
#30
Posted 28 August 2003 - 01:52
Originally posted by Ray Bell
I think Derek would be happy simply to be remembered as a winner and one who conquered in many spheres of the sport.
Must try again to get him to join us on TNF...
Great stuff.
If anyone can convince Derek to join TNF, it has to be you Ray - with you both having the Bell family name in common.
#31
Posted 28 August 2003 - 03:59
Okay, I've e.mailed him, I hope his e.mail address hasn't changed in the past three years!
#32
Posted 01 September 2003 - 15:15
Originally posted by nick stone
In a article in the July issue of CAR magzine, Derek tells his interviewer that:
"... I've been reluctant to say this until now but I've never lost a position in a race through fault of my own since 1971."
I find this an extraordinary achievement considering the length of his career and the quality of the competition he has met in this time. Surely there can be no other driver - extant or otherwise - that could come close to such a claim.
Does this make him the best ever?
Derek is being modest. For in the GP of Israel 1970 thread we find that "The drivers, meanwhile, managed to organise a "race" in Jerusalem on Saturday, with Derek Bell (Camel) winning from Vittorio Brambilla (Donkey) and Xavier Perrot (Camel)!"
So the streak began in 1970 and on a ruminant quadruped too!
#33
Posted 01 September 2003 - 15:35
type of driving.Was he good? Yes, in his day he was a decent driver but he very early on was shown the door in F.1. Ickx,Rodriguez,Peterson,Andretti and many others went by the guy like he was going backwards at the races I went to.Ickx even complained to John Wyer or whoever was team manager to that they should pull Bell in because he was too slow.They did and because of that Ickx won that years' Le Mans. I have never heard such an arrogant comment from a driver before.
#34
Posted 01 September 2003 - 21:42
http://www.atlasf1.c...=&postid=908309
http://www.atlasf1.c...=&postid=657851
The first is on a thread about the Tasman Dinos, the second about 'being there'...
The Most Spectacular: A difficult one, but I remain addicted to the same location and the same era, though the following year... Piers Courage sliding the bi-wing Brabham DFV off the Crossing, nose in the air and the DFV howling like Duckworth had always expected. With a deft flick he turned the direction of the slide, the power still full on, so that he was coming round out left hander with a couple of feet extra radius to the turn for the rear wheels compared to the fronts. The nose of the thing in the air under the sheer torque being fed through the crownwheel, it suddenly dipped, the sound ceased for just a fraction, the whole car stepped sideways about a foot, maybe two, then the noise, the whole shebang resumed in the next gear... Piers was on his way! Obviously he changed ratios later, but we were treated to three or four laps of this, as we were by Derek Bell in his little Ferrari later in the day... Amazingly, I think this sight, reserved for just two or three people, overshadows all that Rindt did in the rain the next day!