
Never has a F2/F3000 champion won the WDC
#1
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:01
It seems a bit strange that law of averages didn't intervene here yet. Or there is something fundamentally wrong with that single-seater category....
Hrvoje
Advertisement
#2
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:05
#3
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:08
#4
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:20
For example, a guy like Giorgio Pantano deserved an F1 ride more than Nicolas Kiesa for that matter.
Many talented drivers are hung out to dry while paydrivers always had to step in. That's something that should be addressed and stopped.
#5
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:30
Yes, but how many of those "paydrivers" have won a WDC title? Even the past F3000 champs that have made it into F1 haven't won a WDC title, which has nothing to do with "paydrivers."Originally posted by Slyder
If you ask me, most of it has to do with money too.
For example, a guy like Giorgio Pantano deserved an F1 ride more than Nicolas Kiesa for that matter.
Many talented drivers are hung out to dry while paydrivers always had to step in. That's something that should be addressed and stopped.
#6
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:46
Of course, thats not always the case, I'm very aware of that. Guys like Erik Comas, Luca Badoer, Vicenzo Sospiri, Ricardo Rosset, Alex Zanardi amongst others never made it big. Especially Comas, Zanardi and Badoer.
One other factor though is that it also has to do with the teams they choose to race with, and if you sign on with a backmarker or a midfielder, that limits your chances of success don't it. Several of these guys never had a chance of getting on with a top team, and that is also a contributing factor.
Hell, Jan Magnussen is also a glaring example; he didn't race in F3000 but was (and IS) a brilliant driver, whom unfortunately ended up in the right place (F1) at the wrong time (Stewart when it was still trying to come through).
Zanardi's case though was more bad luck than anything else if you look at his Williams days. The car was honestly not competitive, PLUS, he had an inexperienced engineer. Right there is the source of the problem why Zanardi never made it big. Also the fact that Zanardi was unfairly booted out after just one year. Had he stayed with the team, he would've shown a lot more than what he did that year.
#7
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:47
Originally posted by Jason
Yes, but how many of those "paydrivers" have won a WDC title? "
Three time WDC Niki Lauda comes to mind...
#8
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:48
Hrvoje
#9
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:55
Yes, Clark did indeed die in a Formula 2 race in 1968. Rindt was knows as the king of F2. Graham Hill, Stewart, McLaren, Siffert, Brabham and plenty of other Grand Prix drivers competed in F2 in 1960s. But they weren't eligible for points so they don't feature as champions although they won plenty of races. However, they were already established Formula 1 stars so their results in Formula 2 should be regarded differently than results of young drivers who used Formula 2 as a stepping stone to Formula 1.Originally posted by Jason
I think some of the brighest stars are plucked before they have a chance to compete in F3000. BTW, didn't established drivers like Jim Clark compete in F2 way back when. I'm not so sure I'd consider it a feeder series.
Hrvoje
#10
Posted 03 October 2003 - 20:56
Originally posted by RJL
Three time WDC Niki Lauda comes to mind...
YEah, but at least Lauda had talent. Most of these hacks today don't. Maybe Pedro Diniz, and that's a BIG maybe
#11
Posted 03 October 2003 - 21:03
Originally posted by Vrba
Formula 2 champions during the late 1960s and 1970s include many formidable racers (Ickx, Regazzoni, Peterson, Jarier, Depailler, Laffite, Jabouille, Arnoux....) yet no one was able to capture the WDC title. It was different times back then and more-less everyone of certain quality got his chance in Formula 1, for indeed all these quoted above had the rides with the top teams for many years, yet none won the WDC. That's what I consider a bit strange.
Hrvoje
Several factors, ranging, to machinery, to injuries, choices, bad luck, you name it.
1970, Ickx had little if no chance of getting the title even if Jochen Rindt were alive.
Peterson wasn't a car developer and fought against Fittipaldi giving Stewart the title in 1973, and played second fiddle to Andretti in 78.
Jarier AFAIK, never had a good ride.
Laffite had several chances, but mechanical failures, accidents and fighting with Depallier, and Pironi hampered his chances.
Depallier wasn't the same after his hand-gliding accident.
Arnoux and Jabouille were plagued by the crappy unreliability of the Renault. Jabuille's career would end prematurely in the fog in Canada in 1980, while Arnoux shifted from one team to another. I think what killed Arnoux's career was when he moved into the underpowered Ligier, that was what did it.
But yes, it's nevertheless interesting that no F2/F3000 champ has never been F1 champ, which may arouse serious questions of how the feeder series are composed.
#12
Posted 03 October 2003 - 21:07
Of course, to his credit, he did not win the F3000 championship

shaggy
#13
Posted 03 October 2003 - 21:13
And you thought the Twilight Zone is just fiction


#14
Posted 04 October 2003 - 05:53
Originally posted by Todd
Even if there is something wrong with the category today, it is a category that has seen a lot of change through the years. There have been competitive grids. There have been multiple chassis. There have been multiple engine suppliers. There have been times when neither talent nor funding were as lean as they are today. I think it is partially a matter of chance, and partially a trend to identify the cream of the crop prior to them completing a second season in F2/F3000.

#15
Posted 04 October 2003 - 12:01
