
Deaths at Goodwood
#1
Posted 25 June 2000 - 12:23
I have never been to Goodwood but I always catch it on Speedvision. It always looks very laid back, sort of a trip down memory lane. It does appear to me however that some of the cars are racing under track conditions that also seem a little nostalgic.
I would like to hear from anyone who has been there, do you feel that the track itself is unsafe? I imagine there will have to be changes made in light of this weekends events.
It goes without saying that I would like to express my sympathy for the two men and their families. I also hope the second marshall makes it.
FP
Advertisement
#2
Posted 25 June 2000 - 13:32
I've been meaning to tell you, too, that many people who were around when Ford Prefects were common called them 'Rejects.' No slur intended...[p][Edited by Ray Bell on 06-25-2000]
#3
Posted 25 June 2000 - 13:40
Ross Stonefeld
Aztec Group Motorsport
#4
Posted 25 June 2000 - 15:15
#5
Posted 25 June 2000 - 19:54
Ross Stonefeld
Aztec Group Motorsport
#6
Posted 25 June 2000 - 21:57
#7
Posted 25 June 2000 - 22:46
Off the subject the 6-wheel 1982 Williams has made appearances at Goodwood in the hands of Jonathan Palmer.
Best wishes to all affected by the accident.
#8
Posted 25 June 2000 - 23:37
I saw that crash,and thought he was dead as well.
#9
Posted 25 June 2000 - 23:55
#10
Posted 26 June 2000 - 00:58
#11
Posted 26 June 2000 - 02:41
#12
Posted 26 June 2000 - 13:19
#13
Posted 26 June 2000 - 14:23
#14
Posted 26 June 2000 - 16:01
#15
Posted 26 June 2000 - 18:02
Ross Stonefeld
Aztec Group Motorsport
#16
Posted 26 June 2000 - 20:37
My sympathies are with the bereaved and it is a shame that such a tragedy marred a fairly unique occasion.
It is still a safer place to be than at a World Rally Championship event. The spectators there a just plain suicidal!
#17
Posted 26 June 2000 - 20:59
#18
Posted 26 June 2000 - 22:10
On Sunday, Tony Smith comprehensively stuffed a Maserati Tipo 61 "Birdcage" into the hay bales at Mulcombe corner. It was a high speed off but the bales did their job, the front of the car being heavily bent but the driver walking (or more accurately - hobbling) away. In many respects, hay bales are far more effective than Armco. Don't forget, Armco was installed at race circuits originally to prevent cars going into the crowd, not to protect the driver.
There were also a number of accidents involving the charity Soap Box Challenge on Saturday, with two drivers (if that's what you call the occupant of a soap box) being taken to hospital.
The incident invoving the ex-Gilles Villenueve Ferrari (actually owned by Nick Mason)happened at the 1994 event. The driver, Mike Wilds, lost control just after he passed under the footbridge and proceeded up the hill sideways until he hit the kerbing at the paddock entrance. The impact (which sounded like a rifle going off) took the entire front end off the car, severly injuring his legs. The accident happened right in front of me and I caught the whole thing on my video camera. Apparently, the car was running on its original 1978 slicks! Both Mike and the car have now fully recovered.
I think the events of the week-end will prompt Lord March to re-think the format of the "Festival" with far less emphasis on timed runs and far more on entertaining the public. I felt last year that Nick Heidfeld's record in the McLaren was almost too fast for the hill - my hunch is now that it will be a record which will never be broken.
#19
Posted 26 June 2000 - 22:26
who cares if its an historic race? They still should have much better safety standards than that.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 26 June 2000 - 22:55
Where the Festival of Speed does have a problem is that many of the cars and drivers who participate in the hillclimb are not seasoned hillclimbers and are sometimes caught off guard by things like camber or the road surface. Also, many of the drivers are "guest" drivers who are not used to the particular car they may be driving that week-end (eg. when did Damon Hill last drive a 1968 Honda Formula 1 car?).
The Revival Meeting at Goodwood Race Circuit is now held each September. Jack Brabham's crash last year was at the race meeting on the circuit. Lord March has done an excellent job in improving the safety aspects of the old Goodwood track. He has not installed any Armco as it was not featured at Goodwood prior to its closure in 1966. However, Armco has limited effect as a driver safety feature (see my post above). Instead, he has cut back the embankments around the track and inserted tyre walls virtually around the entire circuit. The tyres have been placed behind rubber conveyor belts. Fast growing shrubbery is being trained to grow around these tyre walls so that eventually they will become part of the embankments. Gravel traps HAVE been constructed at the main corners (Woodcote, Madgwick and Lavant) but that is the only concession to modernity. In some respects, Goodwood is now one of the SAFEST race tracks in Britain. What Lord March cannot do is improve the safety of old racing cars. A heavy impact in 1968 in a 1968 McLaren is still as likely to hurt you in 2000 as it did in 1968! It's up to the drivers to be aware of this and drive accordingly. Whilst some of the younger generation of drivers may find this difficult, I think it was ironic the lasy year's accident was precipitated by two veterans (Jack Brabham and Jackie Oliver) having a coming together at St Marys.
#21
Posted 27 June 2000 - 09:44
The finish line where the tragic accident occurred is quite along way from the main action/paddock and I did not get to see that area, but I did see the firat two-thirds of the "track". I remember standing in a popular place near the house about 10-15 metres away from the track. All the crowd protection if grass, haybales and a simple fence. Further up the climb is the famous wall - very solid looking!
It is a great event in that you may see a WRC rally car immediately followed up the hillclimb by a 60's F1 car followed by a Le Mans car. Going to the paddock and being deafened by Stefan Johannson's turbo Ferrari being warmed up next to me was amazing. I think that the Festival is great from an aural point of view - to me the hillclimb was a disappointment.
I am sure that the drivers have a lot of respect for the track, but many are amateurs (owner-drivers) in powerful machinery; some drive cautiously, but most do go for a fast run. I have to say the it is surprising that there have not been more accidents at the Festival of Speed, and that if there were, the crowd could be in potential dangerous positions.
#22
Posted 28 August 2002 - 09:56
http://freespace.vir..... Accident.htm
Tarrant's brave struggle to adapt to a new life is a story that concerns us all.
#23
Posted 28 August 2002 - 10:07
Originally posted by DOHC
While searching the web for other Lotus 63 info, I came across this web page written by the marshall Steve Tarrant, who was seriously injured in the Goodwood 2000 accident where the 63 went off at the end of the hillclimb. Another marshall and the driver was killed.
http://freespace.vir..... Accident.htm
Tarrant's brave struggle to adapt to a new life is a story that concerns us all.
Unbelievable - how do people do this? I would just give up, I am sure.
I have enormous admiration for him
PdeRL

#24
Posted 28 August 2002 - 17:41
Originally posted by John B
In the US we have the Pike's Peak hillclimb coming up soon (the big story, as it has been for the 1990s, is will Rod Millen finally break the 10-minute barrier) - what's the safety situation like there? Does it compare to Goodwood at all? (the first thing that popped into my mind was "liability......"
John B, I saw that ESPN2 had a one-hour show on this year's Pike's Peak hillclimb. It was on this week at some point (I think during the day).
Pike's Peak has no safety situation. If you go off-track on one side then you hit the side of the mountain. If you go off on the other side then you have a long ways to the bottom.
There was a guy driving in the semi-truck division who, just after crossing the finish line, turned left right into a boulder. He flipped his truck on impact. Quite scary. Luckily he turned into the mountain and not away from it.
#25
Posted 28 August 2002 - 18:47
Originally posted by Eric McLoughlin
I felt last year that Nick Heidfeld's record in the McLaren was almost too fast for the hill - my hunch is now that it will be a record which will never be broken.
Didn't McNish in his Toyota break the record this year?