
David Coulthard did not attend McLaren End of Season Party...
#1
Posted 14 October 2003 - 15:47
Source
A sign of things to come? Do I smell Montoya leaving for a McLaren & JV heading back to his roots?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 14 October 2003 - 15:50
Originally posted by Roots
"David Coulthard left the Suzuka paddock last night without attending the McLaren Mercedes party fuelling rumours that he might not be staying at the team next season after all."
Source
A sign of things to come? Do I smell Montoya leaving for a McLaren & JV heading back to his roots?
Maybe he was just not happy with the way things went the last two races, too bad for him though. If he had performed better, it wouldn't have happened, I can understand him being disappointed and not being in the mood for a party. No need to start conspiracy theories on a Montoya switch though

#3
Posted 14 October 2003 - 15:55
Thing is, he did perform better; DC was clearly faster than Kimi all weekend, but still had to play second fiddle to the Finn. People often feel bad the few times Rubens has had to do it, so it's only natural that we feel bad for David. I don't think it's too hard to understand how Coulthard must've felt.Originally posted by Enkei
If he had performed better, it wouldn't have happened,
#4
Posted 14 October 2003 - 15:59
Originally posted by Teez
Thing is, he did perform better; DC was clearly faster than Kimi all weekend, but still had to play second fiddle to the Finn. People often feel bad the few times Rubens has had to do it, so it's only natural that we feel bad for David. I don't think it's too hard to understand how Coulthard must've felt.

I'm no DC fan, but he was clearly faster than KR in Japan and one can understand him being miffed at losing one of his only chances to shine this year.
#5
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:02
And a McLaren/Mercedes party really doesn't sound like the bash of the year, does it? Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert, some dried up sandwiches and a couple of bottles of warm white wine? The food is probably better in First Class...
#6
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:08
I understand that McLaren has one of the top hospitality suites in F1, and that the food is exquisite... But you're probably right about the speeches.Originally posted by BRG
And a McLaren/Mercedes party really doesn't sound like the bash of the year, does it? Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert, some dried up sandwiches and a couple of bottles of warm white wine? The food is probably better in First Class...

#7
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:09
#8
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:16
Originally posted by Teez
I understand that McLaren has one of the top hospitality suites in F1, and that the food is exquisite... But you're probably right about the speeches.![]()
He probably flew back to his nice big hotel in Monaco and had a good meal and a few drinks

#9
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:17
#10
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:20
#11
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:26
After wasting the mclaren so badly this year he should of been at the party washing dishes.
#12
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:40
#13
Posted 14 October 2003 - 16:43
Originally posted by Scudetto
I can't speak for you guys, but if I had Simone waiting for me back at my personal hotel in Monaco, I wouldn't see the immediate need to stick around Suzuka and party with Ron and Norby.
Yuk. Don't be deceived by the pictures.
#14
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:01
Originally posted by Derbris
Yuk. Don't be deceived by the pictures.
Thanks, but I'd be willing to take my chances.
#15
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:15
Originally posted by Scudetto
I can't speak for you guys, but if I had Simone waiting for me back at my personal hotel in Monaco, I wouldn't see the immediate need to stick around Suzuka and party with Ron and Norby.
Exactly what I was thinking. So DC's choice is to go home to his stunning GF or hang out to listen to "Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert" (thanx BRG). The choice seems pretty damn clear to me... I'd be on the first flight outta there. Particularly given that David had to yield to Kimi even though he (DC) was clearly faster. Personally I thought it a bit lame that they made him finish third even though Kimi's world championship was gone.
#16
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:23
Originally posted by BRG
.... Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert.....
Please DO NOT USE words LONG+SPEECH+KIMI together!
#17
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:26
Originally posted by RJL
Exactly what I was thinking. So DC's choice is to go home to his stunning GF or hang out to listen to "Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert" (thanx BRG). The choice seems pretty damn clear to me... I'd be on the first flight outta there. Particularly given that David had to yield to Kimi even though he (DC) was clearly faster. Personally I thought it a bit lame that they made him finish third even though Kimi's world championship was gone.
You never know what might happen so I think McLaren did the right thing to keep David behind Kimi. By doing that they at least avoided an Austria02-like finish.
#18
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:45
Originally posted by davegp3
Please DO NOT USE words LONG+SPEECH+KIMI together!

#19
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:49
Originally posted by Teez
Thing is, he did perform better; DC was clearly faster than Kimi all weekend, but still had to play second fiddle to the Finn. People often feel bad the few times Rubens has had to do it, so it's only natural that we feel bad for David. I don't think it's too hard to understand how Coulthard must've felt.


Advertisement
#20
Posted 14 October 2003 - 17:52
Originally posted by Enkei
You never know what might happen so I think McLaren did the right thing to keep David behind Kimi. By doing that they at least avoided an Austria02-like finish.
While I understand what you're saying, I'd just like to point out that Kimi needed TWO things to happen in order for him to become WDC. BOTH Rubens & Michael would have had to drop out during those final laps in order for Kimi's WDC to become reality. One or the other wouldn't have been enough. Just about impossible I'd say; and as we know with hindsight, NEITHER happened. So DC was forced to finish behind Kimi despite being clearly faster (even though he forfeited his racecar) & with the Finn having gained NOTHING whatsoever from the manipulation. No wonder he didn't go to the damn party. I wouldn't either.
#21
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:07
#22
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:10
#23
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:13
There was nothing to be cheerful about for DC. Given their performance of late perhaps a few other drivers should've skipped the party too: like Ralf, Montoya, Panis...Originally posted by Roots
"David Coulthard left the Suzuka paddock last night without attending the McLaren Mercedes party fuelling rumours that he might not be staying at the team next season after all."
[URL=http://www.f1racing.net/news.php?ID=64342]Source[/URLA sign of things to come? Do I smell Montoya leaving for a McLaren & JV heading back to his roots?
#24
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:14
Never heard that he avoided Ron's speeches, he must have some earplugs with him after all those years.
Maybe the Montoya thing is true after all..
#25
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:19
Originally posted by BRG
Maybe he just had an early flight home booked and didn't feel like attending a wake for Kimi's WDC hopes?
And a McLaren/Mercedes party really doesn't sound like the bash of the year, does it? Long incomprehensible speeches by Ron, Kimi and Norbert, some dried up sandwiches and a couple of bottles of warm white wine? The food is probably better in First Class...
The food at the Ferrari bash was top notch. Cool Champagne and no dried up sandwiches.



#26
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:22
#27
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:33
#28
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:35
#29
Posted 14 October 2003 - 18:53
Originally posted by aportinga
I don't know if anyone else noticed this but I found it quite strange how DC carefully dropped his champagne to the team without taking a sip. I mean he was lining that drop up for over a minute - with what seemed to be extreme caution as to not have it spill or break. Was that perhaps his last bottle?
Do McLaren drivers get to keep their empty podium champagne jeroboams, or do they each go in Ron Dennis personal recycling bin, while the drivers have the option of buying replicas to put on the shelf at home?
#30
Posted 14 October 2003 - 19:08
Originally posted by Todd
Do McLaren drivers get to keep their empty podium champagne jeroboams, or do they each go in Ron Dennis personal recycling bin, while the drivers have the option of buying replicas to put on the shelf at home?


I think Senna managed to sneak one trophy away from Dennis, as did Mika...if memory serves...
#31
Posted 14 October 2003 - 19:09

#32
Posted 14 October 2003 - 19:28
Originally posted by Chris_Amon
Ron Dennis paied a lot to have Kimi from Peter Sauber. Why wouldn´t he do the same taking Montoya from Williams?
Because Kimi was off to Ferrari if McLaren didn't, Montoya (if rumors are true) has already signed for 2005.
#33
Posted 14 October 2003 - 19:43
Originally posted by Ricardo F1
Because Kimi was off to Ferrari if McLaren didn't, Montoya (if rumors are true) has already signed for 2005.
What about 2004?
I would of thought certain victiories and WC contention is worth the rumoured 25 million frank williams is asking.
He would get that with montoya but with DC its as highly unlikely.
He is risking a lot more than 25 million by letting DC occupy the seat of the mp4/19 next year especially considering the stakes will be a lot higher.
#34
Posted 14 October 2003 - 19:46
Clearly faster? I'm not quite so sure about that.Originally posted by Teez
Thing is, he did perform better; DC was clearly faster than Kimi all weekend, but still had to play second fiddle to the Finn.
Free practices: DC slightly faster.
Q1: Almost identical times despite DC driving in better track conditions.
Q2: Again almost identical despite Kimi having more fuel.
Race: Kimi with 2 stop strategy. No wonder he was slower.
I would say they were about equal.
#35
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:12
dc ? jv ? mw ?

#36
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:48
#37
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:52
#38
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:53
Plus I like the idea of the driver that was "worthless and that no other team wanted" going to WIlliams in 2004 and promptly dominating the sport again!

#39
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:56
JV will prove all those bashers wrong if given the right equipment!
Advertisement
#40
Posted 14 October 2003 - 20:56
Originally posted by Arrow
What about 2004?
I would of thought certain victiories and WC contention is worth the rumoured 25 million frank williams is asking.
He would get that with montoya but with DC its as highly unlikely.
He is risking a lot more than 25 million by letting DC occupy the seat of the mp4/19 next year especially considering the stakes will be a lot higher.
Uh . . . . . no.

#41
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:17
Originally posted by steeng
I would love to see JV at Williams and Coulthard at Jaguar partnering Webber. We would finally get answers to the questions about how good Ralf Schumacher and Mark Webber really are.
or how bad JV really is

#42
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:23
DC's fastest lap: 1:33.416Originally posted by Orrelto
Clearly faster? I'm not quite so sure about that.
KR's fastest lap: 1:34.488
You can see a comparison of their respective lap times during the race on AtlasF1 here:
http://www.atlasf1.c...3&submit=Submit
Seems to me DC was clearly the faster of the two.
#43
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:24
No need to start conspiracy theories on a Montoya switch though
Yes there is a need.... Enkei's boy Kimi would be in for quite a fight with JPM ... I think it would be brilliant ... they'd be pretty equal and pound each other around. Great news for MS WDC #7!!!!
#44
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:31
Originally posted by Teez
DC's fastest lap: 1:33.416
KR's fastest lap: 1:34.488
Seems to me DC was clearly the faster of the two.
Absolutely - I don't know who in the McLaren garage came up with the two stop idea, it clearly was out of the top draw of dunce moves. But I guess they had to gamble to stand a chance and that's the gamble they took. :
#45
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:34
Originally posted by Ricardo F1
Absolutely - I don't know who in the McLaren garage came up with the two stop idea, it clearly was out of the top draw of dunce moves. But I guess they had to gamble to stand a chance and that's the gamble they took. :
When exactly did they take it? What lap did they each make their first stop on?
#46
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:41
Originally posted by Orrelto
Clearly faster? I'm not quite so sure about that.
Free practices: DC slightly faster.
Q1: Almost identical times despite DC driving in better track conditions.
Q2: Again almost identical despite Kimi having more fuel.
Race: Kimi with 2 stop strategy. No wonder he was slower.
I would say they were about equal.
You might want to check your times.
DC was faster all weekend. In final qualifying he was faster in worse conditions in the spare without even a practice session in that car. In the race DC's fastest lap was a seond faster then Kimi's. In fact it was only a few hundredths slower than Ralf's fastest lap. Kimi only set the 7th fastest lap.
#47
Posted 14 October 2003 - 21:52
Somehow you try to make every single thread a JVi threadOriginally posted by steeng
I would love to see JV at Williams and Coulthard at Jaguar partnering Webber. We would finally get answers to the questions about how good Ralf Schumacher and Mark Webber really are.
Plus I like the idea of the driver that was "worthless and that no other team wanted" going to WIlliams in 2004 and promptly dominating the sport again!![]()

#48
Posted 14 October 2003 - 22:18
Originally posted by Todd
Do McLaren drivers get to keep their empty podium champagne jeroboams, or do they each go in Ron Dennis personal recycling bin, while the drivers have the option of buying replicas to put on the shelf at home?

#49
Posted 14 October 2003 - 22:25
Originally posted by Todd
When exactly did they take it? What lap did they each make their first stop on?
I would assume just prior to the first stop - Kimi stoped the lap after David but was 2.3 seconds slower in the pits. He was about the same second time around (stopping at lap 33 to DC's 26).
#50
Posted 14 October 2003 - 22:29
Originally posted by Ricardo F1
I would assume just prior to the first stop - Kimi stoped the lap after David but was 2.3 seconds slower in the pits. He was about the same second time around (stopping at lap 33 to DC's 26).
I thought so. I remember Kimi having a much longer first stop than the other top cars. I think that an argument can be made that DC with full practice time, his race car, and no team orders would have been competitive with Rubens, JPM and Alonso.
