
Ayrton Senna Monaco lap onboard 1989.
#1
Posted 06 October 2004 - 15:10
http://www.f1-fansit.....pole lap.mpeg
#3
Posted 06 October 2004 - 15:41
What I like is the look on Prosts face and his reaction at the end of the clip



#4
Posted 06 October 2004 - 15:47
Senna 4 ever

#5
Posted 06 October 2004 - 15:52

#6
Posted 06 October 2004 - 15:56
#7
Posted 06 October 2004 - 18:44
#8
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:16
Originally posted by 911
What's amazing is that he "could" have won this event another two times in 1984 & 1988, and this would have given him 8 wins at Monaco.
Wasnt he also a strong contender in 1985 and 1986 too? Just imagine...Ayrton Senna winning the Monaco Grand Prix for 10 years in a row, from 1984-1993. The most ironic thing is that he had a chance in EVERY year (dont know about '86) to win. Just one word to describe the man and that is awesome. I've used his words '...something happens inside you and you can fly very high' as a motivational tool when I am boxing. I'm now proud to say that i am 13-0 in super middleweight bouts. Just awesome man, just awesome.
What is really amazing is that it is a regular H-pattern gearbox, not sequential. Ah, the art of heel and toe, where has it gone.
Really? That makes it even more special then. I always thought that the H-boxes finished around the mid-1980's and sequential's were introduced for 5 years and then the paddles (which remain to this day). My dad's car has a sequential shift, it's pretty cool. Makes for much quicker gearchanges and allows him to drive like a looney without losing too much reaction time

#9
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:25

#10
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:44
#11
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:48
Originally posted by Ozz88
What I like is the look on Prosts face and his reaction at the end of the clip![]()
![]()
![]()
It really says it all.
#12
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:49

#13
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:50
Originally posted by Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
Really? That makes it even more special then. I always thought that the H-boxes finished around the mid-1980's and sequential's were introduced for 5 years and then the paddles (which remain to this day). My dad's car has a sequential shift, it's pretty cool. Makes for much quicker gearchanges and allows him to drive like a looney without losing too much reaction time![]()
Only Ferrari had the semi-automatic gearbox in 1989. IIRC, McLaren-Honda did not have one until 1990.
#14
Posted 06 October 2004 - 19:53
#15
Posted 06 October 2004 - 20:00
#16
Posted 06 October 2004 - 20:07
#17
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:18

#18
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:19
#19
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:23
Originally posted by Corners
That video is 1991 pole position lap as you can see by the front wing end plates and the external view in the tunnel...
Actually, this was an error on the company that produced this video. This was put together for the video, Racing is in My Blood. The original shot of this video shows the #27 car coming out of the tunnel. The only reason why there isn't an in-car footage of Senna's actual lap was due to the video breakup on the monitor.
If you look closely you'll see that the rearview mirrors are attached to the cockpit. This is on the 1990 McLaren. In 1991 the rearview mirrors are sitting on top of the sidepods.
911
Advertisement
#20
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:26
Originally posted by MPJay
It's a good clip, but i like the Suzuka pole lap clip better, its a common clip often seen online. The way the car wants to swap ends under braking for Casio Triangle as he's steering one handed and downshifting, manual gearbox! is amazing.
link please? Thanks

Senna 4 ever !!!

#21
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:26
Originally posted by Corners
That video is 1991 pole position lap as you can see by the front wing end plates and the external view in the tunnel, Prost was at Ferrari then.
Yep, that was my idea too. I had this video already and as you can see the complete car in the tunnel, it is indeed the MP4/6 from 91.
#22
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:32
#23
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:51
Yes absolutely correct I wasn't going to mention that cause it gets so confusing, I remember Steve Rider in (like you said) 1990 commentating for Grandstand for BBC about the incredible lap(on board) Senna had put in for Pole I think it might've been the first sub 1.20 at the time if I remember(perhaps not).Originally posted by 911
Actually, this was an error on the company that produced this video. This was put together for the video, Racing is in My Blood. The original shot of this video shows the #27 car coming out of the tunnel. The only reason why there isn't an in-car footage of Senna's actual lap was due to the video breakup on the monitor.
If you look closely you'll see that the rearview mirrors are attached to the cockpit. This is on the 1990 McLaren. In 1991 the rearview mirrors are sitting on top of the sidepods.
911
I think it was incomplete because they lost the footage through the tunnel but chose the wrong year when adding the external view in editing.
He took Pole both years anyway, I loved the 1990 race I think I remember them having a camera down inside the cockpit near his left knee looking up at him during the race, he was way out in the lead and was seemingly cruising along with his overals unbuttoned at the top because of the heat.
Nice to know you're so clued up about it so many people get it all wrong.
#24
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:58
#25
Posted 06 October 2004 - 22:05
Originally posted by Corners
Yes absolutely correct I wasn't going to mention that cause it gets so confusing, I remember Steve Rider in (like you said) 1990 commentating for Grandstand for BBC about the incredible lap(on board) Senna had put in for Pole I think it might've been the first sub 1.20 at the time if I remember(perhaps not).
I think it was incomplete because they lost the footage through the tunnel but chose the wrong year when adding the external view in editing.
He took Pole both years anyway, I loved the 1990 race I think I remember them having a camera down inside the cockpit near his left knee looking up at him during the race, he was way out in the lead and was seemingly cruising along with his overals unbuttoned at the top because of the heat.
Nice to know you're so clued up about it so many people get it all wrong.
He did a 1:21.314.

#26
Posted 06 October 2004 - 22:07
#27
Posted 06 October 2004 - 22:12
#28
Posted 06 October 2004 - 22:32
Originally posted by Gabbiano
right, but the MP4/5 probably had a sequential box, even though it's not 'semi-automatic'...
IIRC, one of the first, if not "the first" F1 cars to have a sequential gearbox was the Arrows FA13 (1992) and all other cars either had H patern gearboxes or semi-automatic gearboxes.
You can actually hear Senna jumping a gear or two into some of the corners (which you can not do with a sequential box) instead of shifting down sequentially (e.g. from 5th to 3rd instead of 5th, 4th, 3rd into Casino) to save time.
Drivers preferred H pattern boxes to sequential boxes for that reason as well.
#29
Posted 06 October 2004 - 23:04
I downloaded a bunch of Senna clips off the web. See the following topic: http://forums.atlasf...&threadid=73155Originally posted by speedmaster
link please? Thanks![]()
Senna 4 ever !!!![]()
A lot were from "F1 Racing World" which unfortunately isn't working, ATM. I wish I could upload a few of them somewhere, but I don't have any webspace.
#30
Posted 06 October 2004 - 23:38
#31
Posted 06 October 2004 - 23:55
#32
Posted 07 October 2004 - 00:00
Originally posted by dick
I'm sure that is a regular H-pattern gearbox. I'm not completely sure, but I don't think F1 ever used sequential gearboxes like Cart. It was a regular box until the advent of paddle shifters. I wish they'd go back to working a regular H-pattern box. Increase the drivers' work load which might lead to mistakes and more overtaking.
I believe you are correct on this. I don't recall F1 going to a sequential gearbox because the semi-automatic gearboxes came out in '89 (Ferrari). So, I think most teams jumped right into the paddle shifters as soon as their R & D allowed. I think Williams did it in '91, and then McLaren did in Mexico, 1992, I believe.
#33
Posted 07 October 2004 - 00:58
#34
Posted 07 October 2004 - 03:16
Originally posted by Jason
I downloaded a bunch of Senna clips off the web. See the following topic: http://forums.atlasf...&threadid=73155
A lot were from "F1 Racing World" which unfortunately isn't working, ATM. I wish I could upload a few of them somewhere, but I don't have any webspace.
Thanks Jason... but the only way I see is through file sharing or msn...

#35
Posted 07 October 2004 - 03:17
Originally posted by The Fazz
What was also amazing was the real sensation of speed from the on board cams in those days. Modern technology has made the current on-board cams look like video games. Also - great to see drivers working hard in the cockpit... the un-powered steering, the bumps, the corrections and the shifting all at the same time is simply an awesome sight to behold.
Hope they bring back the driver back someday...computers are not even 1/1000th of the fun..
#36
Posted 07 October 2004 - 03:28




R.I.P Aryton . The King of the Track

#37
Posted 07 October 2004 - 06:20

#38
Posted 07 October 2004 - 08:27
Originally posted by The Fazz
What was also amazing was the real sensation of speed from the on board cams in those days. Modern technology has made the current on-board cams look like video games. Also - great to see drivers working hard in the cockpit... the un-powered steering, the bumps, the corrections and the shifting all at the same time is simply an awesome sight to behold.
Absolutely. I've got that "Lap of the Gods" video where some of the laps are recorded by film cameras mounted on the cars - amazing footage, especially the 6-wheel Tyrrell.
We all know the g-forces on the drivers of today are bigger than ever before, but it just doesn't come across. Not sure why, maybe it's the totally smooth tracks of today coupled with steering wheel shifting.
- Michael
#39
Posted 07 October 2004 - 09:00
Originally posted by MichaelJP
We all know the g-forces on the drivers of today are bigger than ever before, but it just doesn't come across. Not sure why, maybe it's the totally smooth tracks of today coupled with steering wheel shifting.
- Michael
Today on-board shots are just not that spectular beause the camera' lenses are so perfectly stabilized.. It doesn't show how much vibration goes through the car and drivers body. Also the wide angle of the lenses takes the speed sensation off, especially on newly designed circuits, where tarmac is wide and all trackside objects far away.
The best shots these days are from the cameras mounted on the side of the airbox, which are on the level of drivers eaysight, but that very of them...
Advertisement
#40
Posted 07 October 2004 - 09:07
Originally posted by Gemini
Today on-board shots are just not that spectular beause the camera' lenses are so perfectly stabilized.. It doesn't show how much vibration goes through the car and drivers body. Also the wide angle of the lenses takes the speed sensation off, especially on newly designed circuits, where tarmac is wide and all trackside objects far away.
The best shots these days are from the cameras mounted on the side of the airbox, which are on the level of drivers eaysight, but that very of them...
I like the in-helmet cams you sometimes see in the indy/champ car broadcasts. F1 just doesn't seem to innovate with its TV broadcasts. Not sure why as they desperately need to improve the show.
- Michael
#41
Posted 07 October 2004 - 09:27
Originally posted by 911
What's amazing is that he "could" have won this event another two times in 1984 & 1988, and this would have given him 8 wins at Monaco.
He "could" also have lost two more races: If the near notorious Jinx on Williams and Renault at Monaco had not prevailed yet again in both '92 and '93. So I guess that makes the balance about even.
Henri Greuter
#42
Posted 07 October 2004 - 09:47
Originally posted by MPJay
It's a good clip, but i like the Suzuka pole lap clip better, its a common clip often seen online. The way the car wants to swap ends under braking for Casio Triangle as he's steering one handed and downshifting, manual gearbox! is amazing.
The on board footage from Suzuka is during the race, he was frantically trying to chase down Prost who was 7 seconds up the road! Makes you wonder how fast Prost must've been going!!
#43
Posted 07 October 2004 - 10:35
#44
Posted 07 October 2004 - 11:12
Originally posted by ivanalesi
do we have any turbo era Senna on board laps?
I've got Q91 from Adelaide, the on board laps with Senna are as good as Monaco, you really get the feel esp with the engine note being so prodominent and the camera shaking on down change.
#45
Posted 07 October 2004 - 11:57
#46
Posted 07 October 2004 - 12:48
#48
Posted 07 October 2004 - 14:32
Originally posted by Sith
The on board footage from Suzuka is during the race, he was frantically trying to chase down Prost who was 7 seconds up the road! Makes you wonder how fast Prost must've been going!!
Actually, the clip he is referring to is Senna's qualifying lap. It shows the entire lap and it was the one that put him on pole. What's nice about it, too, is that as soon as he finished the lap you could see that he was pleased with it.
#49
Posted 07 October 2004 - 14:36
Originally posted by Henri Greuter
He "could" also have lost two more races: If the near notorious Jinx on Williams and Renault at Monaco had not prevailed yet again in both '92 and '93. So I guess that makes the balance about even.
Henri Greuter
Yes, Senna did win those races in unlucky circumstances for Williams. I have to admit, though, that Senna's last laps in the '92 race were unbelievable. There's no way he should have won that one. Mansell was way quicker than him, and if it were on a different circuit (i.e. one where there were more passing zones) then Nigel would have won easily.
#50
Posted 07 October 2004 - 15:47
At the time Jackie Stewart was covering this race for ABC sports in the States. He said that this "hold up" cost Senna a second on that pole position lap. If that were the case, then Prost would have had a very sour look on his face!
Oh man, that would have been a MASSIVE pride blow.