
Japanese GP will be held at Fuji Speedway?
#1
Posted 16 June 2005 - 09:51
As you might know, Suzuka circuit's F1 contract is going to expire in 2006.
Which do you prefer, Suzuka or rebuilded Fuji Speedway?
I prefer Fuji Speedway because It contains 1.5km-long straight(the longest straight in F1 circuits) and a lots of overtaiking points.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:17

Seriously, Suzuka is a fantastic track and along with Spa probably the one I would most hate to lose. Fuji just doesn't cut it (although I concede the backdrop is pretty spectacular).
#3
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:19
#4
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:21
Originally posted by Ross Stonefeld
No reason we cant have both...
There's a very good reason we can't have both. It's hard enough trouble dragging myself out of bed to watch one Japanese race a year. I am not doing it twice. They can only have Fuji if they move it to a European location and have a sensible start time. As Toyota own it Cologne would make a lot of sense.
#5
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:35
Originally posted by toyota_lexus
I prefer Fuji Speedway because It contains 1.5km-long straight(the longest straight in F1 circuits) and a lots of overtaiking points.
And who told you that? Toyota's PR machine?
I suggest a lap or two on GT4's rather accurate digital replication of Fuji 2005 before you say you like it. I don't know anyone who has does.
#6
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:43

#7
Posted 16 June 2005 - 11:49
so why move the Japanese GP
#8
Posted 16 June 2005 - 12:28
#9
Posted 16 June 2005 - 12:40
But Suzuka is Japan's best circuit by far and is one of the world's best tracks and GPs should surely be run at the best tracks. A pity that Bernie and Tilko don't understand that simple point.
#10
Posted 16 June 2005 - 14:50
I was thinking that when I voted for Suzuka. Fuji looks like the most unlikely circuit for overtaking in a modern F1 car.Originally posted by Racer Joe
And who told you that? Toyota's PR machine?
I suggest a lap or two on GT4's rather accurate digital replication of Fuji 2005 before you say you like it. I don't know anyone who has does.
#11
Posted 16 June 2005 - 15:38
Originally posted by skinnylizard
hmmm. i thought the French GP would have moved to Paul Ricard with Bernie ownership but that has happened yet....
so why move the Japanese GP
Because the commercial terms he applies on race promoters and track owners ain't that great, so why would he rip himself off when there are plenty of suckers to pick from?

Toyota wants the GP on their track, so they will pay plenty for hosting rights. Not to mention that it could be a minor bargaining chip for Bernie and maybe, if you want to stretch it, drive a small wedge between Honda and Toyota in the GPWC.
#12
Posted 16 June 2005 - 15:42
Suzuka all the way. One of the best tracks out there, despite the recent 130R/Casio triangle tweaking

#13
Posted 16 June 2005 - 16:46
#14
Posted 16 June 2005 - 16:49

#15
Posted 16 June 2005 - 18:00
#16
Posted 16 June 2005 - 18:17
Originally posted by BRG
Better Fuji than Aida or Motegi or some of the other less than inspiring Japanese tracks.
Have you seen the new Fuji?
#17
Posted 16 June 2005 - 20:12
Originally posted by mikedeering
There's a very good reason we can't have both. It's hard enough trouble dragging myself out of bed to watch one Japanese race a year. I am not doing it twice. They can only have Fuji if they move it to a European location and have a sensible start time. As Toyota own it Cologne would make a lot of sense.
Boohoo... compared to the 13 or so races that i have to wake up at 4:30am in the morning for?

#18
Posted 16 June 2005 - 20:46
#19
Posted 16 June 2005 - 21:10
Originally posted by 911
Both are really good circuits. Suzuka is a real drivers' track, and Fuji is a fast circuit. Have there been any changes to this track since the early '80s?
The last long sweeping corner was turned into Mickey Mouse hell.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 16 June 2005 - 21:21
Originally posted by Jerry Lee
The last long sweeping corner was turned into Mickey Mouse hell.
Thanks, Jerry Lee. That's too bad because that was a FAST sweeper. Okay, so I guess this track isn't as fast as I thought it was.. In that case, keep Suzuka!
#21
Posted 16 June 2005 - 21:58
Originally posted by mikedeering
There's a very good reason we can't have both. It's hard enough trouble dragging myself out of bed to watch one Japanese race a year. I am not doing it twice. They can only have Fuji if they move it to a European location and have a sensible start time. As Toyota own it Cologne would make a lot of sense.
Harden up, we down here at the bottom of the world have to watch european races at midnight monday morning, the north american races are slightly better, 4am.
#22
Posted 17 June 2005 - 03:55
I watched a race at new Fuji Speedway it was very exciting in that there were a lot of overtaking and we could see machines run on the longest straight(1.5km) and there is a tight coner at the end of the straight so you can guess what could happen.
In addition, new Fuji Speedway(opened in this April) contains several corners at which a driver take several lines not a single line.
#23
Posted 17 June 2005 - 03:58
Christ you should have seen Fuji back in the sixties

#25
Posted 17 June 2005 - 06:55
Originally posted by Pilla
Harden up, we down here at the bottom of the world have to watch european races at midnight monday morning, the north american races are slightly better, 4am.
I know, I know. For now at least Europeans have it easy, espeically compared to everyone more than a few hours ahead of CET. With Bernie moving more races outside the continent though things might change.
Back on topic - I think lexus is fighting a losing battle!
#26
Posted 17 June 2005 - 07:07
#27
Posted 17 June 2005 - 08:32

If its Raining.....er........um....anywhere else is on earth is preferable

#28
Posted 17 June 2005 - 14:22
#29
Posted 17 June 2005 - 15:16
Originally posted by 911
Both are really good circuits. Suzuka is a real drivers' track, and Fuji is a fast circuit. Have there been any changes to this track since the early '80s?
ROFL.
Allow me to put it this way.
"Have there been any changes to Hockenheim since the early 80s"?
#30
Posted 17 June 2005 - 17:52
#31
Posted 17 June 2005 - 18:27
Originally posted by MN
http://www.fujispeed...uide/index.html
see the circuit.
![]()
what a shitty track. If they change from suzuka to this piece of turd...... well I can't say it, it will get me banned.

#32
Posted 17 June 2005 - 19:01
Originally posted by MN
http://www.fujispeed...uide/index.html
see the circuit.
The new Fuji rulez cant wait until F1 races there

#33
Posted 17 June 2005 - 19:12
LOL! F1 is an international sport, I'm sure the FIA isn't going to base their decision on the sleep patterns of one fan. Record the race if it's that much of a hassle. I don't know what the big deal is.Originally posted by mikedeering
There's a very good reason we can't have both. It's hard enough trouble dragging myself out of bed to watch one Japanese race a year. I am not doing it twice. They can only have Fuji if they move it to a European location and have a sensible start time. As Toyota own it Cologne would make a lot of sense.
#34
Posted 17 June 2005 - 19:53

#35
Posted 17 June 2005 - 20:53
#36
Posted 17 June 2005 - 20:58
#37
Posted 17 June 2005 - 21:20
as for fuji/suzuka... suzuka!
#38
Posted 18 June 2005 - 03:09
Sepang is the only Tilke that i call a good track, even very good . Barhain is a Mikey Mouse IMHO.
#39
Posted 19 June 2005 - 07:13

Advertisement
#40
Posted 19 June 2005 - 10:52
And although I realise Japan is a vast market, it shouldn't get two Grands Prix per year. There aren't enough slots to go around as it is. Ditto Italy and Germany.